AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CancerBELGSSARNCT04903561

Increase in Response by Offering Self-sampling Devices in Belgian GP Practices to Non-screened Women

A study testing ColliPee in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Sciensano at 3 sites in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Small scale data indicate that cervical cancer screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 64 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Cancer
What is being tested?
ColliPee
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,200 participants
Where
3 sitesBelgium
Study dates
19 Apr 2021to Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 64 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • women who have not been screened for cervical cancer since the last three years
  • visiting their GP for whatever reason

Who cannot join

  • pregnant women,
  • women under active follow-up because of previous cervical abnormality,
  • women who had a total hysterectomy,
  • women who had a history of cervical cancer or a treatment for cervical precancer less than three years ago,
  • non-consenting women,
  • women who are not able to understand and sign the informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Belgium3 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Université catholique de Louvain

    Brussels, 1080

    Guy Beuken, MD

    Laura Prud'homme, MD

    Recruiting
  • Université de Liège

    Liège, 4000

    Completed
  • Maison médicale Neptune

    Schaarbeek, 1030

    Julie Gosuin, MD

    Anais Bosefe, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Randomized Participation Trials: Increase in Response by Offering Self-sampling Devices in Belgian GP Practices to Non-screened Women

Small scale data indicate that cervical cancer screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of a SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.

BELGSSAR will also investigate whether GP's have the information on the most important risk factors for cervical cancer available in their patient files.

Read the detailed description

Screening with clinically validated high-risk (hr) HPV tests is more effective in reducing cervical cancer incidence than cytology. Another advantage of hrHPV testing is that it can be performed on self-samples whereas cytology on self-samples shows poor clinical accuracy. hrHPV DNA testing on vaginal self-samples is as accurate on self- as on clinician-taken samples under the condition to use clinically validated PCR-based assays that target DNA sequences of the viral genome.

Offering kits for vaginal self-sampling is more effective than conventional invitations / reminders sent to under-screened women to have a cervical specimen taken by a clinician. Small scale data indicate that screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.

Risk based cervical cancer screening takes risk factors into account to differentiate screening policies. GPs have knowledge of these risk factors. Demonstration of the knowledge of these risk factors from GP's patient files will be demonstrated through the BELGSSAR trials.

Two self-sampling methods will be used in BELGSSAR:

  1. vaginal self-sampling using the Evalyn® Brush (Roovers, Oss, NL) and
  2. first-void urine collection with the Colli-PeeTM (Novosanis, Wijnegem, BE). Depending on the GP practice, collection will take place at home or at the GP office (predefined by the respective GP). The inclusion of urine collection is motivated by the possible lower threshold for women who dislike genital examinations.

The following hypotheses will be investigated:

  1. Participation in cervical cancer screening is substantially higher when a GP offers a self-sampling kit compared to control interventions.
  2. Risk factors for cervical cancer can be identified accurately from GP's patient files.

To test these hypotheses, a two-arm participation trial will be conducted in eight GP practices in Belgium, spread over four locations (Ghent, Leuven, Brussels and Liège). In each GP practice the enrolled patients will be randomized to one of the two study arms.

In the experimental arms (Arm 1), the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope.

Women in the control group (Arm 2) will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test.

Double blinding of patient and investigator is not possible, because the participants will be aware to which study arm they belong when they receive or offer the self-sample.

All samples collected under the experimental arms will be handled and tested for presence of hrHPV types at the AML laboratory in Antwerp. AML is the national reference laboratory for HPV for Belgium. The used HPV assay will be the RIATOL qPCR, that detects E6/E7 HPV genes, with measurement of type-specific viral load of all high-risk HPV types. This test is clinically validated for HPV-based cervical cancer screening. The tests performed in the control arm will be processed in the laboratories connected with the respective GP practices.

Conditions
Cervical Cancer
Being tested
ColliPee
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, self sampling kit, general practicioners, ColliPee, Evalyn Brush
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ColliPeeDevice

    Also called Evalyn Brush

    The GP will hand over the self-sampling kit to the women, after obtaining informed consent, and the women then takes the self sample at home or in the doctor's office (predefined), according to the respective users manual.

Study groups in NCT04903561
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalIn the experimental arms, the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope.
Receives: Device: ColliPee
controlNo interventionWomen in the control group will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in response between intervention and control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]).

    Difference in response in women included in the self-sampling arms vs the control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]).

    The absolute difference in response rate = proportion with screening test in experimental arm - proportion with screening test in control arm, within 6 months after enrolment.

    In the PP analysis only women with a screening test on the self-sample according to the specific experimental intervention will be taken into account, whereas in the ITT analysis all screening tests performed within 6 months after enrolment will be considered (also those performed on samples taken by a clinician).

    Measured: 2 years and 4 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Absolute response rates in each arm and each GP practice

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  2. Heterogeneity in response rate differences, over the eight GP practices (assessed by the Cochran Q test for heterogeneity)

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  3. net difference in response rate between practices offering vaginal self-sampling devices vs offering urine collection devices • Difference in response between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  4. net difference in response rate between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  5. Screen test positivity rate (by arm [PP and ITT], GP intervention)

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  6. Attitude/preferences of women towards self-sampling (assessed through a questionnaire)

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

  7. Presence of information on risk factors

    Measured: 2 years and 7 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2021
  2. Study start19 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04903561
Sponsor's protocol ID
Sciensano_2021_001
Acronym
BELGSSAR
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
20 May 2021
Last updated
24 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ColliPee in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Sciensano at 3 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marc Arbyn, MD (+32 2 642 50 21, marc.arbyn@sciensano.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in response between intervention and control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]). (time frame: 2 years and 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
BELGSSAR Clinical Trial NCT04903561 | AzTrials