Surgical Wound InfectionNCT04906642
Clinical Assessment of Next Science Solution on Gustilo and Anderson Type II and IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures
A study testing Next Science in people with Surgical Wound Infection, run by Next Science TM at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical feasibility study of subjects that are being treated for Gustilo and Anderson Type II or IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Wound Infection
- What is being tested?
- Next Science
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 May 2021to 1 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female 18 to 65 years old
- Scheduled to undergo surgery to repair open tibial fracture
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Provide signed and dated informed consent or obtain consent from legally authorized representative
- Not be pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or nursing female subjects.
Who cannot join
- Unable to provide signed and dated informed consent or unable to obtain consent from a legally authorized representative
- Unable or unwilling to comply with all study-related procedures
- Known history of allergic reaction to any of the study products or its components, including any products used for standard of care (such as dressings or any coverings)
- Subject has known history of contraindications to general anesthesia
- Subject with any underlying condition or state that, in the investigator's opinion, will make them too critically ill to complete 30 and/or 90 day follow ups
- Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or nursing female subjects.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Any subject positive for Covid-19 virus at time of surgical screening
- Tibial plateau, pilon, or Gustilo-Anderson type IIIc fractures and any fracture that will require referral to another surgical service will be excluded from this study
- Any patient who will require ongoing use of NPWT after hospital discharge will be excluded from the study.
- Subjects have evidence of prolonged QT segment, per EKG.
- Subjects from a vulnerable population, in accordance with 45 CFR 46 Subparts B, C, and D
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Piedmont Healthcare
Columbus, Georgia, 31901
About this study
Official title: Clinical Assessment of How Next Science XPERIENCE No Rinse Antimicrobial Solution May Promote Wound Healing by Decreasing Post-Operative Infections in Gustilo and Anderson Type II and IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical feasibility study of subjects that are being treated for Gustilo and Anderson Type II or IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, controlled, double-arm, double-blinded, randomized clinical study of 30 subjects that are undergoing single stage surgical repair of Type II or IIIA or IIIB tibial fractures.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required before the site can begin enrolling patients. Additionally, protocol amendments need to be approved by the IRB prior to starting any changes or procedures stemming from the amended protocol. Potentially eligible patients will be offered study enrollment and all subjects are required to participate in the informed consent process and sign the most recent IRB-approved written informed consent document prior to being enrolled in the study. If all the study inclusion/exclusion criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable subjects' rights and safety regulations. Reconsenting procedures for cases of protocol amendments will be performed in compliance with the IRB.
Patients who present for open tibial fracture repair surgery will have a pre-op medical evaluation prior to being screened against the protocol's inclusion/exclusion criteria. If criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study, and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable participants' rights and safety regulations. At the time of surgery, participants determined to require surgical repair of a Type IIIC tibial fracture will be excluded. Patients who continue to be eligible meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of surgery will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms: SOC with Saline or SOC plus Next Science treatment. The treatment assignment will be predetermined by a randomization plan within Castor Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. Although, paper source documents will be used to obtain subject data, randomization will be primarily through the EDC system. As a back-up, should the EDC system be unavailable at that time, randomization will occur using a sealed envelope system.
The following must have occurred prior to determining treatment assignment:
- Screening
- Participant must meet all eligibility requirements
- Informed Consent must be signed
- Continued Eligibility screening
- Randomization must occur*
- Randomization occurs prior to surgery based on Exclusion #8. If the index fractures are bilateral, right leg will be randomized while the other leg will be assigned to the opposite treatment arm to prevent dosing of identical products on one subject.
Once surgical evaluation occurs if the index fracture is determined to be Type II, IIIA or IIIB (that does not require referral to another surgical service [vascular, plastic surgery] ) then the subject will continue to dosing. If the index fracture(s) must receive additional surgical referrals they will not be dosed, considered a screen failure, and exited from the study.
If the patient fails to meet continued eligibility:
- Screen Failure and
- Study Exit forms must be completed.
Accurate recording of the information per section 9.3 is critical for the traceability of treatment and product to a participant.
The duration of each subjects' participation once eligible and approved to start treatment, will start from Day 1 (first index surgery) and end at the Day 90 Visit. On-site visits will be carried out at Screening/Enrollment; Day of Surgery; Day of Discharge; and Days 14, 30, and 90; consisting of safety, bone healing (via X-ray findings), bioburden assessment, and surgical site infection assessment questions.
