Generalized Myasthenia GravisPhase 3NCT04963270
A Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Satralizumab In Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
A Phase 3 study testing Satralizumab in people with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 76 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of satralizumab compared with placebo in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
- What is being tested?
- Satralizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Oct 2021to 2 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed Informed Consent Form
- For adolescent patients: Informed Consent Form for study participation signed by the parents or a legal guardian, and patient assent obtained, as per local requirements
- Ability to comply with the study protocol procedures
- Confirmed diagnosis of gMG (anti-AChR, anti-MuSK or anti-LRP4 present at screening)
- A total MG-ADL score of ≥ 5 points at screening with more than 50% of this score attributed to non-ocular items
- MGFA severity Class II-IV
- Ongoing gMG treatment at a stable dose
- For female patients of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use adequate contraception during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the final dose of satralizumab.
Who cannot join
- History of thymectomy within 12 months prior to screening
- Ocular MG (MGFA Class I) and myasthenic crisis (MGFA Class V) within the last 3 months prior to screening
- Known disease other than gMG that would interfere with the course and conduct of the study
- Positive screening tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)
- Evidence of latent or active tuberculosis (excluding patients receiving chemoprophylaxis for latent tuberculosis infection)
- Receipt of live or live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to baseline
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study or within 3 months after the last dose
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 17 countries.
76 sites in 17 countries
China12 sites
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Beijing, 100730
Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University
Beijing, DUMMY_VALUE
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 130021
West China Hospital - Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610047
The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
Guiyang, DUMMY_VALUE
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Hangzhou, 310016
The First Affiliated Hospital Of Shandong First Medical University
Jinan, DUMMY_VALUE
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, 200040
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, 201102
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, 300052
Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, 430030
Tangdu Hospital
Xi'an, 710038
Japan12 sites
Juntendo University Hospital
Bunkyō City, 113-8431
Chiba University Hospital
Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8677
General Hanamaki Hospital
Hanamaki, Iwate, 025-0082
Sapporo Medical University Hospital
Hokkaido, 060-8543
NHO Hokkaido Medical Center
Hokkaido, 063-0005
St. Marianna University Hospital
Kanagawa, 216-8511
International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital
Narita, Chiba, 286-0124
Kindai University Hospital
Osaka, 589-8511
Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital
Shizuoka, 430-8558
Osaka University Hospital
Suita, 565-0871
Tokyo Medical And Dental University, Medical Hospital
Tokyo, 113-8519
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-0023
United States6 sites
University of Chicago Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Keck School of Medicine of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Prairie Education and Research
O'Fallon, Illinois, 62269
University of California Irvine - Manchester Pavilion
Orange, California, 92868
SC3 Research Group, Inc
Pasadena, California, 91105
Medical Faculty Associates Inc.
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Argentina5 sites
Hospital Italiano
CABA, C1199ABA
Hospital Ramos Mejía
CABA, C1221ADC
Hospital Britanico
Ciudad Autonoma Bs As, C1280AEB
Fundación Scherbovsky
Mendoza, M5500AYB
INECO Neurociencias Orono
Rosario, S2000DTC
France5 sites
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076
APHP Raymond Poincare
Garches, 92380
Hopital Timone Adultes
Marseille, 13385
CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur 2
Nice, 06000
South Korea5 sites
Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital
Daegu, 41404
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, (0)6351
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, 02841
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Brazil4 sites
Hospital das Clinicas - UNICAMP
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887
Hospital Sao Lucas - PUCRS
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC
Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650
Hospital Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04037-002
Italy4 sites
Fond. Istituto Neurologico C.Besta
Milan, Lombardy, 20133
Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli
Naples, Campania, 80131
A.R.N.A.S. Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli
Palermo, Sicily, 90127
Ospedale Cà Foncello
Treviso, Veneto, 31100
Poland4 sites
Klinika Neurologii Doros?ych, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gda?sk, 80-952
Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych - Poradnia Neurologiczna
Krakow, 31-503
Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp z o.o. Centrum Neurologii K
Krakow, 31-505
Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. Dr Hab. N. Med. Konrad Rejdak.
Lublin, 20-016
Spain4 sites
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Universitario la Fe
Valencia, 46026
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06100
Ege University Medical Faculty
Izmir, 35100
Kocaeli University Hospital
Kocaeli, 41380
Ondokuz Mayis Univ. Med. Fac.
Samsun, 55139
Germany3 sites
St. Josef-Hospital, Klinik für Neurologie
Bochum, 44791
Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)
Essen, 45147
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, 48149
Denmark2 sites
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Aarhus N, 8200
Rigshospitalet
København Ø, 2100
Russia2 sites
Krasnoyarsk State Medical Academy
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, 660022
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Novosibirsk, 630087
Taiwan2 sites
Taipei Veterans General Hospital-Neurology
Taipei, 11217
Chang Gung Medical Foundation Linkou Branch
Taoyuan City, 333
Australia1 site
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Concord, New South Wales, 2139
Canada1 site
MUCH - Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Satralizumab In Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of satralizumab compared with placebo in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).
