Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 3TOPAZ-1NCT04895241
A Study to Learn About the Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) Injections and Whether They Can Improve Symptoms of Adult Participants Who Have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 3 study testing Litifilimab in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Biogen at 164 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- What is being tested?
- Litifilimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 548 participants
- Where
- 164 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 25 May 2021to 16 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at least 24 weeks prior to screening and must meet the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) / American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE at screening by a qualified physician.
- Participant has a modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score ≥ 6 (excluding alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated).
- Participant has a modified clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥ 4 (excluding anti-dsDNA, low complement component 3 (C3) and/or complement component 4 (C4), alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at Screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant has BILAG-2004 grade A in ≥ 1 organ system or BILAG-2004 grade B in ≥ 2 organ systems at Screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant must be treated with one of the following background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapies, initiated ≥ 12 weeks prior to Screening and at stable dose ≥ 4 weeks prior to randomization:
- Antimalarials as stand-alone treatment
- Antimalarial treatment in combination with OCS and/or a single immunosuppressant
- Treatment with OCS and/or a single immunosuppressant
Who cannot join
- History of or positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Current hepatitis C infection (defined as positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]).
- Current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or positive for total hepatitis antibody to B core antigen [anti-HBc] with positive reflex HBV DNA).
- History of severe herpes infection.
- Presence of uncontrolled or New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure.
- Active severe lupus nephritis where, in the opinion of the Investigator, protocol-specified SOC is insufficient and use of a more aggressive therapeutic approach is indicated, such as adding IV cyclophosphamide and/or high-dose IV pulse corticosteroid therapy or other treatments not permitted in the protocol is indicated; or urine protein-creatinine ratio > 2.0 or severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meter square [mL/min/1.73 m^2]) calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease equation.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Any active skin conditions other than cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) that may interfere with the study assessment of CLE such as but not limited to psoriasis, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, non-LE skin lupus manifestation or drug-induced lupus.
- History or current diagnosis of a clinically significant non-SLE-related vasculitis syndrome.
- Active neuropsychiatric SLE.
- Use of oral prednisone (or equivalent) above 20 mg/day.
- Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
164 sites in 15 countries.
164 sites in 15 countries
United States53 sites
PrimeCare 360
Allen, Texas, 75013
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Highlands Rheumatology
Avon Park, Florida, 33825
Wallace Rheumatic Study Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Joseph S. and Diane H. Steinberg Ambulatory Care Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
Joint and Muscle Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solution
Colleyville, Texas, 76034-5913
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
Believe Clinical Trials
Coral Springs, Florida, 33065
Arthritis Care Texas
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78415
Omega Research Consultants
DeBary, Florida, 32713
AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Centre for Rheumatology, Immunology and Arthritis
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Medication Management, LLC
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405
GNP Research at Mark Jaffe, MD
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
Tilda Research Birmingham
Homewood, Alabama, 35209
Prolato Clinical Research Center
Houston, Texas, 77054
Accurate Clinical Management LLC
Houston, Texas, 77089
Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
Houston, Texas, 77099
Accurate Clinical Research, Inc.
Humble, Texas, 77346
Rheumatology care of Georgia
Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144
Accurate Clinical Research Inc.
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Life Clinical Trials
Margate, Florida, 33063
Atlanta Research Center for Rheumatology LLC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Ramesh C Gupta, MD
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Charisma Medical and Research Center
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Providence Facey Medical Foundation
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Northwell Health Center for Advanced Medicine
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042-1118
Hightower Clinical
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73102
Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Renown Medical Group
Reno, Nevada, 89502
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
OnSite Clinical Solutions, LLC - Charlotte
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
University of California San Diego School of Medicine
San Diego, California, 92103
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Accurate Clinical Research
Stafford, Texas, 77477
Fort Bend Rheumatology Associates
Sugar Land, Texas, 77407
SUNY Upstate Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, 13210
AdventHealth Medical Group
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Vantage Clinical Trials
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Advanced Rheumatology of Houston
The Woodlands, Texas, 77382
SCLA Management
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90509
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
Upland, California, 91786
Georgetown University Hospital-Medstar
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2113
CLS Research Ctr, PLLC
Webster, Texas, 77598
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Brazil17 sites
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221
L2IP - Instituto de Pesquisas Clínicas Ltda.
