Rectal CancerIMMUNOREACT2NCT04917263
IMMUNOlogical Microenvironment in REctal Adenocarcinoma Treatment.
An observational study of Rectal Cancer, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Background The current management on rectal cancer based on TNM staging has some limitations. In locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy the persistence of a complete response to therapy cannot be accurately predicted by the simple tumor regression grade. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis
- How many people
- 544 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: We aim to analyze 66 patients with pathological complete response and 66 patients without complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Given an expected proportion of 20% of patients with complete response, we estimate to enroll a total number of 66/0.20=330 patients with early rectal cancer. However, we will performed flow cytometry, transcriptomic analysis, mRNA microarray and mutational profiling only in 132 patients (66 patients with complete response and 66 patients without complete response) in order to test the non-inferiority of AUC. Taking into account a 15-20% of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and a maximum of 7 prognostic factors (including markers and clinical factors) in the model, we aim to enroll 412 patients in this part of the study.
Who may be able to join
- locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+, TNM stage II-III) low and medium rectal cancer (<11 cm) or low rectum adenocarcinoma cT≤2, at risk for abdominoperineal amputation, undergoing neoadjuvant therapy will be included in the study group.
- Only neoadjuvant therapy protocols including long course radiotherapy (45 Gy) and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens will be included while short radiation therapy of radiation therapy or chemotherapy alone will be excluded
- at least 6 weeks after the end of the neoadjuvant therapy will be included
- Full availability of clinical records at least 1 year of follow up
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova
Padova, 35128
Marco Scarpa, MD, PhD, #39 049 821 2055, marco.scarpa@aopd.veneto.it
About this study
Official title: IMMUNOlogical Microenvironment in REctal Adenocarcinoma Treatment. Predictors of Sustained Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo/Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Background The current management on rectal cancer based on TNM staging has some limitations. In locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy the persistence of a complete response to therapy cannot be accurately predicted by the simple tumor regression grade. The current guidelines recommend the complete rectal resection with a total mesorectal excision. The implications for patients' quality of life are evident even in case of sphincter sparing surgery. Moreover, in both cases the cancer sample available for the analysis can be small or inexistent. Hypothesis The main hypothesis underlying our research is that the aggressiveness of rectal cancer is determined by the complex interactions between the malignant cells and their immune microenvironment. The second hypothesis is that relevant trace of this cross talk between tumor cells and immune microenvironment can be detected in the normal mucosa surrounding the cancer according to the concept of field cancerization.
Aims The aim of this project is to analyze the healthy rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer to identify traces of immunosurveillance mechanisms and of field cancerization and to use them to obtain a composite prognostic test to predict recurrence after complete response at neoadjuvant therapy in case of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Experimental Design This prognostic test will be constructed on the combinatory analysis of the transcriptome, immune and epithelial cells cross-talk, immune checkpoints and miRNA expression in normal rectal mucosa surrounding cancer. The project aim is to identify, among locally advanced rectal cancer, those with sustained complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. The study is articulated in two steps. In step A, we will retrospectively analyze archival tissue samples in order to identify the most performing biomarkers; in step B, we will validate the prognostic performance of the markers identified in phase I through a prospective analysis of rectal mucosa specimen.
