Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT04931966
Comparision of IPACK and Periarticular Block With Adductor Block Alone After Total Knee Artroplasty
A study testing block, adductor canal block and Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Karaman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
105 patients ASA I-III, undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia, will be randomly assigned into one of three groups, namely group A (n=35), where an adductor canal block, group B (N:35) where an adductor canal block with IPCAK, and group C (n=35) where an adductor canal block with PAI will be… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- What is being tested?
- block, adductor canal block and Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2021to 17 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Physical status according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III
- Patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty
Who cannot join
- Previous operation on same knee
- Hepatic or renal insufficiency
- Younger than 18 years old and older than 85
- Patients undergoing general anesthesia
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
- BMI > 40
Show all 9Show fewer
- ASA IV
- Chronic gabapentin/pregabalin use (regular use for longer than 3 months)
- Chronic opioid use (taking opioids for longer than 3 months, or daily oral morphine equivalent of >5mg/day for one month)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Karaman Training and Research Hospital
Karaman, 70200
About this study
Official title: Comparision of IPACK and Periarticular Block With Adductor Block Alone After Total Knee Artroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Trial on Pain and Knee Function After Total Knee Artroplasty
105 patients ASA I-III, undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia, will be randomly assigned into one of three groups, namely group A (n=35), where an adductor canal block, group B (N:35) where an adductor canal block with IPCAK, and group C (n=35) where an adductor canal block with PAI will be performed preoperatively. All patients will receive a standardized multimodal approach. NRS scores will be evaluated in static and dynamic conditions during the first 48 hours postoperatively.
Read the detailed description
Total knee replacement (TKP) is accepted as one of the major orthopedic surgery that most patients suffer from pain in the postoperative period. The primary aim of this research is to compare the analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee(IPACK) with the periarticular block when an additional adductor canal block is used. In the literature, adductor canal block(ACB) and sciatic nerve block are used as part of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management of patients undergoing TKP. Nevertheless, ACB is found less effective for pain originating from the posterior part of the knee. Sciatic nerve block and periarticular injection(PAI) are commonly used blocks to improve the analgesic effect of ACB. Besides this, ACB is effective for pain originated from the posterior part of the knee. IPACK block is performed under ultrasound guidance and targets the articular branches of tibial, common peroneal, and obturator nerves with sparing lower extremity motor function.
Patients scheduled for knee surgery under spinal anesthesia are included fort his study. All groups will be applied 0.03 mg/kg midazolam iv, then spinal anesthesia will be applied to 15 mg 0.5 % heavy bupivacaine. Three groups of 105 patients will be included in the study.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) (Group A ) (n:35): After the patients are given the supine position, under the guidance of the ultrasound linear probe, 10-15cm proximal to the knee joint, under the sartorius muscle, next to the femoral artery. After the saphenous is observed, 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be given
Adductor + İPACK Grup ( group B) (n: 35): Adductor canal 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be administered. After the knee is flexed, after the convex probe is placed in the popliteal space, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the area between the popliteal artery and the femur called IPACK
Adductor + PAI ( group C) (n: 35): Adductor canal 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be administered. Patients will receive 60 ml of local anesthetic cocktail intraoperatively by the surgeon. At the end of the operation to the peri-articular area (posterior capsule, collateral ligament, quadriceps muscle). Cocktail consists of 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + 8 ml 8 mg morphine+12 ml saline.
Routine multimodal analgesia will be used for postoperative analgesia
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Being tested
- block, adductor canal block, Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block, adductor Canal Block plus PAI Block
- Keywords
- Total knee arthroplasty, Peri articular infiltration, Ipack block, Adductor canal block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
blockProcedure or surgery
Adductor canal block
adductor canal blockProcedure or surgery
adductor canal block bupivacain
Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK BlockProcedure or surgery
Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block using bupivacaine
adductor Canal Block plus PAI BlockProcedure or surgery
Adductor Canal Block plus PAI Block using bupivacaine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | Adductor canal block Receives: Procedure: block; Procedure: adductor canal block |
| Group B | Active comparator | Adductor canal block plus IPACK Receives: Procedure: block; Procedure: adductor canal block; Procedure: Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block |
| Group C | Active comparator | Adductor canal block plus PAI Receives: Procedure: block; Procedure: adductor canal block; Procedure: adductor Canal Block plus PAI Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NRS scores
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores (Range 0-10, 0=no pain, 10=the worse pain ever)
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
Opioid consumption
Analgesic consumption at 4-6-8-12-24 and 48 hours
Measured: 4-6-8-12-24 and 48 hours
Range of knee motion
Degrees of flexion
Measured: 48 hours
Complications
Complications
Measured: 48 hours
Patient satisfaction
Patients asked whether they would choose the same anaesthetic management in a future operation: Yes/No
Measured: 48 hours
Incidence of adverse events related to nerve block procedures
muscle weakness, systemic toxicity
Measured: Post-op 24 to 72 hours
Rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting
nausea, vomiting
Measured: Post-op 24 to 48 hours
Patient mobilization
Patient reporting time of first standing to the side of the bed and time up and go test 2 days
Measured: 2 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2021
- Study start22 Jun 2021
- Primary completion8 Aug 2021
- Study completion17 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteo Arthritis KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karaman Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04931966
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 02-202l/04:
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kertkiatkachorn W, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S. Adductor Canal Block Combined With iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block vs Periarticular Injection for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):122-129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.086. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
PubMed 32694032Kim DH, Beathe JC, Lin Y, YaDeau JT, Maalouf DB, Goytizolo E, Garnett C, Ranawat AS, Su EP, Mayman DJ, Memtsoudis SG. Addition of Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee and Adductor Canal Block to Periarticular Injection Enhances Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):526-535. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003794.