- Conditions
- Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
- Being tested
- Satralizumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Myasthenia Gravis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SatralizumabDrug
Satralizumab will be administered as a subcutaneous injection
PlaceboOther
Satralizumab placebo will be administered as a subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Satralizumab | Experimental | Participants will receive Satralizumab at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter. Adolescent patients who first enter the study in the OLE period will receive satralizumab SC loading doses at Week 0, 2, and 4 in the OLE, followed by maintenance doses Q4W thereafter and will remain on stable background therapy until Week 24 of the OLE. Receives: Drug: Satralizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score in the AChR+ Population
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
Secondary outcomes (28)
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in the Overall Population (OP) at Week 24
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Participants who received rescue therapy were considered non-responders.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in OP at Week 24
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Participants who received rescue therapy were considered non-responders.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in QMG Score in OP at Week 24
The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 Scale (Revised) (MG-QOL 15r) Total Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The MG-QOL-15r is a disease-specific health-related QoL measure that consists of 15 items: mobility (9 items), symptoms (3 items), and contentment and emotional well-being (3 items). Items were scored on a scale from 0=Not at all to 2=Very much with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 and higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in MG-QOL 15r Total Score in OP at Week 24
The MG-QOL-15r is a disease-specific health-related QoL measure that consists of 15 items: mobility (9 items), symptoms (3 items), and contentment and emotional well-being (3 items). Items are scored on a scale from 0=Not at all to 2=Very much, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 and higher scores indicate worse HRQoL.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Fatigue Subscale Total Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The Neuro-QoL is a validated tool designed to evaluate the HRQoL in participants with chronic neurological disease. The Fatigue Subscale is implemented as an eight-item, stand-alone short form that assesses the multi-dimensional aspects of fatigue ranging from general tiredness to debilitating exhaustion that Impacts activities of daily living. Each item was assessed using a 5-level Likert scale ranging between 1=never to 5=always. Raw scores range from 8 to 40, higher values indicate greater fatigue.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Neuro-QoL Fatigue Subscale Total Score in OP at Week 24
The Neuro-QoL is a validated tool designed to evaluate the HRQoL in participants with chronic neurological disease. The Fatigue Subscale is implemented as an eight-item, stand-alone short form that assesses the multi-dimensional aspects of fatigue ranging from general tiredness to debilitating exhaustion that Impacts activities of daily living. Each item was assessed using a 5-level Likert scale ranging between 1=never to 5=always. Raw scores range from 8 to 40, higher values indicate greater fatigue.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in QMG Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in QMG Score in OP at Week 24
The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total MGC Score in OP at Week 24
The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MGC Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MGC Score in OP at Week 24
The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Symptom Expression (Total MG-ADL Score of 0 or 1) in AChR+ Population at Week 24
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Symptom Expression (Total MG-ADL Score of 0 or 1) in OP at Week 24
The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: At Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One gMG-Related Exacerbation Between Baseline and Week 24 in AChR+ Population
gMG-related exacerbation was defined as one of the following: MG crisis; Substantial symptomatic worsening that requires immediate therapy; or health in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not given.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One gMG-Related Exacerbation Between Baseline and Week 24 in OP
gMG-related exacerbation was defined as one of the following: MG crisis; Substantial symptomatic worsening that requires immediate therapy; or health in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not given.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants in AChR+ Population Receiving Rescue Therapy Between Baseline and Week 24
The percentage of participants receiving rescue therapy during DBP analyzed the variable that encodes whether a participant received rescue therapy during DBP or not. If a participant stopped the study drug but received rescue therapy during the safety follow-up and this occurred within 24 weeks of baseline then this was counted as having received rescue therapy.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants in OP Receiving Rescue Therapy Between Baseline and Week 24
The percentage of participants receiving rescue therapy during DBP analyzed the variable that encodes whether a participant received rescue therapy during DBP or not. If a participant stopped the study drug but received rescue therapy during the safety follow-up and this occurred within 24 weeks of baseline then this was counted as having received rescue therapy.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Period: Duration of Meaningful Improvement, Defined as ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in AChR+ Population
The duration was the difference in weeks between the two visits defining the start and end (or Week 24) of reduction from baseline. The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Duration of Meaningful Improvement, Defined as ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in OP
The duration was the difference in weeks between the two visits defining the start and end (or Week 24) of reduction from baseline. The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptoms, or disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Measured: Day 1 up to approximately 24 weeks
DB Period: Serum Levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DB Period: Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6R)
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Satralizumab
The percentage of ADA-positive participants after drug administration were determined for participants exposed to satralizumab. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. Participants were considered to be ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that is at least 4-fold (0.60 titer unit) greater than the titer of the baseline sample.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Serum Concentrations of Satralizumab
Measured: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2021
- Study start19 Oct 2021
- Primary completion29 Jan 2024
- Study completion2 Sep 2024
Why it stopped: Sponsor decided to halt development of satralizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis and discontinued further dosing with the study drug (while the OLE period was ongoing) upon reviewing the primary results (DB period).
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Generalized Myasthenia GravisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04963270
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WN42636
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Habib AA, Zhao C, Aban I, Franca MC Jr, Jose JG, Zu Horste GM, Klimiec-Moskal E, Pulley MT, Tavolini D, Krumova P, Lennon-Chrimes S, Smith J, Thanei GA, Blondeau K, Vodopivec I, Wolfe GI, Murai H. Safety and efficacy of satralizumab in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (LUMINESCE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025 Feb;24(2):117-127. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00514-3.
PubMed 39862880