Cancer-related FatigueNCT04921644
Longitudinal Investigation of Cancer-related Fatigue and Its Treatment (LIFT Project)
An observational study of Cancer-related Fatigue, run by German Cancer Research Center at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding cancer-related fatigue from the institutional, professionals' and patients' perspective. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer-related Fatigue
- How many people
- 1,183 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 4 Aug 2021to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients newly diagnosed with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia.
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Newly diagnosed with a primary tumor of one of the following malignant neoplasms: colon (C18), rectum (C19-20), liver (C22), pancreas (C25), lung (C33-34), malignant melanoma (C43), breast (C50, only female), cervix (C53), endometrium (C54.1), ovaries (C56), prostate (C61), kidney (C64), bladder (C67), thyroid gland (C73), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (C82-88), leukemia (C91-C95)
- Having received or receiving at enrolment at least one of the following treatments: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted or immune therapy
- Able to understand and follow the study protocol
Who cannot join
- Carcinoma in situ
- Any additional malignant or unclear neoplasm before or since time of diagnosis of the considered primary tumor, except unspecified neoplasm of skin (C44)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding cancer-related fatigue from the institutional, professionals' and patients' perspective.
Read the detailed description
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding fatigue from the institutional, professionals', and patients' perspective. With a multimodal approach including a comprehensive assessment of fatigue management and support offered by different institutions (uncertified hospitals, uncertified oncological practices, counselling units, certified cancer centers; n=350), a survey and qualitative interviews among practicing physicians ("Niedergelassene Ärzte"), hospital physicians, practicing psychotherapists with psycho-oncological focus, psycho-oncologists at hospitals, nurses at certified cancer centers and nurses at other hospitals (n=420), and a longitudinal clinical study among cancer patients (n=1400) as well as two focus groups with patient representatives (each n=6), the characteristics, patterns, and potential effects or shortcomings of the current fatigue management will be investigated. Furthermore, factors associated with patients' and health care professionals' knowledge about fatigue will be examined.
Concerning the longitudinal clinical study assessing the patients' perspective, online or paper-based questionnaires on socio-demographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes will be sent to the patients 6,9,12 and 24 months after diagnosis. Moreover, detailed data on screening, diagnosis and counseling as well as therapies offered and administered to reduce fatigue will be surveyed, as well as the patients' state of knowledge, perception and prevailing needs regarding fatigue. Tumor and cancer therapy data will be extracted from the Epidemiological Cancer Registry.
The results of the LIFT project shall provide a basis to identify and overcome shortcomings in the actual fatigue management in Germany, and, to eventually ameliorate this severe burden in cancer patients and survivors.
- Conditions
- Cancer-related Fatigue
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patient cohort | Newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia recruited approximately 6 months after diagnosis and followed up to 2 years post-diagnosis. No intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fatigue severity
assessed by EORTC QLQ-FA12 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Fatigue Questionnaire). The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) with higher scores meaning a higher level of fatigue.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Impact of fatigue
assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The BFI consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine) with higher scores signifying higher intensity and impairment.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
State of fatigue management
Questionnaire assessing the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines regarding management of cancer-related fatigue.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue
Questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue. The knowledge score consists of fatigue-related statements that should be rated as either right, wrong, or "dont know". The attitudes scale is composed of statements that should be rated on a 4-point likert scale. Higher scores indicate a greater agreement to the particular statement.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Secondary outcomes (13)
Quality of life functions and symptoms
assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and 5 additional items derived according to the EORTC scoring manual assessing symptoms of fever, hot flashes, night sweat, polyneuropathy and distress of dependents caused by the diagnosis are added. The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A higher score corresponds to a higher level of symptoms/problems.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Sleep problems
assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI consists of open and closed questions regarding characteristics of sleep and sleep quality. Some items are rated on a 4-point likert scale with higher scores meaning more sleep problems.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Depression
assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). A sum score is calculated, with higher scores meaning a higher level of depressive symptoms.
Measured: 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months post-diagnosis
Body mass index
calculated from weight and height
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Total physical activity
assessed by a questionnaire regarding walking, cycling and exercise behavior
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Return to work
assessed by questions regarding occupational issues
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Anxiety
assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). The items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). A sum score (ranging from 0 to 21) is calculated, with higher scores meaning a higher level of symptomatology.
Measured: assessed 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months after diagnosis
Supportive Care Needs
assessed by the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF-34). The scale ranges from 1 (not applicable) to 5 (high need) with higher scores meaning a higher need of support.
