Urinary IncontinenceNCT04922255
Cystic Fibrosis and Urinary Incontinence
A study testing Reusable Underwear, Disposable urethral support and Pelvic floor physical therapy in people with Urinary Incontinence and Cystic Fibrosis, run by Megan Bradley at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of non-surgical urinary incontinence (UI) management options for women with CF. The investigators will complete a pilot, feasibility study (n=30) to compare tolerability and symptom relief in women with CF and UI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence, Cystic Fibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Reusable Underwear, Disposable urethral support and Pelvic floor physical therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 1 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female age 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of CF
- Self-reported UI (at least answer of "a little" on King's Health Questionnaire - Question #2)
- Fluent in spoken English
- Ability to present for in-office exam and study procedures
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- No UI
- Inability to comply with study protocol
- No diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
Official title: Pilot Trial of Non-Surgical Management for Women With Cystic Fibrosis and Urinary Incontinence
Evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of non-surgical urinary incontinence (UI) management options for women with CF. The investigators will complete a pilot, feasibility study (n=30) to compare tolerability and symptom relief in women with CF and UI. Subjects will be recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Cystic Fibrosis Center after demonstrating bother from UI on initial phone script. Participants will undergo UI questionnaires and undergo a pelvic examination, non-invasive bladder scan ultrasound and a provocative stress test and then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), an absorbent product (Speax Reusable Underwear), or Pelvic floor muscle therapy. The primary outcome will be to determine the feasibility and tolerability of these options.
Hypothesis: All three non-surgical UI management options for women are feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire).
The results from the proposed aims will provide important information about the experiences and symptom burden of women with CF and UI. Importantly, the investigators will also be able to answer the important questions of "Can it work?" and "Does it work?" as the investigators seek to construct the definitive, adequately powered trial of these therapies in women with CF and UI.
Read the detailed description
Study Procedures: Participants will be recruited at routine cystic fibrosis (CF) clinic visits and via telephone screening. The investigators will again utilize the ISI for screening procedures with subjects required to have at incontinence at least as frequent as 'less than once a month' and at least as 'drops' to be eligible for enrollment. Informed consent will be obtained before any study procedures are initiated. Initial demographic questions and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) will be completed at the baseline visit. Subjects will be given materials to complete a 2-day bladder diary. The bladder diary has participants track what they take in (fluids) and also their voided volumes throughout the day and night. Subjects will be given a hat to void in a collect the numbers/volume of voids and also leakage episodes. Pregnancy will be excluded by self-report. Participants will then have a pelvic exam for a visual urethral mobility examination and assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength to be completed by the principal investigator. The principal investigator will additionally first perform a bladder scan ultrasound to assess current bladder volume and then a cough stress test (CST). The exam will be performed in the supine/lithotomy position with ≥300 mL of fluid in the bladder. The investigators will have the subject cough forcefully 1-4 times and the examiner will directly visualize the urethral meatus for the presence of leakage. Leakage of fluid from the urethral meatus coincident with/simultaneous to the cough(s) is considered a positive test consistent with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Randomized feasibility trial (Table 2). At the baseline visit, women will be given a brief description of the three different treatment options and be initially asked to rank initial choice for treatment. Participants will then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), Speax™ Reusable Underwear, or pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT). Randomization will be in a 1:1:1 allocation without stratification by incontinence severity. The disposable Impressa® urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI). Speax Reusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection. Both the Impressa and Speax are commercially available and the Impressa is FDA approved. The Speax underwear are not a FDA regulated product. Urethral support device cohort - A week supply of the Impressa device will be provided and participants will be asked to complete a daily bladder diary for a total of 7 days. The instructions for use booklet will be provided. Subjects will be told that they can continuously utilize one Impressa for up to 12 hours. The investigators will ask subjects to wear for at least 12 hours a day but up to 24 if they desire. Reusable absorbent pad cohort - Three pairs of Speax underwear will be provided and subjects will complete a similar daily UI diary for 7 days. Subjects will be instructed to wear one pair of speax daily and may wash as they desire. Subjects will be provided the website for the product and The investigators will allow them to order whatever pair/size the subject desires. https://www.shethinx.com/pages/speax. PFMT cohort - Experienced pelvic health physical therapists (at both University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart. Each PFMT visit will take ~60 minutes. The investigators will develop a standardized pelvic floor exercise intervention based on previous RCT for PFMT in women with MUI. The intervention will comprise: 1) Bladder training and delayed voiding techniques 2) Urgency suppression 3) SUI strategies (e.g., 'knack') and 4) Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training for those agreeable to internal exams. The investigators will utilize Diaphragmatic breathing, Happy Baby Stretch with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) relaxation and lower abdominal myofascial release (MFR) to start. These are all non-internal stretching type exercises similar to yoga and will be performed for ~20-30 minutes. If the subject is willing the investigators will consider internal pelvic floor muscle training which will involve the physical therapist inserting one digit into the vagina in order to aid in muscle coordination. This will also be done for 20-30 minutes.
