AzTrials
AzTrials

Generalized Myasthenia GravisPhase 3NCT04963270

A Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Satralizumab In Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

A Phase 3 study testing Satralizumab in people with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 76 sites in 17 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of satralizumab compared with placebo in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
What is being tested?
Satralizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
188 participants
Where
76 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
19 Oct 2021to 2 Sep 2024
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed Informed Consent Form
  • For adolescent patients: Informed Consent Form for study participation signed by the parents or a legal guardian, and patient assent obtained, as per local requirements
  • Ability to comply with the study protocol procedures
  • Confirmed diagnosis of gMG (anti-AChR, anti-MuSK or anti-LRP4 present at screening)
  • A total MG-ADL score of ≥ 5 points at screening with more than 50% of this score attributed to non-ocular items
  • MGFA severity Class II-IV
  • Ongoing gMG treatment at a stable dose
  • For female patients of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use adequate contraception during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the final dose of satralizumab.

Who cannot join

  • History of thymectomy within 12 months prior to screening
  • Ocular MG (MGFA Class I) and myasthenic crisis (MGFA Class V) within the last 3 months prior to screening
  • Known disease other than gMG that would interfere with the course and conduct of the study
  • Positive screening tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)
  • Evidence of latent or active tuberculosis (excluding patients receiving chemoprophylaxis for latent tuberculosis infection)
  • Receipt of live or live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to baseline
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study or within 3 months after the last dose

Trial locations and contacts

76 sites in 17 countries.

76 sites in 17 countries

China12 sites
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital

    Beijing, 100730

  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University

    Beijing, DUMMY_VALUE

  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, 130021

  • West China Hospital - Sichuan University

    Chengdu, 610047

  • The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

    Guiyang, DUMMY_VALUE

  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

    Hangzhou, 310016

  • The First Affiliated Hospital Of Shandong First Medical University

    Jinan, DUMMY_VALUE

  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai, 200040

  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University

    Shanghai, 201102

  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

    Tianjin, 300052

  • Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan, 430030

  • Tangdu Hospital

    Xi'an, 710038

Other trials in China

Japan12 sites
  • Juntendo University Hospital

    Bunkyō City, 113-8431

  • Chiba University Hospital

    Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8677

  • General Hanamaki Hospital

    Hanamaki, Iwate, 025-0082

  • Sapporo Medical University Hospital

    Hokkaido, 060-8543

  • NHO Hokkaido Medical Center

    Hokkaido, 063-0005

  • St. Marianna University Hospital

    Kanagawa, 216-8511

  • International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital

    Narita, Chiba, 286-0124

  • Kindai University Hospital

    Osaka, 589-8511

  • Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital

    Shizuoka, 430-8558

  • Osaka University Hospital

    Suita, 565-0871

  • Tokyo Medical And Dental University, Medical Hospital

    Tokyo, 113-8519

  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital

    Tokyo, 160-0023

Other trials in Japan

United States6 sites
  • University of Chicago Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Keck School of Medicine of USC

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Prairie Education and Research

    O'Fallon, Illinois, 62269

  • University of California Irvine - Manchester Pavilion

    Orange, California, 92868

  • SC3 Research Group, Inc

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Medical Faculty Associates Inc.

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

Other trials in United States

Argentina5 sites
  • Hospital Italiano

    CABA, C1199ABA

  • Hospital Ramos Mejía

    CABA, C1221ADC

  • Hospital Britanico

    Ciudad Autonoma Bs As, C1280AEB

  • Fundación Scherbovsky

    Mendoza, M5500AYB

  • INECO Neurociencias Orono

    Rosario, S2000DTC

Other trials in Argentina

France5 sites
  • CHU Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • APHP Raymond Poincare

    Garches, 92380

  • Hopital Timone Adultes

    Marseille, 13385

  • CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

  • CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur 2

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

South Korea5 sites
  • Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital

    Daegu, 41404

  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, (0)6351

  • Korea University Anam Hospital

    Seoul, 02841

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

Other trials in South Korea

Brazil4 sites
  • Hospital das Clinicas - UNICAMP

    Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887

  • Hospital Sao Lucas - PUCRS

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000

  • Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650

  • Hospital Sao Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04037-002

Other trials in Brazil

Italy4 sites
  • Fond. Istituto Neurologico C.Besta

    Milan, Lombardy, 20133

  • Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli

    Naples, Campania, 80131

  • A.R.N.A.S. Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli

    Palermo, Sicily, 90127

  • Ospedale Cà Foncello

    Treviso, Veneto, 31100

Other trials in Italy

Poland4 sites
  • Klinika Neurologii Doros?ych, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

    Gda?sk, 80-952

  • Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych - Poradnia Neurologiczna

    Krakow, 31-503

  • Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp z o.o. Centrum Neurologii K

    Krakow, 31-505

  • Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. Dr Hab. N. Med. Konrad Rejdak.