Brasília, Federal District, 70200-730
Oncovida - Centro de Onco-Hematologia de Mato Grosso
Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78043-142
CETI - Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras Ltda.
Curitiba, Paraná, 80030-110
HUWC - UFC - Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio - Universidade Federal do Ceará
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-370
CMiP - Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36010-570
Hospital Bruno Born
Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, 95900-000
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-001
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
LMK Serviços Médicos S/S Ltda
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90480-000
Clínica SER da Bahia
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40150-150
Centro Multidisciplinar de Estudos Clínicos - CEMEC
São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, 09715-090
Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
Sao Jose Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
CEPIC - Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica e Serviços Médicos
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04266-010
RDSS Ricardo Diaz Scientific Solution
São Paulo, 04037-030
A2Z Clinical Centro Avancado de Pesquisa Clinica
Valinhos, São Paulo, 13271-130
CEDOES - Diagnóstico e Pesquisa
Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29055-450
Mexico16 sites
Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
Chihuahua City, 31000
Consultorio Privado Dr. Miguel Cortes Hernandez
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62448
Centro de Investigacion y Atencion Integral Durango CIAID
Durango, 34080
Diseno y Planeacion en Investigacion Medica S.C.
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44130
Centro de Investigacion Farmaceutica Especializada de Occidente S.C
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160
Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C.
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44650
Centro de investigacion medica y reumatologia
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44959
Centro Peninsular de Investigacion Clinica, SCP
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Unidad de Atencion Medica e Investigacion en Salud S.C.
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Medical Care & Research SA de CV
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Dr. Salvador Zubiran
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
Centro de Investigacion Clínica GRAMEL S.C
Mexico City, Mexico City, 3720
Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico City, Mexico City, 6700
Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64000
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
FAICIC S. de R.L. de C.V.
Veracruz, 91900
Poland15 sites
Nova Reuma Domysławska i Rusiłowicz, Spółka Partnerska Lekarza Reumatologa i Fizjoterapeuty
Bialystok, 15-707
Centrum Medyczne Intercor Sp. z o.o
Bydgoszcz, 85-605
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela
Bydgoszcz, 87-100
Nzoz Bif-Med
Bytom, 41-902
Malopolskie Badania Kliniczne
Krakow, 30-002
Centrum Medyczne Plejady
Krakow, 30-363
Pratia MCM Krakow
Krakow, 30-727
Centrum Medyczne All-Med
Krakow, 31-023
Reumed Spolka z o.o.
Lublin, 20-607
Centrum Badawcze Panaceum Agnieszka Brzezicka, Magdalena Lenkiewicz Sp. z o.o.
Malbork, 82-200
Twoja Przychodnia NCM
Nowa Sól, 67-100
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska prof Pawel Hrycaj
Poznan, 61-397
Przychodnia Care Access Warszawa
Warsaw, 00-719
MICS Centrum Medyczne Warszawa
Warsaw, 00-874
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej 'Biogenes' Sp. z o.o.
Wroclaw, 53-224
Philippines13 sites
Chong Hua Hospital
Cebu City, 6000
Ospital Ng Makati
City of Taguig, 1642
Davao Doctors Hospital
Davao City, 8000
The Medical City Iloilo
Iloilo City, 5000
Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
Lipa City, 4217
The Medical City Clark
Mabalacat, Pampanga, 2023
Manila Doctors Hospital
Manila, 1000
Medical Center Manila
Manila, 1000
Philippine General Hospital
Manila, 1000
Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center
Manila, 1012
St. Luke's Medical Center
Quenzon City, 1102
Far Eastern University - Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation
Quezon City, Metro Manila, 1118
Lorma Medical Center
San Fernando City, La Union, 2500
Bulgaria8 sites
DCC 'Sv. Georgi', EOOD
Plovdiv, 4000
UMHAT "Pulmed" OOD
Plovdiv, 4002
UMHAT-Plovdiv AD
Plovdiv, 4003
DCC 1 - Ruse, EOOD
Rousse, 7002
DCC 'Alexandrovska', EOOD
Sofia, 1431
Medical Center Hera EOOD
Sofia, 1510
Military Medical Academy - MHAT - Sofia
Sofia, 1606
UMHAT 'Sv. Ivan Rilski', EAD
Sofia, 1612
Chile8 sites
Clinica Alemana de Osorno
Osorno, 5290000
Centro Medico Prosalud
Santiago, 7500000
Interin
Santiago, 7500010
CTR Estudios
Santiago, 7500571
Enroll Spa
Santiago, 7500587
BioMedica Research Group
Santiago, 7500710
CeCim Biocinetic
Santiago, 8331143
Clinical Research Chile SpA.
