Lung CancerNCT04954625
Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) Autologous Blood Patch Intervention Trial
A study testing Autologous Blood Patch in people with Lung Cancer, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A postoperative autologous blood patch (ABP) intervention trial for patients who underwent lung resection for cancer to examine its effectiveness in preventing a prolonged air leak. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Autologous Blood Patch
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who underwent elective wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy for suspected non-small cell lung cancer
- Patients that have reviewed and signed the Informed Consent Form, had an opportunity to ask questions, and consent to have their de-identified data included in the study
- Patients who have an air leak on the morning of postoperative Day 3
- Age ≥18 years old
Who cannot join
- Patients who undergo pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, chest wall or diaphragm resection, or bilateral procedures.
- Age < 18 years old
- Women who are pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
About this study
A postoperative autologous blood patch (ABP) intervention trial for patients who underwent lung resection for cancer to examine its effectiveness in preventing a prolonged air leak.
AIM 1: To determine the safety and efficacy of autologous blood patch (ABP) as a means to reduce the rate of prolonged air leak (PAL) after lung cancer resection
AIM 2: To prospectively examine variation in morbidity and quality of life between patients with and without a PAL
Read the detailed description
The plan for this trial is to establish the safety and efficacy of ABP as a means of reducing PAL following lung cancer resection. Patients with an air leak on the morning of postoperative day 3 after elective lung resection for cancer will be randomized to ABP on postoperative day 3 and day 4 (if an air leak remains present), or standard care (n=60 per arm). This will be a multi-institutional randomized, controlled trial open for enrollment at centers in the United States and Canada. The study methods and design are compliant with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT).
Subjects will be consented on postoperative day 3, with autologous blood patch intervention occurring on day 3 or day 4. If subjects are randomized to the ABP arm of the trial, they will receive 60-100 ml of autologous blood sterilely drawn from a peripheral vein and immediately instilled into the chest tube.
Subjects will then follow up either in clinic or via telephone to answer the questionnaire. If the subject is being seen in person, they will be handed a questionnaire form to complete. This form will be kept and stored as source documentation. If the patient is answering the questionnaire via telephone, the study team personnel will record their answers on the questionnaire form, indicating it was completed by the subject but recorded by study team personnel. A telephone encounter note will be recorded and stored as source with the completed questionnaire. Follow up occurs at 30 days (+/-5 days) postoperatively.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Autologous Blood Patch, Standard of Care (per Physician)
- Keywords
- Surgery, Prolonged Air Leak, Autologous Blood Patch, Lung
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Autologous Blood PatchProcedure or surgery
All patients will be assessed on the morning of postoperative Day 3 and 4 for the presence of an air leak. If an air leak is present, 60-100 ml of autologous blood will be drawn from a peripheral vein and immediately instilled into the chest tube. The individual who draws blood is that the discretion of the site principal investigator. The tubing will be elevated over an IV pole while the patient remains in bed, moving position every 15 minutes for 1 hour to distribute the blood throughout the pleural cavity. The tubing support will then be removed, allowing the chest tube to drain. After ABP intervention, the chest tube will remain to water seal, as long as the patient tolerates it.
Standard of Care (per Physician)Procedure or surgery
Patients randomized to Standard of Care will be treated as their surgeon would as routine. This may mean postoperative observation, of another type of intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous Blood Patch | Experimental | 60-120ml of patient's blood will be drawn and inserted into patient's chest tube. A minimum of 60ml of blood is required, with the optimal amount of blood being 120ml. Receives: Procedure: Autologous Blood Patch |
| Standard of Care (Per physician) | Active comparator | Chest tube remains intact without blood patch. Receives: Procedure: Standard of Care (per Physician) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prolonged Air Leak >5 days
Definition of prolonged air leak: air leak present at 5 days or greater
Measured: Within 30 Days
Hospital Length of Stay
Number of days patient was admitted inpatient
Measured: Within 30 Days
Readmission within 30 days
Determination of whether the patient was readmitted after discharge within 30 days.
Measured: Within 30 Days
In hospital mortality
Survival status while inpatient.
Measured: Within 30 Days
30-day Mortality
Survival status within 30 days consent.
