AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerNCT04887545

Immune- and Microenvironment- Proteogenomics Profiling for Classifying Lung Cancer Patients

An observational study of Lung Cancer and Malignancy, run by Universidade Nova de Lisboa at 1 site in Portugal.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The excessive accumulation of fluid between the membranes surrounding the lung, a clinical condition commonly referred to as "pleural effusion", is caused by one of three factors: increased production of pleural fluid, decreased ability to reabsorb pleural fluid or a mixture both. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer, Malignancy
What is being tested?
Proteomics analysis of pleural effusion
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 1 Dec 2022
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male and female subjects evaluated by thoracentesis at Hospital CUF Descobertas and CUF Infante Santo and at the Local Health Unit of Guarda may participate.

Who may be able to join

  • Candidate for diagnostic thoracentesis.
  • The General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016) and the Law on Personal Genetic Information and Health Information (Decree-Law no. 131/2014) is fulfilled.
  • Participation in the Study is completely voluntary.
  • It is possible to drop out of the study at any time without affecting the quality of medical care.
  • The information obtained from this study may originate scientific publications, without jeopardizing the anonymity of the Participants.
  • During the course of the Study, it is possible to ask the investigators questions that you consider convenient.
  • This study does not impose any cost on the participants.

Who cannot join

  • Participants with unstable / severe medical illness (per investigator's judgment), coagulopathies and / or bleeding disorders, immunodeficiency syndromes (primary or acquired - including HIV infection), active and untreated HCV infection, HBV and active history of intravenous drug addictions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rune Matthiesen, PhD contact

939218696

rune.matthiesen@nms.unl.pt

Ana S Carvalho, PhD contact

962615903

ana.carvalho@nms.unl.pt

Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital CUF Descorbertas

    Lisbon, Parque Das Nacoes, 1998-018

    Recruiting

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

The excessive accumulation of fluid between the membranes surrounding the lung, a clinical condition commonly referred to as "pleural effusion", is caused by one of three factors: increased production of pleural fluid, decreased ability to reabsorb pleural fluid or a mixture both.

The basis of pleural effusion accumulation may originate from multiple pathologies: from benign and extrapulmonary conditions to intrinsic pleural pathology (inflammatory or neoplastic primary or metastatic) in which the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space is mainly due to changes in the structure of the pleural membrane (loss of integrity and / or infiltration by neoplastic cells).

Read more

An example of extrapulmonary conditions is the pleural effusion observed in patients with congestive heart failure in which there is increase in hydrostatic capillary pressure, due to failure of the cardio circulatory pump.

The distinction between benign and malignant causes is currently a diagnostic challenge that usually requires the collection of material (cells immersed in the pleural fluid or even a histological sample).

The first step of this investigation is currently the cytological evaluation of the pleural fluid, that is, the observation of cells, of an initial sample of the pleural fluid. This procedure is associated with an average sensitivity of 62% while a second sample through thoracentesis improves the sensitivity of the diagnosis by 10%. In certain cases, however, it is not possible to diagnose by analyzing the pleural fluid and, as a rule, a more invasive diagnostic method is recommended, such as pleural biopsy (collected by puncture with a "blind" needle, echo guided or computed tomography guided or obtained by means of direct visualization of the pleural cavity through pleuroscopy).

The diagnostic yield of this approach can reach up to 97% (in the case of pleural biopsy obtained by medical thoracoscopy). However, it implies greater morbidity and greater consumption of resources (material and human). The development of a more sensitive and specific and at the same time less invasive diagnostic method for pleural fluid may contribute to a more effective screening of patients, limiting the use of more invasive methods to only patients with a higher risk of malignant pathology.

Read the detailed description

The excessive accumulation of fluid between the membranes surrounding the lung, a clinical condition commonly referred to as "pleural effusion", is caused by one of three factors: increased production of pleural fluid, decreased ability to reabsorb pleural fluid or a mixture both.

The basis of pleural effusion accumulation may originate from multiple pathologies: from benign and extrapulmonary conditions to intrinsic pleural pathology (inflammatory or neoplastic primary or metastatic) in which the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space is mainly due to changes in the structure of the pleural membrane (loss of integrity and / or infiltration by neoplastic cells).