Valdivia, 5090000
Spain7 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 8035
Hospital Universitario San Cecilio
Granada, 18016
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hospital Quironsalud Infanta Luisa
Seville, 41010
Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
Valencia, 46017
Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega
Valladolid, Cantabria, 47012
South Korea6 sites
Dong-A University Hospital
Busan, 49201
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, 21565
Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
Seoul, 4763
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, 5030
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 5505
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499
Peru5 sites
Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa
Arequipa, 40103
Centro de Investigacion Clinica Immunoreumatologioa
Lima, Lima 11
Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins
Lima, LIMA 11
HMA - Hospital Maria Auxiliadora
Lima, LIMA 29
Invest Clinicas Sac Inst de Ginecologia y Reproduccion
Lima, Lima 33
Australia4 sites
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Footscray Hospital
Footscray, Victoria, 3011
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
France3 sites
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33000
CHU Clermont Ferrand - Hopital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, Puy De Dome, 63003
Hopital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, Herault, 34295
Greece3 sites
NNA Hospita;
Athens, 11521
General Hospital of Athens Laiko
Athens, 11527
University General Hospital 'Attikon'
Athens, 12462
Sweden3 sites
Universitetssjukhuset Orebro
Örebro, 70185
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna
Stockholm, SE-171 76
Akademiska Sjukhuset
Uppasala, 75185
Taiwan3 sites
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 833
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40201
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital,Linkou
Taoyuan County, 333
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) in Adult Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Receiving Background Nonbiologic Lupus Standard of Care
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. These may include antimalarials, steroids, and immunosuppressants.
The main objective of the study is to learn about the effect litifilimab has on lowering the activity of the disease. The main question researchers want to answer is:
Read more
- How many participants have an improvement in their symptoms after 52 weeks of treatment? Researchers will answer this and other questions by measuring the symptoms of SLE over time using a variety of scoring tools. These include the SLE Responder Index (SRI), the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 index (BILAG-2004), and the BILAG-BASED Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA), among others.
Researchers will also learn more about the safety of litifilimab. They will study how participants' immune systems respond to litifilimab. Additionally, they will measure the effect litifilimab and SLE have on the quality of life of participants using a group of questionnaires.
The study will be done as follows:
- After screening, participants will be randomized to receive either a high or low dose of litifilimab, or placebo. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine.
- All participants will receive either litifilimab or placebo as injections under the skin once every 4 weeks. The treatment period will last 52 weeks. Participants will continue to take their standard of care medications.
- Neither the researchers nor the participants will know if the participants are receiving litifilimab or placebo.
- There will be a follow-up safety period that lasts up to 24 weeks.
- In total, participants will have up to 22 study visits. The total study duration for participants will be up to 80 weeks.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus standard of care (SOC) therapy in reducing disease activity.
The secondary objectives of this study are to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing disease activity and occurrence of flare up to Week 52; to demonstrate organ-specific efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing joint disease activity and skin disease activity; to demonstrate and evaluate effect of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid(s) (OCS) use; to evaluate additional efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing disease activity with additional disease activity measures; assess the difference between litifilimab and placebo on participant reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and impacts of SLE; to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogeneicty of litifilimab in participants with active SLE.
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Being tested
- Litifilimab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Lupus, SLE, CLE
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LitifilimabDrug
Also called BIIB059
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
PlaceboDrug
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Litifilimab High Dose | Experimental | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive high dose of litifilimab, subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W), up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Litifilimab |
| Litifilimab Low Dose | Experimental | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive low dose of litifilimab, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Litifilimab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive litifilimab-matching placebo, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52
SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K).