    Lublin, 20-016

Other trials in Poland

Spain4 sites
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Hospital Universitario la Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Hacettepe University Medical Faculty

    Ankara, 06100

  • Ege University Medical Faculty

    Izmir, 35100

  • Kocaeli University Hospital

    Kocaeli, 41380

  • Ondokuz Mayis Univ. Med. Fac.

    Samsun, 55139

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Germany3 sites
  • St. Josef-Hospital, Klinik für Neurologie

    Bochum, 44791

  • Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)

    Essen, 45147

  • Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Denmark2 sites
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital

    Aarhus N, 8200

  • Rigshospitalet

    København Ø, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

Russia2 sites
  • Krasnoyarsk State Medical Academy

    Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, 660022

  • Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

    Novosibirsk, 630087

Other trials in Russia

Taiwan2 sites
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital-Neurology

    Taipei, 11217

  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation Linkou Branch

    Taoyuan City, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia1 site
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital

    Concord, New South Wales, 2139

Other trials in Australia

Canada1 site
  • MUCH - Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Satralizumab In Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of satralizumab compared with placebo in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

Being tested
Satralizumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Myasthenia Gravis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SatralizumabDrug

    Satralizumab will be administered as a subcutaneous injection

  • PlaceboOther

    Satralizumab placebo will be administered as a subcutaneous injection

Study groups in NCT04963270
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SatralizumabExperimentalParticipants will receive Satralizumab at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter. Adolescent patients who first enter the study in the OLE period will receive satralizumab SC loading doses at Week 0, 2, and 4 in the OLE, followed by maintenance doses Q4W thereafter and will remain on stable background therapy until Week 24 of the OLE.
Receives: Drug: Satralizumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score in the AChR+ Population

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in the Overall Population (OP) at Week 24

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  2. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Participants who received rescue therapy were considered non-responders.

    Measured: At Week 24

  3. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in OP at Week 24

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Participants who received rescue therapy were considered non-responders.

    Measured: At Week 24

  4. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  5. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in QMG Score in OP at Week 24

    The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  6. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 Scale (Revised) (MG-QOL 15r) Total Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The MG-QOL-15r is a disease-specific health-related QoL measure that consists of 15 items: mobility (9 items), symptoms (3 items), and contentment and emotional well-being (3 items). Items were scored on a scale from 0=Not at all to 2=Very much with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 and higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

    Measured: At Week 24

  7. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in MG-QOL 15r Total Score in OP at Week 24

    The MG-QOL-15r is a disease-specific health-related QoL measure that consists of 15 items: mobility (9 items), symptoms (3 items), and contentment and emotional well-being (3 items). Items are scored on a scale from 0=Not at all to 2=Very much, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 and higher scores indicate worse HRQoL.

    Measured: At Week 24

  8. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Fatigue Subscale Total Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The Neuro-QoL is a validated tool designed to evaluate the HRQoL in participants with chronic neurological disease. The Fatigue Subscale is implemented as an eight-item, stand-alone short form that assesses the multi-dimensional aspects of fatigue ranging from general tiredness to debilitating exhaustion that Impacts activities of daily living. Each item was assessed using a 5-level Likert scale ranging between 1=never to 5=always. Raw scores range from 8 to 40, higher values indicate greater fatigue.

    Measured: At Week 24

  9. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Neuro-QoL Fatigue Subscale Total Score in OP at Week 24

    The Neuro-QoL is a validated tool designed to evaluate the HRQoL in participants with chronic neurological disease. The Fatigue Subscale is implemented as an eight-item, stand-alone short form that assesses the multi-dimensional aspects of fatigue ranging from general tiredness to debilitating exhaustion that Impacts activities of daily living. Each item was assessed using a 5-level Likert scale ranging between 1=never to 5=always. Raw scores range from 8 to 40, higher values indicate greater fatigue.