An example of extrapulmonary conditions is the pleural effusion observed in patients with congestive heart failure in which there is increase in hydrostatic capillary pressure, due to failure of the cardio circulatory pump.

The distinction between benign and malignant causes is currently a diagnostic challenge that usually requires the collection of material (cells immersed in the pleural fluid or even a histological sample).

The first step of this investigation is currently the cytological evaluation of the pleural fluid, that is, the observation of cells, of an initial sample of the pleural fluid. This procedure is associated with an average sensitivity of 62% while a second sample through thoracentesis improves the sensitivity of the diagnosis by 10%. In certain cases, however, it is not possible to diagnose by analyzing the pleural fluid and, as a rule, a more invasive diagnostic method is recommended, such as pleural biopsy (collected by puncture with a "blind" needle, echo guided or computed tomography guided or obtained by means of direct visualization of the pleural cavity through pleuroscopy).

The diagnostic yield of this approach can reach up to 97% (in the case of pleural biopsy obtained by medical thoracoscopy). However, it implies greater morbidity and greater consumption of resources (material and human). The development of a more sensitive and specific and at the same time less invasive diagnostic method for pleural fluid may contribute to a more effective screening of patients, limiting the use of more invasive methods, only for patients with a higher risk of malignant pathology.

Study Objectives:

This project consists of a preclinical study where we will explore new methodologies for clinical evaluation, based on proteomic analysis of the immunological characteristics and the microenvironment of the tumor in the pleural fluid of patients whose diagnosis has not been confirmed. The results obtained will be used in the implementation of an algorithm for the classification of pleural fluid in the following groups: a) low risk or benign; b) high risk or malignant. If the algorithm has good sensitivity and specificity for malignant diagnoses, it may be useful to distinguish patients in to the groups: a) postpone the invasive test and do active imaging surveillance; b) proceed to invasive testing.

Benefit / Risk Assessment:

The collection of the pleural fluid will be carried out by procedures used in standard care and diagnosis of the disease, thus not constituting additional risks to the participants. The results of this investigation do not bring clinical effects directly applicable to the participants involved. However, in the future the results obtained may benefit other users through improved understanding the tumor microenvironment.

Modalities of Recruitment:

Through an interview with the investigating doctor, the participant in this study becomes aware of the terms of the treatment of his personal data in the scope of the research project. In addition, data subjects sign informed consent for participation in the study. The notification includes an explanation of the procedures involved in the investigation and the role of personal data collected in the context of the investigation. In an interview with the investigating doctor and by signing the informed consent for participation in the study, the data subject becomes aware of his right to withdraw from the study and / or to withdraw his informed consent.

The collection of biological samples for the comparative prospective cohort study will be carried out in all collaborative hospitals in this project in a period of two to three years. Based on the variance and statistical power observed in a previous study of the pulmonary fluid exosome proteome, 200 samples were estimated as the minimum number for the classification of biological samples. The analysis of statistical power is based on the variance observed in 10 samples in which approximately 3500 proteins were identified and quantified in pulmonary fluids. The statistical power analysis considers the correction for multiple tests according to the number of proteins identified and quantified.

Data collection specifications:

During the consultation, a clinical interview will be conducted, which will allow the collection of personal data, namely genetic data, data related to health and racial or ethnic origin. An objective exam will also be carried out to assess weight, height, blood pressure and heart rate. Data relating to the results of complementary diagnostic tests will be collected, namely: 1. Chest X-ray (location, extent and characteristics of the pleural effusion); 2. chest ultrasound (location, extent, characterization of the ecostructure - homogeneous / heterogeneous; with / without visible septations); 3. Thoracic Computed Tomography (location, extent, morphological aspect of the pleura - thickness increase, nodules, etc.); 4. Cytological evaluation of the pleural fluid; 5. Serum biochemical study: blood glucose level; assay of total proteins and serum albumin; lactate dehydrogenase level.

The reference diagnostic method will be based on histological evaluation of the tissue. The results of the proteomics analysis obtained in this project will not be taken into account for the final diagnosis of the participants.

