Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 3TOPAZ-2NCT04961567
A Study to Learn About the Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) Injections and Whether They Can Improve Symptoms of Adult Participants Who Have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 3 study testing Litifilimab in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Biogen at 177 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- What is being tested?
- Litifilimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 562 participants
- Where
- 177 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Jul 2021to 16 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be diagnosed with SLE at least 24 weeks prior to screening and must meet the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, at screening by a qualified physician.
- Participant has a modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-200 (SLEDAI-2K) score ≥6 (excluding alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated).
- Participant has a modified clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 (excluding anti-dsDNA, low complement component 3 [C3] and/or complement component 4 [C4], alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant has BILAG-2004 grade A in ≥1 organ system or BILAG-2004 grade B in ≥2 organ systems at screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participants must be treated with one of the following background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapies, initiated ≥12 weeks prior to screening and at stable dose ≥4 weeks prior to randomization:
- Antimalarials as stand-alone treatment
- Antimalarial treatment in combination with OCS and/or a single immunosuppressant
- Treatment with OCS and/or a single immunosuppressant.
Who cannot join
- History of or positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Current hepatitis C infection (defined as positive hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibody and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]).
- Current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or positive for total antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc] with positive reflex HBV DNA).
- History of severe herpes infection.
- Presence of uncontrolled or New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure.
- Active severe lupus nephritis where, in the opinion of the investigator, protocol-specified SOC is insufficient and use of a more aggressive therapeutic approach, such as adding intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide and/or high-dose IV pulse corticosteroid therapy or other treatments not permitted in the protocol, is indicated; or urine protein-creatinine ratio >2.0 or severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meter square [mL/min/1.73 m^2]) calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Any active skin conditions other than cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) that may interfere with the study assessment of CLE such as but not limited to psoriasis, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, non-LE skin lupus manifestation or drug-induced lupus.
- History or current diagnosis of a clinically significant non-SLE-related vasculitis syndrome.
- Active neuropsychiatric SLE.
- Use of oral prednisone (or equivalent) above 20 mg/day.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
177 sites in 17 countries.
177 sites in 17 countries
United States44 sites
Arthritis & Rheumatology Institute
Allen, Texas, 75013
Office of John P. Lavery M.D., PA
Allen, Texas, 75013
The Emory Clinic Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Tekton Research
Austin, Texas, 78745
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
RASF - Clinical Research Center
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Boston University School of Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
DM Clinical Research - Boston
Brookline, Massachusetts, 02445
DJL Clinical Research, PLLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206-0829
Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
STAT Research
Dayton, Ohio, 45417
Jefrey Lieberman, M.D., P.C.
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Associates, PA
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
Southeastern Rheumatology Alliance dba Arthritis Center of North Georgia
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
RNA America Health Sciences
Gainesville, Georgia, 30518
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Piedmont Arthritis Clinic, P.A.
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Care Access Research - Huntington BeachCare Access Research - Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
West Tennessee Research Institute
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
R and H Clinical Research
Katy, Texas, 77494
Vida Clinical Research
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Arthritis and Osteoporosis Associates of New Mexico
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88011
Valerius Medical Group
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
The Practice of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90004
Prime Clinical Research
Mansfield, Texas, 76063
SouthWest Rheumatology Research, LLC
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136
R. Srinivasan, M.D., Inc. dba Monterey Park Medical Center
Monterey Park, California, 91754
Neurovations
Napa, California, 94558
Joo-Hyung Lee MD
Orange, California, 92868
HMD Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Sun Research Institute, LLC
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
EBGS Clinical Trials
Snellville, Georgia, 30078
Saint Louis Rheumatology
St Louis, Missouri, 63119
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Medvin Clinical Research
Whittier, California, 90602
Carolina Arthritis Associates
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
University of Massachusetts
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Japan33 sites
Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital
Bunkyō City, Tokyo-To, 113-8519
Chiba University Hospital
Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677
NHO Chibahigashi National Hospital
Chiba, Chiba, 260-8712
St. Luke's International Hospital
Chūōku, Tokyo-To, 104-8560
KKR Hamanomachi Hospital
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 810-8539
NHO Kyushu Medical Center
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 810-8563
Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital
