Septic ShockNCT04884854
Efferon LPS Hemoperfusion for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock
An observational study of Septic Shock, run by Efferon JSC at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock
- What is being tested?
- Efferon LPS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 13 Sep 2019to 12 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study included 9 surgical patients with clinical signs of septic shock (SEPSIS-3, 2016) who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in 2019-2020.
Who may be able to join
- Gram-negative agents in the blood; or detection of an infection focus suggesting Gram-negative agents; or suspected infection based on patient condition, presence of at least two criteria for a systemic inflammatory response and procalcitonin (PCT) level ≥ 2 ng/ml;
- severity of organ dysfunction assessed on a Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale > 4 points as a result of an evident or suspected infection;
- need for vasopressor support after administration of fluids to maintain an average blood pressure of at least 65 mmHg. and lactate level in serum > 2 mmol/l (optional, for diagnosis of septic shock).
- An additional criterion was the endotoxin activity exceeding 0.6 units according to EAA
Who cannot join
- terminal condition,
- ongoing internal bleeding or high risk of bleeding,
- severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%),
- decompensated liver failure,
- body weight less than 20 kg,
- age < 18 or > 80 years.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Early Efferon LPS Hemoperfusion Through Hypercrosslinked Styrene-divinylbenzene Copolymer With Immobilized LPS-selective Ligand for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. Aim of the study: to evaluate safety and feasibility of clinical use of an extracorporeal blood adsorber based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with immobilized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream to treat patients with septic shock.
Read the detailed description
Introduction. Sepsis, according to the latest consensus definition (SEPSIS-3, 2016), is a disease characterized by life-threatening organ failure resulting from a disordered regulation of the body's response to infection. Sepsis continues to be the leading cause of death in intensive care units in almost any country in the world.
The highest mortality rate in sepsis is associated with the development of septic shock (SS). Septic shock is defined as sepsis (according to the criteria of SEPSIS-3, 2016) accompanied by severe hemodynamic, cellular and metabolic disorders, with a higher risk of fatal outcome than sepsis without shock. On average, SS is detected with a frequency of 8.3-10.4% among ICU patients, and its mortality, according to recent estimates, reaches 38-50% and even higher, exceeding 50-80% with such comorbidity as diabetes mellitus.
Success in treating septic shock is traditionally associated with adequate vasopressor, antibacterial, and anti-shock therapy, including inotropic support. At the same time, such factors as multiple antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria, changes in the intestinal microbiota and associated profile of bacterial metabolites entering circulation and participating in the pathogenesis of sepsis, other bacterial products such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns and cytokines induced by them, bacterial endotoxins contributing most to the multiorgan failure, nowadays are considered as new targets for developing effective mtools of controlling the septic shock sequelae.
Taking into account the key role of bacterial endotoxins in the pathogenesis of septic shock and the absence of a significant trend for reducing mortality in response to the medication treatment, increasing interest is being focused on extracorporeal methods of clearing the endotoxins and inflammatory immune mediators from the bloodstream. Such methods are designed to reduce the levels of pathogenetically significant molecules in the systemic circulation down to less critical values at least for a certain period of time in order to enable the immune system and antibiotics to reduce the bacterial load and the production of new endotoxin molecules.
The methods used and developed with respect to selective adsorption of endotoxin molecules from the bloodstream are promising. They provide, at early stages of the disease, interruption of the pro-inflammatory cascade initiated by inborn immune cells and causing organ dysfunction. At the same time, the place of LPS-selective hemoperfusion in sepsis therapy is still not clearly defined.
Recently, the first clinical experience of using a new generation of Efferon LPS medical device for successful treatment of a patient with sepsis has been reported [Ushakova N.D., Tikhonova S.N., Rozenko D.A. Hemosorption by a Column Adsorber Based on Hyper-Cross-Linked Styrene-Divinylbenzene Copolymer with Immobilized Lipopolysaccharide-Selective Ligand in Combined Intensive Care of Lung Cancer-Related Postoperative Acute Lung Injury (Case Report). Obshchaya Reanimatologiya=General Reanimatology. 2020; 16 (4): 14-20. [In Russ.] DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2020-4-14-20].