PubMed 30234517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparision of IPACK and Periarticular Block With Adductor Block Alone After Total Knee Artroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Trial on Pain and Knee Function After Total Knee Artroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04931966
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 02-202l/04:
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Keywords
- Total knee arthroplasty, Peri articular infiltration, Ipack block, Adductor canal block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karaman Training and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
105 patients ASA I-III, undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia, will be randomly assigned into one of three groups, namely group A (n=35), where an adductor canal block, group B (N:35) where an adductor canal block with IPCAK, and group C (n=35) where an adductor canal block with PAI will be performed preoperatively. All patients will receive a standardized multimodal approach. NRS scores will be evaluated in static and dynamic conditions during the first 48 hours postoperatively.
Detailed description
Total knee replacement (TKP) is accepted as one of the major orthopedic surgery that most patients suffer from pain in the postoperative period. The primary aim of this research is to compare the analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee(IPACK) with the periarticular block when an additional adductor canal block is used. In the literature, adductor canal block(ACB) and sciatic nerve block are used as part of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management of patients undergoing TKP. Nevertheless, ACB is found less effective for pain originating from the posterior part of the knee. Sciatic nerve block and periarticular injection(PAI) are commonly used blocks to improve the analgesic effect of ACB. Besides this, ACB is effective for pain originated from the posterior part of the knee. IPACK block is performed under ultrasound guidance and targets the articular branches of tibial, common peroneal, and obturator nerves with sparing lower extremity motor function.
Patients scheduled for knee surgery under spinal anesthesia are included fort his study. All groups will be applied 0.03 mg/kg midazolam iv, then spinal anesthesia will be applied to 15 mg 0.5 % heavy bupivacaine. Three groups of 105 patients will be included in the study.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) (Group A ) (n:35): After the patients are given the supine position, under the guidance of the ultrasound linear probe, 10-15cm proximal to the knee joint, under the sartorius muscle, next to the femoral artery. After the saphenous is observed, 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be given
Adductor + İPACK Grup ( group B) (n: 35): Adductor canal 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be administered. After the knee is flexed, after the convex probe is placed in the popliteal space, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the area between the popliteal artery and the femur called IPACK
Adductor + PAI ( group C) (n: 35): Adductor canal 0.25% 20 mL of bupivacaine will be administered. Patients will receive 60 ml of local anesthetic cocktail intraoperatively by the surgeon. At the end of the operation to the peri-articular area (posterior capsule, collateral ligament, quadriceps muscle). Cocktail consists of 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + 8 ml 8 mg morphine+12 ml saline.
Routine multimodal analgesia will be used for postoperative analgesia
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | Procedure: block, Procedure: adductor canal blockAdductor canal block |
| Group B | Active comparator | Procedure: block, Procedure: adductor canal block, Procedure: Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK BlockAdductor canal block plus IPACK |
| Group C | Active comparator | Procedure: block, Procedure: adductor canal block, Procedure: adductor Canal Block plus PAI BlockAdductor canal block plus PAI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Physical status according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III
- Patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous operation on same knee
- Hepatic or renal insufficiency
- Younger than 18 years old and older than 85
- Patients undergoing general anesthesia
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| blockAdductor canal block | Procedure or surgery | Group A, Group B, Group C |
| adductor canal blockadductor canal block bupivacain | Procedure or surgery | Group A, Group B, Group C |
| Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK BlockAdductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block using bupivacaine | Procedure or surgery | Group B |
| adductor Canal Block plus PAI BlockAdductor Canal Block plus PAI Block using bupivacaine | Procedure or surgery | Group C |
Primary outcome
NRS scores
Time frame: 48 hours
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores (Range 0-10, 0=no pain, 10=the worse pain ever)
7 secondary outcomes
Opioid consumption
Time frame: 4-6-8-12-24 and 48 hours
Range of knee motion
Time frame: 48 hours
Complications
Time frame: 48 hours
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 48 hours
Incidence of adverse events related to nerve block procedures
Time frame: Post-op 24 to 72 hours
Rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Post-op 24 to 48 hours
Patient mobilization
Time frame: 2 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32694032Kertkiatkachorn W, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S. Adductor Canal Block Combined With iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block vs Periarticular Injection for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):122-129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.086. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 30234517Kim DH, Beathe JC, Lin Y, YaDeau JT, Maalouf DB, Goytizolo E, Garnett C, Ranawat AS, Su EP, Mayman DJ, Memtsoudis SG. Addition of Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee and Adductor Canal Block to Periarticular Injection Enhances Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):526-535. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003794.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of HL-01 in the Treatment of Pain in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Arthritis Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing block, adductor canal block and Adductor Canal Block plus IPACK Block in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Karaman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NRS scores (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04931966, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2021.