AzTrials
AzTrials

Musculoskeletal DiseasesNCT04900480

Pilot Project for Direct Access to Physical Therapy

A study testing Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy in people with Musculoskeletal Diseases, run by Ulla Toft at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of publicly subsidized physiotherapy for all patients receiving general treatment in physiotherapy clinics with an official provider number. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Musculoskeletal Diseases
What is being tested?
Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,427 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Nov 2020to 1 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Begin treatment in general physiotherapy within the four municipalities included

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Have a GP referral to home treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Center for Clinical Research and Prevention

    Copenhagen, 2000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of publicly subsidized physiotherapy for all patients receiving general treatment in physiotherapy clinics with an official provider number. This study will evaluate effects on physical and mental health, number of consultations in physiotherapy; number of contacts with general practitioner; referrals to diagnostic imaging; number of contacts with specialists within rheumatology, neurology and orthopedics and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

In Denmark, patients in physiotherapy with a referral from their general practitioner (GP) get 40% of their expenses paid by public subsidy. This study aims to test the effects of direct access to physiotherapy with public subsidy without a referral from the GP.

GPs are by default the gatekeeper to all public health care services in Denmark. However, increasing demand in terms of task complexity and patient volume is putting pressure on GPs. In this study, physiotherapists may become the first point of access for patients with musculoskeletal problems.

The hypothesis is, that direct access may decrease use of health services and increase patient satisfaction by shortening the time between occurrence of symptoms and beginning treatment in physiotherapy a) by eliminating the time needed to get a referral from the GP and b) by making access to physiotherapy easier, thus encouraging patients to seek and begin treatment earlier.

The effect of direct access to physiotherapy with public subsidy will be tested in a controlled design. Four similar municipalities located in the Capital Region of Denmark were selected to participate in the study. The four municipalities have been grouped in pairs to ensure similarity on size, health utilization, urbanization and commuting patterns. Two grouped municipalities have been assigned to the intervention group by lottery; the matching pair of municipalities have been assigned to the control group.

From November 2020 to November 2021, citizens living in the two intervention municipalities can get public subsidy for general physiotherapy without a GP referral. For all citizens in the control group access to physiotherapy is provided as usual; thus, public subsidy physiotherapy is only provided for patients with a GP referral. The study includes all physiotherapy clinics in all four municipalities. All included clinics must have an official provider number, i.e. be approved to offer services with public subsidy.

All patients with residence within one of the four municipalities who seeks general treatment in included physiotherapy clinics within their own municipality will be invited to participate in the study. Both patients with and without a GP referral will be included. Participation involves giving consent to providing data for the evaluation.

Data in the study consists of health care contacts accessed through the Capital Region of Denmark's own price mechanism registers logging all transactions between relevant service providers and the Capital Region of Denmark. In addition, all patients are asked to fill in a survey before their 1st diagnostic consultation with a physiotherapist and a follow up survey at six weeks and six months. Finally, the study will collect data through interviews with general practitioners and physiotherapists as well as their respective receptionists.

Being tested
Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy
Keywords
Physiotherapy, Public subsidy, Direct access
Medical subject headings
Musculoskeletal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapyOther

    This pilot project introduces temporary exemption on the legal required GP referral for public subsidy for treatment in general physiotherapy.

Study groups in NCT04900480
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Public subsidy to physiotherapy continue as usualNo interventionThis control arm consists of all physiotherapy clinics with registered provider numbers in two municipalities, where the access and public subsidy to physiotherapy continue as usual.
Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapyExperimentalThis intervention arm consists of all physiotherapy clinics with registered provider numbers in two municipalities, introducing temporary exemption on the legal required general practitioner referral for public subsidy for treatment in general physiotherapy.
Receives: Other: Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline physical functioning at 6 months

    Physical functioning will be measured by a validated Danish Short Form 12 instrument. The questionnaire consists of six items weighted, summed and transformed to provide physical health score. The score of 50 represents the median score of a reference population. 10 points equals 1 standard deviation. Higher score equal better physical health.

