Arthritis, PsoriaticPhase 3SOLSTICENCT04936308
Guselkumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to One Prior Anti-TNF Alpha Agent
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Arthritis, Psoriatic, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 169 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to a prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 453 participants
- Where
- 169 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2021to 2 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have a diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent and meet Classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
- Have active PsA as defined by: at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline; and C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening from the central laboratory
- Have at least one of the following PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Have active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of >= 2 centimeters (cm) diameter and/or nail changes consistent with psoriasis, or documented history of plaque psoriasis
- Have an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with one prior anti-TNF alpha agent
Who cannot join
- Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy in the treatment of PsA, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis/nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has received more than 1 prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha agent (or biosimilars)
- Has ever received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib or any other investigational JAK inhibitor
- Has received any systemic immunosuppressants (example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention
- Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (example, recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (example, mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
Trial locations and contacts
169 sites in 14 countries.
169 sites in 14 countries
United States50 sites
Albuquerque Center for Rheumatology
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC 2
Avondale, Arizona, 85392
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System
Bay Pines, Florida, 33744
Rheumatology and Pulmonary Clinic
Beckley, West Virginia, 25801
DJL Clinical Research, PLLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
Chicago, Illinois, 60640
Clinical Research of West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
Adriana Pop Moody MD Clinic PA
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Clinical Research Center of Connecticut
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Omega Research Consultants
DeBary, Florida, 32713
St. Paul Rheumatology P A
Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC 3
Flagstaff, Arizona, 86001-6218
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions 1
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107
Klein And Associates M D P A
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Newport Huntington Medical Group
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Great Lakes Center of Rheumatology
Lansing, Michigan, 48911
Arthritis and Osteoperosis Associates of New Mexico
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88011
West Texas Clinical Research
Lubbock, Texas, 79424
Dr. Ramesh Gupta
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
The Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203
Arthritis Associates
Mountain Brook, Alabama, 35223
Advanced Clinical Research of Orlando
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Arthritis and Rheumatology Center of MI
Okemos, Michigan, 48864
Health Research of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Rheumatology Associates of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116
Buffalo Rheumatology and Medicine PLLC
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC 1
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Texas Rheumatology Care
Plano, Texas, 75024
Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081
Unity Health-White County Medical Center
Searcy, Arkansas, 72143
Clinic of Robert Hozman
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Arthritis Northwest PLLC 1
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Arthritis Consultants
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates
Sun City, Arizona, 85351
Clinical Research of West Florida 1
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Advanced Rheumatology of Houston
The Woodlands, Texas, 77382
Medvin Clinical Research 2
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
DM Clinical Research
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System
Tucson, Arizona, 85723
Medvin Clinical Research
Tujunga, California, 91042
STAT Research, Inc.
Vandalia, Ohio, 45377
Arthritis Rheumatic And Back Disease Associates
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Arthritis And Osteoporosis Clinic
Waco, Texas, 76710
Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542
Russia20 sites
Altay Medical State University
Barnaul, 656038
Chelyabinck Regional Clinical Hospital
Chelyabinsk, 454076
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Chelyabinsk, 454092
Kemerovo State Medical University
Kemerovo, 650000
LLL Medical Center Revma-Med
Kemerovo, 650070
LLC Family Outpatient Clinic # 4
Korolyov, 141060
Krasnodar Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary
Krasnodar, 350020
Regional SBI of PH Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical hospital #20 named after I.S. Berzon
Krasnoyarsk, 660123
Clinical-Diagnostic Center Euromedservice, JSC
Moscow, 115419
FGBU Research Institute of Rheumatology named V.A.Nasonova
Moscow, 115522
GBUZ of Moscow Region 'Moscow Region SRI n.a. Vladimirskyi'
Moscow, 129110
GBOU VPO Orenburg State Medical University
