AzTrials
AzTrials

Lateral Patellar Compression SyndromeNCT04958603

The Clinical Effect of Different Lateral Retinaculum Relaxation Methods in the Treatment of LPCS

An observational study of Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To observe the comparison of the clinical effects of two different ways of loosening the lateral support band under arthroscopy to treat lateral patella excessive compression syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome
What is being tested?
"L" type release surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Apr 2020to 1 Nov 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: From September 2004 to January 2019, patients with lateral patella overcrowding syndrome treated by deputy chief physician Yang Yuping of the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • From September 2004 to January 2019, patients with lateral patella overcrowding syndrome treated by deputy chief physician Yang Yuping of the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital

Who cannot join

  • From September 2004 to January 2019, patients with lateral patella overcrowding syndrome treated by deputy chief physician Yang Yuping of the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking Univerisity Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Clinical Effect of Different Lateral Retinaculum Relaxation Methods in the Treatment of Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome

To observe the comparison of the clinical effects of two different ways of loosening the lateral support band under arthroscopy to treat lateral patella excessive compression syndrome.

Read the detailed description

To analyze the surgical conditions of 64 patients with lateral patella excessive compression syndrome who were surgically treated by Deputy Chief Physician Yang Yuping of the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital from September 2004 to January 2019. Among them, 24 early cases used the traditional proximal release of the lateral retinaculum (traditional surgical group), and recently 40 cases, after learning from the surgical experience of the early cases, switched to the lateral release of the lateral retinaculum, that is, "L" type Release (new surgery group). The visual analog scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and IKDC knee function subjective evaluation scale (IKDC) score were performed before and after the operation. By analyzing the knee movement scores of patients before and after surgery, the efficacy of the above two operations was judged, and the two groups of postoperative scores were evaluated.

Being tested
"L" type release surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • "L" type release surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Lateral release of the lateral support belt

Study groups in NCT04958603
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Traditional surgery groupTraditionally loosen the lateral support belt proximally
New surgery groupLaterally loosen the outer support belt, that is, "L"-shaped loosen
Receives: Procedure: "L" type release surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    VAS is used to evaluate knee function. The higher the score of VAS, the better the recovery of knee function

    Measured: Six months after surgery

  2. (International Knee Documentation Committee) IKDC knee function subjective evaluation form score

    IKDC score is used to evaluate knee function. The higher the score of IKDC score, the better the recovery of knee function

    Measured: Six months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion1 May 2020
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04958603
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2020506
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
27 Jun 2021
Last updated
12 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: Six months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in