Read the detailed description
Locally advanced rectal cancer: which treatment after complete response after neoadjuvant therapy? Combined treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer achieves a 5-year overall survival close to90% [15]. This multimodal approach can be also applied to elderly patients with stage III rectal cancer obtaining improved oncological outcomes [16]. Some patients with rectal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) and may be eligible for less radical surgery or non-operative management [17]. Moreover, complete regression of the rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy have been confirmed by clinical and radiographic evaluation-this is known as complete clinical response (cCR). The "watch and wait" approach was first proposed by Dr. Angelita Habr-Gama in Brazil in 2009. Those patients with cCR are followed with rigorousphysical, endoscopical, and imaging surveillance [18]. Several studies aimed to identify variables that predict pCR after nCRT for rectal cancer. A large retrospective review of the NCDB performed from 2006 to 2011, including a total of 23,747 patients identified the clinical factors associated with pCR. They were lower tumor grade, lower clinical T and N stage, higher radiation dose, and delaying surgery by more than 6-8weeks after the end of radiation, while lack of health insurance was linked with a lower likelihood of pCR [17]. Another study identified predictive factors in the models included tumor length, tumor circumferential extent, age, and ApoA1 [19]. A different study showed that responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation had a lower incidence of cytokeratin 20 positive circulating tumor cells compared to non-responders, which might be a result of effective systemic and local treatment prior to surgery [20]. Finally, the role of immune microenvironment was investigated analyzing Foxp3(+), CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+) and IL-17(+) cell density in post-CRT surgical samples from 128 patients with rectal cancer. Stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was strongly associated with tumor regression grade. A low stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was observed in 84% of patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) compared to41% of patients who did not. Low stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was also associated with improved recurrence-free survival. Regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment may inhibit response to neoadjuvant CRT and may represent a therapeutic target in rectal cancer [21].
Hypotheses and Specific aims The main hypothesis underlying our research is that aggressiveness of rectal cancer is determined by the complex interactions between the malignant cells and the local immune microenvironment. Our hypothesis is that the local immune activation may involve the "healthy" rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer and the sampling of this mucosa may provide useful information about rectal cancer behavior. In fact, a combination of different factors, including molecular signaling networks (i.e. checkpoint genes) within different cell population, presence of soluble chemical factors and quantity/quality of immune cells infiltrate will decide rectal cancer behavior and its response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Moreover, tumor cells actively interact with the microenvironment secreting and degrading extracellular matrix components, and the release of soluble molecules (e.g. miRNA) can significantly influence the inflammatory and immune responses of the "healthy" rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer. By using state of the art histological/molecular/immunological markers and bio-statistical analysis tools we aim to identify clinically relevant molecular targets to design effective therapeutic strategies for rectal cancer patients.
Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify a prognostic test that accurately predicts rectal cancer behavior even in case when the tumor samples are scarce (due to small size of early rectal cancer) or absent (in case of complete response to therapy). This prognostic test will be constructed on the combinatory analysis of the transcriptome, immune cells activation and checkpoints, epithelial cells activity as antigen presenting cells and miRNA expression in normal tissue specimens of prospectively collected rectal cancers. The question is how to identify, among locally advanced rectal cancer, those with immediate and sustained complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. These patients might safely avoid a low rectal resection with all the consequences for their quality of life. In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (N+) an ideal biomarker should be able to identify the cohort of patients that will have a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and will not require further treatments.
Study design Tissue samples will be obtained from cancer tissue (if possible) and from normal rectal mucosa adjacent to the cancer at surgery. The very large number of patients need to answer the two questions imply a multicentric design. Complete medical record and follow-up will be collected from each center. The analysis will be centralized mostly in Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova. The study will be articulated in two parts each of them aiming to answer to one of the above described questions. Each part of the study will be articulated in a retrospective and exploratory step (A) and in a prospective validation step (B).
