Health BehaviorNCT04895865
Repetition Prescription Approaches Delivered Via Videoconferencing
A study testing RPE-based load and repetition number selection and Predetermined load and number of repetitions in people with Health Behavior, run by Tel Aviv University at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
A randomized controlled trial comparing between two approaches of prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training (RT) sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- RPE-based load and repetition number selection and Predetermined load and number of repetitions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 23 May 2021to 10 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy
- Non-active (characterized by 60 minutes or less per week of formal exercise sessions)
- Ages of 18-45
- Did not participate in RT in the past six months.
- Participants will be asked to fill out a health questionnaire. If they marked any of the items on the health questionnaire as positive (e.g., diabetes) they were asked to provide a medical clearance from a doctor.
- Signing a health declaration to participate in physical activity according to the government regulations
Who cannot join
- Orthopedic or neurological conditions
- Diagnosis of co-morbidities
- Routine use of prescription medication
- Pregnancy
- Less than six months after childbirth
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Comparison Between Two Repetition Prescription Approaches in Resistance Training Delivered Via Videoconferencing to Untrained Young Adults
A randomized controlled trial comparing between two approaches of prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training (RT) sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will be randomly allocated to either the "predetermined" or "self-selected" groups. The groups will differ in the amount of choice they will be able to make concerning the resistance of each exercise and the number of repetitions they complete (see detailed description). Both groups will complete two sessions per week composed of body weight and resistance band exercises, lasting 45 minutes for eight weeks. The sessions will be delivered live by a certified instructor using a videoconferencing platform.
The primary aim of this study is:
Read more
Compare between the "predetermined" and the "self-selected" repetition prescription approaches on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes in a cohort of 60 healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) over an eight-week period of live, videoconferencing RT sessions.
The secondary aim is:
Determine the influence of live, videoconferencing group RT sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes across groups.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Providing trainees with more choices in exercise sessions is an autonomy supportive process which can lead to a more enjoyable experience, greater adherence to the training program and preferable performance outcomes. We will compare between two approaches to prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training sessions- the "predetermined" and the "self-selected", based on the amount of choice trainees receive while training. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will train bi-weekly for 45 minutes using resistance bands in a live, videoconferencing group setting.
Intervention details:
The intervention will last eight weeks and include bi-weekly, 45-minute online sessions instructed by two alternating experienced instructors. Each session will include an introduction and setup (5-minutes), warm-up (5-minutes), body-weight and resistance band exercises (30-minutes) and cool down (5-minutes). We will upload the study protocol to an external server for more details.
Both groups will follow the exact same exercise program with one key difference: participants in the "predetermined" group will be instructed to complete 10 repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal. Conversely, in the "self-selected" group, participants will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the same target RPE of 7/10. Note that while the initial resistance, and thus, the number of repetitions is expected to differ between group, both are matched for perception of effort.
Recruitment and procedures:
Participants will be recruited via social media (i.e., Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA). Each candidate will be screened for initial eligibility. After screening participants will be block-randomized to the "predetermined" of the "self-selected" groups, matched for age and gender. Participants will be blind to their allocation (see concealment section). Prior to visiting the exercise laboratory at Tel Aviv University for the testing session, participants will receive written materials regarding the exercise sessions, testing procedures, and the use of the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (0-10), and a video demonstrating the implementation of RPE in practice. All participants that are part of a given group will be required to complete the first testing session within a maximum of one week before the program begins, and the follow up testing session within a maximum of one week after the program ends. Practically, one group will begin and end all procedures (i.e., initial testing, eight-weeks program, follow up testing) one week before the other group. The order of which group will begin first will be randomly decided by a coin flip.
The initial testing session will include the following steps:
- Sign an informed consent form.
- Fill out the Basic Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ).
- Body composition analysis (see outcome measures section).
- RPE terminology verification based on the videos and written materials delivered in advance.
- Performance tests (see outcome measures section).
- Practice how to use the resistance band (see below) and set up terminology to be used during the sessions (e.g. "open loop", "more tension").
That same order will be kept on the final tests (excluding the informed consent), which will also be conducted at the same place, at the same hour-window, and by the same experimenter.
Home-based equipment:
Participants will receive one elastic band (NT loops, purchased from: (https://www.ntloop.com/shop/) as they are affordable, accessible and allow exercising in a controlled, safe manner. When practicing with an elastic band, changing grip width, or rubber stiffness allows the trainee to achieve greater or lesser resistance.
