AzTrials
AzTrials

Necrotizing EnterocolitisNCT04912453

Primary Anastomosis Versus Enterostomy in the Surgical Treatment of Necrotising Enterocolitis

A study testing Primary anastomosis and Enterostomy in people with Necrotizing Enterocolitis, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating disease that affects the intestine of premature infants and is the most common surgical emergency in newborns. It is estimated that up to 10% of premature babies can suffer from this condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 30 days
Conditions the study is for
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
What is being tested?
Primary anastomosis and Enterostomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jul 2021to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 30 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All neonates with confirmed NEC and require surgical intervention will be included

Who cannot join

  • Neonates found to have NEC totalis and deemed unsalvageable;
  • Neonates found to have multiple sites of gangrenous bowels which require more than two anastomoses;
  • Neonates found to be extremely unstable cardiovascularly intra-operatively and can only withstand excision of gangrenous bowels, but will not allow anastomosis or stoma creation;
  • Parents who do not agree to participate in the study
  • Neonates found to have pathology other than NEC after recruitment (either on intraoperative findings or pathological findings on surgical specimens).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Adrian Fung, MBBS contact

+85222554850

fungchiheng@gmail.com

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong, 0000

    Adrian Fung, MBBS, +85222554850, fungchiheng@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Primary Anastomosis Versus Enterostomy in the Surgical Treatment of Necrotising Enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating disease that affects the intestine of premature infants and is the most common surgical emergency in newborns. It is estimated that up to 10% of premature babies can suffer from this condition. Despite aggressive medical treatment, surgical intervention is necessary in up half of the cases for bowel necrosis or perforation and these often represent the more severe form of the disease. The advances in neonatal intensive care and surgical knowledge have resulted in improved survival rate in recent years.

For NEC patients with severe disease (i.e.) those with intestinal perforation or gangrenous bowel not responding to medical therapy, surgery with resection of diseased segments is the treatment of choice. Traditional surgical approach would be to resect the diseased bowel segment with formation of enterostomy. However, in a few advanced centres, primary anastomosis after the resection of diseased bowel segment is practised. Retrospective reports of the primary anastomosis approach have shown that this is also a viable option with no increased rate of peri-operative morbidity. It also has the advantage of avoiding a second operation for enterostomy closure. Nonetheless, prospective studies comparing the two approaches are lacking.

Read more

The proposed study will fill up the following knowledge gap on what the best surgical option for NEC at laparotomy is. The findings will help guide our practice for NEC patients in the future in order to provide them with the best possible and evidence-based care.

In this study, the investigators hypothesize that neonates with major NEC undergoing primary anastomosis after surgical resection is not inferior to neonates who have enterostomy, in terms of peri-operative morbidities.

Aim of the study is to compare the short term and medium term outcomes of NEC patients requiring surgical intervention who either receive primary anastomosis or enterostomy creation.

Being tested
Primary anastomosis, Enterostomy
Keywords
Necrotizing Enterocolitis, Neonatal surgery, Primary anastomosis, Enterostomy
Medical subject headings
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Primary anastomosisProcedure or surgery

    At laparotomy, the diseased segment of intestine will be resected and the patients will then receive primary anastomosis

  • EnterostomyProcedure or surgery

    At laparotomy, the diseased segment of intestine will be resected and the patients will then receive enterostomy

Study groups in NCT04912453
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary anastomosis groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Primary anastomosis
Enterostomy groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Enterostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Re-operation rate of the two surgical approaches

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Wound-related problems

    Wound problems not requiring re-operations e.g. wound infection; stomal prolapse; incisional hernia

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Time to full enteral feeding

    Time needed (in term of days) to achieve full enteral feeding (defined as 150ml/kg/day) and stoppage of parenteral feeding

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
All neonates with confirmed NEC and require surgical intervention will be included. This is a local multi-centre study and neonates from the three centres which perform neonatal surgery will participate. At laparotomy, the diseased segment of intestine will be resected and the patients will then receive either primary anastomosis or enterostomy according to randomisation done pre-operatively.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04912453
Sponsor's protocol ID
NECHKTrial
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
28 May 2021
Last updated
11 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Primary anastomosis and Enterostomy in people with Necrotizing Enterocolitis, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Adrian Fung, MBBS (+85222554850, fungchiheng@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Re-operation rate of the two surgical approaches (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in