Labor Onset and Length AbnormalitiesLaPPSNCT04933708
LaPPS: Labor Podcast for Patient Satisfaction
A study testing Labor Podcast in people with Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities and Pregnancy Related, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients will be enrolled at 28w0d-36w0d. Randomized to one of two arms: 1. Labor podcasts - Seven labor podcasts that can be downloaded for any podcast app 2. Usual care Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities, Pregnancy Related
- What is being tested?
- Labor Podcast
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to 1 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Nulliparous
- Singleton pregnancy
- English-speaking
- Age 18-50
- Own a smart phone or device capable of downloading podcasts
- Reached at least 36w0d of gestation
- Willing and able to sign consent form
Who cannot join
- Planned cesarean delivery
- Complication in pregnancy including:
- Placenta accrete spectrum
- Vasa previa
- Intrauterine fetal demise
- Known major fetal anomaly
- Delivery planned at location other than the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: The Effect of a Labor Podcast Intervention on Patient Satisfaction and Postpartum Depression in Nulliparous Women
Patients will be enrolled at 28w0d-36w0d. Randomized to one of two arms:
- Labor podcasts - Seven labor podcasts that can be downloaded for any podcast app
- Usual care
Read the detailed description
Objectives Overall objectives To assess the effect of listening to physician-created podcasts of common labor topics on patient satisfaction and perception of their birth experience Primary outcome variable(s) Patient satisfaction as measured by LAS + 2 satisfaction questions Secondary outcome variable(s) Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) scores Logistic regression for multivariate analysis with regards to demographics and other birth outcomes
Background Recently, podcasts have been used for both undergraduate and graduate medical education, with studies showing that they are feasible, acceptable, and effective. Learners appear to enjoy podcast learning because they increased efficiency by allowing listeners to multitask, made listeners keep up to date with medical literature, and increased overall knowledge. However, podcast learning has not been as widespread for patient education. There have been some studies that showed that podcast patient education is feasible, and one small study showed increased knowledge scores after listening to podcasts.
To our knowledge, podcast learning has never been studied in the obstetric population. Labor and delivery is usually a time that is fraught with questions from first time mothers, and more education may increase these women's perception of control and satisfaction overall with birth and the postpartum period. The Labor Agentry Scale (LAS)-10 is a validated instrument measuring expectancies and experiences of personal control during childbirth. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is also a validated scale that measures levels of postpartum depression that is commonly used at our institution both immediately postpartum and at the postpartum visit 4-6 weeks after delivery.
Study Design Design Pregnant patients between 28w0d - 36w0d will be randomized to one of the following study arms upon enrollment. Patients will be approached after 20 weeks for consent and randomized after they reach 28 weeks. The study will be done in an intent-to-treat fashion. Due to the nature of the study, blinding will not be possible.
Study Arms 1) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download seven HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum
- Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth, Normal Labor
- LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
- EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
- Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions:
- LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
- EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
Study duration Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete the study Length of a subject's participation time in study Project date of the proposed study
Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete study:
Based on previous studies using the LAS-10, average score ranged between 45-53/70, with standard deviations ranging from 6-12. Therefore, we would estimate that the LAS score in the usual care group to be approximately 50. To be able to detect an effect size of 4, with a standard deviation of 9, and to achieve a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05, we would need a sample size of approximately 79 subjects per group. Calculating for a 20% loss to follow-up rate, we would anticipate recruiting 95 subjects per group.
Our city has an average of 16% preterm birth rate. Our hospital averages 1400 nulliparous deliveries/year. We would conservatively estimate approaching 50% of these women in the prenatal period for enrollment. If we assume a 75% consent rate for the RCT, which is standard for our center, we anticipate enrolling 30-36 women per month in our study. We would therefore anticipate it taking 6 months before we reach our target sample size.
We would then require an additional 6 months to compile and analyze the data.
Length of subject's participation:
Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum.
Project date of the proposed study:
Proposed to start April 2021 for recruitment and enrollment. We anticipate enrolling all patients by end of September 2021. We would likely be able to conclude the study by April 2022.
Resources necessary for human research protection Subjects will be recruited from looking at antepartum clinic charts and messaged via MPM once they are deemed eligible. This can be one by Dr. Cai and Dr. Srinivas. Both will be trained in the study protocol prior to enrolling subjects.
The research staff will also distribute information regarding the study to the aforementioned prenatal clinics so that written information can be handed out by providers to patients. This will allow for patients to be aware of the study. However, only study personnel will be able to consent and enroll patients.
- Being tested
- Labor Podcast
- Keywords
- Nulliparity, Podcast, Labor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Labor PodcastBehavioural
Listening to podcasts.
