Chronic Subdural HematomaEarly Phase 1TASDNCT04966546
Targeting Spreading Depolarization After Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery (TASD)
A Early Phase 1 study testing Memantine Hydrochloride in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is an extremely common problem, particularly in the aging population, where fluid like collections compress the brain, frequently requiring surgical drainage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- What is being tested?
- Memantine Hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2022to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Surgical intervention for chronic or subacute SDH
- Electrode strip placed at time of surgery (for clinical indication of enhanced seizure monitoring)
- Age 18-100
- SD detected within 48h of surgery
Who cannot join
- Acute SDH requiring large craniotomy (some acute subacute component within cSDH is acceptable)
- Strip not feasible or safe to place at conclusion of surgery
- Known or suspected infection
- Recurrent surgery
- Subjects who previously participated in the study (contralateral or recurrent hematoma)
- Severe renal impairment (CrCl 5-29)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Use of other NMDA antagonist
- Severe hepatic impairment
- Child-Pugh Class C hepatic impairment
- Known allergy to memantine
- Memantine use at time of admission
- Inability to obtain enteral feeding (oral or via NGT)
- Patients on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
- Women of child-bearing age who are unwilling to undergo dual contraception for 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
About this study
Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is an extremely common problem, particularly in the aging population, where fluid like collections compress the brain, frequently requiring surgical drainage. After drainage, 25-50% of patients experience post operative neurologic deficits such as weakness or confusion that are often not explained by problems such as seizure, stroke, or mass effect from the fluid and blood. Recent subdural recordings have demonstrated that some of these neurological deficits may be related to waves of spreading depolarization (SD), which cause temporary neurological dysfunction. Our overall objective is to examine the relationship between neurological deficits and SD and to assess feasibility of a pilot trial to determine if a strategy of NMDA-R antagonism can effectively reduce SD and improve clinical recovery.
Read the detailed description
- Objectives 1.1. Assess risk factors for SD and seizures 1.2. Compare clinical outcomes between patients with SD and without 1.3. Obtain preliminary data on safety and efficacy of Memantine in subjects with SD 1.4. Assess early temporal relationship between SD and neurological deficits 1.5. Compare clinical outcomes between subjects with seizure and without
- Background Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) represents a unique phenotype of traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurring almost exclusively in elderly patients. Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is estimated to become the most common condition treated by neurosurgeons by 2030(1). Surgical evacuation is the mainstay of treatment, and though most patients recover with a straightforward course, up to 50% of patients develop postoperative neurological deficits or impaired recovery (2, 3). Though some of these events may be related to seizures or other metabolic changes(3), we recently demonstrated that spreading depolarization (SD) is definitively demonstrated in at least 15% of patients after surgical evacuation and are closely linked to postoperative neurological deficits(4). NMDA-R antagonists are a promising treatment for inhibiting SD, and we performed the first prospective study demonstrating dose dependent inhibition of SD with ketamine(5). Further, a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated efficacy of memantine (a related NMDA-R antagonist) in neurologic recovery after moderate traumatic brain injury (6). What is not known is whether postoperative neurologic deficits and subsequent impaired recovery are explained by an SD dependent mechanism. There is a critical need to assess this mechanistic link with SD and neurological recovery after cSDH evacuation in order to develop effective targeted therapies. Our long-term goal is to develop effective SD targeted therapies to improve recovery after cSDH evacuation and other neurologic injuries. The overall objective of this project, which is the necessary next step toward attainment of this long-term goal, is to assess for the overall relationship between SD and clinical outcomes. The central hypothesis is that SD plays a causal role in postoperative neurologic deficits after cSDH evacuation and therefore could be a therapeutic target. This hypothesis was formulated based on several key pieces of preliminary data: 1) We have demonstrated that SD occurs after cSDH evacuation and is closely related to postoperative neurological deficits. 2) We have demonstrated prospectively that a strategy of NMDA-R antagonism can inhibit SD after brain injury. The rationale that underlies the proposed research is that the temporal and long-term clinical outcomes, as they relate to SD, must be better defined. Further, in order to ultimately perform a randomized trial for efficacy, pilot data are needed to assess feasibility and appropriate outcome measures and timing.