Himeji-shi, Hyōgo, 670-8540
Hiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 734-8551
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495
NHO Osaka Minami Medical Center
Kawachinagano-shi, Osaka, 586-8521
St. Marianna University Hospital
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511
Kagawa University Hospital
Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken, 761-0793
Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 807-8556
Kobe University Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0017
Kobe City Hospital Organization Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0047
Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 861-8520
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
Meguro-ku, Tokyo-To, 153-8515
Nagasaki University Hospital
Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501
JCHO Chukyo Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8510
Chibaken Saiseikai Narashino Hospital
Narashino-shi, Chiba, 275-8580
Tazuke-kofukai Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital
Osaka, Osaka, 530-8480
Kindai University Hospital
Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, 589-8511
Toho University Omori Medical Center
Ōta-ku, Tokyo-To, 143-8541
Kitasato University Hospital
Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0375
Tonan Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0004
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574
Keio University Hospital
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To, 160-8582
Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To, 162-8655
Nihon University Itabashi Hospital
tabashi City, Tokyo-To, 173-8610
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, 569-8686
Fujita Health University Hospital
Toyoake-shi, Aichi-ken, 470-1192
Yokohama City University Medical Center
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024
NHO Yokohama Medical Center
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 245-8575
China25 sites
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, 100020
Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
Beijing, 100053
Binzhou Medical University Hospital
Binzhou, Shandong, 256603
Jilin Province People's Hospital
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 130021
The second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hu'nan, 410011
Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, 410008
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500
Dongguan People's Hospital
Dongguan, Guangdong, 523059
Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510317
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515
Hainan General Hospital
Haikou, Hainan, 570311
Jiujiang No.1 People's Hospital
Jiujiang, Jiujiang, 332000
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010
Jiangxi Pingxiang People's Hospital
Pingxiang, Jiangxi, 337055
Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine - West Branch
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200001
Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300052
Wenzhou People's Hospital
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000
EC of Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022
Yanbian University Hospital (Yanbian Hospital)
Yanji, Jilin, 133000
ZhuZhou Central Hospital
Zhuzhou, Hu'nan, 412000
Argentina20 sites
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, B1878GEG
Hospital Italiano de La Plata
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, B1900AXI
APRILLUS Asistencia e Investigacion
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1406AGA
Centro Medico Barrio Parque
Buenos Aires, C1425
Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Centro Medico Dra Laura Maffei Investigacion Clinica Aplicada
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1425
STAT Research S.A.
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1013AAB
Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1280AEB
Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar - Mind Out Research
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1417
Sanatorio Allende
Córdoba, X5000JHQ
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar del Plata
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, B7600FYK
Policlìnica Red Omip S.A - Ensayos Clinicos GC
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, B7600GNY
Instituto de Reumatologia
Mendoza, M5500
Instituto CAICI
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000PBJ
CER San Juan Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica
San Juan, 5400
Centro Dermatologico Schejtman
San Miguel, Buenos Aires, B1663
Clinica Mayo de Urgencias Medicas Cruz Blanca SRL
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL
Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000ICL
Italy8 sites
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (Presidio Spedali Civili)
Brescia, 25123
Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova
Padova, 35100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56100
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Roma, 00151
Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
Roma, 00155
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I - Università di Roma La Sapienza
Roma, 00161
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
Ospedale M. Scarlato
Scafati, Salerno, 84018
Colombia7 sites
Centro de Investigacion Medico Asistencial S.A.S
Barranquilla, 080020
Clínica de la Costa Ltda.
Barranquilla, 080020
Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas CIREEM S.A.S.
Bogotá, 110221
Servimed S.A.S.
Bucaramanga, 680003
IPS Centro Medico Julián Coronel S.A.
Cali, 760001
Preventive Care Ltda
Chía, 250001
Healthy Medical Center
Zipaquirá, 250252
Romania6 sites
S.C Centrul Medical de Diagnostic si Tratament Ambulator Neomed S.R.L
Brasov, 500283
S C Delta Health Care SRL
Bucharest, 014142
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Cluj Napoca
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
S.C.Centrul Medical Unirea SRL
Iași, 700023
Spitalul Judetean de Urgenta 'Sf. Ioan cel Nou' Suceava
Suceava, 720284
S.C Centrul Medical Unirea SRL
Târgu Mureş, 540136
Germany5 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Koeln
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Hungary5 sites
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft.
Budapest, 1036
Del-pesti Centrumkorhaz - Orszagos Hematologiai es Infektologiai Intezet
Budapest, 1097
Bekes Varmegyei Kozponti Korhaz
Gyula, 5700
Vita Verum Medical Egeszsegugyi Szolgaltato Bt.