Videoconferencing platform:
RT sessions will be delivered using "Zoom video communications" (San-Jose, CA, USA) due to its popularity and user-friendly interface. Additionally, a WhatsApp group chat (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) will be created for each group to deliver updates and reminders. A technical assistant from the research team will be available during the live broadcast.
Sample size:
This sample size is based on our recruitment abilities and resources and based on our previous experience with this type of intervention. A sample size of 30 participants per group is considered large in exercise science research with both statistically and practically significant effects often detected. We also expect for future meta-analyses to take place and for this work to be included. Thus, even if this study is currently under-powered for small effects, it may add valuable data to the field of exercise science.
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Being tested
- RPE-based load and repetition number selection, Predetermined load and number of repetitions
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Exercise adherence, Resistance training, Affective responses, eHealth, Online exercise, Self-selection, Rating of Perceived Exertion
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RPE-based load and repetition number selectionBehavioural
Providing trainees with choices regarding the load and the number of repetitions to be performed per set and exercise
Predetermined load and number of repetitionsBehavioural
Trainees predetermine the load and perform ten repetitions per set and exercise
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self-selected | Experimental | Participants in the "self-selected" arm will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the target rating of perceived exertion RPE of 7/10 Receives: Behavioral: RPE-based load and repetition number selection |
| Predetermined | Active comparator | Participants in the "predetermined" arm will be instructed to complete ten repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal. Receives: Behavioral: Predetermined load and number of repetitions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline enjoyment score
Participants will respond to a bi-monthly survey introducing the question: "how much did you enjoy the previous four sessions?" using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., did not enjoy it at all) to 100 (i.e., enjoyed it very much). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as the main outcome.
Measured: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Adherence proportion
The proportion of adherence to the program calculated as session attended divided by the total sessions, times 100 over a period of eight weeks.
Measured: Through study completion, a period of eight weeks.
Change in fat free mass (FFM)
SECA mBCA 515 device (MFBIA; SECA®, Hamburg, Germany) will be used to measure bioimpedance. Participants will be asked to drink 400 ml of water on the day of measurement and up to 30 minutes before stepping on the feet-electrodes bare feet. Participants will hold the hand-electrodes and the flow of low alternating current will produce an output of FFM reported in units of kilograms.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in body mass index (BMI)
SECA mBCA 515 device (MFBIA; SECA®, Hamburg, Germany) will be used to measure body weight and height, which will be used to calculate BMI. Participants will be asked to stand on a stadiometer to measure their height, then step on the device which will measure their weight and produce an automated output of BMI score. The change in BMI from baseline to the end of the intervention will be used as a secondary outcome.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in maximal strength:
The isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) assesses maximal strength of the body's large muscle groups. Participants will pull a fixed bar while standing on force plates (Kinvent, Deltas force plates). The force plate will measure the mean force of the three-second test. Test units are kilograms.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in hand-grip strength:
The hand grip test assesses maximum strength of the grip muscles through squeeze the dynamometer (Kinvent, Grip dynamometer). Measurement units are kilogram, and the peak value will be used to calculate the change from baseline.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in knee-extensor strength:
The isometric knee extension test will measure force by a dynamometer device attached to a firm belt (Kinvent, Link pull dynamometer). Measurement units are kilogram, and the mean force will be used for analysis.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in lower-body explosive power:
The counter movement jump test assesses lower body explosive power using a force plate (Kinvent, Deltas force plates). Participants will stand on the force plate with their hands on their waist and jump as high as possible. The measurement unit is centimeter, and the peak value will be used for analysis.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in upper body endurance:
The push-up test assesses muscular endurance of the upper body muscle groups. Participants will perform the maximal number of push-ups with their body straight and their chest touching a target. Participants will use an inclination if they cannot complete five repetitions before beginning the test. Inclination height will be recorded. The number of repetitions will be used for analysis.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in perception of autonomy:
Participants will be presented with three questions concerning their perceived autonomy. Participants will be asked to rate their response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., not autonomous at all) to 100 (extremely autonomous). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as a secondary outcome.
Measured: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in satisfaction with the program:
Participants will be presented with three questions concerning their satisfaction with the variety of exercises, the instructor and the resistance band. Participants will be asked to rate their response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., not satisfied at all) to 100 (i.e, extremely satisfied). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as a secondary outcome.
Measured: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in response to the ease of use of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale:
Participants will be presented with two questions concerning the use of the RPE scale during the sessions. Participants will be asked to rate their response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (not easy to use) to 100 (very easy to use). The average score of the three items will be used for analysis.