This extracorporeal adsorber contains a multimodal sorbent based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with a covalently immobilized ligand to the Lipid A domain of LPS molecule. The combination of a porous matrix containing mesopores and ligand provides selective and simultaneous action of the adsorbent on two types of dissimilar therapeutic targets (cytokines and endotoxins, respectively).
Efferon LPS (Efferon JSC, Moscow, Russia) is a single-use therapeutic device for extracorporeal blood purification using direct hemoperfusion. Detoxification is carried out by selective adsorption of lipopolysaccharides (bacterial endotoxins) and non-selective removal of cytokines by internal porous structure. It is a cylindrical polycarbonate casing filled with spherical granules of LPS-selective polymeric adsorbent mesoporous beads and isotonic sodium chloride solution. The device is registered in Russia as a medical device RZN 2019/8886.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and clinical eligibility of a novel medical device based on a hypercrosslinked styrene divinylbenzene copolymer with an immobilized LPS-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream for treatment of patients with septic shock.
Materials and methods. Nine patients (mean age 58 years, 5 men and 4 women, initial median APACHE II score 28 points, SOFA score 10 points) with confirmed gram-negative bacterial infection and septic shock (SEPSIS-3, 2016) underwent LPS-selective hemoperfusion using Efferon LPS for 6 hours, followed by prolonged venous-venous hemodiafiltration. The decision to use LPS-selective hemoperfusion in a particular patient was made by the attending doctor with the participation of a medical consultant team in accordance with clinical indications.
Before hemoperfusion (day 0), immediately after it, one day after its end (day 1) and once a day for the next 4 days, patients were determined hemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, signs of organ failure, leukocyte count, procalcitonin levels, C- reactive protein, IL 1β, clinical chemistry parameters. All patients underwent a test for endotoxin activity at the same time. Endotoxin Activity Assay Kit (EAA TM) (Spectral Medical Inc., Canada; Certificate No. FSZ 2009/04982) was used to determine endotoxin activity (EAA) using chemiluminescent rapid test and immunodiagnostic reagent set according to the manufacturer's protocol.
SOFA and APACHE II scales were used for comprehensive assessment of clinical status and risk of adverse outcomes. In the course of treatment, adverse reactions during the procedures and final outcome of the hospital stay (duration of stay in ICU and other departments, 28-day mortality) were assessed.
Hemoperfusion through the Efferon LPS adsorber was performed in hospitalized patients with unstable hemodynamic parameters, obvious signs of septic shock according to SEPSIS-3 (2016), during the first hours after making the diagnosis of septic shock. The procedures were performed on MultiFiltrate (Fresenius) along the veno-venous bypass. After LPS-selective hemoperfusion procedure, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed on MultiFiltrate (Fresenius).
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis of research data was carried out using descriptive statistics. The test for normal distribution of paired variable changes before and after hemosorption was performed for each data group using the Shapiro-Wilk test, the hypothesis of normal distribution was rejected at P<0.05. To assess the statistical significance of differences between groups, in distribution differing from the normal, the bilateral Wilcoxon test for paired samples or Mann-Witney test for independent groups were used. In normal distribution of paired variable changes in groups, the significance of differences was assessed using the Student's paired bilateral t-criterion. The value of P<0.05 was taken as the cutoff value for statistical significance. When comparing groups by categories of treatment outcome "survived-dead" in the group of patients undergoing hemosorption and the group of patients with abdominal sepsis who did not get hemosorbents (control sample), the exact Fisher's test and the calculation of sample power adequacy at alpha=0.05 were used (SigmaPlot 12.5, Systat Software,USA). The Fisher test was also used to compare the percentage of abdominal sepsis and the sex distribution between the above-mentioned groups of patients.
The ultimate goal of the study was to improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock and acute renal failure through combined use of LPS-selective hemoperfusion and prolonged venovenous hemodiafiltration.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock
- Being tested
- Efferon LPS
- Keywords
- septic shock, extracorporeal therapy, LPS sequestration, abdominal sepsis
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Intraabdominal Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Efferon LPSDevice
Efferon LPS is a single-use therapeutic device for extracorporeal blood purification using direct hemoperfusion. Detoxification is carried out by selective adsorption of lipopolysaccharides (bacterial endotoxins) and non-selective removal of cytokines by internal porous structure. It is a cylindrical polycarbonate casing filled with spherical granules of LPS-selective polymeric adsorbent mesoporous beads and isotonic sodium chloride solution. The device is registered in Russia as a medical device RZN 2019/8886.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effect of Efferon LPS hemoperfusion on vasopressor dose after initiation of use in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
The time (number of hours) from inclusion in the study to the earliest time that the 'resolution of septic shock' event is achieved. Event criteria is end of vasopressor support (persistence of effect - for 4 hours).