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Vital Medical Center
Veszprém, 8200
Israel5 sites
Rambam Health Care Center
Haifa, 3109601
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 44281
Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus
Petah Tikva, 49372
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 5265601
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Serbia4 sites
Institute of Rheumatology
Belgrade, 11000
University Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska kosa
Belgrade, 11080
Institute of Treatment and Rehabilitation 'Niska Banja'
Niška Banja, 18205
United Kingdom4 sites
Cannock Chase Hospital
Cannock, Staffordshire, WS11 5XY
Doncaster Royal Infirmary
Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 5LT
Whipps Cross University Hospital
London, Greater London, E11 1NR
Guy's Hospital
London, Greater London, SE1 9RT
Canada3 sites
The Waterside Clinic
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6L2
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3
The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Netherlands3 sites
Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUMC
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, 9700 RB
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Belgium2 sites
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
Liège, 4000
Czechia2 sites
Revmatologie s.r.o.
Brno, 638 00
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, 77520
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) in Adult Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Receiving Background Nonbiologic Lupus Standard of Care
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. These may include antimalarials, steroids, and immunosuppressants.
The main objective of the study is to learn about the effect litifilimab has on lowering the activity of the disease. The main question researchers want to answer is:
Read more
- How many participants have an improvement in their symptoms after 52 weeks of treatment? Researchers will answer this and other questions by measuring the symptoms of SLE over time using a variety of scoring tools. These include the SLE Responder Index (SRI), the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 index (BILAG-2004), and the BILAG-BASED Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA), among others.
Researchers will also learn more about the safety of litifilimab. They will study how participants' immune systems respond to litifilimab. Additionally, they will measure the effect litifilimab and SLE have on the quality of life of participants using a group of questionnaires.
The study will be done as follows:
- After screening, participants will be randomized to receive either a high or low dose of litifilimab, or placebo. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine.
- All participants will receive either litifilimab or placebo as injections under the skin once every 4 weeks. The treatment period will last 52 weeks. Participants will continue to take their standard of care medications.
- Neither the researchers nor the participants will know if the participants are receiving litifilimab or placebo.
- There will be a follow-up safety period that lasts up to 24 weeks.
- In total, participants will have up to 22 study visits. The total study duration for participants will be up to 80 weeks.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus standard of care (SOC) therapy in reducing disease activity.
The secondary objectives of this study are to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing disease activity and occurrence of flare up to Week 52; to demonstrate organ-specific efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing joint disease activity and skin disease activity; to demonstrate and evaluate effect of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid(s) (OCS) use; to evaluate additional efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing disease activity with additional disease activity measures; assess the difference between litifilimab and placebo on participant reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and impacts of SLE; to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogeneicty of litifilimab in participants with active SLE.
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Being tested
- Litifilimab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Lupus, SLE, CLE
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LitifilimabDrug
Also called BIIB059
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
PlaceboDrug
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Litifilimab High Dose | Experimental | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive high dose of litifilimab, subcutaneously (SC), every 4 weeks (Q4W), up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Litifilimab |
| Litifilimab Low Dose | Experimental | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive low dose of litifilimab, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Litifilimab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive litifilimab-matching placebo, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52
An SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K).
- No new organ system affected as defined by no new organ system with British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (33)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) - Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BICLA is a composite endpoint defined as BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at baseline improved to grade C or D, no BILAG-2004 worsening in other BILAG-2004 organ systems such that there are no new BILAG-2004 grade A or greater than 1 new BILAG-2004 grade B, no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared with Baseline, no worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS and no violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Joints (Both Swollen and Tender) at Baseline Who Achieved a Joint-50 Response at Week 52
Joint-50 response is 50% reduction in total active joint count from baseline. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). A 28-joint assessment will be performed to determine the active joint count, which is defined as the sum of tender and swollen joint counts.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid(s) (OCS) ≥10 milligrams per day (mg/day) at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 40, Which Is Sustained Through Week 52 With No Disease Worsening from Week 40 to Week 52
No worsening of the disease is defined as no new BILAG-2004 grade A or less than 2 new BILAG-2004 grade B since the last visit during the Week 40 to Week 52.