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis
- Keywords
- rectal cancer, complete response, neoadjuvant therapy, immune surveillance
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms, Pathologic Complete Response
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysisDiagnostic test
we will perform immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, transcriptomic analysis, mRNA microarray and mutational profiling
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis | |
| Prospective | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pathological complete response on the operative specimen
pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
Measured: first post operative month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Padova
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Azienda Ulss 2 Marca Trevigiana
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marco Scarpa, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Clinica Chirurgica I, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04917263
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AIRC IG2019 23381 IMMUNOREACT2
- Acronym
- IMMUNOREACT2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Becherucci G, Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Scognamiglio F, Stepanyan A, Maretto I, Kotsafti A, De Simoni O, Pilati P, Franzato B, Scapinello A, Bergamo F, Massani M, Stecca T, Pozza A, Cataldo I, Brignola S, Pellegrini V, Fassan M, Guzzardo V, Dal Santo L, Salmaso R, Carlotta C, Dei Tos AP, Angriman I, Spolverato G, Chiminazzo V, Negro S, Vignotto C, Marchegiani F, Facci L, Rivella G, Bao QR, Baldo A, Pucciarelli S, Zizzo M, Businello G, Salmaso B, Parini D, Pirozzolo G, Recordare A, Tagliente G, Bordignon G, Merenda R, Licia L, Pozza G, Godina M, Mondi I, Verdi D, Da Lio C, Guerriero S, Piccioli A, Portale G, Zuin M, Cipollari C, Noaro G, Cola R, Candioli S, Gavagna L, Ricagna F, Ortenzi M, Guerrieri M, Tomassi M, Tedeschi U, Marinelli L, Barbareschi M, Bertalot G, Brolese A, Ceccarini L, Antoniutti M, Porzionato A, Agostini M, Cavallin F, Tussardi G, Di Camillo B, Bardini R, Castagliuolo I, Scarpa M. IMMUNOREACT 8: Immune markers of local tumor spread in patients undergoing transanal excision for clinically N0 rectal cancer. Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108902. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.043. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
PubMed 39572264Spolverato G, Fassan M, Scarpa M, Stepanyan A, De Simoni O, Scognamiglio F, Chiminazzo V, De Nardi C, Tamponi G, Negro S, Angriman I, Kotsafti A, Ruffolo C, Vignotto C, Zizzo M, Marchegiani F, Facci L, Bergamo F, Brignola S, Businello G, Guzzardo V, Dal Santo L, Salmaso R, Ceccon C, Massani M, Pozza A, Cataldo I, Stecca T, Dei Tos AP, Zagonel V, Pilati P, Franzato B, Scapinello A, Pirozzolo G, Recordare A, Merenda R, Bordignon G, Laurino L, Guerriero S, Romiti C, Portale G, Cipollari C, Candioli S, Gavagna L, Pozza G, Godina M, Mondi I, Noaro G, Ortenzi M, Guerrieri M, Tagliente G, Tomassi M, Tedeschi U, Porzionato A, Agostini M, Maretto I, Bao QR, Cavallin F, Di Camillo B, Bardini R, Castagliuolo I, Pucciarelli S, Scarpa M; IMMUNOREACT Study Group. IMMUNOREACT 6: weak immune surveillance characterizes early-onset rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1490-1501. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad219.
PubMed 37478362
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IMMUNOlogical Microenvironment in REctal Adenocarcinoma Treatment. Predictors of Sustained Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo/Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04917263
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMMUNOREACT2 / AIRC IG2019 23381 IMMUNOREACT2
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- rectal cancer, complete response, neoadjuvant therapy, immune surveillance
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PadovaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Azienda Ulss 2 Marca Trevigiana
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background The current management on rectal cancer based on TNM staging has some limitations. In locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy the persistence of a complete response to therapy cannot be accurately predicted by the simple tumor regression grade. The current guidelines recommend the complete rectal resection with a total mesorectal excision. The implications for patients' quality of life are evident even in case of sphincter sparing surgery. Moreover, in both cases the cancer sample available for the analysis can be small or inexistent. Hypothesis The main hypothesis underlying our research is that the aggressiveness of rectal cancer is determined by the complex interactions between the malignant cells and their immune microenvironment. The second hypothesis is that relevant trace of this cross talk between tumor cells and immune microenvironment can be detected in the normal mucosa surrounding the cancer according to the concept of field cancerization.
Aims The aim of this project is to analyze the healthy rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer to identify traces of immunosurveillance mechanisms and of field cancerization and to use them to obtain a composite prognostic test to predict recurrence after complete response at neoadjuvant therapy in case of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Experimental Design This prognostic test will be constructed on the combinatory analysis of the transcriptome, immune and epithelial cells cross-talk, immune checkpoints and miRNA expression in normal rectal mucosa surrounding cancer. The project aim is to identify, among locally advanced rectal cancer, those with sustained complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. The study is articulated in two steps. In step A, we will retrospectively analyze archival tissue samples in order to identify the most performing biomarkers; in step B, we will validate the prognostic performance of the markers identified in phase I through a prospective analysis of rectal mucosa specimen.