Subjects will not be blinded to their group assignment given the nature of the differences in management options. At the end of the treatment assignment all subjects will repeat the KHQ and a patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I). The PGI-I is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). All subjects will complete the follow-up questionnaires 7-days after the beginning of their assigned therapy.
Given the opportunity to gather acceptability on these options for a sensitive issue, subjects will be offered an option to further participate in one alternate therapy of their choosing. If subjects select this option, investigators will organize an additional week of therapy. Participants will only have to complete a BSW questionnaire and another PGI-I at the end of therapy. This is an option for all women in the study even if they initially had been randomized to their preferred option as participants may ultimately have not really liked that choice.
Acceptability and Feasibility assessment: Urethral support device cohort and Reusable absorbent pad cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of use and product performance. Logs regarding utilization of assigned product will be completed daily. Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of both therapies utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. PFMT cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of adherence and self-reported success with ability to perform exercises. Adherence to intervention sessions will be documented by physical therapist using attendance logs. Adherence to home practice will be documented by participants in home logs that included the dates and times of practice. At the end of each physical therapy visit, participants will be asked to rate their confidence in performing the PFMT exercises featured in their program (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all confident).
At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy). All subjects will complete a Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire. The investigators will consider therapy feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire). By allowing subjects to choose another one of the arms after their randomization this will give us further, important information about feasibility and patient preference for a larger trial.
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Cystic Fibrosis
- Being tested
- Reusable Underwear, Disposable urethral support, Pelvic floor physical therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Cystic Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Reusable UnderwearDevice
Reusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection
Disposable urethral supportDevice
The disposable urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI)
Pelvic floor physical therapyBehavioural
Experienced pelvic health physical therapists (at University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| disposable urethral support device | Active comparator | disposable urethral support device Receives: Device: Disposable urethral support |
| Reusable Underwear | Active comparator | Reusable Underwear Receives: Device: Reusable Underwear |
| pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) | Active comparator | Pelvic floor muscle therapy Receives: Behavioral: Pelvic floor physical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). It is a score calculated at Day 7.
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Patient Treatment Preference
Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of initial assigned therapy utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. Patients are allowed to answer each question with either "unacceptable (1)," "acceptable (2) ," or "good (3) " to each question. Therefor minimum on questionnaire is a 0 and maximum is 39 with higher score showing improved patient treatment preference/performance of product.
Measured: 7 days
King's Health Questionnaire
The KHQ is a 21-item scale with 9 domains: general health perceptions, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, Sleep/Energy, and severity measures and an 11-item symptom severity score. (Hebbar et al., 2015)
Each question has four options "not at all", "a little", "moderately" and "a lot". (numerically 1-4) The general health perception domain has five choices ("very good", "good", "fair", "bad" and "very bad") (numerically 1-5). The scores are then converted to "out of 100" with accepted formulas. For example for Q1 the overall score = ((actual score-1)/4)*100 In the KHQ, a minimum possible score of zero is assigned to the best health and a maximum possible score of 100 is assigned to the worst health. The 0-100 scale is used for each item and each subscale separately.
