Humerus FractureNCT04944446
Myofascial Release in Shoulder Pathologies
A study testing Treatment in people with Humerus Fracture and Rotator Cuff Injuries, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Shoulder pathology has a high prevalence in the field of musculoskeletal diagnoses, as well as being a common etiology in cases of disability. Passive and active-assisted kinesitherapy are used in the physiotherapy protocol. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Humerus Fracture, Rotator Cuff Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2018to 15 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be between 20 and 80 years old.
- Patients who have been immobilized due to the following diagnoses: Suture of the rotator cuff or fracture of the proximal extremity of the humerus.
- Have signed the informed consent of acceptance in the participation of the study
Who cannot join
- Present neurological pathology.
- Be subdued corticoid therapy.
- Have anticoagulant treatment or have had it less than a month ago.
- Insulin-dependent diabetic patients.
- Patients with hemophilia.
- Having diagnosed a psychological or psychiatric pathology.
- Non-intervened displaced humerus fractures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy. University of Cadiz
Cadiz, 11008
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Myofascial Release in Pathologies of the Shoulder
Shoulder pathology has a high prevalence in the field of musculoskeletal diagnoses, as well as being a common etiology in cases of disability. Passive and active-assisted kinesitherapy are used in the physiotherapy protocol. These techniques sometimes lead to feedback of fear and increased sensation of pain on the part of the patient that can slow or hinder the optimal recovery. A randomized clinical trial is intended to demonstrate that techniques for myofascial release of muscles important in the biomechanics of the shoulder, it is more effective than kinesitherapy in improving myofascial and also by eliminating the aforementioned unwanted effects and, therefore, improving the recovery of these processes.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of myofascial therapy and kinesitherapy in improving function in shoulder pathology with prolonged immobilization. Design Prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting Inpatient department of a secondary university hospital. Participants Shoulder pain patients (N=44) were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to a Control Group, to which conventional kinesitherapy was applied, or to the intervention group to which a Myofascial therapy protocol was applied. Both groups completed a therapeutic exercise program based on specific mobilization and strengthening exercises. Main Outcome Measures The QuickDash questionnaire was the primary outcome, visual analog scale and the passive range of motion of the shoulder joint, grades were the secondary outcomes. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0) and at 4 (T2),
- Conditions
- Humerus Fracture, Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Being tested
- Treatment
- Keywords
- Shoulder, Pathology, Myofascial release, Clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Humeral Fractures, Rotator Cuff Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TreatmentOther
Myofascial release of various muscle groups Treatment of mobilization of the shoulder joint
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group myofascial treatment | Experimental | The trial group will also be referred by the rehabilitating doctor to the physiotherapy room, these patients will be treated by two physiotherapists with training in myofascial release therapy with which they will carry out a treatment protocol that will consist of myofascial release of the shoulder blade angle, subscapularis and global pectoral technique as well as superficial myofascial release of said musculature with a during 12-15 minutes, in addition to a 30-minute session of active kinesitherapy with exercises and mechanotherapy. Same as the control group.
These mobilizations are carried out in the absence of pain, although the difference between joint tension or stretching and pain is explained to the patient. Receives: Other: Treatment |
| Group Kinesitherapy treatment | Active comparator | This group will be treated in a protocolized way with techniques such as passive kinesitherapy, active-assisted and active kinesitherapy to win mobility.
They consist of mobilizing the affected arm in the movements of flexion (upward), separation (towards the outer side) and rotation, these lateral decubitus (bring the hand to the nape of the neck) and internal (bring the hand to the lower back) trying to win joint amplitude.