Measured: 1-120 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Effect of the Efferon LPS hemoperfusion on pulmonary oxygen metabolism function in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock
Value of oxygenation index (Pa02 / Fi02 (Pa) every 24 hours ± 1 hour from the start of hemoperfusion (hour 0) to 120 hours.
Measured: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on SOFA scores in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Value of indicators on the SOFA scale every 24 hours ± 1 hour from the start of hemoperfusion (hour 0) to 120 hours.
Measured: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on procalcitonin levels in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Value of procalcitonin levels every 24 hours ± 1 hour from the start of hemoperfusion (hour 0) to 120 hours
Measured: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on endotoxin activity in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Value of endotoxin levels every 24 hours ± 1 hour from the start of hemoperfusion (hour 0) to 72 hours
Measured: 1-72 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on IL-1β levels in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Value of IL-1β levels from the start of hemoperfusion (hour 0) to 24 hours.
Measured: 1-24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2021
- Study start13 Sep 2019
- Primary completion20 Mar 2020
- Study completion12 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Efferon JSC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Timur Kim, MD, Principal investigator, N.I. Pirogov Clinical City Hospital No. 1
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04884854
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- efferon-lps-2020-01
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, Rubenfeld G, Kahn JM, Shankar-Hari M, Singer M, Deutschman CS, Escobar GJ, Angus DC. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
PubMed 26903335Besen BAMP, Romano TG, Nassar AP Jr, Taniguchi LU, Azevedo LCP, Mendes PV, Zampieri FG, Park M. Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low-middle-income country. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0204-y. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PubMed 27807819Hurley JC. The Role of Endotoxin in Septic Shock. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):902-903. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20874. No abstract available.
PubMed 30835303Shoji H, Tani T, Hanasawa K, Kodama M. Extracorporeal endotoxin removal by polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge: designing and antiendotoxin efficacy in the clinical application. Ther Apher. 1998 Feb;2(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.1998.tb00066.x.
PubMed 10227782Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, Kellum JA. Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2209-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf412.
PubMed 23860248Cruz DN, Perazella MA, Bellomo R, de Cal M, Polanco N, Corradi V, Lentini P, Nalesso F, Ueno T, Ranieri VM, Ronco C. Effectiveness of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column in sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R47. doi: 10.1186/cc5780.
PubMed 17448226Esteban E, Ferrer R, Alsina L, Artigas A. Immunomodulation in sepsis: the role of endotoxin removal by polymyxin B-immobilized cartridge. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:507539. doi: 10.1155/2013/507539. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PubMed 24249974Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Krotenko N, Popov D, Plyushch M, Rogalskaya E, Nazarova H. Combined extracorporeal therapy for severe sepsis in patients after cardiac surgery. Blood Purif. 2014;37(1):39-46. doi: 10.1159/000357015. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
PubMed 24503765Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Popok Z, Nazarova E, Stupchenko O, Popov D, Plushch M, Samsonova N. Preliminary report regarding the use of selective sorbents in complex cardiac surgery patients with extensive sepsis and prolonged intensive care stay. Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):227-33. doi: 10.1159/000231988. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
PubMed 19684388Martin EL, Cruz DN, Monti G, Casella G, Vesconi S, Ranieri VM, Ronco C, Antonelli M. Endotoxin removal: how far from the evidence? The EUPHAS 2 Project. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:119-125. doi: 10.1159/000315926. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
PubMed 20519906Iba T, Klein DJ. The wind changed direction and the big river still flows: from EUPHRATES to TIGRIS. J Intensive Care. 2019 May 16;7:31. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0386-0. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31131109Yin C, Liu W, Liu Z, Huang Y, Ci L, Zhao R, Yang X. Identification of potential serum biomarkers in pigs at early stage after Lipopolysaccharide injection. Res Vet Sci. 2017 Apr;111:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PubMed 28249176Kogelmann K, Jarczak D, Scheller M, Druner M. Hemoadsorption by CytoSorb in septic patients: a case series. Crit Care. 2017 Mar 27;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1662-9.