You can then report a total average score across all domains which is reported here
Measured: 7 days
Adherence Logs
Subjects will be asked to document their adherence to therapy on a daily basis and outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants with 100% adherence (responded yes to adherence to therapy all 7 days of therapy on their daily log)
Measured: 7 days
Benefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue
At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy) and complete the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire which asks "would you be willing to continue treatment with this product or therapy?" The reported outcome is the number of participants per group that answered "Yes" to this question.
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2021
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2023
Why it stopped: We exhausted all ability to recruit from our study sites
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Megan Bradley
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Megan Bradley, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Megan Bradley, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsbugh School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04922255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY21010012
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 17 May 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Trial of Non-Surgical Management for Women With Cystic Fibrosis and Urinary Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04922255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY21010012
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Cystic Fibrosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: We exhausted all ability to recruit from our study sites
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Megan BradleyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of non-surgical urinary incontinence (UI) management options for women with CF. The investigators will complete a pilot, feasibility study (n=30) to compare tolerability and symptom relief in women with CF and UI. Subjects will be recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Cystic Fibrosis Center after demonstrating bother from UI on initial phone script. Participants will undergo UI questionnaires and undergo a pelvic examination, non-invasive bladder scan ultrasound and a provocative stress test and then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), an absorbent product (Speax Reusable Underwear), or Pelvic floor muscle therapy. The primary outcome will be to determine the feasibility and tolerability of these options.
Hypothesis: All three non-surgical UI management options for women are feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire).
The results from the proposed aims will provide important information about the experiences and symptom burden of women with CF and UI. Importantly, the investigators will also be able to answer the important questions of "Can it work?" and "Does it work?" as the investigators seek to construct the definitive, adequately powered trial of these therapies in women with CF and UI.
Detailed description
Study Procedures: Participants will be recruited at routine cystic fibrosis (CF) clinic visits and via telephone screening. The investigators will again utilize the ISI for screening procedures with subjects required to have at incontinence at least as frequent as 'less than once a month' and at least as 'drops' to be eligible for enrollment. Informed consent will be obtained before any study procedures are initiated. Initial demographic questions and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) will be completed at the baseline visit. Subjects will be given materials to complete a 2-day bladder diary. The bladder diary has participants track what they take in (fluids) and also their voided volumes throughout the day and night. Subjects will be given a hat to void in a collect the numbers/volume of voids and also leakage episodes. Pregnancy will be excluded by self-report. Participants will then have a pelvic exam for a visual urethral mobility examination and assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength to be completed by the principal investigator. The principal investigator will additionally first perform a bladder scan ultrasound to assess current bladder volume and then a cough stress test (CST). The exam will be performed in the supine/lithotomy position with ≥300 mL of fluid in the bladder. The investigators will have the subject cough forcefully 1-4 times and the examiner will directly visualize the urethral meatus for the presence of leakage. Leakage of fluid from the urethral meatus coincident with/simultaneous to the cough(s) is considered a positive test consistent with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Randomized feasibility trial (Table 2). At the baseline visit, women will be given a brief description of the three different treatment options and be initially asked to rank initial choice for treatment. Participants will then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), Speax™ Reusable Underwear, or pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT). Randomization will be in a 1:1:1 allocation without stratification by incontinence severity. The disposable Impressa® urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI). Speax Reusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection. Both the Impressa and Speax are commercially available and the Impressa is FDA approved. The Speax underwear are not a FDA regulated product. Urethral support device cohort - A week supply of the Impressa device will be provided and participants will be asked to complete a daily bladder diary for a total of 7 days. The instructions for use booklet will be provided. Subjects will be told that they can continuously utilize one Impressa for up to 12 hours. The investigators will ask subjects to wear for at least 12 hours a day but up to 