Cervical CancerBELGSSARNCT04903561
Increase in Response by Offering Self-sampling Devices in Belgian GP Practices to Non-screened Women
A study testing ColliPee in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Sciensano at 3 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
Small scale data indicate that cervical cancer screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 64 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- ColliPee
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 19 Apr 2021to Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 64 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- women who have not been screened for cervical cancer since the last three years
- visiting their GP for whatever reason
Who cannot join
- pregnant women,
- women under active follow-up because of previous cervical abnormality,
- women who had a total hysterectomy,
- women who had a history of cervical cancer or a treatment for cervical precancer less than three years ago,
- non-consenting women,
- women who are not able to understand and sign the informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Belgium3 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Université catholique de Louvain
Brussels, 1080
Guy Beuken, MD
Laura Prud'homme, MD
- Completed
Université de Liège
Liège, 4000
- Recruiting
Maison médicale Neptune
Schaarbeek, 1030
Julie Gosuin, MD
Anais Bosefe, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Participation Trials: Increase in Response by Offering Self-sampling Devices in Belgian GP Practices to Non-screened Women
Small scale data indicate that cervical cancer screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of a SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.
BELGSSAR will also investigate whether GP's have the information on the most important risk factors for cervical cancer available in their patient files.
Read the detailed description
Screening with clinically validated high-risk (hr) HPV tests is more effective in reducing cervical cancer incidence than cytology. Another advantage of hrHPV testing is that it can be performed on self-samples whereas cytology on self-samples shows poor clinical accuracy. hrHPV DNA testing on vaginal self-samples is as accurate on self- as on clinician-taken samples under the condition to use clinically validated PCR-based assays that target DNA sequences of the viral genome.
Offering kits for vaginal self-sampling is more effective than conventional invitations / reminders sent to under-screened women to have a cervical specimen taken by a clinician. Small scale data indicate that screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.
Risk based cervical cancer screening takes risk factors into account to differentiate screening policies. GPs have knowledge of these risk factors. Demonstration of the knowledge of these risk factors from GP's patient files will be demonstrated through the BELGSSAR trials.
Two self-sampling methods will be used in BELGSSAR:
- vaginal self-sampling using the Evalyn® Brush (Roovers, Oss, NL) and
- first-void urine collection with the Colli-PeeTM (Novosanis, Wijnegem, BE). Depending on the GP practice, collection will take place at home or at the GP office (predefined by the respective GP). The inclusion of urine collection is motivated by the possible lower threshold for women who dislike genital examinations.
The following hypotheses will be investigated:
- Participation in cervical cancer screening is substantially higher when a GP offers a self-sampling kit compared to control interventions.
- Risk factors for cervical cancer can be identified accurately from GP's patient files.
To test these hypotheses, a two-arm participation trial will be conducted in eight GP practices in Belgium, spread over four locations (Ghent, Leuven, Brussels and Liège). In each GP practice the enrolled patients will be randomized to one of the two study arms.
In the experimental arms (Arm 1), the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope.
Women in the control group (Arm 2) will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test.
Double blinding of patient and investigator is not possible, because the participants will be aware to which study arm they belong when they receive or offer the self-sample.
All samples collected under the experimental arms will be handled and tested for presence of hrHPV types at the AML laboratory in Antwerp. AML is the national reference laboratory for HPV for Belgium. The used HPV assay will be the RIATOL qPCR, that detects E6/E7 HPV genes, with measurement of type-specific viral load of all high-risk HPV types. This test is clinically validated for HPV-based cervical cancer screening. The tests performed in the control arm will be processed in the laboratories connected with the respective GP practices.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- ColliPee
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, self sampling kit, general practicioners, ColliPee, Evalyn Brush
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ColliPeeDevice
Also called Evalyn Brush
The GP will hand over the self-sampling kit to the women, after obtaining informed consent, and the women then takes the self sample at home or in the doctor's office (predefined), according to the respective users manual.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | In the experimental arms, the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope. Receives: Device: ColliPee |
| control | No intervention | Women in the control group will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in response between intervention and control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]).
Difference in response in women included in the self-sampling arms vs the control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]).
The absolute difference in response rate = proportion with screening test in experimental arm - proportion with screening test in control arm, within 6 months after enrolment.
In the PP analysis only women with a screening test on the self-sample according to the specific experimental intervention will be taken into account, whereas in the ITT analysis all screening tests performed within 6 months after enrolment will be considered (also those performed on samples taken by a clinician).
Measured: 2 years and 4 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Absolute response rates in each arm and each GP practice
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
Heterogeneity in response rate differences, over the eight GP practices (assessed by the Cochran Q test for heterogeneity)
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
net difference in response rate between practices offering vaginal self-sampling devices vs offering urine collection devices • Difference in response between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
net difference in response rate between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
Screen test positivity rate (by arm [PP and ITT], GP intervention)
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
Attitude/preferences of women towards self-sampling (assessed through a questionnaire)
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
Presence of information on risk factors
Measured: 2 years and 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2021
- Study start19 Apr 2021
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sciensano
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Horizon 2020 - European Commission
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04903561
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sciensano_2021_001
- Acronym
- BELGSSAR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 20 May 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Participation Trials: Increase in Response by Offering Self-sampling Devices in Belgian GP Practices to Non-screened Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04903561
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BELGSSAR / Sciensano_2021_001
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, self sampling kit, general practicioners, ColliPee, Evalyn Brush
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- SciensanoOther government
- Collaborators
- Horizon 2020 - European Commission
- Study start
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Small scale data indicate that cervical cancer screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of a SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.
BELGSSAR will also investigate whether GP's have the information on the most important risk factors for cervical cancer available in their patient files.
