AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemophilia ANCT04941898

A Study of TAK-660 in Surgical Procedures for People With Hemophilia A.

An observational study of Hemophilia A, run by Takeda at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is about a factor VIII medicine called Adynovate (TAK-660) used during surgery for people with hemophilia A who have low blood levels of factor VIII. The aims of this study are as follows: To check for side effects from TAK-660. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Hemophilia A
What is being tested?
PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
30 Jun 2021to 15 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency who received this drug during surgery or treatment after the start date of this survey.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency who received this drug during surgery or treatment after the start date of this survey.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Takeda Selected Site

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Adynovate Special Drug Use Result Survey (Perioperative Administration)

This study is about a factor VIII medicine called Adynovate (TAK-660) used during surgery for people with hemophilia A who have low blood levels of factor VIII.

The aims of this study are as follows:

Read more
  • To check for side effects from TAK-660.
  • To check how well TAK-660 controls bleeding when used routinely during surgery and other invasive procedures such as tooth extractions.

The study sponsor will not be involved in how the participants are treated but will provide instructions on how the clinics will record what happens during the study.

During the study, participants will receive infusions of TAK-660 during their hospital stay for surgery according to their clinic's standard practice. The study doctors will check for bleeds and side effects from TAK-660 from surgery until discharge.

Conditions
Hemophilia A
Being tested
PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Medical subject headings
Hemophilia A

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIIIBiological

    Also called TAK-660, BAX855, ADYNOVATE

    Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ylated full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII)

Study groups in NCT04941898
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TAK-660 15-50 international units per kilograms (IU/kg)Participants will receive TAK-660 15-50 IU/kg slow intravenous injection every 8- 24 hours until the bleeding is resolved or wound healing.
Receives: Biological: PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

    Measured: Up to 30 Days

  2. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.

    Measured: Up to 30 Days

  3. Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

    Measured: Up to 30 Days

  4. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reaction

    A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

    Measured: Up to 30 Days

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions Categorized as Inhibitor Development, Shock, or Anaphylaxis

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Number of participants with adverse reactions categorized as inhibitor development, shock, or anaphylaxis was reported.

    Measured: Up to 30 Days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Intraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion

    The number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Intraoperative hemostatic efficacy was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (≤100%)), Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type: of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (101-150%), Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (>150%) None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

    Measured: Day 1 (date of surgery)

  2. Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After Surgery

    The number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Postoperative hemostatic efficacy 1 day after surgery was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

    Measured: 1 Day post-surgery

  3. Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative Management

    Postoperative hemostatic efficacy at completion of perioperative management was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug after Day 1 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding after Day 1 that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

    Measured: At completion of perioperative management (approximately 30 days after surgery)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2021
  2. Study start30 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04941898
Sponsor's protocol ID
TAK-660-5002
Other IDs
jRCT2031210173
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
25 Jun 2021
Last updated
15 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hemophilia A, run by Takeda at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: Up to 30 Days). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in