Topics include:
Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Labor Podcast Group | Experimental | 1) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download six HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum
o Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth
* LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
* EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire Receives: Behavioral: Labor Podcast |
| Usual Care | No intervention | 2. Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions: * LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message) * EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Labor Agentry Scale
Subjects will complete the labor agentry scale after delivery. Score on labor agentry scale will be compared between groups. Score range: 10-70. Higher scores indicate more agentry, which we consider to be better for this study.
Measured: 2 days after delivery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Birth Satisfaction
Subjects will also complete a birth satisfaction survey after delivery. Score on birth satisfaction will be compared between two groups. Score range: 3 - 21. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Measured: 2 days after delivery
Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale
Subjects will complete the EPDS 7 days postpartum. Scores will be compared between the two groups. Score range: 0-30. Higher scores indicate more risk of depression
Measured: 7 days postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2021
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completion1 Jul 2022
- Study completion1 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Labor Onset and Length AbnormalitiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pregnant patients between 28w0d - 36w0d will be randomized to one of the following study arms upon enrollment. Patients will be approached after 20 weeks for consent and randomized after they reach 28 weeks. The study will be done in an intent-to-treat fashion. Due to the nature of the study, blinding will not be possible. Study Arms 1. Labor Podcast Group 2. Usual Teaching
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fei Cai, MD, University of Pennsylvania
- Investigators
- Sindhu Srinivas, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04933708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 848622
- Acronym
- LaPPS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lee SC, Huang H, Minard CG, Schackman J, Rajagopalan S. The use of podcast videos for airway skills. Clin Teach. 2019 Dec;16(6):585-588. doi: 10.1111/tct.12984. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
PubMed 30592144Cai F, Burns RN, Kelly B, Hampton BS. CREOGs Over Coffee: Feasibility of an Ob-Gyn Medical Education Podcast by Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Jun;12(3):340-343. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00644.1.
PubMed 32595856Young B, Pouw A, Redfern A, Cai F, Chow J. Eyes for Ears-A Medical Education Podcast Feasibility Study. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):342-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
PubMed 32709568Malecki SL, Quinn KL, Zilbert N, Razak F, Ginsburg S, Verma AA, Melvin L. Understanding the Use and Perceived Impact of a Medical Podcast: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Sep 19;5(2):e12901. doi: 10.2196/12901.
PubMed 31538949Chin A, Helman A, Chan TM. Podcast Use in Undergraduate Medical Education. Cureus. 2017 Dec 9;9(12):e1930. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1930.
PubMed 29464137Cai F, McCabe M, Srinivas SK. A randomized trial assessing the impact of educational podcasts on personal control and satisfaction during childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):592.e1-592.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
PubMed 36791987
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of a Labor Podcast Intervention on Patient Satisfaction and Postpartum Depression in Nulliparous Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04933708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LaPPS / 848622
- Keywords
- Nulliparity, Podcast, Labor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients will be enrolled at 28w0d-36w0d. Randomized to one of two arms:
- Labor podcasts - Seven labor podcasts that can be downloaded for any podcast app
- Usual care
Detailed description
Objectives Overall objectives To assess the effect of listening to physician-created podcasts of common labor topics on patient satisfaction and perception of their birth experience Primary outcome variable(s) Patient satisfaction as measured by LAS + 2 satisfaction questions Secondary outcome variable(s) Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) scores Logistic regression for multivariate analysis with regards to demographics and other birth outcomes
Background Recently, podcasts have been used for both undergraduate and graduate medical education, with studies showing that they are feasible, acceptable, and effective. Learners appear to enjoy podcast learning because they increased efficiency by allowing listeners to multitask, made listeners keep up to date with medical literature, and increased overall knowledge. However, podcast learning has not been as widespread for patient education. There have been some studies that showed that podcast patient education is feasible, and one small study showed increased knowledge scores after listening to podcasts.
To our knowledge, podcast learning has never been studied in the obstetric population. Labor and delivery is usually a time that is fraught with questions from first time mothers, and more education may increase these women's perception of control and satisfaction overall with birth and the postpartum period. The Labor Agentry Scale (LAS)-10 is a validated instrument measuring expectancies and experiences of personal control during childbirth. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is also a validated scale that measures levels of postpartum depression that is commonly used at our institution both immediately postpartum and at the postpartum visit 4-6 weeks after delivery.
Study Design Design Pregnant patients between 28w0d - 36w0d will be randomized to one of the following study arms upon enrollment. Patients will be approached after 20 weeks for consent and randomized after they reach 28 weeks. The study will be done in an intent-to-treat fashion. Due to the nature of the study, blinding will not be possible.
