Covid19NCT04952844
Functional Capacity in Survivors of COVID-19 Related ARDS
An observational study of Covid19 and Functional Capacity, run by Koç University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors frequently develop impaired physical function, muscle weakness and quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the functional capacity, global muscle weakness and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors after 4 weeks following hospital discharge and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Covid19, Functional Capacity, Post-intensive Care Syndrome
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Jul 2021to Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors related to COVID-19
Who may be able to join
- to be older that 18 years
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors related to COVID-19 who treated in Intensive care unit and attend appointment after 4 weeks following discharge from hospital
Who cannot join
- History of diseases that could affect functional capacity, muscle strength and quality of life, such as cancer, spinal cord disease, neuromuscular diseases
- do not want to attend the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Koc University School of Medicine
Istanbul, 34010
About this study
Official title: Functional Capacity in Survivors of COVID-19 Related ARDS: A Cross-sectional Study
Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors frequently develop impaired physical function, muscle weakness and quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the functional capacity, global muscle weakness and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors after 4 weeks following hospital discharge and the relationship between different tools. COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors were assessed 4 weeks following discharge from the hospital, 15 patients who attended the evaluation will be included the study. All subjects underwent standardized physical clinical evaluation, Medical Research Council-sumscore, hand-grip strength, 6-minute walk test, chair-stand test, timed up and go test and Short form-36, 4 weeks after hospital discharge.
Read the detailed description
COVID-19 could cause acute respiratory distress syndrome in a minority of patients. After recovery from acute critical illness and discharged from hospital, secondary disabilities related to Post Intensive Care Syndrome could take over the role. There is limited data and information about the functional capacity of these patients after hospital discharge.Follow-up these patients after discharge might help assessing the symptoms of Post Intensive Care Syndrome, functional capacity and need of physical therapy, therefore give care for the impairments. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study is to demonstrate the functional capacity, global muscle weakness and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors after 4 weeks following hospital discharge and the relationship between different tools. Appointment was given all of the ARDS survivors related to COVID-19 who treated in ICU after 4 weeks following discharge from hospital in order to assess the need of rehabilitation. 15 patients who attended the evaluation will be included the study.
- Conditions
- Covid19, Functional Capacity, Post-intensive Care Syndrome
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, 6-minute walk test, handgrip strength, MRC sumscore
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19, postintensive care syndrome, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Six-minute walk test
Six-minute walk test is a field test evaluating submaximal aerobic capacity. The technical standards are defined by European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. The individuals were asked to walk as far as possible in a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes and the distance, oxygen saturation, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and dyspnea scale (Borg 0-20) were recorded before and immediately after the test, and recovery period (1. minute of recovery). It is a valid and responsive measurement of functional capacity and also predicts quality of life in Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (5)
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength will be measured using a handheld dynamometer according to the instructions of the American Society of Hand Therapists. Patients will be requested to seat placing their arms by their sides with the elbow flexed to 90°, the forearm mid-prone, and the wrist in neutral position. Using standard verbal encouragement, patients will be asked to grip the dynamometer with dominant hand with maximal effort. Three trials will be performed with a 30-second interval between trials and the highest value will be recorded in kg. The cut-off values of grip strength are 28.6 kg in men and 16.4 kg in women.
Measured: 1 day
Medical Research Council-sumscore
It is valid and reliable tool in survivors of critical illness, it will be used in order to evaluate the overall muscle strength
Measured: 1 day
Short form - 36
Short form - 36 measures health related quality of life. It is a self-reported survey that evaluates individual health status with eight parameters consisting of physical function, pain, role limitations attributed to physical problems, role limitations attributed to emotional problems, mental health, social functioning, energy/ vitality, general health perception. There is not a summary score, each section is scored between 0-100, 0 indicates the worst condition, 100 indicates the best.
Measured: 1 day
Chair stand test
It is used to evaluate strength and endurance of lower limbs. Patients will be asked to sit on a chair with a 46 cm seat height by crossing their hands over their chest and stand and sit five times consecutively as fast as possible. The test starts in the sitting position and terminate at the last sitting position and the time will be recorded.
Measured: 1 day
timed up and go test
The test will be used to assess physical function. It is an objective, reliable and simple test to evaluate both balance and functional movement. The patients will be asked to get up from a chair, walk 3 m, turn around, walk back and sit on the chair again. The time will be recorded in seconds.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2021
- Study startJul 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Covid19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Koç University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran, Prof, Principal investigator, Koc University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04952844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021.014.IRB1.008
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
PubMed 32091533Held N, Moss M. Optimizing Post-Intensive Care Unit Rehabilitation. Turk Thorac J. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):147-152. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2018.18172. Print 2019 Apr.