Detailed description
Screening with clinically validated high-risk (hr) HPV tests is more effective in reducing cervical cancer incidence than cytology. Another advantage of hrHPV testing is that it can be performed on self-samples whereas cytology on self-samples shows poor clinical accuracy. hrHPV DNA testing on vaginal self-samples is as accurate on self- as on clinician-taken samples under the condition to use clinically validated PCR-based assays that target DNA sequences of the viral genome.
Offering kits for vaginal self-sampling is more effective than conventional invitations / reminders sent to under-screened women to have a cervical specimen taken by a clinician. Small scale data indicate that screening participation may increase when self-sampling (SS) devices are offered directly by health care workers to non-screened woman, when those woman contact health services for whatever reason. The purpose of the current research is to reproduce the early findings of a MSc project conducted in a general practitioners (GP) group practice in Brussels, where women not screened since >3 years randomized to direct reception of SS kit yielded a response of 78% vs 51% in the control arm.
Risk based cervical cancer screening takes risk factors into account to differentiate screening policies. GPs have knowledge of these risk factors. Demonstration of the knowledge of these risk factors from GP's patient files will be demonstrated through the BELGSSAR trials.
Two self-sampling methods will be used in BELGSSAR:
- vaginal self-sampling using the Evalyn® Brush (Roovers, Oss, NL) and
- first-void urine collection with the Colli-PeeTM (Novosanis, Wijnegem, BE). Depending on the GP practice, collection will take place at home or at the GP office (predefined by the respective GP). The inclusion of urine collection is motivated by the possible lower threshold for women who dislike genital examinations.
The following hypotheses will be investigated:
- Participation in cervical cancer screening is substantially higher when a GP offers a self-sampling kit compared to control interventions.
- Risk factors for cervical cancer can be identified accurately from GP's patient files.
To test these hypotheses, a two-arm participation trial will be conducted in eight GP practices in Belgium, spread over four locations (Ghent, Leuven, Brussels and Liège). In each GP practice the enrolled patients will be randomized to one of the two study arms.
In the experimental arms (Arm 1), the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope.
Women in the control group (Arm 2) will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test.
Double blinding of patient and investigator is not possible, because the participants will be aware to which study arm they belong when they receive or offer the self-sample.
All samples collected under the experimental arms will be handled and tested for presence of hrHPV types at the AML laboratory in Antwerp. AML is the national reference laboratory for HPV for Belgium. The used HPV assay will be the RIATOL qPCR, that detects E6/E7 HPV genes, with measurement of type-specific viral load of all high-risk HPV types. This test is clinically validated for HPV-based cervical cancer screening. The tests performed in the control arm will be processed in the laboratories connected with the respective GP practices.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Device: ColliPeeIn the experimental arms, the woman will be asked to collect a vaginal sample with the Evalyn® Brush or a urine sample with the Colli-PeeTM. Women shall receive this self-sampling device directly from the GP or shall pick it up at a close by pharmacist with a prescription of the GP. In four GP practices (1, 2, 5, 6) the patient has to collect the SS preferentially in the GP practice (at home if the GP practice is not well equipped) whereas in the other four GP practices (3, 4, 7, 8), the patient has to collect the SS at home and send it to the laboratory by using a prepaid envelope. |
| control | No intervention | –Women in the control group will receive an oral recommendation given by the GP with a reminder of the current screening policy to have a cervical sample taken by a physician chosen by the woman. This clinician-taken cervical sample will be sent to a laboratory for processing with the usual screening test. Today the usual screening test still is cytology, but this will change in the future (date to be defined) to an HPV test. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 64 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- women who have not been screened for cervical cancer since the last three years
- visiting their GP for whatever reason
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pregnant women,
- women under active follow-up because of previous cervical abnormality,
- women who had a total hysterectomy,
- women who had a history of cervical cancer or a treatment for cervical precancer less than three years ago,
- non-consenting women,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ColliPeeAlso: Evalyn BrushThe GP will hand over the self-sampling kit to the women, after obtaining informed consent, and the women then takes the self sample at home or in the doctor's office (predefined), according to the respective users manual. | Device | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Difference in response between intervention and control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]).
Time frame: 2 years and 4 months
Difference in response in women included in the self-sampling arms vs the control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]). The absolute difference in response rate = proportion with screening test in experimental arm - proportion with screening test in control arm, within 6 months after enrolment. In the PP analysis only women with a screening test on the self-sample according to the specific experimental intervention will be taken into account, whereas in the ITT analysis all screening tests performed within 6 months after enrolment will be considered (also those performed on samples taken by a clinician).
7 secondary outcomes
Absolute response rates in each arm and each GP practice
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
Heterogeneity in response rate differences, over the eight GP practices (assessed by the Cochran Q test for heterogeneity)
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
net difference in response rate between practices offering vaginal self-sampling devices vs offering urine collection devices • Difference in response between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
net difference in response rate between practices offering self-sampling collection at the GP's office vs at home.
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
Screen test positivity rate (by arm [PP and ITT], GP intervention)
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
Attitude/preferences of women towards self-sampling (assessed through a questionnaire)
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
Presence of information on risk factors
Time frame: 2 years and 7 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Dual Energy CT - a Tool for Delineation of Tumor and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Vaginal Microbiome and HPV Pre-malignant and Cervical Dysplasia
Human Papilloma Virus, Vaginal Flora Imbalance
Recruiting
Hydrogel Spacer During Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Circulating Tumor DNA MRD-Guided Adjuvant Therapy for Curatively Resected Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ColliPee in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Sciensano at 3 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marc Arbyn, MD (+32 2 642 50 21, marc.arbyn@sciensano.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in response between intervention and control arm (per protocol (PP) and intention to treat analyses [ITT]). (time frame: 2 years and 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2023.