Measured: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in the satisfaction with technology:
Participants will be presented with two questions concerning the use of technology (videoconferencing interface) during the sessions. Participants will be asked to rate their response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., not satisfied at all) to 100 (i.e., extremely satisfied). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as a secondary outcome.
Measured: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in Basic Regulation to Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3) score:
Participants will respond to a 24-items questionnaire. Items are designed to explore the underlying motives to engaging in physical activity. The Likert-based items range from 0 (i.e., not true for me) to 4 (i.e., very true for me). The total score of the questionnaire will be calculated for the baseline response at the beginning of the intervention and the final response at the end of the intervention, and compared between the two groups. The absolute change in scores will be used as a secondary outcome.
Measured: Change from baseline to the end of the intervention (up to seven days from the end of week eight).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2021
- Study start23 May 2021
- Primary completion10 Aug 2021
- Study completion10 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Health BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Intervention group receives alternative treatment Control group receives traditional treatment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tel Aviv University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Israel Science Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Israel Halperin, Tel Aviv University
- Investigators
- Israel Halperin, PhD, Principal investigator, Tel Aviv University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04895865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IHalperin
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 9 May 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Schwartz H, Har-Nir I, Wenhoda T, Halperin I. Staying physically active during the COVID-19 quarantine: exploring the feasibility of live, online, group training sessions among older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):314-322. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa141.
PubMed 33447852Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):270-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
PubMed 18298272Lopes JSS, Machado AF, Micheletti JK, de Almeida AC, Cavina AP, Pastre CM. Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Feb 19;7:2050312119831116. doi: 10.1177/2050312119831116. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30815258Emanuel A, Har-Nir I, Rozen Smukas II, Halperin I. The effect of self-selecting the number of repetitions on motor performance and psychological outcomes. Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2398-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01402-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
PubMed 32778961
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison Between Two Repetition Prescription Approaches in Resistance Training Delivered Via Videoconferencing to Untrained Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04895865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IHalperin
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Exercise adherence, Resistance training, Affective responses, eHealth, Online exercise, Self-selection, Rating of Perceived Exertion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tel Aviv UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Israel Science Foundation
- Study start
- 23 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized controlled trial comparing between two approaches of prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training (RT) sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will be randomly allocated to either the "predetermined" or "self-selected" groups. The groups will differ in the amount of choice they will be able to make concerning the resistance of each exercise and the number of repetitions they complete (see detailed description). Both groups will complete two sessions per week composed of body weight and resistance band exercises, lasting 45 minutes for eight weeks. The sessions will be delivered live by a certified instructor using a videoconferencing platform.
The primary aim of this study is:
Compare between the "predetermined" and the "self-selected" repetition prescription approaches on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes in a cohort of 60 healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) over an eight-week period of live, videoconferencing RT sessions.
The secondary aim is:
Determine the influence of live, videoconferencing group RT sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes across groups.
Detailed description
Background:
Providing trainees with more choices in exercise sessions is an autonomy supportive process which can lead to a more enjoyable experience, greater adherence to the training program and preferable performance outcomes. We will compare between two approaches to prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training sessions- the "predetermined" and the "self-selected", based on the amount of choice trainees receive while training. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will train bi-weekly for 45 minutes using resistance bands in a live, videoconferencing group setting.
Intervention details:
The intervention will last eight weeks and include bi-weekly, 45-minute online sessions instructed by two alternating experienced instructors. Each session will include an introduction and setup (5-minutes), warm-up (5-minutes), body-weight and resistance band exercises (30-minutes) and cool down (5-minutes). We will upload the study protocol to an external server for more details.
Both groups will follow the exact same exercise program with one key difference: participants in the "predetermined" group will be instructed to complete 10 repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal. Conversely, in the "self-selected" group, participants will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the same target RPE of 7/10. Note that while the initial resistance, and thus, the number of repetitions is expected to differ between group, both are matched for perception of effort.
Recruitment and procedures:
Participants will be recruited via social media (i.e., Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA). Each candidate will be screened for initial eligibility. After screening participants will be block-randomized to the "predetermined" of the "self-selected" groups, matched for age and gender. Participants will be blind to their allocation (see concealment section). Prior to visiting the exercise laboratory at Tel Aviv University for the testing session, participants will receive written materials regarding the exercise sessions, testing procedures, and the use of the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (0-10), and a video demonstrating the implementation of RPE in practice. All participants that are part of a given group will be required to complete the first testing session within a maximum of one week before the program begins, and the follow up testing session within a maximum of one week after the program ends. Practically, one group will begin and end all procedures (i.e., initial testing, eight-weeks program, follow up testing) one week before the other group. The order of which group will begin first will be randomly decided by a coin flip.