PubMed 30958989Ngai JC, Ko FW, Ng SS, To KW, Tong M, Hui DS. The long-term impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health status. Respirology. 2010 Apr;15(3):543-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01720.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
PubMed 20337995Turan Z, Topaloglu M, Ozyemisci Taskiran O. Medical Research Council-sumscore: a tool for evaluating muscle weakness in patients with post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care. 2020 Sep 18;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03282-x. No abstract available.
PubMed 32948221Wilcox ME, Herridge MS. Lung function and quality of life in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Presse Med. 2011 Dec;40(12 Pt 2):e595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2011.04.024. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
PubMed 22078086Chan KS, Zheng JP, Mok YW, Li YM, Liu YN, Chu CM, Ip MS. SARS: prognosis, outcome and sequelae. Respirology. 2003 Nov;8 Suppl(Suppl 1):S36-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00522.x.
PubMed 15018132Hui DS, Wong KT, Ko FW, Tam LS, Chan DP, Woo J, Sung JJ. The 1-year impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in a cohort of survivors. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2247-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2247.
PubMed 16236881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Functional Capacity in Survivors of COVID-19 Related ARDS: A Cross-sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04952844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021.014.IRB1.008
- Conditions
- Covid19, Functional Capacity, Post-intensive Care Syndrome
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, 6-minute walk test, handgrip strength, MRC sumscore
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Koç UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors frequently develop impaired physical function, muscle weakness and quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the functional capacity, global muscle weakness and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors after 4 weeks following hospital discharge and the relationship between different tools. COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors were assessed 4 weeks following discharge from the hospital, 15 patients who attended the evaluation will be included the study. All subjects underwent standardized physical clinical evaluation, Medical Research Council-sumscore, hand-grip strength, 6-minute walk test, chair-stand test, timed up and go test and Short form-36, 4 weeks after hospital discharge.
Detailed description
COVID-19 could cause acute respiratory distress syndrome in a minority of patients. After recovery from acute critical illness and discharged from hospital, secondary disabilities related to Post Intensive Care Syndrome could take over the role. There is limited data and information about the functional capacity of these patients after hospital discharge.Follow-up these patients after discharge might help assessing the symptoms of Post Intensive Care Syndrome, functional capacity and need of physical therapy, therefore give care for the impairments. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study is to demonstrate the functional capacity, global muscle weakness and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors after 4 weeks following hospital discharge and the relationship between different tools. Appointment was given all of the ARDS survivors related to COVID-19 who treated in ICU after 4 weeks following discharge from hospital in order to assess the need of rehabilitation. 15 patients who attended the evaluation will be included the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors related to COVID-19
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- to be older that 18 years
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors related to COVID-19 who treated in Intensive care unit and attend appointment after 4 weeks following discharge from hospital
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- History of diseases that could affect functional capacity, muscle strength and quality of life, such as cancer, spinal cord disease, neuromuscular diseases
- do not want to attend the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Six-minute walk test
Time frame: 1 day
Six-minute walk test is a field test evaluating submaximal aerobic capacity. The technical standards are defined by European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. The individuals were asked to walk as far as possible in a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes and the distance, oxygen saturation, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and dyspnea scale (Borg 0-20) were recorded before and immediately after the test, and recovery period (1. minute of recovery). It is a valid and responsive measurement of functional capacity and also predicts quality of life in Acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors
5 secondary outcomes
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 1 day
Medical Research Council-sumscore
Time frame: 1 day
Short form - 36
Time frame: 1 day
Chair stand test
Time frame: 1 day
timed up and go test
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32091533Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30958989Held N, Moss M. Optimizing Post-Intensive Care Unit Rehabilitation. Turk Thorac J. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):147-152. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2018.18172. Print 2019 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 20337995Ngai JC, Ko FW, Ng SS, To KW, Tong M, Hui DS. The long-term impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health status. Respirology. 2010 Apr;15(3):543-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01720.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 32948221Turan Z, Topaloglu M, Ozyemisci Taskiran O. Medical Research Council-sumscore: a tool for evaluating muscle weakness in patients with post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care. 2020 Sep 18;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03282-x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22078086Wilcox ME, Herridge MS. Lung function and quality of life in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Presse Med. 2011 Dec;40(12 Pt 2):e595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2011.04.024. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 15018132Chan KS, Zheng JP, Mok YW, Li YM, Liu YN, Chu CM, Ip MS. SARS: prognosis, outcome and sequelae. Respirology. 2003 Nov;8 Suppl(Suppl 1):S36-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00522.x.
- Background: PubMed 16236881Hui DS, Wong KT, Ko FW, Tam LS, Chan DP, Woo J, Sung JJ. The 1-year impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in a cohort of survivors. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2247-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2247.
Related trials for Covid19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran, Prof principal investigator
Koc University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Covid19 and Functional Capacity, run by Koç University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ihsan Solaroglu, Prof (+ 90 212 338 10 39, isolaroglu@ku.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Six-minute walk test (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04952844, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2021.