AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 2NCT04959201

Combination of NMDA-enhancing and Antioxidant Treatments for Schizophrenia

A Phase 2 study testing NMDAE plus AO in people with Schizophrenia, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to improve clinical symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with antioxidant properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
NMDAE plus AO
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
30 Nov 2020to Mar 2027
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association) diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Remain symptomatic but without clinically significant fluctuation, while their antipsychotic doses are unchanged for at least 3 months and will be maintained during the period of the 12-week trial
  • PANSS total score ≥ 60
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of intellectual disability or substance (including alcohol) use disorder
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma, stroke, or serious medical or central nervous system diseases (other than schizophrenia) which may interfere with the study
  • Clinically significant laboratory screening tests (including blood routine, biochemical tests)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to follow protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D contact

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

hylane@gmail.com

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung

    Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D, 886 4 22052121 ext. 1855, hylane@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to improve clinical symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with antioxidant properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether combined treatment of an NMDA-enhancing agent and a drug with antioxidant property can be better than an NMDA-enhancing agent alone deserves study.

Read the detailed description

Several lines of evidence suggest that both NMDA and oxidative stress hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to augment efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with antioxidant properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether a drug with antioxidant property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of schizophrenia remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE plus a drug with antioxidant property and NMDAE plus placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia. The subjects are the schizophrenia patients who remain symptomatic while having been stabilized with antipsychotic treatment. They keep their original treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE plus Antioxidant agent (AO), or (2) NMDAE plus placebo. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. The efficacies of NMDAE plus AO and NMDAE plus placebo will be compared.

Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
NMDAE plus AO, NMDAE plus Placebo Cap
Keywords
Schizophrenia, NMDA, Oxidative stress
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NMDAE plus AODrug

    Use of an NMDA enhancer plus a drug with antioxidant property for the treatment of schizophrenia.

  • NMDAE plus Placebo CapDrug

    Use of an NMDA enhancer plus placebo as a comparator.

Study groups in NCT04959201
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NMDAE plus Antioxidant agent (AO)ExperimentalAn NMDA enhancer plus a drug with antioxidant property
Receives: Drug: NMDAE plus AO
NMDAE plus PlaceboPlacebo comparatorAn NMDA enhancer plus Placebo
Receives: Drug: NMDAE plus Placebo Cap

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change of scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  2. Positive subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  3. Negative subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  4. General Psychopathology subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  5. Clinical Global Impression

    Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  6. Global Assessment of Functioning

    Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  7. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

    Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  8. Quality of Life Scale

    Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  9. Cognitive function

    Ten tests for assessment of 7 cognitive domains:

    1. speed of processing (assessed by Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding)
    2. sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test)
    3. working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span)
    4. verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing)
    5. visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction)
    6. reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze)
    7. social cognition (MSCEIT Version 2)

    All tests have no unit. Firstly, for the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score (with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10 for making every test comparative). Secondly, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains, a-f) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score of each domain (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry. 2013).

    Measured: Week 0, 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2021
  2. Study start30 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04959201
Sponsor's protocol ID
CMUH108-REC1-177
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
10 Jun 2021
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in