- No new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with British isles lupus assessment group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (33)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) - Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BICLA is a composite endpoint defined as BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at baseline improved to grade C or D, no BILAG-2004 worsening in other BILAG-2004 organ systems such that there are no new BILAG-2004 grade A or greater than 1 new BILAG-2004 grade B, no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared with Baseline, no worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS and no violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Joints (Both Swollen and Tender) at Baseline Who Achieved a Joint-50 Response at Week 52
Joint-50 response is 50% reduction in total active joint count from baseline. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). A 28-joint assessment will be performed to determine the active joint count, which is defined as the sum of tender and swollen joint counts.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid(s) (OCS) ≥10 milligrams per day (mg/day) at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 40, Which Is Sustained Through Week 52 with No Disease Worsening from Week 40 to Week 52
No worsening of the disease is defined as no new BILAG-2004 grade A or less than 2 new BILAG-2004 grade B since the last visit during the Week 40 to Week 52.
Measured: Week 40 to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a CLASI-A score ≥10 at Baseline Who Achieved a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity Score (CLASI-50) Response at Week 24
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-50 is 50% of improvement from baseline in CLASI-A.
Measured: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate Through Week 52
Annualized flare rate will be calculated as the total number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days, and the ratio multiplied by 365.25.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score by Visit
The PGA is an Investigator-administered assessment used to quantify disease activity and is measured using an anchored VAS. The PGA asks the Investigator to assess the participant's current disease activity from a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with the assessment made relative to the most severe state of SLE.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a BILAG-BICLA Response by Visit
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BICLA is a composite endpoint defined as BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at baseline improved to grade C or D, no BILAG-2004 worsening in other BILAG-2004 organ systems such that there are no new BILAG-2004 grade A or greater than 1 new BILAG-2004 grade B, no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared with Baseline, no worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS and no violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to Onset of SRI-4 Response Sustained Through Week 52
SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in SLEDAI-2K.
- No new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with British isles lupus assessment group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA -VAS.
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRI-4, -5, or -6 Response by Visit
SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in SLEDAI-2K.
- No new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with British isles lupus assessment group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA -VAS.
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules. The SRI-5 and SRI-6 are computed with a minimal five-point or six-point improvement in SLEDAI-2K being required, respectively.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Joint-50 Response by Visit
Joint-50 response is 50% reduction in total active joint count from baseline. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). A 28-joint assessment will be performed to determine the active joint count, which is defined as the sum of tender and swollen joint counts.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-20, -50, -70, or -90 Response by Visit
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-20, -50, -70 and -90 represent 20%, 50%, 70% or 90% improvement from baseline in CLASI-A score, respectively.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-A Score of ≤ 1 by Visit
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-A ≤1 represent the absolute score ≤1 in CLASI-A by visit.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Severe Flares Through Week 52
A SFI severe flare is defined as any of the following:
- Change in SLEDAI instrument score to > 12.
- New or worse: central nervous system SLE; vasculitis; nephritis; myositis; platelets < 60,000/mL; or hemolytic anemia with hemoglobin < 7 g/dL or decrease in hemoglobin >3 g/dL AND requiring: doubling prednisone dose, increase to > 0.5 mg/kg/day or hospitalization.
- Increase in prednisone dose to > 0.5 mg/kg/day.
- New requirement for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or mycophenolate for SLE activity.
- Hospitalization for SLE activity.