Measured: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a CLASI-A Score ≥10 at Baseline Who Achieved a 50% Improvement from Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity Score (CLASI-50) Response at Week 24
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-50 is 50% of improvement form baseline in CLASI-A.
Measured: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate Through Week 52
Annualized flare rate will be calculated as the total number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days, and the ratio multiplied by 365.25.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score by Visit
The PGA is an investigator-administered assessment used to quantify disease activity and is measured using an anchored VAS. PGA asks the investigator to assess the participant's current disease activity from a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with the assessment made relative to the most severe state of SLE.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a BICLA Response by Visit
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BICLA is a composite endpoint defined as BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at baseline improved to grade C or D, no BILAG-2004 worsening in other BILAG-2004 organ systems such that there are no new BILAG-2004 grade A or greater than 1 new BILAG-2004 grade B, no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared with Baseline, no worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS and no violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to Onset of SRI-4 Response Sustained Through Week 52
An SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in SLEDAI-2K.
- No new organ system affected as defined by no new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS.
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRI-4, -5, or -6 Response by Visit
An SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria:
- Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in SLEDAI-2K.
- No new organ system affected as defined by no new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with baseline.
- No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS.
- No violation to protocol-specified medication rules. SRI-5 and SRI-6 are computed with a minimal five-point or six-point improvement in SLEDAI-2K being required, respectively.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Joint-50 Response by Visit
Joint-50 response is 50% reduction in total active joint count from baseline. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). A 28-joint assessment will be performed to determine the active joint count, which is defined as the sum of tender and swollen joint counts.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-20, -50, -70, or -90 Response by Visit
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-20, -50, -70 and -90 represent 20%, 50%, 70% or 90% improvement from baseline in CLASI-A score, respectively.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-A Score of ≤1 by Visit
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Activity (CLASI-A) score is used to evaluate lupus skin manifestations. CLASI-A scores of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. CLASI-A ≤1 represent the absolute score ≤1 in CLASI-A by visit.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Severe Flares Through Week 52
A SFI severe flare is defined any of the following:
- Change in SLEDAI instrument score to >12.
- New or worse: central nervous system SLE; vasculitis; nephritis; myositis; platelets <60,000 per milliliter (/mL); or hemolytic anemia with hemoglobin <7 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or decrease in hemoglobin >3 g/dL and requiring: doubling prednisone dose; or increase to >0.5 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) or hospitalization.
- Increase in prednisone dose to >0.5 mg/kg/day.
- New requirement for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or mycophenolate for SLE activity.
- Hospitalization for SLE activity.
- Increase in PGA score to >2.5
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to First British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) Severe Flare by Visit
BILAG-2004 severe flare is defined as an A score for items recorded as worse or new. BILAG-2004 is evaluated by scoring each item of a list of signs and symptoms given as 4 = new; 3 = worse; 2 = same; 1 = improving; 0 = not present; and ND = not done.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to First Severe Flare as Defined by Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index Flare Index (SFI)
SFI severe flare is defined any of the following: change in SLEDAI instrument score to >12; or new or worse: central nervous system SLE; vasculitis; nephritis; myositis; platelets <60,000 per milliliter (/mL); or hemolytic anemia with hemoglobin <7 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or decrease in hemoglobin >3 g/dL and requiring: doubling prednisone dose; or increase to >0.5 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) or hospitalization; or increase in prednisone dose to >0.5 mg/kg/day; or new requirement for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or mycophenolate for SLE activity; or hospitalization for SLE activity; or increase in PGA score to >2.5.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Time Spent in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Sustained LLDAS as Defined by the Number of Participants With ≥ 3, ≥ 5, and ≥ 7 Consecutive Visits in LLDAS up to and Including Week 52
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- SELENA-SLEDAI PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved LLDAS at Week 52
LLDAS is a composite endpoint defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score ≤ 4, with no activity in a major organ system (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); and
- No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; and
- SELENA-SLEDAI PGA ≤ 1; and
- Current prednisone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day; and
- Standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved SLEDAI-2K Improvement at Week 52
The SLEDAI-2K is a reliable, valid, simple, 1-page activity index that measures disease activity and records features of active lupus as present or not. It uses a weighted checklist to assign a numeric score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 28 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms), where higher scores represent increased disease activity. SLEDAI-2K improvement is defined as a reduction from Baseline of ≥ 4 points in SLEDAI-2K score.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of BILAG at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. No worsening of BILAG is defined as no new organ system affected, as defined by no new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with Baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of PGA-VAS at Week 52