These mobilizations are performed in the absence of pain, although the difference between joint tension or stretching and pain will be explained to the patient. The treatment will be carried out as usual with a duration of about 12-15 minutes of mobilization and about 30 minutes of active kinesitherapy with exercises and mechanotherapy, these consist of active shoulder mobility exercises. Emphasis will be placed on working with the pain threshold so as not to cause damage or negative nociceptive reactions. Receives: Other: Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional capacity
Dash Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Shoulder joint mobility
Goniometer Records
Measured: Baseline
Degree of pain
Visual Analog Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Functional capacity
Dash Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Shoulder joint mobility
Goniometer Records
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Degree of pain
Visual Analog Scale
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pathology of access to the study
Suture of the rotator cuff or fracture of the proximal limb of the humerus
Measured: Baseline
Age
Years
Measured: Baseline
Sex
Man or woman
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2021
- Study start15 Sep 2018
- Primary completion5 Sep 2020
- Study completion15 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Humerus FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled longitudinal experimental study
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cadiz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Inés Carmona Barrientos, Dra., Principal investigator, University of Cádiz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04944446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- InesCarmona
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ajimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jan;19(1):102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
PubMed 25603749Castro-Martin E, Ortiz-Comino L, Gallart-Aragon T, Esteban-Moreno B, Arroyo-Morales M, Galiano-Castillo N. Myofascial Induction Effects on Neck-Shoulder Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors: Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):832-840. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
PubMed 28003133Rodriguez-Fuentes I, De Toro FJ, Rodriguez-Fuentes G, de Oliveira IM, Meijide-Failde R, Fuentes-Boquete IM. Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Occupational Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Parallel Group Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;95(7):507-15. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000425.
PubMed 26745225Ajimsha MS, Chithra S, Thulasyammal RP. Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.012. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PubMed 22236639Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Granero-Molina J, Aguilera-Manrique G, Quesada-Rubio JM, Moreno-Lorenzo C. Benefits of massage-myofascial release therapy on pain, anxiety, quality of sleep, depression, and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:561753. doi: 10.1155/2011/561753. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
PubMed 21234327Sumariva-Mateos J, Leon-Valenzuela A, Vinolo-Gil MJ, Bautista Troncoso J, Del Pino Algarrada R, Carmona-Barrientos I. Efficacy of myofascial therapy and kinesitherapy in improving function in shoulder pathology with prolonged immobilization: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;48:101580. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101580. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
PubMed 35397306
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Myofascial Release in Pathologies of the Shoulder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04944446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- InesCarmona
- Conditions
- Humerus Fracture, Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Keywords
- Shoulder, Pathology, Myofascial release, Clinical trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CadizUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Shoulder pathology has a high prevalence in the field of musculoskeletal diagnoses, as well as being a common etiology in cases of disability. Passive and active-assisted kinesitherapy are used in the physiotherapy protocol. These techniques sometimes lead to feedback of fear and increased sensation of pain on the part of the patient that can slow or hinder the optimal recovery. A randomized clinical trial is intended to demonstrate that techniques for myofascial release of muscles important in the biomechanics of the shoulder, it is more effective than kinesitherapy in improving myofascial and also by eliminating the aforementioned unwanted effects and, therefore, improving the recovery of these processes.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of myofascial therapy and kinesitherapy in improving function in shoulder pathology with prolonged immobilization. Design Prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting Inpatient department of a secondary university hospital. Participants Shoulder pain patients (N=44) were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to a Control Group, to which conventional kinesitherapy was applied, or to the intervention group to which a Myofascial therapy protocol was applied. Both groups completed a therapeutic exercise program based on specific mobilization and strengthening exercises. Main Outcome Measures The QuickDash questionnaire was the primary outcome, visual analog scale and the passive range of motion of the shoulder joint, grades were the secondary outcomes. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0) and at 4 (T2),
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled longitudinal experimental study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group myofascial treatment | Experimental | Other: TreatmentThe trial group will also be referred by the rehabilitating doctor to the physiotherapy room, these patients will be treated by two physiotherapists with training in myofascial release therapy with which they will carry out a treatment protocol that will consist of myofascial release of the shoulder blade angle, subscapularis and global pectoral technique as well as superficial myofascial release of said musculature with a during 12-15 minutes, in addition to a 30-minute session of active kinesitherapy with exercises and mechanotherapy. Same as the control group. These mobilizations are carried out in the absence of pain, although the difference between joint tension or stretching and pain is explained to the patient. |
| Group Kinesitherapy treatment | Active comparator | Other: TreatmentThis group will be treated in a protocolized way with techniques such as passive kinesitherapy, active-assisted and active kinesitherapy to win mobility. They consist of mobilizing the affected arm in the movements of flexion (upward), separation (towards the outer side) and rotation, these lateral decubitus (bring the hand to the nape of the neck) and internal (bring the hand to the lower back) trying to win joint amplitude. These mobilizations are performed in the absence of pain, although the difference between joint tension or stretching and pain will be explained to the patient. The treatment will be carried out as usual with a duration of about 12-15 minutes of mobilization and about 30 minutes of active kinesitherapy with exercises and mechanotherapy, these consist of active shoulder mobility exercises. Emphasis will be placed on working with the pain threshold so as not to cause damage or negative nociceptive reactions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Be between 20 and 80 years old.
