Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective StudyNCT04944355
Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective Study
An observational study of Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective Study, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
M1- evaluates the cases of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence in the period between years 2018 and 2021. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective Study
- What is being tested?
- ultrasound
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2021to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Adult
Study population: 1. This cross-sectional study will be conducted in Assiut University Hospital by analysis of records of cesarian section with or without hysterectomy in patient with morbid adherent placenta will be conducted and the cases complicated by urinary tract injuries from october2018 to october 2021. 2. The occurrence of urinary tract injuries will be estimated and the records of those with injuries will be analysed prospectively from October 2018 to october 2021and retrospectively in terms of site and characteristics of injury, difference in management by different specialists, requirement of urologist for management, type of suturing, need for cystoscopy and catheter in situ placement. Study design: This study is a prospective and retrospective study
Who may be able to join
- All cases in the 3rd trimester admitted to Asyut university women health hospital and diagnosed antenatally as having morbidly adherent placenta
- Confirmed diagnosis of MAP.
- Peri partum hysterectomy for MAP.
- Complicated CS without hysterectomy
- Maternal age between 18 and 45 yrs
- No other medical diseases
Who cannot join
- associated other uterine pathology
- Refusal of the patient
- Emergency CS before confirming MAP diagnosis.
- Urinary tract injuries due to other causes than MAP
- Presence of major medical disorders e.g. DM, PE, Cardiac lesion, Coagulopathy, liver diseases or kidney diseases
- Postpartum depression.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Asyut university women health hospital
Asyut
Ahmed Mohamed Alaa El-Din Mahmoud Youssef, 01006184921, AHMEDALAA11282@gmail.com
About this study
M1- evaluates the cases of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence in the period between years 2018 and 2021. This study was carried out in assiut university women health hospital M 2- Clarification of the risk factors and outcome of urinary tract injuries.
Read the detailed description
Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS), also called abnormally invasive placenta (AIP), describes a clinical situation where the placenta does not detach spontaneously after delivery and cannot be forcibly removed without causing massive and potentially life-threatening bleeding(1-2) The incidence of PAS is rising worldwide(3) PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions of the pregnancy as it is significantly associated with maternal morbidity and mortality.(4) PAS may occur after any kind of procedure that causes damage to the endometrium, including curettage, manual removal of the placenta, uterine-artery embolization, or myomectomy(5-6) a full thickness surgical scar is associated with both the absence of endometrial re-epithelialization and vascular remodelling around the scar area, and this may lead to abnormally invasive placentation (increta/percreta).(7) Ultrasound is the first-line imaging tool for the screening and diagnosis of PAS. However, it is now well-established that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a role in the diagnosis of PAS, with high sensitivity and specificity(8-9) Urinary bladder injury is one of the operative morbidities of cesarean section. It occurs in 0.08% - 0.94% of cesarean sections(10) Repeated cesarean section and type of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) are considered the major risk factors for urinary tract injuries during cesarean delivery(11) Urinary bladder injury complicates about 11.7% of cesarean sections in women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)(12) The presence of tough adhesions between the bladder and the lower uterine segment carries the risk of urinary bladder injury. Trial of separation of the bladder in such circumstances may result in bladder injury. Filling of the bladder will delineate the contour of the bladder and clarify the proper plane of dissection (13)
- Being tested
- ultrasound
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ultrasoundOther
Also called doppler
diagnosis of morbid adherent placenta and incidence of urinary tract injuries during surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
• Evaluate the incidence of different types of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence(bladder-ureteric-bladder and ureteric injuries)
- Evaluate the incidence of different types of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence(bladder-ureteric-bladder and ureteric injuries)
Measured: BASELINE
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2021
- Study startJun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective StudyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beshoy Kedes Roshdy Said, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04944355
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Urinary tract injuries at MAP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
PubMed 28599899Chantraine F, Braun T, Gonser M, Henrich W, Tutschek B. Prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta reduces maternal peripartum hemorrhage and morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Apr;92(4):439-44. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12081.
PubMed 23331024Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):265-273. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12407. No abstract available.
PubMed 29405321Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):62-70; discussion 70-1. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12405. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
PubMed 23924326Silver RM, Branch DW. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1529-1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709324. No abstract available.
PubMed 29669225Baldwin HJ, Patterson JA, Nippita TA, Torvaldsen S, Ibiebele I, Simpson JM, Ford JB. Antecedents of Abnormally Invasive Placenta in Primiparous Women: Risk Associated With Gynecologic Procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):227-233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002434.
PubMed 29324602Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
PubMed 28268196Familiari A, Liberati M, Lim P, Pagani G, Cali G, Buca D, Manzoli L, Flacco ME, Scambia G, D'antonio F. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the severity of abnormal invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 May;97(5):507-520. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13258. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PubMed 29136274Morel O, Collins SL, Uzan-Augui J, Masselli G, Duan J, Chabot-Lecoanet AC, Braun T, Langhoff-Roos J, Soyer P, Chantraine F; International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta (IS-AIP). A proposal for standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) - From the International Society for AIP. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Jun;100(6):319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PubMed 30853416Korniluk A, Kosinski P, Wielgos M. Intraoperative damage to the urinary bladder during cesarean section - literature review. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(3):161-165. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0031. No abstract available.
PubMed 28397207Salman L, Aharony S, Shmueli A, Wiznitzer A, Chen R, Gabbay-Benziv R. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: Maternal outcome from a contemporary large case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
PubMed 28411456Alanwar A, Al-Sayed HM, Ibrahim AM, Elkotb AM, Abdelshafy A, Abdelhadi R, Abbas AM, Abdelmenam HS, Fares T, Nossair W, Abdallah AA, Sabaa H, Nawara M. Urinary tract injuries during cesarean section in patients with morbid placental adherence: retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 May;32(9):1461-1467. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1408069. Epub 2017 Dec 3.
