AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple Sclerosis, Primary ProgressiveMAP-MSNCT04918225

Motor Asymmetry in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive and Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Project Rational A better understanding of the causes of physical disability is an important unmet need in progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients. Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients most often present a worsening pyramidal syndrome of lower and, to a lesser extent, upper limbs (Lublin et al., 2014) suggesting a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurological examination and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
3 Nov 2021to 10 Feb 2026
How long will I take part?
24 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Patient population will consist of progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients (both Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis), a population for whom a better understanding of the causes of disability is an unmet need.

  1. - Inclusion Criteria: 1.1/ Patients:
  • Aged between 18 and 60 years.
  • Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis or Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis as defined by Mac Donald revised criteria in 2017.
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale lower or equal to 8.0, at inclusion.
  • asymmetric motor deficit. The motor deficit asymmetry will be defined by a difference of 3 or more at the American Society Injury. Association motor sub-score per limb between the right lower limb and the left lower limb.
  • No evidence of focal inflammatory activity for at least 3 years (no clinical relapse, no gadolinium enhancement on an Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan and no new T2 lesion)
  • Provided written informed consent according to the Institutional review board approval
  • Affiliated to the French healthcare system. 1.2 / Controls:
  • Aged between 18 and 60 years, sex and age matched with patients.
  • Provided written informed consent according to the Institutional review board approval
  • Affiliated to the French healthcare system.
  1. - Non-inclusion criteria:

2.1 /Patients:

  • cerebellar Expanded Disability Status Scale sub score higher than pyramidal Expanded Disability Status Scale sub score.
  • Relapse or corticosteroids in the 30 days preceding inclusion.
  • Other neurological diseases.
  • Lack of ability to understand the Institutional review board consent form.
  • Magnetic Resonance contraindications.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
  • Major persons subject to legal protection (legal safeguards, guardianship,curatorship), persons deprived of their liberty

2.2 / Controls:

  • Personal history of central nervous related disease
  • Familial history of Multiple Sclerosis.
  • Personal history of spinal cord injury.
  • Personal history of spondylotic myelopathy.
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging contraindication.
  • Lack of ability to understand the Institutional review board form.
  • Major persons subject to legal protection (legal safeguards, guardianship, curatorship), persons deprived of their liberty
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35033

Other trials in France

About this study

Project Rational

A better understanding of the causes of physical disability is an important unmet need in progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients. Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients most often present a worsening pyramidal syndrome of lower and, to a lesser extent, upper limbs (Lublin et al., 2014) suggesting a strong corticospinal tract involvement. The systematic high resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging exploration of lesions location and severity, as well as extra-lesional tissue, on pan-medullar and encephalic motor tracts offers the opportunity to better understand the pathological mechanism associated with motor impairment.

Read more

Scientific aims

This project will follow a twofold approach. First, the investigators will consider an "inter-patient" approach where independent and absolute Magnetic Resonance metrics for each limb will be related to disability. Second, the investigators will consider an "intra-patient" approach (i.e. comparing differences of Magnetic Resonance metric and of clinical score from the left and the right side in the same patient). For this purpose, progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients with asymmetric motor impairment will be studied. Confronting clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging metric value asymmetries indeed offers the unique opportunity to free oneself from many confounding factors such as genetics, age, duration of disease evolution, acquisition bias, etc. These two approaches will allow us to precisely study the impact of local factors such as Multiple Sclerosis lesions located on motor tracts on motor disability.

Methodology

The investigators propose an observational multicenter cross-sectional and prognostic study. This study will involve two French centers (Rennes, Marseille) and will include a total of 40 progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients with an asymmetrical motor deficit. Twenty sex and age matched controls will be needed to calibrate quantitative Magnetic Resonance imaging (magnetization transfer ratio). Encephalic and pan medullar structural and quantitative Magnetic Resonance images will be acquired at inclusion and clinical follow-up examinations will be performed at inclusion and 24 months. Detailed motor evaluation "per limb" will be performed, including the motor American Society Injury. Association sub-score and upper and lower limbs muscle strength measurements using a dynamometer.

Being tested
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurological examination, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, Physiotherapist examination
Keywords
motor disability, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiation

    Encephalic (about 30 minutes*)

    • lesion location assessment: 3D FLAIR, 3DT1, 3DT2 (standard OFSEP protocol)
    • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1)
    • tract location assessment: 30 directions diffusion imaging (standard OFSEP protocol)
    • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities ● Spinal cord (about 50 minutes*)
    • lesion location assessment: cervical and thoracic sagittal T2 TSE (0.7x0.7x2.5mm3), axial cervical MEDIC T2* (0.7x0.7x3mm3), axial thoracic T2 (0.5x0.5x3mm3)
    • lesion severity assessment: Axial magnetization transfer imaging (mt0, mt1, 0.7x0.7x3mm3) on the cervical cord and on the thoracic cord
    • tract location assessment: performed from registration on atlas
    • B0 and B1 mapping to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities
  • Neurological examinationDiagnostic test

    Global disability will be scored using the Expanded Disability Status Scale score

  • Multiple Sclerosis Functional CompositeDiagnostic test

    • Walking disability will be scored using the 25-foot timed-walked test
    • Arm disability will be scored using the nine-hole peg test
  • Physiotherapist examinationDiagnostic test

    • American Society Injury. Association motor subscore for each limb
    • The muscle strength using a dynamometer. Two muscle groups will be tested for the upper (elbow flexors and extensors) and lower limbs (hip flexors and ankle dorsiflexion).
    • The Ashworth Scale and the Tardieu Scale to assess spasticity.
    • 6 minutes walking test
    • Fatigue Severity Scale
    • MFIS : Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Study groups in NCT04918225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patientsProgressive Multiple Sclerosis patients
Receives: Radiation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diagnostic Test: Neurological examination; Diagnostic Test: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite; Diagnostic Test: Physiotherapist examination
Healthy VolunteersHealthy Volunteers
Receives: Radiation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. link between focal and diffuse damage in motor tract

    link between focal and diffuse damage in motor tract per side and it functional consequences per limb assessed clinically at baseline

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Link between the asymmetry of functional motor impairment and the asymmetry of structural damage on the motor pathways

    To study the link between the asymmetry of functional motor impairment and the asymmetry of structural damage on the motor pathways (intra-patient assessment).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. prognostic value of motor tract focal and diffuse damage on clinical scores variations

    To study the prognostic value of motor tract focal and diffuse damage on clinical scores variations at 2 years

    Measured: 24 months

  3. link between fatigability, fatigue and analytical disorders

    To explore fatigability during the 6-minute instrumented walking test (evolution of spatio-temporal parameters: walking speed, step length, cadence; feeling of fatigue) and to study the link between fatigability, fatigue and analytical disorders (strength, spasticity)

    Measured: 24 months

  4. link between fatigue and fatigability and the focal and diffuse impairment of the motor pathways

    To study the link between fatigue and fatigability and the focal and diffuse impairment of the motor pathways.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2021
  2. Study start3 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion10 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion10 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
Target duration
24 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04918225
Sponsor's protocol ID
35RC20_9751_MAP-MS
Acronym
MAP-MS
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
2 Jun 2021
Last updated
19 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive and Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

link between focal and diffuse damage in motor tract (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in