Orenburg, 460000
Rostov Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Rostov-on-Don, 344007
St. Petersburg GBUZ Clinical Reumatological Hospital 25
Saint Petersburg, 190068
X7 Clinical Research Company Limited
Saint Petersburg, 194156
Saratov Regional Clinical Hospital
Saratov, 410053
Smolensk regional hospital on Smolensk railway station
Smolensk, 214025
GBUZ of Samara Region 'Tolyatti City Clinical Hospital 5'
Tolyatti, 445846
Tula Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Tula, 300053
Republican Clinical Hospital - G.G. Kuvatov
Ufa, 450005
Poland16 sites
Nzoz Bif Med
Bytom, 41 902
Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze
Elblag, 82-300
Malopolskie Badania Kliniczne Sp z o o
Krakow, 30 002
Malopolskie Centrum Kliniczne
Krakow, 30 149
Centrum Medyczne Promed
Krakow, 31-513
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
Lodz, 90-265
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
Lodz, 90-338
NZOZ Lecznica MAK MED S C
Nadarzyn, 05-830
Twoja Przychodnia - Centrum Medyczne Nowa Sol
Nowa Sól, 67-100
Twoja Przychodnia PCM
Poznan, 60 324
Centrum Medyczne
Poznan, 61 113
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
Świdnik, 21 040
MICS Centrum Medyczne Warszawa
Warsaw, 00-874
Rheuma Medicus Sp z o o
Warsaw, 02 118
Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park
Warsaw, 02 665
WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c
Wroclaw, 51 685
Ukraine15 sites
Communal Noncommercial Enterprise Cherkasy Regional Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council
Cherkasy, 18009
Municipal non-commercial enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital
Kharkiv, 61204
Khmelnitckiy regional hospital
Khmelnytsky, 29000
City Clinical Hospital No. 2
Kryvyi Rih, 50056
Medical Center LLC 'Harmony of Beauty'
Kyiv, 01135
Medical Center of 'Institute of Rheumatology', LLC
Kyiv, 02081
Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #3
Kyiv, 02125
Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital #2 Of Branch 'Health Center' Of The Company 'Ukrainian Railway'
Kyiv, 03049
SI National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko of NAMS of Ukraine
Kyiv, 03151
Medical Center 'Consylium Medical'
Kyiv, 04050
Volyn Regional Clinical Hospital
Lutsk, 43005
LLC Medical House
Odesa, 65026
ME Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.V. Sklifosovsky of Poltava Regional Consuil
Poltava, 36011
Vinnitsia Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. M. I. Pyrogov
Vinnytsia, 21018
Medical Center LLC 'Modern Clinic'
Zaporizhzhya, 69600
Turkey (Türkiye)14 sites
Adana City Hospital
Adana, 01370
Gulhane Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Ankara, 06010
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, 06800
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 6100
Akdeniz Universitesi Hastanesi
Antalya, 07070
Bursa Uludag Universitesi Hastanesi
Bursa, 16059
Pamukkale University Medical Faculty
Denizli, 20070
Osmangazi University Medical Faculty
Eskişehir, 26040
Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34093
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34098
Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar sehir Hastanesi
Istanbul, 34865
Marmara University Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34899
Kocaeli University Medical Faculty
Kocaeli, 41380
Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Konya, 42090
Bulgaria9 sites
UMHAT 'Dr. Georgi Stranski', EAD
Pleven, 5804
Medical Center Unimed Plovdiv
Plovdiv, 4001
UMHAT Kaspela
Plovdiv, 4001
Diagnosis-consulting centre-1
Rousse, 7002
Military Medical Academy
Sofia, 1606
UMHAT St. Ivan Rilski
Sofia, 1612
ASIMP Rheumatology Centre St Irina EOOD
Sofia, 1750
University Multiprofile Hospital Sofiamed Sofia
Sofia, 1770
Medical Centre Synexus
Sofia, 1794
Hungary8 sites
Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz
Budapest, 1027
Uno Medical Trials Ltd.
Budapest, 1152
Debreceni Egyetem, Kenézy Gyula Egyetemi Oktatókórház
Debrecen, 4031
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz
Gyula, 5700
Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
Kistarcsa, 2143
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, ÁOK, Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ
Szeged, 6725
Fejer Varmegyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
Székesfehérvár, H-8000
Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont
Veszprém, 8200
Argentina7 sites
Cosultorios Reumatologógicos Pampa
Buenos Aires, 1428
OMI
Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
CIPREC
Buenos Aires, C1061AAS
Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar
Buenos Aires, C1417EYG
Hospital Central Militar Cirujano Mayor Dr Cosme Argerich
Buenos Aires, C1426BOS
Instituto de Reumatología Mendoza
Mendoza, M5631AHF
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL
Czechia7 sites
RHEUMA s r o
Břeclav, 690 02
L K N Arthrocentrum
Hlučín, 748 01
MUDr Rosypalova s r o
Ostrava, 70800
Arthrohelp S.R.O.
Pardubice, 53002
Revmatologicky ustav
Prague, 128 50
Medical Plus S R O
Uherské Hradiště, 68601
PV Medical S R O
Zlín, 76001
Spain7 sites
Hosp. Univ. de Cruces
Barakaldo, 48903
Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hosp. Quiron Madrid Pozuelo
Madrid, 28223
Hosp Regional Univ de Malaga
Málaga, 29011
Clinica Gaias
Santiago de Compostela, 15702
Hosp. Quiron Sagrado Corazon
Seville, 41013
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Israel5 sites
Bnai Zion Medical Center
Haifa, 31048
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, 3109601
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, 34362
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 4428164
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 5265601
Australia4 sites
Southern Clinical Research
Hobart, 7000
Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool, 2170
Skin Health Institute Inc.