- Increase in PGA score to > 2.5.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to First British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) Severe Flare by Visit
BILAG-2004 severe flare is defined as an A score for items recorded as worse or new. BILAG-2004 is evaluated by scoring each item of a list of signs and symptoms given as 4 = new; 3 = worse; 2 = same; 1 = improving; 0 = not present; and ND = not done.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to First Severe Flare as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index Flare Index (SFI)
SFI severe flare is defined any of the following: change in SLEDAI instrument score to >12; or new or worse: central nervous system SLE; vasculitis; nephritis; myositis; platelets <60,000 per milliliter (/mL); or hemolytic anemia with hemoglobin <7 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or decrease in hemoglobin >3 g/dL and requiring: doubling prednisone dose; or increase to >0.5 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) or hospitalization; or increase in prednisone dose to >0.5 mg/kg/day; or new requirement for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or mycophenolate for SLE activity; or hospitalization for SLE activity; or increase in PGA score to >2.5.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Time Spent in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Sustained LLDAS as Defined by the Number of Participants With ≥ 3, ≥ 5, and ≥ 7 Consecutive Visits in LLDAS up to and Including Week 52
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- SELENA-SLEDAI PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved LLDAS at Week 52
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- SELENA-SLEDAI PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved SLEDAI-2K Improvement at Week 52
The SLEDAI-2K is a reliable, valid, simple, 1-page activity index that measures disease activity and records features of active lupus as present or not. It uses a weighted checklist to assign a numeric score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 28 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms), where higher scores represent increased disease activity. SLEDAI-2K improvement is defined as a reduction from Baseline of ≥ 4 points in SLEDAI-2K score.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of BILAG at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. No worsening of BILAG is defined as no new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of PGA-VAS at Week 52
The PGA is an investigator-administered assessment used to quantify disease activity and is measured using an anchored VAS. PGA asks the investigator to assess the participant's current disease activity from a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with the assessment made relative to the most severe state of SLE. No worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity is defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS. No worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of SLEDAI-2K at Week 52
The SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numeric score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 28 (+2) days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms present) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). No worsening of SLEDAI-2K is defined as no increase in the SLEDAI-2K total score from baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved BILAG Improvement at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 5 mg/day at Week 40, Which is Sustained Through Week 52 With no Disease Worsening From Week 40 to Week 52
No worsening of the disease is defined as no new BILAG-2004 grade A or less than 2 new BILAG-2004 grade B since the last visit between Week 40 and Week 52.
Measured: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day Who Achieved ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 7.5 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Change from Baseline in Lupus-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LupusQoL) Score
The LupusQoL is a participant-reported, lupus-specific, Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (HRQoL) consisting of 34 items grouped in 8 domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4 = never, 3 = occasionally, 2 = a good bit of the time, 1 = most of the time, and 0 = all the time. A LupusQoL score for each domain will be reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better HRQoL.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Score
The SF-36 determines participant's overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary (PCS) score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
The FACIT-Fatigue is a participant-administered HRQoL questionnaire that evaluates participant's fatigue in the 5 broad categories: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns. The level of fatigue is measured by questions assessed on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The responses for each item are added to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
The PHQ-9 is a participant-administered HRQoL questionnaire to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The PHQ-9 is a participant-reported outcome (PRO) that is used to measure depression in adults. It contains 9 questions. The PHQ-9 yields an overall severity score that can range from 0 to 27 with the following severity scores: 0-4 = none; 5-9 = mild; 10-14 = moderate; 15-19 = moderate-to-severe; and 20-27 = severe.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Lupus Score
WPAI questionnaire is a validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment. Each score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is an AE that started or worsened in severity after the first dose of study treatment through 28 days after the last dose of study treatment or end of study (EOS) date, whichever comes earlier. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death (a life-threatening event), in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a birth defect, or is a medically important event.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Litifilimab
Measured: Up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2021
- Study start25 May 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 548 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04895241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 230LE303
- Other IDs
- 2023-505695-30, 2023
- Acronym
- TOPAZ-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 17 May 2021
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) in Adult Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Receiving Background Nonbiologic Lupus Standard of Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04895241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPAZ-1 / 230LE303
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Keywords
- Lupus, SLE, CLE
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 548 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. These may include antimalarials, steroids, and immunosuppressants.
The main objective of the study is to learn about the effect litifilimab has on lowering the activity of the disease. The main question researchers want to answer is:
- How many participants have an improvement in their symptoms after 52 weeks of treatment? Researchers will answer this and other questions by measuring the symptoms of SLE over time using a variety of scoring tools. These include the SLE Responder Index (SRI), the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 index (BILAG-2004), and the BILAG-BASED Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA), among others.