The PGA is an investigator-administered assessment used to quantify disease activity and is measured using an anchored VAS. PGA asks the investigator to assess the participant's current disease activity from a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with the assessment made relative to the most severe state of SLE. No worsening from Baseline in lupus disease activity is defined by < 0.3-point increase on 3-point PGA-VAS.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of SLEDAI-2K at Week 52
The SLEDAI-2K is a reliable, valid, simple, 1-page activity index that measures disease activity and records features of active lupus as present or not. It uses a weighted checklist to assign a numeric score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 28 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms), where higher scores represent increased disease activity. No worsening of SLEDAI-2K is defined as no increase in the SLEDAI-2K total score from baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved BILAG Improvement at Week 52
The BILAG disease activity index evaluates SLE activity in number of organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows, BILAG A: severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: Stable mild disease; BILAG D: System previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: System never involved. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D. BILAG-2004 improvement, defined as all BILAG-2004 grade A at Baseline improved to grade B, C, or D, and all BILAG-2004 grade B at Baseline improved to grade C or D.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 5 mg/day at Week 40, Which is Sustained Through Week 52 With no Disease Worsening From Week 40 to Week 52
No worsening of the disease is defined as no new BILAG-2004 grade A or less than 2 new BILAG-2004 grade B since the last visit between Week 40 and Week 52
Measured: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day Who Achieved ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 7.5 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Change from Baseline in Lupus-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LupusQoL) Score
The LupusQoL is a participant-reported, lupus-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (HRQoL) consisting of 34 items grouped in 8 domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4 = never, 3 = occasionally, 2 = a good bit of the time, 1 = most of the time, and 0 = all the time. A LupusQoL score for each domain will be reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better HRQoL.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Score
SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
FACIT-Fatigue is a participant-administered HRQoL questionnaire that evaluates participant's fatigue in the 5 broad categories: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns. The level of fatigue is measured by questions assessed on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The responses for each item are added to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
PHQ-9 is a participant-administered HRQoL questionnaire to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The PHQ-9 is a participant-reported outcome (PRO) that is used to measure depression in adults. It contains 9 questions. The PHQ-9 yields an overall severity score that can range from 0 to 27 with the following severity scores: 0- 4 = none; 5-9 = mild; 10-14 = moderate; 15-19 = moderate-to-severe; and 20-27 = severe.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Lupus Score
WPAI questionnaire is a validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment. Each score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is an AE that started or worsened in severity after the first dose of study treatment through 28 days after the last dose of study treatment or end of study (EOS) date, whichever comes earlier. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death (a life-threatening event), in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a birth defect, or is a medically important event.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Litifilimab
Measured: Up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2021
- Study start16 Jul 2021
- Primary completion27 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 562 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04961567
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 230LE304
- Other IDs
- 2023-505696-74, 2023
- Acronym
- TOPAZ-2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Litifilimab (BIIB059) in Adult Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Receiving Background Nonbiologic Lupus Standard of Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04961567
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPAZ-2 / 230LE304
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Keywords
- Lupus, SLE, CLE
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 562 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called litifilimab (BIIB059) in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study will focus on participants who have active disease and are already taking standard of care medications. These may include antimalarials, steroids, and immunosuppressants.
The main objective of the study is to learn about the effect litifilimab has on lowering the activity of the disease. The main question researchers want to answer is:
- How many participants have an improvement in their symptoms after 52 weeks of treatment? Researchers will answer this and other questions by measuring the symptoms of SLE over time using a variety of scoring tools. These include the SLE Responder Index (SRI), the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 index (BILAG-2004), and the BILAG-BASED Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA), among others.
Researchers will also learn more about the safety of litifilimab. They will study how participants' immune systems respond to litifilimab. Additionally, they will measure the effect litifilimab and SLE have on the quality of life of participants using a group of questionnaires.
The study will be done as follows:
- After screening, participants will be randomized to receive either a high or low dose of litifilimab, or placebo. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine.
- All participants will receive either litifilimab or placebo as injections under the skin once every 4 weeks. The treatment period will last 52 weeks. Participants will continue to take their standard of care medications.
- Neither the researchers nor the participants will know if the participants are receiving litifilimab or placebo.
