AzTrials
AzTrials

BurnsPhase 1/2NCT04893863

A Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries

A Phase 1/2 study testing Standard dressing and PluroGel in people with Burns, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Burn injuries can result in long term physical and mental sequelae, not only from the scarring but also the painful dressings. The standard of care today remains use of antibiotic topical dressings while awaiting demarcation of the burn depth, with surgical excision and grafting for deep partial thickness and full… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Burns
What is being tested?
Standard dressing and PluroGel
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Oct 2021to 1 Jun 2029
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Persons with bilateral limb partial thickness burn injuries of similar depth requiring admission

Who cannot join

  • Total body surface area (TBSA) of burn >30%.
  • Burn depth full thickness or deeper on initial assessment.
  • Prior excision at another healthcare centre.
  • Patients with pre-existing malnutrition
  • Electrical, chemical or other unusual burn etiologies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Justin Gawaziuk contact

2047878682

jgawaziuk@hsc.mb.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Manitoba

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9

    Justin P Gawaziuk, MSc, 2047873669, jgawaziuk@hsc.mb.ca

    Sarvesh Logsetty, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Within Patient, Pilot Randomized Controlled Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries

Burn injuries can result in long term physical and mental sequelae, not only from the scarring but also the painful dressings. The standard of care today remains use of antibiotic topical dressings while awaiting demarcation of the burn depth, with surgical excision and grafting for deep partial thickness and full thickness areas. Demarcation can be appreciated on admission for full thickness burns but is often a prolonged process that can last weeks. The clinical evaluation of the depth of the burn is a complex decision that often is made more challenging by the presence of the proteinaceous pseudoeschar and the coagulated dermis itself. Surgical debridement is relatively 'coarse' and by its very nature requires removal of a thin layer of viable tissue to reach the level that is vascularized enough to support a skin graft. There has been growing interest in the use of adjuncts to reduce the amount tissue debrided and potentially reduce the need for surgery itself. Operatively, there have been some reports that use of hydro-dissection devices (Versajet™) may allow a more controlled debridement, resulting in less viable tissue being sacrificed. There is also a growing experience with enzymatic debridement, especially with Bromolein, derived from Pineapple (NexoBrid®). Neither of these have been shown to definitively improve care in randomized controlled trials, (RCTs) and there is suggestion that in some settings may actually cause harm.

Read the detailed description

Burn injuries can result in long term physical and mental sequelae, not only from the scarring but also the painful dressings. The standard of care today remains use of antibiotic topical dressings while awaiting demarcation of the burn depth, with surgical excision and grafting for deep partial thickness and full thickness areas. Demarcation can be appreciated on admission for full thickness burns but is often a prolonged process that can last weeks. The clinical evaluation of the depth of the burn is a complex decision that often is made more challenging by the presence of the proteinaceous pseudoeschar and the coagulated dermis itself. Surgical debridement is relatively 'coarse' and by its very nature requires removal of a thin layer of viable tissue to reach the level that is vascularized enough to support a skin graft. There has been growing interest in the use of adjuncts to reduce the amount tissue debrided and potentially reduce the need for surgery itself. Operatively, there have been some reports that use of hydro-dissection devices (Versajet™) may allow a more controlled debridement, resulting in less viable tissue being sacrificed. There is also a growing experience with enzymatic debridement, especially with Bromolein, derived from Pineapple (NexoBrid®). Neither of these have been shown to definitively improve care in randomized controlled trials, (RCTs) and there is suggestion that in some settings may actually cause harm.

A relatively recent entry into the 'space' of non-surgical burn wound debridement is Plurogel®. Unlike Bromolein, Plurogel® is a concentrated surfactant in the form of a stable, viscous gel. Each micelle has a hydrophilic outer surface that softens and loosens wound debris, and a hydrophobic inner core that traps debris. The micelles link to form a matrix that continually expands and contracts. This creates a cleansing/rinsing action that disrupts the surface tension holding slough and necrotic tissue in place. PluroGel® helps in creating a moist wound healing environment, which softens, loosens and drives slough and necrotic debris away from the wound bed, promoting autolytic debridement. PluroGel® is approved for use in burn injuries in Canada, however there are no randomized control trials (RCTs) to support its use. As Plurogel® appears to fill a much-needed niche in burn wound care, and as our centre seeks to be innovative in patient care, we trialed Plurogel® on some of our appropriately consented burn patients. The anecdotal experience is that the eschar lifted within about a week and there was visible wound healing. Healing time appeared to be reduced as the product would gently debride while still providing a moist wound bed encouraging wound healing. Team members began to value the new product. This early positive experience is the impetus for us to embark on a pilot RCT to provide evidence for us to continue to use this product.

Conditions
Burns
Being tested
Standard dressing, PluroGel
Keywords
burn, wound, dressing, debridement
Medical subject headings
Burns, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard dressingDrug

    Topical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).

  • PluroGelDrug

    A 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)

Study groups in NCT04893863
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard dressingActive comparatorTopical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).
Receives: Drug: Standard dressing
Test dressingExperimentalA 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)
Receives: Drug: PluroGel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion healed

    Proportion of burn requiring skin grafting (grafted cm2/ total burn area on that limb cm2) compared between a standard dressing limb and a PluroGel® treated limb.

    Measured: 14 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion requiring surgery

    Proportion of burn injuries that require skin grafting in each group.

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04893863
Sponsor's protocol ID
within
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
14 May 2021
Last updated
14 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Standard dressing and PluroGel in people with Burns, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Justin Gawaziuk (2047878682, jgawaziuk@hsc.mb.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion healed (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in