Measured: assessed at t2 9 months post-diagnosis
Social Support
assessed by the Illness-specific Social Support Scale (ISSS, German Version) among cancer patients. The 8 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Sum scores for the items 1,3,6 and 8 (positive support) as well as for the items 2,4,5 and 7 (detrimental interaction) are calculated with higher scores meaning higher levels of positive support and detrimental interaction respectively.
Measured: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t3 (12 months post-diagnosis)
Loneliness
assessed by three items of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)-loneliness-scale. The response categories are 1 (hardly ever), 2 (some of the time) and 3(often). A sum score is calculated with higher scores meaning a higher level of loneliness.
Measured: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
Resilience
assessed by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). The six items are rated on a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). After reversing the coding of inverted items 2,4 and 6, the mean of the six items is calculated with higher scores meaning a higher level of resilience.
Measured: assessed at t1 6 months post-diagnosis
Patient Activation
assessed by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Patients are supposed to rate their level of agreement to 13 statements on a 4-point-scale. A higher score corresponds to a higher level of patient activation.
Measured: at t2 (9 months post-diagnosis)
Posttraumatic growth
assessed by Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). The items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very strongly) with higher scores indicating a higher level of posttraumatic growth.
Measured: at t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2021
- Study start4 Aug 2021
- Primary completion7 Jan 2023
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cancer-related FatigueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,183 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- German Cancer Research Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wuerzburg University Hospital, Baden-Württemberg Cancer Registry, German Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karen Steindorf, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and CancerMartina E. Schmidt, Dr., Principal investigator, German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and CancerImad Maatouk, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy and Psycho-Oncology, Medical Hospital II, University Hospital Wuerzburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04921644
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LIFT project
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Wagner AS, Milzer M, Schmidt ME, Kiermeier S, Maatouk I, Steindorf K. Nurses' Knowledge of Cancer-Related Fatigue and the Coverage of This Subject in Nursing Training: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Nurs Res. 2025 Apr 1;33(2):e379. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000666.
PubMed 40162696Wagner AS, Wehlen L, Milzer M, Schmidt ME, Kiermeier S, Maatouk I, Steindorf K. Physicians' perspectives on cancer-related fatigue management and their suggestions for improvements in medical training: a cross-sectional survey study in Germany. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 14;32(12):788. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08978-2.
PubMed 39537876Milzer M, Wagner AS, Schmidt ME, Maatouk I, Hermann S; Cancer Registry of Baden-Wurttemberg; Kiermeier S, Steindorf K. Patient-physician communication about cancer-related fatigue: a survey of patient-perceived barriers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 25;150(2):29. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05555-8.
PubMed 38270814Milzer M, Wagner AS, Steindorf K, Kiermeier S, Schmidt ME, Maatouk I. Psycho-oncologists' knowledge of cancer-related fatigue and the targets for improving education and training: results from a cross-sectional survey study. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 23;31(7):412. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07882-5.
PubMed 37351639
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Longitudinal Investigation of Cancer-related Fatigue and Its Treatment (LIFT Project)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04921644
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIFT project
- Conditions
- Cancer-related Fatigue
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,183 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- German Cancer Research CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wuerzburg University Hospital, Baden-Württemberg Cancer Registry, German Research Foundation
- Study start
- 4 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding cancer-related fatigue from the institutional, professionals' and patients' perspective.
Detailed description
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding fatigue from the institutional, professionals', and patients' perspective. With a multimodal approach including a comprehensive assessment of fatigue management and support offered by different institutions (uncertified hospitals, uncertified oncological practices, counselling units, certified cancer centers; n=350), a survey and qualitative interviews among practicing physicians ("Niedergelassene Ärzte"), hospital physicians, practicing psychotherapists with psycho-oncological focus, psycho-oncologists at hospitals, nurses at certified cancer centers and nurses at other hospitals (n=420), and a longitudinal clinical study among cancer patients (n=1400) as well as two focus groups with patient representatives (each n=6), the characteristics, patterns, and potential effects or shortcomings of the current fatigue management will be investigated. Furthermore, factors associated with patients' and health care professionals' knowledge about fatigue will be examined.
Concerning the longitudinal clinical study assessing the patients' perspective, online or paper-based questionnaires on socio-demographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes will be sent to the patients 6,9,12 and 24 months after diagnosis. Moreover, detailed data on screening, diagnosis and counseling as well as therapies offered and administered to reduce fatigue will be surveyed, as well as the patients' state of knowledge, perception and prevailing needs regarding fatigue. Tumor and cancer therapy data will be extracted from the Epidemiological Cancer Registry.