    Measured: Six months

  2. Consultations in general practice

    Number of consultations in general practice

    Measured: Six months after intervention period

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Consultations with specialists within rheumatology

    Number of Consultations with specialists within rheumatology

    Measured: Six months after intervention period

  2. Consultations with specialists within neurology

    Number of consultations with specialists within neurology

    Measured: Six months after intervention period

  3. Consultations with specialists within orthopedics

    Number of consultations with specialists within orthopedics

    Measured: Six months after intervention period

  4. Referrals to diagnostic imaging

    Number of referrals to diagnostic imaging

    Measured: Six months after intervention period

  5. Cancer diagnoses

    Number of cancer diagnoses

    Measured: Five years after intervention period

  6. Change from baseline physical functioning at six weeks

    Physical functioning will be measured by a validated Danish Short Form 12 instrument. The questionnaire consists of six items weighted, summed and transformed to provide physical health score. The score of 50 represents the median score of a reference population. 10 points equals 1 standard deviation. Higher score equal better physical health.

    Measured: Six months

  7. Change from baseline mental health at six weeks

    Mental health will be measured by a validated Danish Short Form 12 instrument. The questionnaire consists of six items weighted, summed and transformed to provide mental health score. The score of 50 represents the median score of a reference population. 10 points equals 1 standard deviation. Higher score equal better mental health.

    Measured: Six weeks

  8. Change from baseline mental health at six months

    Mental health will be measured by a validated Danish Short Form 12 instrument. The questionnaire consists of six items weighted, summed and transformed to provide mental health score. The score of 50 represents the median score of a reference population. 10 points equals 1 standard deviation. Higher score equal better mental health.

    Measured: Six months

  9. Change from baseline pain intensity at 6 months

    Pain intensity will be measured by Numeric Rating Scale. The score ranges from 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 worst possible pain.

    Measured: Six months

  10. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be measured by an overall satisfaction question with five levels of severity. Answers will be scored from 1-5.

    1 = lowest satisfaction, 5 = highest satisfaction.

    Measured: Six weeks

  11. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be measured by an overall satisfaction question with five levels of severity. Answers will be scored from 1-5.

    1 = lowest satisfaction, 5 = highest satisfaction.

    Measured: Six months

  12. Trust in collaboration between physiotherapist and general practitioner

    Patient perceived trust in professional collaboration between physiotherapist and general practitioner will be measured by questionnaire consisting of three questions with 5 levels of severity. Answers will be scored from 1-5.

    1 = lowest satisfaction, 5 = highest satisfaction.

    Measured: Six months

  13. Change in sickness absence

    Sickness absence is measured by two questionnaire items indicating number of full sickness absence days and number of partial sickness absence days the last 30 days. Answers will be between 0-30 for both questions. Fewer days of sickness absence is a better outcome.

    Measured: Six weeks

  14. Change in sickness absence

    Sickness absence is measured by two questionnaire items indicating number of full sickness absence days and number of partial sickness absence days the last 30 days. Answers will be between 0-30 for both questions. Fewer days of sickness absence is a better outcome.

    Measured: Six months

  15. Change in use of pharmaceuticals

    Use of pharmaceuticals is measured by two questionnaire items indicating number of days of using over the counter painkillers and number og days using prescribed painkillers on average the last three months. The questions have four levels of severity (0, 1-7, 8-15, 16-30 days on average the last three months). Use of less pharmaceuticals is a better outcome.

    Measured: Six weeks

  16. Change in use of pharmaceuticals

    Use of pharmaceuticals is measured by two questionnaire items indicating number of days of using over the counter painkillers and number og days using prescribed painkillers on average the last three months. The questions have four levels of severity (0, 1-7, 8-15, 16-30 days on average the last three months). Use of less pharmaceuticals is a better outcome.

    Measured: Six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,427 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04900480
Sponsor's protocol ID
Direct Access
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
12 Feb 2020
Last updated
23 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dahlerup J, Toft U, Schiotz ML, Grew J, Thrysoe R, Ottosen J, Jakobsen LM. Protocol for a cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial of the effect of direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy for adults with musculoskeletal pain. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106648. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106648. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

    PubMed 34896641

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy in people with Musculoskeletal Diseases, run by Ulla Toft at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline physical functioning at 6 months (time frame: Six months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04900480, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in