- Study Design 3.1. Observational study with nested randomized controlled trial 3.1.1. All subjects undergoing surgery for chronic or subacute subdural hematoma will be screened for participation. The determination of the nature of the Subdural Hematoma will be based on the characteristic radiographic CT appearance of hypo or iso-attenuation of fluid in the subdural space with or without membranes and with or without <50% acute component. A 1x6 recording electrode will be placed for clinical monitoring at the time of surgery and left in place for 1-2 days after surgery. This will allow for recording of spreading depolarizations and seizures. Seizures will be treated as clinically indicated and provide additional potential benefit for these subjects. Subjects will initially be enrolled in an observational study focused on identifying risk factors for SD and poor outcomes. If SD is detected, subjects who consent will be randomized to a nested blinded pilot trial of the effect of a 7 day course of Memantine 10 mg compared to identical placebo on both ECoG (electrocorticography) and clinical outcomes. Patients may or may not undergo middle meningeal artery embolization per standard clinical recommendation. This will not be affected by participation in the study in any way.
3.1.2. Dose Selection Rationale Memantine usually start as 5 mg and titrate up to maximum dose of 20 mg per day. In this trial we will randomize to Memantine vs Placebo with dose of 10 mg BID without titration. The lack of titration is based on the requirement for acute action rather than chronic actions over a short interval. The study by Mokhtari et al used the same approach without titration. Multiple additional studies with similar and higher dose Memantine without titration are summarized in below table.
Published studies with higher dose Memantine without titration:
Study Design Population Indication Dose(s) Duration Adverse Events Mokhtari, 2018 RCT Moderate TBI Neurologic Recovery 30mg PO BID (no titration) 7 days None reported (BP, temp, 02sat, serum Na, Serum glu similar between groups) Bisaga, 2001 RCT Opioid depencance Opioid physical dependance 60mg PO prior to naloxone challenge Single dose None (BP, HR, 02 sat similar. Improved withdrawal symptoms after naloxone admin) Swerdlow, 2009 RCT Normal volunteers undergoing prepulse inhibition and startle testing n/a 20 or 30mg Single dose Dizziness at 30mg (no effect of drowsiness, queasiness, autonomic measures) Hart, 2002 RCT Healthy volunteers Discrimination of methamphatamine dosing 40mg Single dose None, less irritability with memantine Collins, 2007 RCT Cocaine users Cocaine pretreatment 60mg Single dose Increased "anxious" and "stimulated" reported effects during subsequent cocaine use Handforth, 2010 Single arm pilot trial Adults with tremor Tremor reduction Up to 40mg/day 16 wk Dizziness, HA, malaise, loss of consciousness, somnolence, weight gain, poor energy, imbalance, worse tremor Ferguson, 2007 Open label study with flexible dose Major depressive disorder Depressive symptoms Up to 40mg/day 10 weeks Somnolence, dizziness, insomnia Cekman, 2011 Case report Overdose Unintended 2000mg Single dose Sleepiness and coma. Tachycardia, hypertension, respiratory alkalosis, seizure.
Treated with plasmapheresis and DC home without sequelae
3.1.3. Allocation of Treatment and Randomization This is a nested Randomized Double Blinded Study within the observational study, once the SD is detected, subjects who consent will be randomized to a nested blinded pilot trial of the effect of a 7 day course of memantine 10 mg BID compared to identical placebo on both ECoG and clinical outcomes. The research pharmacist will be the only unblinded participant unless any safety concerns arise. All other study-related personnel, hospital care givers, and the patient will remain blinded.
- Conditions
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Being tested
- Memantine Hydrochloride, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Memantine HydrochlorideDrug
Active drug arm
PlaceboDrug
Simple syrup with peppermint oil added to match the commercial solution and make it indistinguishable
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Experimental | Subjects will be given memantine 10mg PO/ NG BID for 7 days Receives: Drug: Memantine Hydrochloride |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects will be given identical placebo syrup PO/NG BID for 7 days Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Spreading depolarizations and seizures
Neurophysiology: spreading depolarization rate, incidence, and duration before and after memantine and between groups.
Measured: 5 days
90 day eGOS
"extended Glasgow outcome scale" 1-8 ordinal scale. * is the best.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Neurological deficits: Incidence of new motor weakness or new dysphagia
Incidence of new motor weakness or new dysphagia during the first 5 post op days.