PubMed 29157027Ozcan HC, Balat O, Ugur MG, Sucu S, Tepe NB, Kazaz TG. Use of Bladder Filling to Prevent Urinary System Complications in the Management of Placenta Percreta: a Randomized Prospective Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Feb;78(2):173-178. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100039. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
PubMed 29479114
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04944355
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Urinary tract injuries at MAP
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
M1- evaluates the cases of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence in the period between years 2018 and 2021. This study was carried out in assiut university women health hospital M 2- Clarification of the risk factors and outcome of urinary tract injuries.
Detailed description
Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS), also called abnormally invasive placenta (AIP), describes a clinical situation where the placenta does not detach spontaneously after delivery and cannot be forcibly removed without causing massive and potentially life-threatening bleeding(1-2) The incidence of PAS is rising worldwide(3) PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions of the pregnancy as it is significantly associated with maternal morbidity and mortality.(4) PAS may occur after any kind of procedure that causes damage to the endometrium, including curettage, manual removal of the placenta, uterine-artery embolization, or myomectomy(5-6) a full thickness surgical scar is associated with both the absence of endometrial re-epithelialization and vascular remodelling around the scar area, and this may lead to abnormally invasive placentation (increta/percreta).(7) Ultrasound is the first-line imaging tool for the screening and diagnosis of PAS. However, it is now well-established that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a role in the diagnosis of PAS, with high sensitivity and specificity(8-9) Urinary bladder injury is one of the operative morbidities of cesarean section. It occurs in 0.08% - 0.94% of cesarean sections(10) Repeated cesarean section and type of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) are considered the major risk factors for urinary tract injuries during cesarean delivery(11) Urinary bladder injury complicates about 11.7% of cesarean sections in women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)(12) The presence of tough adhesions between the bladder and the lower uterine segment carries the risk of urinary bladder injury. Trial of separation of the bladder in such circumstances may result in bladder injury. Filling of the bladder will delineate the contour of the bladder and clarify the proper plane of dissection (13)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- 1. This cross-sectional study will be conducted in Assiut University Hospital by analysis of records of cesarian section with or without hysterectomy in patient with morbid adherent placenta will be conducted and the cases complicated by urinary tract injuries from october2018 to october 2021. 2. The occurrence of urinary tract injuries will be estimated and the records of those with injuries will be analysed prospectively from October 2018 to october 2021and retrospectively in terms of site and characteristics of injury, difference in management by different specialists, requirement of urologist for management, type of suturing, need for cystoscopy and catheter in situ placement. Study design: This study is a prospective and retrospective study
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- All cases in the 3rd trimester admitted to Asyut university women health hospital and diagnosed antenatally as having morbidly adherent placenta
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- associated other uterine pathology
- Refusal of the patient
- Emergency CS before confirming MAP diagnosis.
- Urinary tract injuries due to other causes than MAP
- Presence of major medical disorders e.g. DM, PE, Cardiac lesion, Coagulopathy, liver diseases or kidney diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ultrasoundAlso: dopplerdiagnosis of morbid adherent placenta and incidence of urinary tract injuries during surgery | Other | – |
Primary outcome
• Evaluate the incidence of different types of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence(bladder-ureteric-bladder and ureteric injuries)
Time frame: BASELINE
• Evaluate the incidence of different types of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence(bladder-ureteric-bladder and ureteric injuries)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2021.
- Background: PubMed 28599899Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 23331024Chantraine F, Braun T, Gonser M, Henrich W, Tutschek B. Prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta reduces maternal peripartum hemorrhage and morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Apr;92(4):439-44. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12081.
- Background: PubMed 29405321Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):265-273. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12407. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23924326Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):62-70; discussion 70-1. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12405. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 29669225Silver RM, Branch DW. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1529-1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709324. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29324602Baldwin HJ, Patterson JA, Nippita TA, Torvaldsen S, Ibiebele I, Simpson JM, Ford JB. Antecedents of Abnormally Invasive Placenta in Primiparous Women: Risk Associated With Gynecologic Procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):227-233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002434.
- Background: PubMed 28268196Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 29136274Familiari A, Liberati M, Lim P, Pagani G, Cali G, Buca D, Manzoli L, Flacco ME, Scambia G, D'antonio F. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the severity of abnormal invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 May;97(5):507-520. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13258. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 30853416Morel O, Collins SL, Uzan-Augui J, Masselli G, Duan J, Chabot-Lecoanet AC, Braun T, Langhoff-Roos J, Soyer P, Chantraine F; International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta (IS-AIP). A proposal for standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) - From the International Society for AIP. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Jun;100(6):319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 28397207Korniluk A, Kosinski P, Wielgos M. Intraoperative damage to the urinary bladder during cesarean section - literature review. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(3):161-165. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0031. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28411456Salman L, Aharony S, Shmueli A, Wiznitzer A, Chen R, Gabbay-Benziv R. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: Maternal outcome from a contemporary large case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
- Background: PubMed 29157027Alanwar A, Al-Sayed HM, Ibrahim AM, Elkotb AM, Abdelshafy A, Abdelhadi R, Abbas AM, Abdelmenam HS, Fares T, Nossair W, Abdallah AA, Sabaa H, Nawara M. Urinary tract injuries during cesarean section in patients with morbid placental adherence: retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 May;32(9):1461-1467. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1408069. Epub 2017 Dec 3.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Urinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective Study, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact beshoy kedes (01025244686, beshoyroshdy667@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
• Evaluate the incidence of different types of lower urinary tract injuries during caesarean section with or without hysterectomy in cases with morbid placental adherence(bladder-ureteric-bladder and ureteric injuries) (time frame: BASELINE). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04944355, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2021.