    Measured: At Week 24

  10. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in QMG Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  11. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in QMG Score in OP at Week 24

    The QMG is a 13-item direct physician assessment scoring system that quantifies disease severity based on impairments of body functions and structures. The 13-items are: ptosis, diplopia, orbicularis oculi weakness, swallowing, speech disruption, percent forced vital capacity, arm and leg endurance (four items), grip strength (two items), and neck flexion strength. Each of the 13 item was quantitatively assessed and scored on a scale from 0=None to 3=Severe, providing a total QMG score (sum of each item score) ranging from 0 to 39 where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  12. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  13. DB Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Total MGC Score in OP at Week 24

    The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  14. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MGC Score in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  15. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Total MGC Score in OP at Week 24

    The MGC is a composite measure consisting of items drawn from the MG-ADL (chewing, swallowing, speech, and breathing), QMG (diplopia and ptosis), and Manual Muscle Test (hip flexion strength, neck, facial, and shoulder abduction) in an effort to include both clinician- and participant-reported elements in a single measure. Each of the ten items contribute to a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher values indicating greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  16. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Symptom Expression (Total MG-ADL Score of 0 or 1) in AChR+ Population at Week 24

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  17. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Symptom Expression (Total MG-ADL Score of 0 or 1) in OP at Week 24

    The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  18. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One gMG-Related Exacerbation Between Baseline and Week 24 in AChR+ Population

    gMG-related exacerbation was defined as one of the following: MG crisis; Substantial symptomatic worsening that requires immediate therapy; or health in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not given.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  19. DB Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One gMG-Related Exacerbation Between Baseline and Week 24 in OP

    gMG-related exacerbation was defined as one of the following: MG crisis; Substantial symptomatic worsening that requires immediate therapy; or health in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not given.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  20. DB Period: Percentage of Participants in AChR+ Population Receiving Rescue Therapy Between Baseline and Week 24

    The percentage of participants receiving rescue therapy during DBP analyzed the variable that encodes whether a participant received rescue therapy during DBP or not. If a participant stopped the study drug but received rescue therapy during the safety follow-up and this occurred within 24 weeks of baseline then this was counted as having received rescue therapy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  21. DB Period: Percentage of Participants in OP Receiving Rescue Therapy Between Baseline and Week 24

    The percentage of participants receiving rescue therapy during DBP analyzed the variable that encodes whether a participant received rescue therapy during DBP or not. If a participant stopped the study drug but received rescue therapy during the safety follow-up and this occurred within 24 weeks of baseline then this was counted as having received rescue therapy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  22. DB Period: Duration of Meaningful Improvement, Defined as ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in AChR+ Population

    The duration was the difference in weeks between the two visits defining the start and end (or Week 24) of reduction from baseline. The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  23. DB Period: Duration of Meaningful Improvement, Defined as ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Total MG-ADL Score in OP

    The duration was the difference in weeks between the two visits defining the start and end (or Week 24) of reduction from baseline. The MG-ADL scale was used to assess the degree of gMG symptoms (six items: diplopia, ptosis, difficulties with chewing, swallowing, talking, and respiratory problems) and functional limitations in carrying out activities of daily living (two items: ability to brush teeth or comb hair and impairment in the ability to arise from a chair) that are present and clinically relevant in gMG participants. Each of the eight items was ranked on a 0-3 scale, with 3 representing the most severe symptoms or impaired performance and 0 representing no symptoms or impaired performance. The total MG-ADL score was calculated as the sum of each item score, with a maximum score ranging from 0 (least severe symptoms/impairment) to 24 (most severe symptoms/impairment). Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  24. DB Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptoms, or disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

    Measured: Day 1 up to approximately 24 weeks

  25. DB Period: Serum Levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  26. DB Period: Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6R)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  27. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Satralizumab

    The percentage of ADA-positive participants after drug administration were determined for participants exposed to satralizumab. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. Participants were considered to be ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that is at least 4-fold (0.60 titer unit) greater than the titer of the baseline sample.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  28. Serum Concentrations of Satralizumab

    Measured: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2021
  2. Study start19 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion29 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion2 Sep 2024

Why it stopped: Sponsor decided to halt development of satralizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis and discontinued further dosing with the study drug (while the OLE period was ongoing) upon reviewing the primary results (DB period).

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
188 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04963270
Sponsor's protocol ID
WN42636
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
7 Jul 2021
Last updated
28 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Habib AA, Zhao C, Aban I, Franca MC Jr, Jose JG, Zu Horste GM, Klimiec-Moskal E, Pulley MT, Tavolini D, Krumova P, Lennon-Chrimes S, Smith J, Thanei GA, Blondeau K, Vodopivec I, Wolfe GI, Murai H. Safety and efficacy of satralizumab in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (LUMINESCE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025 Feb;24(2):117-127. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00514-3.

    PubMed 39862880

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in