PubMed 28343448
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Efferon LPS Hemoperfusion Through Hypercrosslinked Styrene-divinylbenzene Copolymer With Immobilized LPS-selective Ligand for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04884854
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- efferon-lps-2020-01
- Conditions
- Septic Shock
- Keywords
- septic shock, extracorporeal therapy, LPS sequestration, abdominal sepsis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Efferon JSCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis is a global healthcare burden sepsis, it reaches 20-30 million cases annually (WHO data). Numerous studies have shown that extracorporeal hemoperfusion therapies that eliminate endotoxin and\or excess of cytokines improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock. Aim of the study: to evaluate safety and feasibility of clinical use of an extracorporeal blood adsorber based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with immobilized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream to treat patients with septic shock.
Detailed description
Introduction. Sepsis, according to the latest consensus definition (SEPSIS-3, 2016), is a disease characterized by life-threatening organ failure resulting from a disordered regulation of the body's response to infection. Sepsis continues to be the leading cause of death in intensive care units in almost any country in the world.
The highest mortality rate in sepsis is associated with the development of septic shock (SS). Septic shock is defined as sepsis (according to the criteria of SEPSIS-3, 2016) accompanied by severe hemodynamic, cellular and metabolic disorders, with a higher risk of fatal outcome than sepsis without shock. On average, SS is detected with a frequency of 8.3-10.4% among ICU patients, and its mortality, according to recent estimates, reaches 38-50% and even higher, exceeding 50-80% with such comorbidity as diabetes mellitus.
Success in treating septic shock is traditionally associated with adequate vasopressor, antibacterial, and anti-shock therapy, including inotropic support. At the same time, such factors as multiple antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria, changes in the intestinal microbiota and associated profile of bacterial metabolites entering circulation and participating in the pathogenesis of sepsis, other bacterial products such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns and cytokines induced by them, bacterial endotoxins contributing most to the multiorgan failure, nowadays are considered as new targets for developing effective mtools of controlling the septic shock sequelae.
Taking into account the key role of bacterial endotoxins in the pathogenesis of septic shock and the absence of a significant trend for reducing mortality in response to the medication treatment, increasing interest is being focused on extracorporeal methods of clearing the endotoxins and inflammatory immune mediators from the bloodstream. Such methods are designed to reduce the levels of pathogenetically significant molecules in the systemic circulation down to less critical values at least for a certain period of time in order to enable the immune system and antibiotics to reduce the bacterial load and the production of new endotoxin molecules.
The methods used and developed with respect to selective adsorption of endotoxin molecules from the bloodstream are promising. They provide, at early stages of the disease, interruption of the pro-inflammatory cascade initiated by inborn immune cells and causing organ dysfunction. At the same time, the place of LPS-selective hemoperfusion in sepsis therapy is still not clearly defined.
Recently, the first clinical experience of using a new generation of Efferon LPS medical device for successful treatment of a patient with sepsis has been reported [Ushakova N.D., Tikhonova S.N., Rozenko D.A. Hemosorption by a Column Adsorber Based on Hyper-Cross-Linked Styrene-Divinylbenzene Copolymer with Immobilized Lipopolysaccharide-Selective Ligand in Combined Intensive Care of Lung Cancer-Related Postoperative Acute Lung Injury (Case Report). Obshchaya Reanimatologiya=General Reanimatology. 2020; 16 (4): 14-20. [In Russ.] DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2020-4-14-20].
This extracorporeal adsorber contains a multimodal sorbent based on a hypercrosslinked styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer with a covalently immobilized ligand to the Lipid A domain of LPS molecule. The combination of a porous matrix containing mesopores and ligand provides selective and simultaneous action of the adsorbent on two types of dissimilar therapeutic targets (cytokines and endotoxins, respectively).