Measured: 5 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2022
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025
- Study completion1 Dec 2025
Why it stopped: Loss of Departmental support
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Subdural HematomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pilot parallel RCT
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-655
- Acronym
- TASD
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We do not anticipate generating any unique resources during the completion of the aims of this proposal. The PI and team are strongly committed to the sharing of resources, experimental details and findings, in order to facilitate replication studies and collaboration. We will therefore make the results and procedures from our study widely available. This will include dissemination through the COSBID network of SD investigators (www.cosbid.org), presentations at national meetings focused on brain injury, and study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and made available via PubMed Central.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Targeting Spreading Depolarization After Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery (TASD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04966546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TASD / 20-655
- Conditions
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Loss of Departmental support
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is an extremely common problem, particularly in the aging population, where fluid like collections compress the brain, frequently requiring surgical drainage. After drainage, 25-50% of patients experience post operative neurologic deficits such as weakness or confusion that are often not explained by problems such as seizure, stroke, or mass effect from the fluid and blood. Recent subdural recordings have demonstrated that some of these neurological deficits may be related to waves of spreading depolarization (SD), which cause temporary neurological dysfunction. Our overall objective is to examine the relationship between neurological deficits and SD and to assess feasibility of a pilot trial to determine if a strategy of NMDA-R antagonism can effectively reduce SD and improve clinical recovery.
Detailed description
- Objectives 1.1. Assess risk factors for SD and seizures 1.2. Compare clinical outcomes between patients with SD and without 1.3. Obtain preliminary data on safety and efficacy of Memantine in subjects with SD 1.4. Assess early temporal relationship between SD and neurological deficits 1.5. Compare clinical outcomes between subjects with seizure and without
- Background Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) represents a unique phenotype of traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurring almost exclusively in elderly patients. Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is estimated to become the most common condition treated by neurosurgeons by 2030(1). Surgical evacuation is the mainstay of treatment, and though most patients recover with a straightforward course, up to 50% of patients develop postoperative neurological deficits or impaired recovery (2, 3). Though some of these events may be related to seizures or other metabolic changes(3), we recently demonstrated that spreading depolarization (SD) is definitively demonstrated in at least 15% of patients after surgical evacuation and are closely linked to postoperative neurological deficits(4). NMDA-R antagonists are a promising treatment for inhibiting SD, and we performed the first prospective study demonstrating dose dependent inhibition of SD with ketamine(5). Further, a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated efficacy of memantine (a related NMDA-R antagonist) in neurologic recovery after moderate traumatic brain injury (6). What is not known is whether postoperative neurologic deficits and subsequent impaired recovery are explained by an SD dependent mechanism. There is a critical need to assess this mechanistic link with SD and neurological recovery after cSDH evacuation in order to develop effective targeted therapies. Our long-term goal is to develop effective SD targeted therapies to improve recovery after cSDH evacuation and other neurologic injuries. The overall objective of this project, which is the necessary next step toward attainment of this long-term goal, is to assess for the overall relationship between SD and clinical outcomes. The central hypothesis is that SD plays a causal role in postoperative neurologic deficits after cSDH evacuation and therefore could be a therapeutic target. This hypothesis was formulated based on several key pieces of preliminary data: 1) We have demonstrated that SD occurs after cSDH evacuation and is closely related to postoperative neurological deficits. 2) We have demonstrated prospectively that a strategy of NMDA-R antagonism can inhibit SD after brain injury. The rationale that underlies the proposed research is that the temporal and long-term clinical outcomes, as they relate to SD, must be better defined. Further, in order to ultimately perform a randomized trial for efficacy, pilot data are needed to assess feasibility and appropriate outcome measures and timing.
- Study Design 3.1. Observational study with nested randomized controlled trial 3.1.1. All subjects undergoing surgery for chronic or subacute subdural hematoma will be screened for participation. The determination of the nature of the Subdural Hematoma will be based on the characteristic radiographic CT appearance of hypo or iso-attenuation of fluid in the subdural space with or without membranes and with or without <50% acute component. A 1x6 recording electrode will be placed for clinical monitoring at the time of surgery and left in place for 1-2 days after surgery. This will allow for recording of spreading depolarizations and seizures. Seizures will be treated as clinically indicated and provide additional potential benefit for these subjects. Subjects will initially be enrolled in an observational study focused on identifying risk factors for SD and poor outcomes. If SD is detected, subjects who consent will be randomized to a nested blinded pilot trial of the effect of a 7 day course of Memantine 10 mg compared to identical placebo on both ECoG (electrocorticography) and clinical outcomes. Patients may or may not undergo middle meningeal artery embolization per standard clinical recommendation. This will not be affected by participation in the study in any way.