- There will be a follow-up safety period that lasts up to 24 weeks.
- In total, participants will have up to 22 study visits. The total study duration for participants will be up to 80 weeks.
Detailed description
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus standard of care (SOC) therapy in reducing disease activity.
The secondary objectives of this study are to demonstrate efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing disease activity and occurrence of flare up to Week 52; to demonstrate organ-specific efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in participants with active SLE, who are receiving background lupus SOC therapy in reducing joint disease activity and skin disease activity; to demonstrate and evaluate effect of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid(s) (OCS) use; to evaluate additional efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing disease activity with additional disease activity measures; assess the difference between litifilimab and placebo on participant reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and impacts of SLE; to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogeneicty of litifilimab in participants with active SLE.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Litifilimab High Dose | Experimental | Drug: LitifilimabParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive high dose of litifilimab, subcutaneously (SC), every 4 weeks (Q4W), up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
| Litifilimab Low Dose | Experimental | Drug: LitifilimabParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive low dose of litifilimab, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants who are receiving background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapy will receive litifilimab-matching placebo, SC Q4W, up to Week 48 with an additional dose at Week 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant must be diagnosed with SLE at least 24 weeks prior to screening and must meet the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, at screening by a qualified physician.
- Participant has a modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-200 (SLEDAI-2K) score ≥6 (excluding alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated).
- Participant has a modified clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 (excluding anti-dsDNA, low complement component 3 [C3] and/or complement component 4 [C4], alopecia, fever, lupus-related headache, and organic brain syndrome) at screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participant has BILAG-2004 grade A in ≥1 organ system or BILAG-2004 grade B in ≥2 organ systems at screening (adjudicated) and randomization.
- Participants must be treated with one of the following background nonbiologic lupus SOC therapies, initiated ≥12 weeks prior to screening and at stable dose ≥4 weeks prior to randomization:
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of or positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Current hepatitis C infection (defined as positive hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibody and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]).
- Current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or positive for total antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc] with positive reflex HBV DNA).
- History of severe herpes infection.
- Presence of uncontrolled or New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LitifilimabAlso: BIIB059Administered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Litifilimab High Dose, Litifilimab Low Dose |
| PlaceboAdministered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
An SRI-4 response is a composite endpoint defined by the following criteria: * Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). * No new organ system affected as defined by no new organ system with British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) grade A and no more than 1 new organ system with BILAG-2004 grade B compared with baseline. * No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity as defined by <0.3-point increase on 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS). * No violation to protocol-specified medication rules.
33 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) - Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Joints (Both Swollen and Tender) at Baseline Who Achieved a Joint-50 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid(s) (OCS) ≥10 milligrams per day (mg/day) at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 40, Which Is Sustained Through Week 52 With No Disease Worsening from Week 40 to Week 52
Time frame: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a CLASI-A Score ≥10 at Baseline Who Achieved a 50% Improvement from Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity Score (CLASI-50) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a BICLA Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to Onset of SRI-4 Response Sustained Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRI-4, -5, or -6 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Joint-50 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-20, -50, -70, or -90 Response by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CLASI-A Score ≥10 Who Achieved a CLASI-A Score of ≤1 by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Severe Flares Through Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to First British Isles Lupus Activity Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) Severe Flare by Visit
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to First Severe Flare as Defined by Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index Flare Index (SFI)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Time Spent in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Sustained LLDAS as Defined by the Number of Participants With ≥ 3, ≥ 5, and ≥ 7 Consecutive Visits in LLDAS up to and Including Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved LLDAS at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved SLEDAI-2K Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of BILAG at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of PGA-VAS at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved no Worsening of SLEDAI-2K at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieved BILAG Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 5 mg/day at Week 40, Which is Sustained Through Week 52 With no Disease Worsening From Week 40 to Week 52
Time frame: Week 40 up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day Who Achieved ≤7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With OCS ≥ 7.5 mg/day at Baseline With OCS Reduction to ≤ 7.5 mg/day at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Change from Baseline in Lupus-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LupusQoL) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change from Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Lupus Score
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Litifilimab
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2026.
- Click here to learn more about this trial, visit our study website.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Related trials for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
177 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Litifilimab in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Biogen at 177 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 177 sites in United States, Japan, China, Argentina, Italy and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index of 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52 (time frame: Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2026.