AzTrials
AzTrials

SARS-COV-2NCT04932837

Level of Immunity, Neutralization of the COVID-19 Virus and Reinfections in Residents of 2 Migrant Workers' Residences

An observational study of SARS-COV-2, run by Epicentre at 2 sites in France.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A previous seroprevalence survey showed very high seroprevalence levels among residents of the two among the residents of the two migrant workers' hostels surveyed, indicating a high level of circulation of the virus SARS-COV-2 during the 1st wave of COVID-19. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
SARS-COV-2
What is being tested?
Blood and Saliva collection
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
14 Jun 2021to 2 Jul 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: residents of 2 Migrant Workers

Who may be able to join

  • All individuals who consented to participate in the 1st study and who consent to participate in this study
  • All individuals 18 years of age or older not residing in the 2 MWRs in July 2020 and permanently living in the MWR since September 2020 who consent to participate in this study

Who cannot join

  • Unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Unwillingness to provide blood
  • Contraindication to venepuncture

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Foyer de travailleurs migrants

    Montreuil, Île-de-France Region, 93

  • Foyer de travailleurs migrants

    Villemomble, Île-de-France Region, 93

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Determination of the Level of Immunity, Neutralization of the SARS-COV-2 Virus and Reinfections in Residents of 2 Migrant Workers' Residences 10 Months Apart

A previous seroprevalence survey showed very high seroprevalence levels among residents of the two among the residents of the two migrant workers' hostels surveyed, indicating a high level of circulation of the virus SARS-COV-2 during the 1st wave of COVID-19. The constitution of a cohort after the event would be an opportunity to obtain opportunity to obtain answers to crucial questions: duration of immunity, potential reinfections potential reinfections, potential re-clustering. Going back to check the serological status seems feasible, especiallyespecially in the Foyers de Travailleurs Migrants (high probability of finding the participants).

There is an obvious scientific interest around the duration of immunity and reinfections in a population highly exposed during the first wave. Several articles document the decline of IgG antibodies in the months following an infection, but very few infection, but very few evaluate the protective character in the medium term (>=6 months), especially in asymptomatic individuals. We are also concerned about the circulation of We are also concerned about the circulation of new variants and the immunity acquired after infection in residents.

To date, no study on the duration of immunity has been conducted in migrant worker's residences.

Conditions
SARS-COV-2
Being tested
Blood and Saliva collection
Keywords
COVID-19, migrant workers' residences, Immunity, protection
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood and Saliva collectionBiological

    Serological, viral RNA and antigenic test

Study groups in NCT04932837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
migrant worker residentsThe target population will be the 124 residents in the 2 migrant worker residences who were included in the previous seroprevalence study and those who arrived at the 2 residences since September 1st, 2020
Receives: Biological: Blood and Saliva collection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Level and quality of current humoral immune protection in the residents of the two migrant workers' residences

    To assess the level and quality of current humoral immune protection in the residents of the two migrant workers' residences in Villemomble and Montreuil who were included in the 1st seroprevalence study in July 2020, approximately 10 months later (May 2021)

    Measured: 15 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Immunity and protection

    • Identify potential reinfections (reported symptoms confirmed by positive PCR tests) or resurgence of symptoms (long COVID) among residents who were seropositive in July 2020
    • Assess the evolution of antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) approximately 10 months after the first test in Sars-CoV-2 seropositive individuals in July
    • To evaluate the neutralizing and therefore protective activity of the re-measured antibodies, and their level of affinity maturation to SARS-COV-2 as well as their efficacy against the mainly circulating variants: B.1.1.7 (UK), B.1.351 (South Africa) and P.1 (Brazil)

    Measured: 15 days

  2. New infections and screening

    • Estimate the proportion of infections (reported symptoms and/or positive PCR tests)/exposure to the virus in people newly arrived since September 2020
    • In case of SARS-COV-2 RNA detection, characterize the virus subtype (genomic sequencing)
    • Document the turnover in MWR populations to guide MSF activities in the future

    Measured: 15 days

  3. COVID Vaccination

    • Assess the proportion of participants already vaccinated or interested in the future COVID vaccination campaign and document the reasons for those who express doubts or plan to refuse vaccination
    • To evaluate the performance of the LuLISA technique for the response to SARS-CoV-2 N and S proteins
    • To evaluate the performance of a rapid serological test on strip, LuLISA Stripe developed by the Institute Pasteur by comparison to the LuLISA technique
    • To evaluate the performance of a rapid N and S antigenic test on saliva, LuLISA Flash, developed by the Institut Pasteur, by comparing it to the RT-PCR method
    • To evaluate the performance of an alternative antigenic test on saliva with very high sensitivity, LuLISA Stick, developed by Institute Pasteur, by comparing it to the RT-PCR method
    • Evaluate the performance of a rapid molecular RT-LAMP test developed by Institute Pasteur (depending on availability) by comparing it to the RT-PCR method

    Measured: 15 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2021
  2. Study start14 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion25 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion2 Jul 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The vaccination campaign started before the approval of the ethics committee was obtained. The study is therefore no longer of interest to be carried out.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04932837
Sponsor's protocol ID
811562
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
1 Jun 2021
Last updated
21 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The research team will develop a range of activities to disseminate the study findings. These dissemination activities will be coordinated by MSF and Epicentre. The results will be presented in an internal report and an external report for the Ministry of Health (MoH), the French National Public Health Agency and Institute Pasteur. An abstract of the findings will be submitted for presentation at a scientific conference, and at least one manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The findings of the survey will also be used for advocacy purposes, in coordination with community leaders of participating communities. The results of the survey (lay version of the report), and their possible use for advocacy / communication, will be shared with the staff, resident representatives and residents of the MWRs, whether or not they actually participated in the study.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of SARS-COV-2, run by Epicentre at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Level and quality of current humoral immune protection in the residents of the two migrant workers' residences (time frame: 15 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in