3.1.2. Dose Selection Rationale Memantine usually start as 5 mg and titrate up to maximum dose of 20 mg per day. In this trial we will randomize to Memantine vs Placebo with dose of 10 mg BID without titration. The lack of titration is based on the requirement for acute action rather than chronic actions over a short interval. The study by Mokhtari et al used the same approach without titration. Multiple additional studies with similar and higher dose Memantine without titration are summarized in below table.
Published studies with higher dose Memantine without titration:
Study Design Population Indication Dose(s) Duration Adverse Events Mokhtari, 2018 RCT Moderate TBI Neurologic Recovery 30mg PO BID (no titration) 7 days None reported (BP, temp, 02sat, serum Na, Serum glu similar between groups) Bisaga, 2001 RCT Opioid depencance Opioid physical dependance 60mg PO prior to naloxone challenge Single dose None (BP, HR, 02 sat similar. Improved withdrawal symptoms after naloxone admin) Swerdlow, 2009 RCT Normal volunteers undergoing prepulse inhibition and startle testing n/a 20 or 30mg Single dose Dizziness at 30mg (no effect of drowsiness, queasiness, autonomic measures) Hart, 2002 RCT Healthy volunteers Discrimination of methamphatamine dosing 40mg Single dose None, less irritability with memantine Collins, 2007 RCT Cocaine users Cocaine pretreatment 60mg Single dose Increased "anxious" and "stimulated" reported effects during subsequent cocaine use Handforth, 2010 Single arm pilot trial Adults with tremor Tremor reduction Up to 40mg/day 16 wk Dizziness, HA, malaise, loss of consciousness, somnolence, weight gain, poor energy, imbalance, worse tremor Ferguson, 2007 Open label study with flexible dose Major depressive disorder Depressive symptoms Up to 40mg/day 10 weeks Somnolence, dizziness, insomnia Cekman, 2011 Case report Overdose Unintended 2000mg Single dose Sleepiness and coma. Tachycardia, hypertension, respiratory alkalosis, seizure.
Treated with plasmapheresis and DC home without sequelae
3.1.3. Allocation of Treatment and Randomization This is a nested Randomized Double Blinded Study within the observational study, once the SD is detected, subjects who consent will be randomized to a nested blinded pilot trial of the effect of a 7 day course of memantine 10 mg BID compared to identical placebo on both ECoG and clinical outcomes. The research pharmacist will be the only unblinded participant unless any safety concerns arise. All other study-related personnel, hospital care givers, and the patient will remain blinded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pilot parallel RCT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Experimental | Drug: Memantine HydrochlorideSubjects will be given memantine 10mg PO/ NG BID for 7 days |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSubjects will be given identical placebo syrup PO/NG BID for 7 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Surgical intervention for chronic or subacute SDH
- Electrode strip placed at time of surgery (for clinical indication of enhanced seizure monitoring)
- Age 18-100
- SD detected within 48h of surgery
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Acute SDH requiring large craniotomy (some acute subacute component within cSDH is acceptable)
- Strip not feasible or safe to place at conclusion of surgery
- Known or suspected infection
- Recurrent surgery
- Subjects who previously participated in the study (contralateral or recurrent hematoma)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine HydrochlorideActive drug arm | Drug | Memantine |
| PlaceboSimple syrup with peppermint oil added to match the commercial solution and make it indistinguishable | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Spreading depolarizations and seizures
Time frame: 5 days
Neurophysiology: spreading depolarization rate, incidence, and duration before and after memantine and between groups.
90 day eGOS
Time frame: 90 days
"extended Glasgow outcome scale" 1-8 ordinal scale. * is the best.
1 secondary outcome
Neurological deficits: Incidence of new motor weakness or new dysphagia
Time frame: 5 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We do not anticipate generating any unique resources during the completion of the aims of this proposal. The PI and team are strongly committed to the sharing of resources, experimental details and findings, in order to facilitate replication studies and collaboration. We will therefore make the results and procedures from our study widely available. This will include dissemination through the COSBID network of SD investigators (www.cosbid.org), presentations at national meetings focused on brain injury, and study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and made available via PubMed Central.
Related trials for Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Recruiting
MMA Embolization With NeoCast for Subacute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Subdural Hematoma
Active, not recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Chronic Subdural Hematoma Embolization With Detachable Coils
Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage (cSDH)
RecruitingObservational study
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) Outcomes for Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Memantine Hydrochloride in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Spreading depolarizations and seizures (time frame: 5 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.