Measured: Within 30 Days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Rush University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rush University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christopher Seder, MD, Principal investigator, Rush University Medical CenterSebastien Gilbert, MD, Study director, University of Ottawa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04954625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19072606
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2017. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs
Stephan F, Boucheseiche S, Hollande J, Flahault A, Cheffi A, Bazelly B, Bonnet F. Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1263.
PubMed 11083673Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Marasco RD, Fianchini A. Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1205-10; discussion 1210. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.082.
PubMed 15063235Isowa N, Hasegawa S, Bando T, Wada H. Preoperative risk factors for prolonged air leak following lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 May;21(5):951. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00076-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 12062302Liang S, Ivanovic J, Gilbert S, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan RS, Seely AJE. Quantifying the incidence and impact of postoperative prolonged alveolar air leak after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Apr;145(4):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.044. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
PubMed 22982031Gilbert S, Maghera S, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan SR, Villeneuve PJ. Identifying Patients at Higher Risk of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1674-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
PubMed 27457828Attaar A, Winger DG, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, Sarkaria IS, Christie NA, Nason KS. A clinical prediction model for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):690-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
PubMed 27912898Lee L, Hanley SC, Robineau C, Sirois C, Mulder DS, Ferri LE. Estimating the risk of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection using a simple scoring system. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):1027-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
PubMed 21489831Brunelli A, Varela G, Refai M, Jimenez MF, Pompili C, Sabbatini A, Aranda JL. A scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.054.
PubMed 20609776Rivera C, Bernard A, Falcoz PE, Thomas P, Schmidt A, Benard S, Vicaut E, Dahan M. Characterization and prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a nationwide study setting up the index of prolonged air leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):1062-8; discussion 1068. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.033.
PubMed 21871301Stolz AJ, Schutzner J, Lischke R, Simonek J, Pafko P. Predictors of prolonged air leak following pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):334-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.004.
PubMed 15691692Pompili C, Falcoz PE, Salati M, Szanto Z, Brunelli A. A risk score to predict the incidence of prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: An analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):957-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.064. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
PubMed 28089646Varela G, Jimenez MF, Novoa N, Aranda JL. Estimating hospital costs attributable to prolonged air leak in pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.005.
PubMed 15691691Liberman M, Muzikansky A, Wright CD, Wain JC, Donahue DM, Allan JS, Gaissert HA, Morse CR, Mathisen DJ, Lanuti M. Incidence and risk factors of persistent air leak after major pulmonary resection and use of chemical pleurodesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;89(3):891-7; discussion 897-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.012.
PubMed 20172150Mueller MR, Marzluf BA. The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar;6(3):271-84. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.29.
PubMed 24624291
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) Autologous Blood Patch Intervention Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04954625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19072606
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Surgery, Prolonged Air Leak, Autologous Blood Patch, Lung
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Rush University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A postoperative autologous blood patch (ABP) intervention trial for patients who underwent lung resection for cancer to examine its effectiveness in preventing a prolonged air leak.
AIM 1: To determine the safety and efficacy of autologous blood patch (ABP) as a means to reduce the rate of prolonged air leak (PAL) after lung cancer resection
AIM 2: To prospectively examine variation in morbidity and quality of life between patients with and without a PAL
Detailed description
The plan for this trial is to establish the safety and efficacy of ABP as a means of reducing PAL following lung cancer resection. Patients with an air leak on the morning of postoperative day 3 after elective lung resection for cancer will be randomized to ABP on postoperative day 3 and day 4 (if an air leak remains present), or standard care (n=60 per arm). This will be a multi-institutional randomized, controlled trial open for enrollment at centers in the United States and Canada. The study methods and design are compliant with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT).
Subjects will be consented on postoperative day 3, with autologous blood patch intervention occurring on day 3 or day 4. If subjects are randomized to the ABP arm of the trial, they will receive 60-100 ml of autologous blood sterilely drawn from a peripheral vein and immediately instilled into the chest tube.