Melbourne, 3053
Eastern Health - Box Hill Hospital
Melbourne, 3128
Malaysia4 sites
Hospital Selayang
Batu Caves, 68100
Hospital Pulau Pinang
George Town, 10990
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Ipoh, 30450
Hospital Tuanku Jaafar
Seremban, 70300
Puerto Rico3 sites
GCM Medical Group
San Juan, 00917
Mindful Medical Research
San Juan, 00918
FDI Clinical Research
San Juan, 00927
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Administered Subcutaneously in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Had an Inadequate Response and/or Intolerance to One Prior Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agent
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to a prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA.
Read the detailed description
PsA is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by peripheral joint inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, axial disease, and the skin lesions associated with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to p19 protein subunit of interleukin (IL)-23 and blocks the binding of extracellular IL-23 to the cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL-23 specific intracellular signaling, subsequent activation, and cytokine production. The primary hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab is superior to placebo as assessed by the proportion of participants who had an inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to one prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) response at Week 24. This study will consist of a screening phase (up to 6 weeks), blinded treatment phase (approximately up to 2 years), which includes a placebo-controlled period from Week 0 to Week 24, and an active-controlled treatment phase from Week 24 to Week 100, and safety follow-up phase (Week 112). Safety assessments will include physical examinations, vital signs, height, weight, electrocardiograms, and clinical safety laboratory assessments. The total duration of the study will be up to 118 weeks.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- Being tested
- Guselkumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuselkumabDrug
Also called Tremfya, CNTO1959
Participants will receive guselkumab as SC injection.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive matching placebo as SC injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab and Placebo | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab and placebo subcutaneously (SC) to maintain the blind. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2: Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab SC. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab |
| Group 3: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive placebo SC and will cross over to receive guselkumab SC. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
ACR 20 response: >=20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: At Week 24
Secondary outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Response of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 Among the Participants With >=3 Percent(%) Body Surface Area (BSA)
A psoriasis IGA response was defined as an IGA score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal) and greater than equal to (>=2) grade reduction from baseline in the IGA psoriasis score. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the patient's psoriasis and lesions are graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale: 0 (no evidence), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores. The participant's psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 24 Among the Participants With >=3% BSA Psoriatic Involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline
PASI is a tool to assess and grade severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In PASI, body is divided into 4 areas: head, trunk, upper extremities, lower extremities. Each area was assessed separately for percentage of area involved and translated to numeric score ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, each rated on scale of 0 to 4 that is none to maximum severtiy. PASI numeric score range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. A PASI 90 response: >=90% improvement in PASI score from baseline.
Measured: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living), each scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement of physical function.
Measured: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a Physical Component Summary (PCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The PCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. The subscale consists 13-item instrument to measure fatigue. Each of the 13 items has a set of five response categories: Not at all (=0), A little bit (=1), Somewhat (=2), Quite a bit (=3) and Very much (=4). A total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score was calculated as the sum of the 13 item scores (reserved scores [4 - score]) and ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of fatigue. Items were reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24
MDA is a measure that defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes 5 domains of PsA (joint symptoms, skin psoriasis, patient's perspective of pain and disease activity on arthritis and psoriasis, physical function and enthesitis). Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 criteria at that visit: Tender joint count (68 joints)<=1, Swollen joint count (66 joints) <=1, Psoriasis activity and severity index <=1, Patient's Assessment of Pain <=15 on a 100-unit VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (arthritis and psoriasis) <=20 on a 100-unit VAS, HAQ-DI score <=0.5, and Tender entheseal points <= 1 (LEI index score <= 1).
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20 Response at Week 16
ACR 20 response: >=20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: At Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 16
ACR 50 response: >=50% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: At Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 24
ACR 50 response: >=50% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70 Response at Week 24
ACR 70 response: >=70% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Related AEs (TERAEs)
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Infections
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Injection-site Reactions
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Infusion Related Reactions
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Laboratory Abnormalities With Maximum Toxicity Grade Greater Than or Equal to >=3 Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Measured: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Serum Guselkumab Concentration Over Time
Serum concentrations of guselkumab over time was reported.
Measured: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20,and 24
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Guselkumab
Number of participants with antibodies to guselkumab (ADA) were reported. A validated immunoassay was used to detect ADA.