The key parameters of the study include bioburden and surgical site infection assessment, re-admission assessment, serious adverse events, and healthcare cost impact.
Bacterial identification and quantification will be evaluated via two methods: PCR/NGS (according to this protocol) and microbiology/pathology (according to site SOC). PCR/NGS swabs will be taken after fracture fixation inside the wound and then around the closed surgical incision:
- After fracture fixation (deep tissue): Swabs will be performed right after fracture fixation, before blinded rinse, and then immediately after blinded irrigation. The swabs will be performed on the entire wound base and around the fixation device. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
- After closed surgical incision (superficial): After final closure, swabs will be taken within the 1-2cm perimeter surrounding the entire incision. This will be repeated on the day of discharge. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Infection
- Being tested
- Next Science, Standard of Care
- Keywords
- Open tibial fracture, Surgical Site Infection, Surgical Irrigation, Single Stage Closure
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Next ScienceDevice
Solution is a clear, colorless, aqueous solution that is used to remove debris, including microorganisms, from wounds via hydrodynamic shear across the wound. This aids in the removal of foreign material such as, microorganisms, dirt, and debris.
Standard of CareOther
Normal Saline will be used in place of Next Science for irrigation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Active comparator | Each of the following procedures will be conducted according to general or local site Standard of Care (SoC):
* Medication administration at surgery
* Surgical irrigation and wound debridement
* Surgical fracture preparation/fixation
* Surgical closure Receives: Other: Standard of Care |
| Standard of Care plus Next Science | Experimental | In addition to the SoC, the blinded product will be applied in place of saline irrigation as the wound is closed (after bone fracture preparation/fixation), depending on the randomization. Receives: Device: Next Science |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical Site Infection
Proportion of subjects that develop a surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space) from surgery to post-op Day 90 for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Superficial Bioburden
Mean change in bioburden around the closed incision, as evaluated via PCR/NGS, from baseline to Day of Discharge for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group.
Measured: 90 days
Deep Bioburden
Mean change in bioburden from the deep tissue immediately after fixation around the fixation site, as evaluated via PCR/NGS, before and after use of the blinded product for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2021
- Study start4 May 2021
- Primary completion5 Jul 2023
- Study completion1 Sep 2023
Why it stopped: low patient enrollment, less-than-ideal patient sample for the study, leading to a significant number of missed scheduled study visits, inefficient study data, and reallocation of finances.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Surgical Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical study
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Next Science TM
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Piedmont Healthcare, Hughston Clinic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert Harris, MD, Principal investigator, Piedmont Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04906642
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CSP-018
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 26 May 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Assessment of How Next Science XPERIENCE No Rinse Antimicrobial Solution May Promote Wound Healing by Decreasing Post-Operative Infections in Gustilo and Anderson Type II and IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04906642
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSP-018
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Infection
- Keywords
- Open tibial fracture, Surgical Site Infection, Surgical Irrigation, Single Stage Closure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: low patient enrollment, less-than-ideal patient sample for the study, leading to a significant number of missed scheduled study visits, inefficient study data, and reallocation of finances.
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Next Science TMIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Piedmont Healthcare, Hughston Clinic
- Study start
- 4 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical feasibility study of subjects that are being treated for Gustilo and Anderson Type II or IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures
Detailed description
This is a prospective, controlled, double-arm, double-blinded, randomized clinical study of 30 subjects that are undergoing single stage surgical repair of Type II or IIIA or IIIB tibial fractures.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required before the site can begin enrolling patients. Additionally, protocol amendments need to be approved by the IRB prior to starting any changes or procedures stemming from the amended protocol. Potentially eligible patients will be offered study enrollment and all subjects are required to participate in the informed consent process and sign the most recent IRB-approved written informed consent document prior to being enrolled in the study. If all the study inclusion/exclusion criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable subjects' rights and safety regulations. Reconsenting procedures for cases of protocol amendments will be performed in compliance with the IRB.
Patients who present for open tibial fracture repair surgery will have a pre-op medical evaluation prior to being screened against the protocol's inclusion/exclusion criteria. If criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study, and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable participants' rights and safety regulations. At the time of surgery, participants determined to require surgical repair of a Type IIIC tibial fracture will be excluded. Patients who continue to be eligible meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of surgery will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms: SOC with Saline or SOC plus Next Science treatment. The treatment assignment will be predetermined by a randomization plan within Castor Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. Although, paper source documents will be used to obtain subject data, randomization will be primarily through the EDC system. As a back-up, should the EDC system be unavailable at that time, randomization will occur using a sealed envelope system.
