AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent CystitisNCT04962971

Comparative Effect of 3 Different Cranberry Extracts on Cystitis Related Urinary Comfort in Women

An observational study of Recurrent Cystitis, run by CEN Biotech at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Urinary discomfort includes a set of signs such as an urgent need to urinate, high frequency of urination per day, discomfort / difficulty or burning sensation when urinating, smelly urine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Recurrent Cystitis
What is being tested?
X, Y and Z
How many people
216 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 1 Feb 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The first 216 women of the CEN Nutriment (Clinical Investigation Center) volunteer panel corresponding to the selection criteria and wishing to participate in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • having had at least 3 symptomatic episodes of cystitis (including 1 urinary tract infection confirmed by a doctor) during the last 12 months
  • whose episode had a significant impact on quality of life / urinary discomfort (ACSS Dimension QoL ≥ 2)
  • had a smartphone compatible with Nurstrial smartphone application (e-CRF)

Who cannot join

  • to be a pregnant or breastfeeding woman or planning to be pregnant within 6 months,
  • currently taking any other supplementation for urinary comfort or having taken any other cranberry-based food supplement in the past 3 months,
  • to be under antibiotic treatment or during the last 7 days preceding inclusion,
  • have urinary discomfort with a severe impact on quality of life (ACSS QoL> 7) during the last 24 hours prior to inclusion,
  • have an allergy known to plants of the cranberry family or to one of the components of the products.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CEN Nutriment

    Dijon, Burgundy, 21000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparative Observational Study Evaluating the Urinary Comfort Related to Cystitis Symptoms Episodes and the Satisfaction of Women Following the Consumption of 3 Cranberry Extracts

Urinary discomfort includes a set of signs such as an urgent need to urinate, high frequency of urination per day, discomfort / difficulty or burning sensation when urinating, smelly urine. This urinary discomfort represents in women 2 to 5% of the reasons for consultation (Berg, 1991) and can have various etiologies but the bacterial origin is the most frequent. Cranberries are traditionally used for urinary comfort and the prevention of urinary disorders with bacterial origin.

The study objective is to collect in real life efficacy and tolerance data from the consumption of 3 cranberry extracts in order to highlight the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of these extracts which are directly involved in the improvement of urinary discomfort or situation of recurrent cystitis symptomatic episodes in women.

Being tested
X, Y, Z
Medical subject headings
Cystitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XDietary supplement

    exocyan

  • YDietary supplement

    exocyan

  • ZDietary supplement

    exocyan

Study groups in NCT04962971
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cranberry extract X373 mg per Day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: X
Cranberry extract Y404 mg per Day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Y
Cranberry extract Z2090 mg per Day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Z

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of the Quality of life related to urinary discomfort

    ACCS Quality of life score

    Measured: at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  2. Change of the Urinary comfort

    Visual Analogic score

    Measured: on weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Intensity of urinary disconfort

    Global ACCS score

    Measured: Every day during each urinary symptoms episod (Week 0 to Week 24)

  2. Patient Global Impression of Improvement

    PGI-I scale related to Urinary discomfort

    Measured: Week 4,Week 12,Week 24

  3. Evolution of the impact of urinary discomfort on psychosocial life

    Likert 5 points scales

    Measured: Week 0,Week 4,Week 12,Week 24

  4. Duration without antibiotic treatment

    Collection of the intake and the duration of the antibiotic treatment, if applicable

    Measured: on Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  5. Satisfaction of the supplementation

    Likert 5 points scales

    Measured: Week 4,Week 12,Week 24

  6. Tolerance of the supplementation

    Adverse events assessment

    Measured: Week 4,Week 12,Week 24

  7. Observance of the supplementation

    Total products minus remaining products

    Measured: on Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
216 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04962971
Sponsor's protocol ID
C1635
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
17 Jun 2021
Last updated
18 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Guillemet D, Juhel C, Rigaudier F, Herpin F, Meudec E. Comparative Evaluation of Three Cranberry Formulations in Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: An Observational Study. Res Rep Urol. 2026 Sep 7;18:613306. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S613306. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 42730009

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Recurrent Cystitis, run by CEN Biotech at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of the Quality of life related to urinary discomfort (time frame: at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04962971, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in