Subjects will then follow up either in clinic or via telephone to answer the questionnaire. If the subject is being seen in person, they will be handed a questionnaire form to complete. This form will be kept and stored as source documentation. If the patient is answering the questionnaire via telephone, the study team personnel will record their answers on the questionnaire form, indicating it was completed by the subject but recorded by study team personnel. A telephone encounter note will be recorded and stored as source with the completed questionnaire. Follow up occurs at 30 days (+/-5 days) postoperatively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous Blood Patch | Experimental | Procedure: Autologous Blood Patch60-120ml of patient's blood will be drawn and inserted into patient's chest tube. A minimum of 60ml of blood is required, with the optimal amount of blood being 120ml. |
| Standard of Care (Per physician) | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard of Care (per Physician)Chest tube remains intact without blood patch. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who underwent elective wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy for suspected non-small cell lung cancer
- Patients that have reviewed and signed the Informed Consent Form, had an opportunity to ask questions, and consent to have their de-identified data included in the study
- Patients who have an air leak on the morning of postoperative Day 3
- Age ≥18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who undergo pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, chest wall or diaphragm resection, or bilateral procedures.
- Age < 18 years old
- Women who are pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous Blood PatchAll patients will be assessed on the morning of postoperative Day 3 and 4 for the presence of an air leak. If an air leak is present, 60-100 ml of autologous blood will be drawn from a peripheral vein and immediately instilled into the chest tube. The individual who draws blood is that the discretion of the site principal investigator. The tubing will be elevated over an IV pole while the patient remains in bed, moving position every 15 minutes for 1 hour to distribute the blood throughout the pleural cavity. The tubing support will then be removed, allowing the chest tube to drain. After ABP intervention, the chest tube will remain to water seal, as long as the patient tolerates it. | Procedure or surgery | Autologous Blood Patch |
| Standard of Care (per Physician)Patients randomized to Standard of Care will be treated as their surgeon would as routine. This may mean postoperative observation, of another type of intervention. | Procedure or surgery | Standard of Care (Per physician) |
Primary outcome
Prolonged Air Leak >5 days
Time frame: Within 30 Days
Definition of prolonged air leak: air leak present at 5 days or greater
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: Within 30 Days
Number of days patient was admitted inpatient
Readmission within 30 days
Time frame: Within 30 Days
Determination of whether the patient was readmitted after discharge within 30 days.
In hospital mortality
Time frame: Within 30 Days
Survival status while inpatient.
30-day Mortality
Time frame: Within 30 Days
Survival status within 30 days consent.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2025.
- BackgroundU.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2017. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs
- Background: PubMed 11083673Stephan F, Boucheseiche S, Hollande J, Flahault A, Cheffi A, Bazelly B, Bonnet F. Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1263.
- Background: PubMed 15063235Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Marasco RD, Fianchini A. Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1205-10; discussion 1210. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.082.
- Background: PubMed 12062302Isowa N, Hasegawa S, Bando T, Wada H. Preoperative risk factors for prolonged air leak following lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 May;21(5):951. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00076-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22982031Liang S, Ivanovic J, Gilbert S, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan RS, Seely AJE. Quantifying the incidence and impact of postoperative prolonged alveolar air leak after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Apr;145(4):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.044. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 27457828Gilbert S, Maghera S, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan SR, Villeneuve PJ. Identifying Patients at Higher Risk of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1674-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
- Background: PubMed 27912898Attaar A, Winger DG, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, Sarkaria IS, Christie NA, Nason KS. A clinical prediction model for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):690-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 21489831Lee L, Hanley SC, Robineau C, Sirois C, Mulder DS, Ferri LE. Estimating the risk of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection using a simple scoring system. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):1027-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 20609776Brunelli A, Varela G, Refai M, Jimenez MF, Pompili C, Sabbatini A, Aranda JL. A scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.054.
- Background: PubMed 21871301Rivera C, Bernard A, Falcoz PE, Thomas P, Schmidt A, Benard S, Vicaut E, Dahan M. Characterization and prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a nationwide study setting up the index of prolonged air leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):1062-8; discussion 1068. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.033.
- Background: PubMed 15691692Stolz AJ, Schutzner J, Lischke R, Simonek J, Pafko P. Predictors of prolonged air leak following pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):334-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.004.
- Background: PubMed 28089646Pompili C, Falcoz PE, Salati M, Szanto Z, Brunelli A. A risk score to predict the incidence of prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: An analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):957-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.064. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Christopher Seder, MD principal investigator
Rush University Medical Center
Sebastien Gilbert, MD study director
University of Ottawa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Autologous Blood Patch in people with Lung Cancer, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prolonged Air Leak >5 days (time frame: Within 30 Days). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04954625, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2025.