- Patients who have been immobilized due to the following diagnoses: Suture of the rotator cuff or fracture of the proximal extremity of the humerus.
- Have signed the informed consent of acceptance in the participation of the study
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Present neurological pathology.
- Be subdued corticoid therapy.
- Have anticoagulant treatment or have had it less than a month ago.
- Insulin-dependent diabetic patients.
- Patients with hemophilia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TreatmentMyofascial release of various muscle groups Treatment of mobilization of the shoulder joint | Other | Group Kinesitherapy treatment, Group myofascial treatment |
Primary outcome
Functional capacity
Time frame: Baseline
Dash Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Shoulder joint mobility
Time frame: Baseline
Goniometer Records
Degree of pain
Time frame: Baseline
Visual Analog Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Functional capacity
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Dash Scale. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Shoulder joint mobility
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Goniometer Records
Degree of pain
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Visual Analog Scale
3 secondary outcomes
Pathology of access to the study
Time frame: Baseline
Age
Time frame: Baseline
Sex
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 25603749Ajimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jan;19(1):102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 28003133Castro-Martin E, Ortiz-Comino L, Gallart-Aragon T, Esteban-Moreno B, Arroyo-Morales M, Galiano-Castillo N. Myofascial Induction Effects on Neck-Shoulder Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors: Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):832-840. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 26745225Rodriguez-Fuentes I, De Toro FJ, Rodriguez-Fuentes G, de Oliveira IM, Meijide-Failde R, Fuentes-Boquete IM. Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Occupational Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Parallel Group Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;95(7):507-15. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000425.
- Results publication: PubMed 22236639Ajimsha MS, Chithra S, Thulasyammal RP. Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.012. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 21234327Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Granero-Molina J, Aguilera-Manrique G, Quesada-Rubio JM, Moreno-Lorenzo C. Benefits of massage-myofascial release therapy on pain, anxiety, quality of sleep, depression, and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:561753. doi: 10.1155/2011/561753. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35397306Sumariva-Mateos J, Leon-Valenzuela A, Vinolo-Gil MJ, Bautista Troncoso J, Del Pino Algarrada R, Carmona-Barrientos I. Efficacy of myofascial therapy and kinesitherapy in improving function in shoulder pathology with prolonged immobilization: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;48:101580. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101580. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Humerus Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Proximal Humerus Fracture
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Triceps Tongue Elevation vs Olecranon Osteotomy in Intra Articular Distal Humerus Fracture (IA-DH) Management
Intra Articular Distal Humerus Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures. Randomized Controlled Trial
Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Affixus Natural Nail System Humeral Nail PMCF
Humeral Fractures, Proximal, Humeral Fractures
Not yet recruiting
X-BS Ortho Bone Graft Study
Orthopedic Disorder, Trauma Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Inés Carmona Barrientos, Dra. principal investigator
University of Cádiz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment in people with Humerus Fracture and Rotator Cuff Injuries, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional capacity (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04944446, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2021.