Researchers will also learn more about the safety of litifilimab. They will study how participants' immune systems respond to litifilimab. Additionally, they will measure the effect litifilimab and SLE have on the quality of life of participants using a group of questionnaires.
The study will be done as follows:
- After screening, participants will be randomized to receive either a high or low dose of litifilimab, or placebo. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine.
- All participants will receive either litifilimab or placebo as injections under the skin once every 4 weeks. The treatment period will last 52 weeks. Participants will continue to take their standard of care medications.
- Neither the researchers nor the participants will know if the participants are receiving litifilimab or placebo.
- There will be a follow-up safety period that lasts up to 24 weeks.
- In total, participants will have up to 22 study visits. The total study duration for participants will be up to 80 weeks.
Detailed description
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus standard of care (SOC) therapy in reducing disease activity.
The secondary objectives of this study are to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing disease activity and occurrence of flare up to Week 52; to demonstrate organ-specific efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing joint disease activity and skin disease activity; to demonstrate and evaluate effect of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid(s) (OCS) use; to evaluate additional efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing disease activity with additional disease activity measures; assess the difference between litifilimab and placebo on participant reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and impacts of SLE; to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogeneicty of litifilimab in participants with active SLE.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Litifilimab High Dose | Experimental | Drug: LitifilimabParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive high dose of litifilimab, subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W), up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
| Litifilimab Low Dose | Experimental | Drug: LitifilimabParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive low dose of litifilimab, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive litifilimab-matching placebo, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant must be diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at least 24 weeks prior to screening and must meet the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) / American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE at screening by a qualified physician.
- Participant has a modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score ≥ 6 (excluding alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated).
- Participant has a modified clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥ 4 (excluding anti-dsDNA, low complement component 3 (C3) and/or complement component 4 (C4), alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at Screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant has BILAG-2004 grade A in ≥ 1 organ system or BILAG-2004 grade B in ≥ 2 organ systems at Screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant must be treated with one of the following background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapies, initiated ≥ 12 weeks prior to Screening and at stable dose ≥ 4 weeks prior to randomization:
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of or positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Current hepatitis C infection (defined as positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]).
- Current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or positive for total hepatitis antibody to B core antigen [anti-HBc] with positive reflex HBV DNA).
- History of severe herpes infection.
- Presence of uncontrolled or New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LitifilimabAlso: BIIB059Administered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Litifilimab High Dose, Litifilimab Low Dose |
| PlaceboAdministered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria: * Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). * No new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with British isles lupus assessment group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline. * No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS). * No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
33 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) - Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Joints (Both Swollen and Tender) at Baseline Who Achieved a Joint-50 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid(s) (OCS) ≥10 milligrams per day (mg/day) at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 40, Which Is Sustained Through Week 52 with No Disease Worsening from Week 40 to Week 52
Time frame: Week 40 to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a CLASI-A score ≥10 at Baseline Who Achieved a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity Score (CLASI-50) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a BILAG-BICLA Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to Onset of SRI-4 Response Sustained Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRI-4, -5, or -6 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Joint-50 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-20, -50, -70, or -90 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-A Score of ≤ 1 by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Severe Flares Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to First British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) Severe Flare by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to First Severe Flare as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index Flare Index (SFI)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Time Spent in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Sustained LLDAS as Defined by the Number of Participants With ≥ 3, ≥ 5, and ≥ 7 Consecutive Visits in LLDAS up to and Including Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved LLDAS at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved SLEDAI-2K Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of BILAG at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of PGA-VAS at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of SLEDAI-2K at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved BILAG Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 5 mg/day at Week 40, Which is Sustained Through Week 52 With no Disease Worsening From Week 40 to Week 52
Time frame: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day Who Achieved ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 7.5 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Change from Baseline in Lupus-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LupusQoL) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Lupus Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Litifilimab
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- Click here to learn more about this trial, visit our study websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Related trials for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
164 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Litifilimab in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Biogen at 164 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 164 sites in United States, Brazil, Mexico, Poland, Philippines and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52 (time frame: Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.