Detailed description
Locally advanced rectal cancer: which treatment after complete response after neoadjuvant therapy? Combined treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer achieves a 5-year overall survival close to90% [15]. This multimodal approach can be also applied to elderly patients with stage III rectal cancer obtaining improved oncological outcomes [16]. Some patients with rectal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) and may be eligible for less radical surgery or non-operative management [17]. Moreover, complete regression of the rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy have been confirmed by clinical and radiographic evaluation-this is known as complete clinical response (cCR). The "watch and wait" approach was first proposed by Dr. Angelita Habr-Gama in Brazil in 2009. Those patients with cCR are followed with rigorousphysical, endoscopical, and imaging surveillance [18]. Several studies aimed to identify variables that predict pCR after nCRT for rectal cancer. A large retrospective review of the NCDB performed from 2006 to 2011, including a total of 23,747 patients identified the clinical factors associated with pCR. They were lower tumor grade, lower clinical T and N stage, higher radiation dose, and delaying surgery by more than 6-8weeks after the end of radiation, while lack of health insurance was linked with a lower likelihood of pCR [17]. Another study identified predictive factors in the models included tumor length, tumor circumferential extent, age, and ApoA1 [19]. A different study showed that responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation had a lower incidence of cytokeratin 20 positive circulating tumor cells compared to non-responders, which might be a result of effective systemic and local treatment prior to surgery [20]. Finally, the role of immune microenvironment was investigated analyzing Foxp3(+), CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+) and IL-17(+) cell density in post-CRT surgical samples from 128 patients with rectal cancer. Stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was strongly associated with tumor regression grade. A low stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was observed in 84% of patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) compared to41% of patients who did not. Low stromal Foxp3(+) cell density was also associated with improved recurrence-free survival. Regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment may inhibit response to neoadjuvant CRT and may represent a therapeutic target in rectal cancer [21].
Hypotheses and Specific aims The main hypothesis underlying our research is that aggressiveness of rectal cancer is determined by the complex interactions between the malignant cells and the local immune microenvironment. Our hypothesis is that the local immune activation may involve the "healthy" rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer and the sampling of this mucosa may provide useful information about rectal cancer behavior. In fact, a combination of different factors, including molecular signaling networks (i.e. checkpoint genes) within different cell population, presence of soluble chemical factors and quantity/quality of immune cells infiltrate will decide rectal cancer behavior and its response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Moreover, tumor cells actively interact with the microenvironment secreting and degrading extracellular matrix components, and the release of soluble molecules (e.g. miRNA) can significantly influence the inflammatory and immune responses of the "healthy" rectal mucosa surrounding the cancer. By using state of the art histological/molecular/immunological markers and bio-statistical analysis tools we aim to identify clinically relevant molecular targets to design effective therapeutic strategies for rectal cancer patients.
Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify a prognostic test that accurately predicts rectal cancer behavior even in case when the tumor samples are scarce (due to small size of early rectal cancer) or absent (in case of complete response to therapy). This prognostic test will be constructed on the combinatory analysis of the transcriptome, immune cells activation and checkpoints, epithelial cells activity as antigen presenting cells and miRNA expression in normal tissue specimens of prospectively collected rectal cancers. The question is how to identify, among locally advanced rectal cancer, those with immediate and sustained complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. These patients might safely avoid a low rectal resection with all the consequences for their quality of life. In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (N+) an ideal biomarker should be able to identify the cohort of patients that will have a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and will not require further treatments.
Study design Tissue samples will be obtained from cancer tissue (if possible) and from normal rectal mucosa adjacent to the cancer at surgery. The very large number of patients need to answer the two questions imply a multicentric design. Complete medical record and follow-up will be collected from each center. The analysis will be centralized mostly in Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova. The study will be articulated in two parts each of them aiming to answer to one of the above described questions. Each part of the study will be articulated in a retrospective and exploratory step (A) and in a prospective validation step (B).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective | – | Diagnostic Test: Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis |
| Prospective | – | Diagnostic Test: Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- We aim to analyze 66 patients with pathological complete response and 66 patients without complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Given an expected proportion of 20% of patients with complete response, we estimate to enroll a total number of 66/0.20=330 patients with early rectal cancer. However, we will performed flow cytometry, transcriptomic analysis, mRNA microarray and mutational profiling only in 132 patients (66 patients with complete response and 66 patients without complete response) in order to test the non-inferiority of AUC. Taking into account a 15-20% of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and a maximum of 7 prognostic factors (including markers and clinical factors) in the model, we aim to enroll 412 patients in this part of the study.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+, TNM stage II-III) low and medium rectal cancer (<11 cm) or low rectum adenocarcinoma cT≤2, at risk for abdominoperineal amputation, undergoing neoadjuvant therapy will be included in the study group.
