AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaEToFNCT04920045

A Trial to Assess the Effect of Transfusion Strategies on Fatigability Levels After Hospital Discharge

A study testing Red blood cell transfusion in people with Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial in which hospitalized patients with anemia are randomized to receive transfusion at: a) Hb<9g/dL (liberal transfusion strategy), or b) Hb<7g/dL (restrictive transfusion strategy). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anemia, Red Blood Cell Transfusion, Fatigability
What is being tested?
Red blood cell transfusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 26 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalized on a general medicine service at the University of Chicago
  • Any hemoglobin (Hb) concentration <9g/dL

Who cannot join

  • Have sickle cell anemia
  • Decline blood transfusion
  • Are receiving palliative care treatment only
  • Are brain dead
  • Cannot follow up after hospital discharge

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Trial Comparing a Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy on Fatigability, Fatigue, and Activity Levels After Discharge in Hospitalized Patients With Anemia.

This study is a randomized controlled trial in which hospitalized patients with anemia are randomized to receive transfusion at: a) Hb<9g/dL (liberal transfusion strategy), or b) Hb<7g/dL (restrictive transfusion strategy). We are measuring self-reported fatigability, fatigue, and activity levels at randomization and 7 days post hospital discharge in both trial arms. In a subset of 75 patients in each trial arm (150 total), we will are administering the 6 Minute Walk Test at randomization and 7 days post discharge.

Read the detailed description

The design of this proposed study is a randomized controlled trial of hospitalized adult general medicine patients with anemia at the University of Chicago (UC). Patients will be randomized to receive transfusion at either a hemoglobin (Hb)<9g/dL (liberal arm) or a Hb<7g/dL (restrictive arm) throughout their hospitalization. Self-reported fatigability, fatigue, and activity levels will be measured in consented patients at randomization and through a follow-up phone call 7 days after hospital discharge. We will also enroll 150 patients to participate in the Six Minute Walk Test85,86 (6MWT) at randomization and in the clinic 7 days after hospital discharge.

This trial will test whether a liberal transfusion strategy is superior to a restrictive transfusion in hospitalized patients with anemia on fatigability levels after hospital discharge. Our primary outcome is self-reported fatigability level 7 days after hospital discharge measured using the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS)71. Secondary outcomes include fatigue measured using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Aa instrument, and activity measured by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, and 6MWT distance.

Eligible patients for this trial will be recruited from the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) general medicine services using the University of Chicago Hospitalist Project (UCHP) research infrastructure. The eligibility criteria is: 1) hospitalized adult >18 years of age, 2) admitted to the general medicine services at the University of Chicago, 3) any Hb concentration of <9g/dL during their hospitalization. We will exclude patients who: 1) decline blood transfusion, 2) and/or who have a diagnosis of sickle cell anemia, 3) and/or are brain dead or receiving only palliative treatment, 4) and/or are unable to follow-up after discharge. We will not exclude patients who received transfusion prior to randomization. Eligible patients will be identified using the encrypted UCHP research database, which is programmed to extract real time EHR data into the database in order to identify patients potentially eligible for participation in research studies. The PI and Study Coordinator (SC) will be responsible for patient recruitment and consent.

Consenting patients will be randomized to either receive transfusion when their Hb drops below 7g/dL (restrictive arm) or 9g/dl (liberal arm) at any point during hospitalization, and randomized assignment will be done using permuted block design with random blocks of 2, 4, or 6 patients per block. All red blood cell (RBC) transfusions will be administered in 1 unit increments in order to maintain patients' Hb concentration above the trial arm threshold they are randomized to. All transfusions will be followed by a Hb measure and an additional unit(s) of RBC's will only be transfused if there is documentation of the patient's Hb concentration below the trial arm threshold they are randomized to. However, In the case of life-threatening bleeding clinicians will be free to transfuse patients without first checking a patient's Hb concentration. Once randomized, patient's will be managed according to protocol until hospital discharge independent of transfusion to another service and/or specialized hospital ward. This trial will not control or dictate transfusion of other blood products, which will be administered at the discretion of the attending physician caring for the patient.

Being tested
Red blood cell transfusion
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Red blood cell transfusionOther

    All RBC transfusions will be administered in 1 unit increments to maintain patients' Hb concentration above the trial arm threshold they are randomized to. All transfusions will be followed by a Hb measure and an additional unit(s) of RBC's will only be transfused if there is documentation of the patient's Hb concentration below the trial arm threshold they are randomized to. However, in the case of life-threatening bleeding clinicians will be able to transfuse patients without first checking a patient's Hb concentration. Once randomized, patients will be man-aged according to protocol until hospital discharge independent of transfer to another service and/or specialized hospital ward.

Study groups in NCT04920045
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Liberal Transfusion ArmActive comparatorPatient's in the liberal transfusion arm will receive a 1 unit RBC transfusion following randomization and will re-ceive blood in additional 1 unit increments until their Hb is above 9g/dL. At any point during the patient's hospital-ization if their Hb subsequently falls below 9g/dL, they will again be transfused to maintain a Hb>9g/dL, and this will be maintained throughout their hospitalization.
Receives: Other: Red blood cell transfusion
Restrictive Transfusion ArmActive comparatorPatients in the restrictive transfusion arm will receive transfusion if their Hb concentration falls below 7g/dL. RBC's will be administered 1 unit at a time and enough blood will be given to increase patient's Hb to above 7g/dL.
Receives: Other: Red blood cell transfusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in self-reported fatigability level

    Self-reported fatigability will be measured by the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS). The PFS is a 10 item scale that ranges from 0-50 with greater scores indicating greater fatigability.

    Measured: Fatigability will be measured at admission to the hospital during the index hospitalization and 7 days after hospital discharge.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in self-reported fatigue level

    Self-reported fatigue will be measured by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-F) Fatigue 8a instrument.The PROMIS-F scores range from 8-40, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

    Measured: Fatigue will be measured at admission to the hospital during the index hospitalization and 7 days after hospital discharge.

  2. Change in self-reported activity level

    Self-reported activity will be measure by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Higher scores on the PASE indicated greater physical activity.

    Measured: Activity will be measured at admission to the hospital during the index hospitalization and 7 days after hospital discharge.

  3. Change in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance

    6MWT is measure of functional capacity

    Measured: 6MWT will be measured at admission to the hospital during the index hospitalization and 7 days after hospital discharge.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jun 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2025

Why it stopped: Clinical practice has shifted such that physician equipoise is lacking, stultifying this study's enrollment. While the scientific question remains relevant, data collection and analysis are complete, and no further research activities are planned.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomization will occur after patients have consented to participate and will be done using permuted block de-sign with random blocks of 2, 4, or 6 patients per block.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04920045
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB21-0854
Acronym
EToF
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
24 May 2021
Last updated
1 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Radford M, Estcourt LJ, Sirotich E, Pitre T, Britto J, Watson M, Brunskill SJ, Fergusson DA, Doree C, Arnold DM. Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5(5):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3.

    PubMed 38780066

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Red blood cell transfusion in people with Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Clinical practice has shifted such that physician equipoise is lacking, stultifying this study's enrollment. While the scientific question remains relevant, data collection and analysis are complete, and no further research activities are planned.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in self-reported fatigability level (time frame: Fatigability will be measured at admission to the hospital during the index hospitalization and 7 days after hospital discharge.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04920045, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in