24 if they desire. Reusable absorbent pad cohort - Three pairs of Speax underwear will be provided and subjects will complete a similar daily UI diary for 7 days. Subjects will be instructed to wear one pair of speax daily and may wash as they desire. Subjects will be provided the website for the product and The investigators will allow them to order whatever pair/size the subject desires. https://www.shethinx.com/pages/speax. PFMT cohort - Experienced pelvic health physical therapists (at both University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart. Each PFMT visit will take ~60 minutes. The investigators will develop a standardized pelvic floor exercise intervention based on previous RCT for PFMT in women with MUI. The intervention will comprise: 1) Bladder training and delayed voiding techniques 2) Urgency suppression 3) SUI strategies (e.g., 'knack') and 4) Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training for those agreeable to internal exams. The investigators will utilize Diaphragmatic breathing, Happy Baby Stretch with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) relaxation and lower abdominal myofascial release (MFR) to start. These are all non-internal stretching type exercises similar to yoga and will be performed for ~20-30 minutes. If the subject is willing the investigators will consider internal pelvic floor muscle training which will involve the physical therapist inserting one digit into the vagina in order to aid in muscle coordination. This will also be done for 20-30 minutes.
Subjects will not be blinded to their group assignment given the nature of the differences in management options. At the end of the treatment assignment all subjects will repeat the KHQ and a patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I). The PGI-I is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). All subjects will complete the follow-up questionnaires 7-days after the beginning of their assigned therapy.
Given the opportunity to gather acceptability on these options for a sensitive issue, subjects will be offered an option to further participate in one alternate therapy of their choosing. If subjects select this option, investigators will organize an additional week of therapy. Participants will only have to complete a BSW questionnaire and another PGI-I at the end of therapy. This is an option for all women in the study even if they initially had been randomized to their preferred option as participants may ultimately have not really liked that choice.
Acceptability and Feasibility assessment: Urethral support device cohort and Reusable absorbent pad cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of use and product performance. Logs regarding utilization of assigned product will be completed daily. Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of both therapies utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. PFMT cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of adherence and self-reported success with ability to perform exercises. Adherence to intervention sessions will be documented by physical therapist using attendance logs. Adherence to home practice will be documented by participants in home logs that included the dates and times of practice. At the end of each physical therapy visit, participants will be asked to rate their confidence in performing the PFMT exercises featured in their program (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all confident).
At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy). All subjects will complete a Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire. The investigators will consider therapy feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire). By allowing subjects to choose another one of the arms after their randomization this will give us further, important information about feasibility and patient preference for a larger trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| disposable urethral support device | Active comparator | Device: Disposable urethral supportdisposable urethral support device |
| Reusable Underwear | Active comparator | Device: Reusable UnderwearReusable Underwear |
| pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Pelvic floor physical therapyPelvic floor muscle therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Female age 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of CF
- Self-reported UI (at least answer of "a little" on King's Health Questionnaire - Question #2)
- Fluent in spoken English
- Ability to present for in-office exam and study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age <18 years
- No UI
- Inability to comply with study protocol
- No diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis
- Pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Reusable UnderwearReusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection | Device | Reusable Underwear |
| Disposable urethral supportThe disposable urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI) | Device | disposable urethral support device |
| Pelvic floor physical therapyExperienced pelvic health physical therapists (at University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart. | Behavioural | pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) |
Primary outcome
Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence
Time frame: 7 days
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). It is a score calculated at Day 7.
4 secondary outcomes
Patient Treatment Preference
Time frame: 7 days
King's Health Questionnaire
Time frame: 7 days
Adherence Logs
Time frame: 7 days
Benefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Megan Bradley, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsbugh School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Reusable Underwear, Disposable urethral support and Pelvic floor physical therapy in people with Urinary Incontinence and Cystic Fibrosis, run by Megan Bradley at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.