Study Arms 1) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download seven HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum
- Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth, Normal Labor
- LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
- EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
- Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions:
- LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
- EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
Study duration Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete the study Length of a subject's participation time in study Project date of the proposed study
Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete study:
Based on previous studies using the LAS-10, average score ranged between 45-53/70, with standard deviations ranging from 6-12. Therefore, we would estimate that the LAS score in the usual care group to be approximately 50. To be able to detect an effect size of 4, with a standard deviation of 9, and to achieve a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05, we would need a sample size of approximately 79 subjects per group. Calculating for a 20% loss to follow-up rate, we would anticipate recruiting 95 subjects per group.
Our city has an average of 16% preterm birth rate. Our hospital averages 1400 nulliparous deliveries/year. We would conservatively estimate approaching 50% of these women in the prenatal period for enrollment. If we assume a 75% consent rate for the RCT, which is standard for our center, we anticipate enrolling 30-36 women per month in our study. We would therefore anticipate it taking 6 months before we reach our target sample size.
We would then require an additional 6 months to compile and analyze the data.
Length of subject's participation:
Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum.
Project date of the proposed study:
Proposed to start April 2021 for recruitment and enrollment. We anticipate enrolling all patients by end of September 2021. We would likely be able to conclude the study by April 2022.
Resources necessary for human research protection Subjects will be recruited from looking at antepartum clinic charts and messaged via MPM once they are deemed eligible. This can be one by Dr. Cai and Dr. Srinivas. Both will be trained in the study protocol prior to enrolling subjects.
The research staff will also distribute information regarding the study to the aforementioned prenatal clinics so that written information can be handed out by providers to patients. This will allow for patients to be aware of the study. However, only study personnel will be able to consent and enroll patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pregnant patients between 28w0d - 36w0d will be randomized to one of the following study arms upon enrollment. Patients will be approached after 20 weeks for consent and randomized after they reach 28 weeks. The study will be done in an intent-to-treat fashion. Due to the nature of the study, blinding will not be possible. Study Arms 1. Labor Podcast Group 2. Usual Teaching
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Labor Podcast Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Labor Podcast1) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download six HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum o Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth * LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message) * EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –2. Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions: * LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message) * EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Nulliparous
- Singleton pregnancy
- English-speaking
- Age 18-50
- Own a smart phone or device capable of downloading podcasts
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Planned cesarean delivery
- Complication in pregnancy including:
- Delivery planned at location other than the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Labor PodcastListening to podcasts. Topics include: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth | Behavioural | Labor Podcast Group |
Primary outcome
Labor Agentry Scale
Time frame: 2 days after delivery
Subjects will complete the labor agentry scale after delivery. Score on labor agentry scale will be compared between groups. Score range: 10-70. Higher scores indicate more agentry, which we consider to be better for this study.
2 secondary outcomes
Birth Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 days after delivery
Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale
Time frame: 7 days postpartum
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30592144Lee SC, Huang H, Minard CG, Schackman J, Rajagopalan S. The use of podcast videos for airway skills. Clin Teach. 2019 Dec;16(6):585-588. doi: 10.1111/tct.12984. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 32595856Cai F, Burns RN, Kelly B, Hampton BS. CREOGs Over Coffee: Feasibility of an Ob-Gyn Medical Education Podcast by Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Jun;12(3):340-343. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00644.1.
- Background: PubMed 32709568Young B, Pouw A, Redfern A, Cai F, Chow J. Eyes for Ears-A Medical Education Podcast Feasibility Study. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):342-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
- Background: PubMed 31538949Malecki SL, Quinn KL, Zilbert N, Razak F, Ginsburg S, Verma AA, Melvin L. Understanding the Use and Perceived Impact of a Medical Podcast: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Sep 19;5(2):e12901. doi: 10.2196/12901.
- Background: PubMed 29464137Chin A, Helman A, Chan TM. Podcast Use in Undergraduate Medical Education. Cureus. 2017 Dec 9;9(12):e1930. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1930.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36791987Cai F, McCabe M, Srinivas SK. A randomized trial assessing the impact of educational podcasts on personal control and satisfaction during childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):592.e1-592.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities
RecruitingPhase 2
Use of Cinnamomum Verum for Induction of Labor. Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities, First Birth
Recruiting
The Norwegian World Health Organisation Labour Care Guide Trial (NORWEL)
Labor Dystocia, Labor Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sindhu Srinivas, MD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Labor Podcast in people with Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities and Pregnancy Related, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Labor Agentry Scale (time frame: 2 days after delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04933708, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025.