Specification of collection and final destination of biological samples:

According to the clinician's decision, pleural fluid will be obtained for diagnosis (through thoracentesis or during the course of pleural biopsy or pleuroscopy). The sample obtained will follow the usual clinical investigation pathway (cytological and / or histopathological evaluation, biochemical evaluation, microbiological evaluation) as registered in each institution. For patients who agree to participate in the study, only an additional sample of pleural fluid will be sent for the study that we propose to carry out. These last samples will be stored at CEDOC.

Text of information to be provided to volunteers:

The study for which we ask for your consent aims to develop a diagnostic method with greater specificity and sensitivity in identifying different pathologies associated with excessive accumulation of pleural fluid (a condition commonly known as pleural effusion). Currently, the cytological evaluation, that is, the observation of cells, of an initial sample of the pleural fluid has an average sensitivity of 62% while a second sampling through thoracentesis (consists of aspiration of the liquid from the pleura through the puncture of the chest wall) improves the sensitivity of the diagnosis by 10%. In certain cases it is not possible to diagnose by analyzing the pleural fluid and as a rule a more invasive diagnostic method is recommended, such as pleural biopsy or pleuroscopy (surgical technique that allows you to directly view the inside of the rib cage) with pleural biopsy (sensitivity 98%). The development of a diagnostic method with greater specificity and sensitivity of the pleural fluid, thus avoiding invasive methods, can improve the efficiency in screening patients with pleural effusion, limiting the invasive study to a selected portion of patients with an effectively higher risk of malignant pathology. Your participation in this study does not involve additional procedures beyond those that your doctor considers necessary for the diagnosis of the disease or prescription of specific drugs for the study in question. The collected samples will be anonymized with a code, that is, it will not be possible for the researchers to match the samples with the personal data of the respective patients. Any of the data collected will be confidential, in accordance with the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that came into force last May 2018 (Regulation (EU) No. 2016/679).

PATIENT'S INFOMRED CONSENT:

(NAME) _____________________________________________________, I voluntarily agree to take part of the research project entitled "Clinical study in the context of the diagnosis of patients with pleural effusion".

I declare that I was informed about the objectives and methodology of this study, as well as about the conditions of participation, having received oral and written information, which I heard, read and understood.

This document was signed after all doubts were clarified with the investigating physician and after reflecting on this proposal for participation with unlimited time.

The samples and data will be encrypted, to protect my identity. I am free to refuse to donate my samples and, even after I have given my consent, I will be able to withdraw it at any time if that is my wish. My decision will in no way affect the quality of my clinical follow-up nor will it change my rights as a patient of the ________________________________________________________ (hospital unit).

At any time, I can request generic information about the study for which samples are being used. However, I will not be informed of the concrete results obtained in my samples, since these data are not relevant for my clinical follow-up.

I also authorize the use of biological samples and data collected, anonymously and confidentially, in subsequent research projects, provided they are authorized by the appropriate Ethics Committee.

Signature of Participant: ______________________________________

Date: __ / __ / _____

Investigator's Signature: ______________________________________

Date: __ / __ / _____

Ownership and data protection of participants / confidentiality:

The security measures in the protection of personal data that will be implemented include 1. Pseudonymization and encryption of personal data; 2. Ability to restore availability and access to personal data in a timely manner in the event of an incident; 3. Process for testing, assessing and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of data processing.

Being tested
Proteomics analysis of pleural effusion
Keywords
pleural effusion, thoracentesis, transudate, exudates
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Pleural Effusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proteomics analysis of pleural effusionDiagnostic test

    Pleural effusion removed as part of standard care is fractionized and analyzed by mass spectrometry

Study groups in NCT04887545
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ThoracentesisPatients who need removal of excess pleural effusion and assessed for the possibility of lung cancer.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Proteomics analysis of pleural effusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. diagnosis of lung cancer by histological examination of surgically-excised nodules

    diagnosis of lung cancer by histological examination of surgically-excised nodules

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04887545
Sponsor's protocol ID
UniversidadeNL_30088
Other IDs
02/SAICT/2017_30088
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
10 May 2021
Last updated
14 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: In case of publication, clinical parameters will be listed as overall summaries rather than for each individual.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lung Cancer and Malignancy, run by Universidade Nova de Lisboa at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rune Matthiesen, PhD (939218696, rune.matthiesen@nms.unl.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

diagnosis of lung cancer by histological examination of surgically-excised nodules (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in