Efferon LPS (Efferon JSC, Moscow, Russia) is a single-use therapeutic device for extracorporeal blood purification using direct hemoperfusion. Detoxification is carried out by selective adsorption of lipopolysaccharides (bacterial endotoxins) and non-selective removal of cytokines by internal porous structure. It is a cylindrical polycarbonate casing filled with spherical granules of LPS-selective polymeric adsorbent mesoporous beads and isotonic sodium chloride solution. The device is registered in Russia as a medical device RZN 2019/8886.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and clinical eligibility of a novel medical device based on a hypercrosslinked styrene divinylbenzene copolymer with an immobilized LPS-selective ligand designed to remove endotoxins from the bloodstream for treatment of patients with septic shock.
Materials and methods. Nine patients (mean age 58 years, 5 men and 4 women, initial median APACHE II score 28 points, SOFA score 10 points) with confirmed gram-negative bacterial infection and septic shock (SEPSIS-3, 2016) underwent LPS-selective hemoperfusion using Efferon LPS for 6 hours, followed by prolonged venous-venous hemodiafiltration. The decision to use LPS-selective hemoperfusion in a particular patient was made by the attending doctor with the participation of a medical consultant team in accordance with clinical indications.
Before hemoperfusion (day 0), immediately after it, one day after its end (day 1) and once a day for the next 4 days, patients were determined hemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, signs of organ failure, leukocyte count, procalcitonin levels, C- reactive protein, IL 1β, clinical chemistry parameters. All patients underwent a test for endotoxin activity at the same time. Endotoxin Activity Assay Kit (EAA TM) (Spectral Medical Inc., Canada; Certificate No. FSZ 2009/04982) was used to determine endotoxin activity (EAA) using chemiluminescent rapid test and immunodiagnostic reagent set according to the manufacturer's protocol.
SOFA and APACHE II scales were used for comprehensive assessment of clinical status and risk of adverse outcomes. In the course of treatment, adverse reactions during the procedures and final outcome of the hospital stay (duration of stay in ICU and other departments, 28-day mortality) were assessed.
Hemoperfusion through the Efferon LPS adsorber was performed in hospitalized patients with unstable hemodynamic parameters, obvious signs of septic shock according to SEPSIS-3 (2016), during the first hours after making the diagnosis of septic shock. The procedures were performed on MultiFiltrate (Fresenius) along the veno-venous bypass. After LPS-selective hemoperfusion procedure, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed on MultiFiltrate (Fresenius).
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis of research data was carried out using descriptive statistics. The test for normal distribution of paired variable changes before and after hemosorption was performed for each data group using the Shapiro-Wilk test, the hypothesis of normal distribution was rejected at P<0.05. To assess the statistical significance of differences between groups, in distribution differing from the normal, the bilateral Wilcoxon test for paired samples or Mann-Witney test for independent groups were used. In normal distribution of paired variable changes in groups, the significance of differences was assessed using the Student's paired bilateral t-criterion. The value of P<0.05 was taken as the cutoff value for statistical significance. When comparing groups by categories of treatment outcome "survived-dead" in the group of patients undergoing hemosorption and the group of patients with abdominal sepsis who did not get hemosorbents (control sample), the exact Fisher's test and the calculation of sample power adequacy at alpha=0.05 were used (SigmaPlot 12.5, Systat Software,USA). The Fisher test was also used to compare the percentage of abdominal sepsis and the sex distribution between the above-mentioned groups of patients.
The ultimate goal of the study was to improve treatment outcomes in patients with septic shock and acute renal failure through combined use of LPS-selective hemoperfusion and prolonged venovenous hemodiafiltration.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study included 9 surgical patients with clinical signs of septic shock (SEPSIS-3, 2016) who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in 2019-2020.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Gram-negative agents in the blood; or detection of an infection focus suggesting Gram-negative agents; or suspected infection based on patient condition, presence of at least two criteria for a systemic inflammatory response and procalcitonin (PCT) level ≥ 2 ng/ml;
- severity of organ dysfunction assessed on a Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale > 4 points as a result of an evident or suspected infection;
- need for vasopressor support after administration of fluids to maintain an average blood pressure of at least 65 mmHg. and lactate level in serum > 2 mmol/l (optional, for diagnosis of septic shock).