Measured: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2021
- Study start28 Sep 2021
- Primary completion28 Oct 2024
- Study completion2 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, PsoriaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04936308
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR109039
- Other IDs
- CNTO1959PSA3005, 2021-000482-32, 2023-504715-33-00, 2023
- Acronym
- SOLSTICE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Ogdie A, Merola JF, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Scher JU, Lafferty KP, Chan D, Chakravarty SD, Langholff W, Wang Y, Shao J, Krol Y, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis After Inadequate Response to One Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor: Week-24 Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026 Aug;78(8):1674-1686. doi: 10.1002/art.70092. Epub 2026 Apr 16.
PubMed 41670439Ogdie A, Merola JF, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Scher JU, Lafferty KP, Chan D, Chakravarty SD, Langholff W, Wang Y, Choi O, Krol Y, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who had inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance to one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: study protocol for SOLSTICE, a phase 3B, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Rheumatol. 2024 May 21;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00386-7.
PubMed 38773563
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Administered Subcutaneously in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Had an Inadequate Response and/or Intolerance to One Prior Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agent
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04936308
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOLSTICE / CR109039
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to a prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA.
Detailed description
PsA is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by peripheral joint inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, axial disease, and the skin lesions associated with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to p19 protein subunit of interleukin (IL)-23 and blocks the binding of extracellular IL-23 to the cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL-23 specific intracellular signaling, subsequent activation, and cytokine production. The primary hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab is superior to placebo as assessed by the proportion of participants who had an inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to one prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) response at Week 24. This study will consist of a screening phase (up to 6 weeks), blinded treatment phase (approximately up to 2 years), which includes a placebo-controlled period from Week 0 to Week 24, and an active-controlled treatment phase from Week 24 to Week 100, and safety follow-up phase (Week 112). Safety assessments will include physical examinations, vital signs, height, weight, electrocardiograms, and clinical safety laboratory assessments. The total duration of the study will be up to 118 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab and Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab and placebo subcutaneously (SC) to maintain the blind. |
| Group 2: Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: GuselkumabParticipants will receive guselkumab SC. |
| Group 3: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo SC and will cross over to receive guselkumab SC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have a diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent and meet Classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
- Have active PsA as defined by: at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline; and C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening from the central laboratory
- Have at least one of the following PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Have active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of >= 2 centimeters (cm) diameter and/or nail changes consistent with psoriasis, or documented history of plaque psoriasis
- Have an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with one prior anti-TNF alpha agent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy in the treatment of PsA, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis/nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has received more than 1 prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha agent (or biosimilars)
- Has ever received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib or any other investigational JAK inhibitor
- Has received any systemic immunosuppressants (example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention
- Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuselkumabAlso: Tremfya, CNTO1959Participants will receive guselkumab as SC injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab and Placebo, Group 2: Guselkumab, Group 3: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo as SC injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab and Placebo, Group 3: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
ACR 20 response: >=20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
20 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Response of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 Among the Participants With >=3 Percent(%) Body Surface Area (BSA)
Time frame: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 24 Among the Participants With >=3% BSA Psoriatic Involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline
Time frame: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Related AEs (TERAEs)
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Infections
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Injection-site Reactions
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Percentage of Participants With Infusion Related Reactions
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Laboratory Abnormalities With Maximum Toxicity Grade Greater Than or Equal to >=3 Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: From first administration of study drug (Week 0) up to Week 112
Serum Guselkumab Concentration Over Time
Time frame: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20,and 24
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Guselkumab
Time frame: Baseline (pre dose Week 0) up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41670439Ogdie A, Merola JF, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Scher JU, Lafferty KP, Chan D, Chakravarty SD, Langholff W, Wang Y, Shao J, Krol Y, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis After Inadequate Response to One Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor: Week-24 Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026 Aug;78(8):1674-1686. doi: 10.1002/art.70092. Epub 2026 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38773563Ogdie A, Merola JF, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Scher JU, Lafferty KP, Chan D, Chakravarty SD, Langholff W, Wang Y, Choi O, Krol Y, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who had inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance to one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: study protocol for SOLSTICE, a phase 3B, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Rheumatol. 2024 May 21;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00386-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Arthritis, Psoriatic
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bimekizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Subtypes Enthesitis-related Arthritis (Including Juvenile-onset Ankylosing Spondylitis) and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enthesitis-related Arthritis, Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enrolling by invitation
Combined High-Intensity Aerobic Training and Resistance Training in Psoriatic Arthritis
Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Definition of Novel Optoacoustic Biomarkers of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Psoriasis (PsO), Psoriasis Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: The CARRA Registry
Rheumatic Joint Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate Tulisokibart in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis (MK-7240-015)
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
169 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Arthritis, Psoriatic, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 169 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 169 sites in United States, Russia, Poland, Ukraine, Turkey (Türkiye) and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: At Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04936308, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.