The results of the LIFT project shall provide a basis to identify and overcome shortcomings in the actual fatigue management in Germany, and, to eventually ameliorate this severe burden in cancer patients and survivors.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patient cohort | – | –Newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia recruited approximately 6 months after diagnosis and followed up to 2 years post-diagnosis. No intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients newly diagnosed with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Newly diagnosed with a primary tumor of one of the following malignant neoplasms: colon (C18), rectum (C19-20), liver (C22), pancreas (C25), lung (C33-34), malignant melanoma (C43), breast (C50, only female), cervix (C53), endometrium (C54.1), ovaries (C56), prostate (C61), kidney (C64), bladder (C67), thyroid gland (C73), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (C82-88), leukemia (C91-C95)
- Having received or receiving at enrolment at least one of the following treatments: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted or immune therapy
- Able to understand and follow the study protocol
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Carcinoma in situ
- Any additional malignant or unclear neoplasm before or since time of diagnosis of the considered primary tumor, except unspecified neoplasm of skin (C44)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Fatigue severity
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by EORTC QLQ-FA12 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Fatigue Questionnaire). The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) with higher scores meaning a higher level of fatigue.
Impact of fatigue
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The BFI consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine) with higher scores signifying higher intensity and impairment.
State of fatigue management
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Questionnaire assessing the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines regarding management of cancer-related fatigue.
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue. The knowledge score consists of fatigue-related statements that should be rated as either right, wrong, or "dont know". The attitudes scale is composed of statements that should be rated on a 4-point likert scale. Higher scores indicate a greater agreement to the particular statement.
13 secondary outcomes
Quality of life functions and symptoms
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Sleep problems
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Depression
Time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months post-diagnosis
Body mass index
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Total physical activity
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Return to work
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Anxiety
Time frame: assessed 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months after diagnosis
Supportive Care Needs
Time frame: assessed at t2 9 months post-diagnosis
Social Support
Time frame: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t3 (12 months post-diagnosis)
Loneliness
Time frame: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
Resilience
Time frame: assessed at t1 6 months post-diagnosis
Patient Activation
Time frame: at t2 (9 months post-diagnosis)
Posttraumatic growth
Time frame: at t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40162696Wagner AS, Milzer M, Schmidt ME, Kiermeier S, Maatouk I, Steindorf K. Nurses' Knowledge of Cancer-Related Fatigue and the Coverage of This Subject in Nursing Training: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Nurs Res. 2025 Apr 1;33(2):e379. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000666.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39537876Wagner AS, Wehlen L, Milzer M, Schmidt ME, Kiermeier S, Maatouk I, Steindorf K. Physicians' perspectives on cancer-related fatigue management and their suggestions for improvements in medical training: a cross-sectional survey study in Germany. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 14;32(12):788. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08978-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38270814Milzer M, Wagner AS, Schmidt ME, Maatouk I, Hermann S; Cancer Registry of Baden-Wurttemberg; Kiermeier S, Steindorf K. Patient-physician communication about cancer-related fatigue: a survey of patient-perceived barriers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 25;150(2):29. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05555-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37351639Milzer M, Wagner AS, Steindorf K, Kiermeier S, Schmidt ME, Maatouk I. Psycho-oncologists' knowledge of cancer-related fatigue and the targets for improving education and training: results from a cross-sectional survey study. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 23;31(7):412. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07882-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cancer-related Fatigue
Enrolling by invitation
Dance-Based Exercise for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients
Breast Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Massage Therapy for Cancer Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer, Fatigue in Cancer Survivors
Recruiting
STEpwise Research Program to Promote INGeniouS ONline Supportive Solutions in the Relief of Cancer-related Fatigue
Cancer Diagnosis, Moderate or Severe Score of Cancer-related Fatigue (CRF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Methylphenidate and Exercise in Reducing Cancer-Related Fatigue in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Methylphenidate in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors With Cancer-related Fatigue
Brain Tumor, Pediatric, Cancer-related Fatigue
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karen Steindorf, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer
Martina E. Schmidt, Dr. principal investigator
German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer
Imad Maatouk, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy and Psycho-Oncology, Medical Hospital II, University Hospital Wuerzburg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer-related Fatigue, run by German Cancer Research Center at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fatigue severity (time frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04921644, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2025.