The following must have occurred prior to determining treatment assignment:
- Screening
- Participant must meet all eligibility requirements
- Informed Consent must be signed
- Continued Eligibility screening
- Randomization must occur*
- Randomization occurs prior to surgery based on Exclusion #8. If the index fractures are bilateral, right leg will be randomized while the other leg will be assigned to the opposite treatment arm to prevent dosing of identical products on one subject.
Once surgical evaluation occurs if the index fracture is determined to be Type II, IIIA or IIIB (that does not require referral to another surgical service [vascular, plastic surgery] ) then the subject will continue to dosing. If the index fracture(s) must receive additional surgical referrals they will not be dosed, considered a screen failure, and exited from the study.
If the patient fails to meet continued eligibility:
- Screen Failure and
- Study Exit forms must be completed.
Accurate recording of the information per section 9.3 is critical for the traceability of treatment and product to a participant.
The duration of each subjects' participation once eligible and approved to start treatment, will start from Day 1 (first index surgery) and end at the Day 90 Visit. On-site visits will be carried out at Screening/Enrollment; Day of Surgery; Day of Discharge; and Days 14, 30, and 90; consisting of safety, bone healing (via X-ray findings), bioburden assessment, and surgical site infection assessment questions.
The key parameters of the study include bioburden and surgical site infection assessment, re-admission assessment, serious adverse events, and healthcare cost impact.
Bacterial identification and quantification will be evaluated via two methods: PCR/NGS (according to this protocol) and microbiology/pathology (according to site SOC). PCR/NGS swabs will be taken after fracture fixation inside the wound and then around the closed surgical incision:
- After fracture fixation (deep tissue): Swabs will be performed right after fracture fixation, before blinded rinse, and then immediately after blinded irrigation. The swabs will be performed on the entire wound base and around the fixation device. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
- After closed surgical incision (superficial): After final closure, swabs will be taken within the 1-2cm perimeter surrounding the entire incision. This will be repeated on the day of discharge. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Active comparator | Other: Standard of CareEach of the following procedures will be conducted according to general or local site Standard of Care (SoC): * Medication administration at surgery * Surgical irrigation and wound debridement * Surgical fracture preparation/fixation * Surgical closure |
| Standard of Care plus Next Science | Experimental | Device: Next ScienceIn addition to the SoC, the blinded product will be applied in place of saline irrigation as the wound is closed (after bone fracture preparation/fixation), depending on the randomization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female 18 to 65 years old
- Scheduled to undergo surgery to repair open tibial fracture
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Provide signed and dated informed consent or obtain consent from legally authorized representative
- Not be pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or nursing female subjects.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Unable to provide signed and dated informed consent or unable to obtain consent from a legally authorized representative
- Unable or unwilling to comply with all study-related procedures
- Known history of allergic reaction to any of the study products or its components, including any products used for standard of care (such as dressings or any coverings)
- Subject has known history of contraindications to general anesthesia
- Subject with any underlying condition or state that, in the investigator's opinion, will make them too critically ill to complete 30 and/or 90 day follow ups
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Next ScienceSolution is a clear, colorless, aqueous solution that is used to remove debris, including microorganisms, from wounds via hydrodynamic shear across the wound. This aids in the removal of foreign material such as, microorganisms, dirt, and debris. | Device | Standard of Care plus Next Science |
| Standard of CareNormal Saline will be used in place of Next Science for irrigation | Other | Standard of Care |
Primary outcome
Surgical Site Infection
Time frame: 90 days
Proportion of subjects that develop a surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space) from surgery to post-op Day 90 for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group.
2 secondary outcomes
Superficial Bioburden
Time frame: 90 days
Deep Bioburden
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: low patient enrollment, less-than-ideal patient sample for the study, leading to a significant number of missed scheduled study visits, inefficient study data, and reallocation of finances.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Integrating Next Generation Sequencing for Treatment of Surgical Site Infection After Fracture Fixation:
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Harris, MD principal investigator
Piedmont Healthcare
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Next Science in people with Surgical Wound Infection, run by Next Science TM at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: low patient enrollment, less-than-ideal patient sample for the study, leading to a significant number of missed scheduled study visits, inefficient study data, and reallocation of finances.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical Site Infection (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2023.