The initial testing session will include the following steps:
- Sign an informed consent form.
- Fill out the Basic Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ).
- Body composition analysis (see outcome measures section).
- RPE terminology verification based on the videos and written materials delivered in advance.
- Performance tests (see outcome measures section).
- Practice how to use the resistance band (see below) and set up terminology to be used during the sessions (e.g. "open loop", "more tension").
That same order will be kept on the final tests (excluding the informed consent), which will also be conducted at the same place, at the same hour-window, and by the same experimenter.
Home-based equipment:
Participants will receive one elastic band (NT loops, purchased from: (https://www.ntloop.com/shop/) as they are affordable, accessible and allow exercising in a controlled, safe manner. When practicing with an elastic band, changing grip width, or rubber stiffness allows the trainee to achieve greater or lesser resistance.
Videoconferencing platform:
RT sessions will be delivered using "Zoom video communications" (San-Jose, CA, USA) due to its popularity and user-friendly interface. Additionally, a WhatsApp group chat (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) will be created for each group to deliver updates and reminders. A technical assistant from the research team will be available during the live broadcast.
Sample size:
This sample size is based on our recruitment abilities and resources and based on our previous experience with this type of intervention. A sample size of 30 participants per group is considered large in exercise science research with both statistically and practically significant effects often detected. We also expect for future meta-analyses to take place and for this work to be included. Thus, even if this study is currently under-powered for small effects, it may add valuable data to the field of exercise science.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Intervention group receives alternative treatment Control group receives traditional treatment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self-selected | Experimental | Behavioral: RPE-based load and repetition number selectionParticipants in the "self-selected" arm will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the target rating of perceived exertion RPE of 7/10 |
| Predetermined | Active comparator | Behavioral: Predetermined load and number of repetitionsParticipants in the "predetermined" arm will be instructed to complete ten repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Healthy
- Non-active (characterized by 60 minutes or less per week of formal exercise sessions)
- Ages of 18-45
- Did not participate in RT in the past six months.
- Participants will be asked to fill out a health questionnaire. If they marked any of the items on the health questionnaire as positive (e.g., diabetes) they were asked to provide a medical clearance from a doctor.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Orthopedic or neurological conditions
- Diagnosis of co-morbidities
- Routine use of prescription medication
- Pregnancy
- Less than six months after childbirth
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RPE-based load and repetition number selectionProviding trainees with choices regarding the load and the number of repetitions to be performed per set and exercise | Behavioural | Self-selected |
| Predetermined load and number of repetitionsTrainees predetermine the load and perform ten repetitions per set and exercise | Behavioural | Predetermined |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline enjoyment score
Time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Participants will respond to a bi-monthly survey introducing the question: "how much did you enjoy the previous four sessions?" using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., did not enjoy it at all) to 100 (i.e., enjoyed it very much). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as the main outcome.
13 secondary outcomes
Adherence proportion
Time frame: Through study completion, a period of eight weeks.
Change in fat free mass (FFM)
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in body mass index (BMI)
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in maximal strength:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in hand-grip strength:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in knee-extensor strength:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in lower-body explosive power:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in upper body endurance:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in perception of autonomy:
Time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in satisfaction with the program:
Time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in response to the ease of use of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale:
Time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in the satisfaction with technology:
Time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Change in Basic Regulation to Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3) score:
Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of the intervention (up to seven days from the end of week eight).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 33447852Schwartz H, Har-Nir I, Wenhoda T, Halperin I. Staying physically active during the COVID-19 quarantine: exploring the feasibility of live, online, group training sessions among older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):314-322. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa141.
- Background: PubMed 18298272Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):270-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
- Background: PubMed 30815258Lopes JSS, Machado AF, Micheletti JK, de Almeida AC, Cavina AP, Pastre CM. Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Feb 19;7:2050312119831116. doi: 10.1177/2050312119831116. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 32778961Emanuel A, Har-Nir I, Rozen Smukas II, Halperin I. The effect of self-selecting the number of repetitions on motor performance and psychological outcomes. Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2398-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01402-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
- Resistance bands used in the interventionLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Health Behavior
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Israel Halperin, PhD principal investigator
Tel Aviv University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RPE-based load and repetition number selection and Predetermined load and number of repetitions in people with Health Behavior, run by Tel Aviv University at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline enjoyment score (time frame: Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04895865, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2021.