- Only neoadjuvant therapy protocols including long course radiotherapy (45 Gy) and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens will be included while short radiation therapy of radiation therapy or chemotherapy alone will be excluded
- at least 6 weeks after the end of the neoadjuvant therapy will be included
- Full availability of clinical records at least 1 year of follow up
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immunohistochemistry, Flow citometry, Trascriptome analysiswe will perform immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, transcriptomic analysis, mRNA microarray and mutational profiling | Diagnostic test | Prospective, Retrospective |
Primary outcome
pathological complete response on the operative specimen
Time frame: first post operative month
pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39572264Becherucci G, Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Scognamiglio F, Stepanyan A, Maretto I, Kotsafti A, De Simoni O, Pilati P, Franzato B, Scapinello A, Bergamo F, Massani M, Stecca T, Pozza A, Cataldo I, Brignola S, Pellegrini V, Fassan M, Guzzardo V, Dal Santo L, Salmaso R, Carlotta C, Dei Tos AP, Angriman I, Spolverato G, Chiminazzo V, Negro S, Vignotto C, Marchegiani F, Facci L, Rivella G, Bao QR, Baldo A, Pucciarelli S, Zizzo M, Businello G, Salmaso B, Parini D, Pirozzolo G, Recordare A, Tagliente G, Bordignon G, Merenda R, Licia L, Pozza G, Godina M, Mondi I, Verdi D, Da Lio C, Guerriero S, Piccioli A, Portale G, Zuin M, Cipollari C, Noaro G, Cola R, Candioli S, Gavagna L, Ricagna F, Ortenzi M, Guerrieri M, Tomassi M, Tedeschi U, Marinelli L, Barbareschi M, Bertalot G, Brolese A, Ceccarini L, Antoniutti M, Porzionato A, Agostini M, Cavallin F, Tussardi G, Di Camillo B, Bardini R, Castagliuolo I, Scarpa M. IMMUNOREACT 8: Immune markers of local tumor spread in patients undergoing transanal excision for clinically N0 rectal cancer. Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108902. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.043. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37478362Spolverato G, Fassan M, Scarpa M, Stepanyan A, De Simoni O, Scognamiglio F, Chiminazzo V, De Nardi C, Tamponi G, Negro S, Angriman I, Kotsafti A, Ruffolo C, Vignotto C, Zizzo M, Marchegiani F, Facci L, Bergamo F, Brignola S, Businello G, Guzzardo V, Dal Santo L, Salmaso R, Ceccon C, Massani M, Pozza A, Cataldo I, Stecca T, Dei Tos AP, Zagonel V, Pilati P, Franzato B, Scapinello A, Pirozzolo G, Recordare A, Merenda R, Bordignon G, Laurino L, Guerriero S, Romiti C, Portale G, Cipollari C, Candioli S, Gavagna L, Pozza G, Godina M, Mondi I, Noaro G, Ortenzi M, Guerrieri M, Tagliente G, Tomassi M, Tedeschi U, Porzionato A, Agostini M, Maretto I, Bao QR, Cavallin F, Di Camillo B, Bardini R, Castagliuolo I, Pucciarelli S, Scarpa M; IMMUNOREACT Study Group. IMMUNOREACT 6: weak immune surveillance characterizes early-onset rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1490-1501. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad219.
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marco Scarpa, MD, PhD principal investigator
Clinica Chirurgica I, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rectal Cancer, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marco Scarpa, MD, PhD (#39 049 821 2672, marco.scarpa@aopd.veneto.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pathological complete response on the operative specimen (time frame: first post operative month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04917263, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2021.