- An additional criterion was the endotoxin activity exceeding 0.6 units according to EAA
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- terminal condition,
- ongoing internal bleeding or high risk of bleeding,
- severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%),
- decompensated liver failure,
- body weight less than 20 kg,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Efferon LPSEfferon LPS is a single-use therapeutic device for extracorporeal blood purification using direct hemoperfusion. Detoxification is carried out by selective adsorption of lipopolysaccharides (bacterial endotoxins) and non-selective removal of cytokines by internal porous structure. It is a cylindrical polycarbonate casing filled with spherical granules of LPS-selective polymeric adsorbent mesoporous beads and isotonic sodium chloride solution. The device is registered in Russia as a medical device RZN 2019/8886. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Effect of Efferon LPS hemoperfusion on vasopressor dose after initiation of use in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Time frame: 1-120 hours
The time (number of hours) from inclusion in the study to the earliest time that the 'resolution of septic shock' event is achieved. Event criteria is end of vasopressor support (persistence of effect - for 4 hours).
5 secondary outcomes
Effect of the Efferon LPS hemoperfusion on pulmonary oxygen metabolism function in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock
Time frame: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on SOFA scores in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Time frame: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on procalcitonin levels in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Time frame: 1-120 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on endotoxin activity in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Time frame: 1-72 hours
Effect of LPS Efferon hemoperfusion on IL-1β levels in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock.
Time frame: 1-24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 26903335Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, Rubenfeld G, Kahn JM, Shankar-Hari M, Singer M, Deutschman CS, Escobar GJ, Angus DC. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
- Results publication: PubMed 27807819Besen BAMP, Romano TG, Nassar AP Jr, Taniguchi LU, Azevedo LCP, Mendes PV, Zampieri FG, Park M. Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low-middle-income country. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0204-y. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 30835303Hurley JC. The Role of Endotoxin in Septic Shock. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):902-903. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20874. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 10227782Shoji H, Tani T, Hanasawa K, Kodama M. Extracorporeal endotoxin removal by polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge: designing and antiendotoxin efficacy in the clinical application. Ther Apher. 1998 Feb;2(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.1998.tb00066.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 23860248Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, Kellum JA. Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2209-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf412.
- Results publication: PubMed 17448226Cruz DN, Perazella MA, Bellomo R, de Cal M, Polanco N, Corradi V, Lentini P, Nalesso F, Ueno T, Ranieri VM, Ronco C. Effectiveness of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column in sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R47. doi: 10.1186/cc5780.
- Results publication: PubMed 24249974Esteban E, Ferrer R, Alsina L, Artigas A. Immunomodulation in sepsis: the role of endotoxin removal by polymyxin B-immobilized cartridge. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:507539. doi: 10.1155/2013/507539. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 24503765Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Krotenko N, Popov D, Plyushch M, Rogalskaya E, Nazarova H. Combined extracorporeal therapy for severe sepsis in patients after cardiac surgery. Blood Purif. 2014;37(1):39-46. doi: 10.1159/000357015. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 19684388Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Popok Z, Nazarova E, Stupchenko O, Popov D, Plushch M, Samsonova N. Preliminary report regarding the use of selective sorbents in complex cardiac surgery patients with extensive sepsis and prolonged intensive care stay. Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):227-33. doi: 10.1159/000231988. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 20519906Martin EL, Cruz DN, Monti G, Casella G, Vesconi S, Ranieri VM, Ronco C, Antonelli M. Endotoxin removal: how far from the evidence? The EUPHAS 2 Project. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:119-125. doi: 10.1159/000315926. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 31131109Iba T, Klein DJ. The wind changed direction and the big river still flows: from EUPHRATES to TIGRIS. J Intensive Care. 2019 May 16;7:31. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0386-0. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 28249176Yin C, Liu W, Liu Z, Huang Y, Ci L, Zhao R, Yang X. Identification of potential serum biomarkers in pigs at early stage after Lipopolysaccharide injection. Res Vet Sci. 2017 Apr;111:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Septic Shock
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
ICU-SUCCEED for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure and Their Caregivers
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Trajectories of Myocardial Work in Patients With Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock Hyperdynamic
RecruitingObservational study
Immunothrombosis With Septic Shock Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy With the OXIRIS Membrane
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Timur Kim, MD principal investigator
N.I. Pirogov Clinical City Hospital No. 1
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Septic Shock, run by Efferon JSC at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effect of Efferon LPS hemoperfusion on vasopressor dose after initiation of use in patients with abdominal sepsis complicated by septic shock. (time frame: 1-120 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04884854, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2021.