HealthyNCT04967612
Visual Perception After Virtual Implantation
A study testing Virtual implantation in people with Healthy, run by Carl Zeiss Meditec AG at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Evaluation of visual perception through diffractive optical lens designs by virtual implantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Virtual implantation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 10 May 2021to 19 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects between and including 18 and 50 years of age;
- Healthy eyes;
- Dominant eye with a monocular CDVA ≥1.0 decimal (≤ 0.0 logMAR) without cycloplegia;
- Subject who has been informed of the consequences and constraints of the protocol and who has given his/her written informed consent;
- Negative COVID19 screening test prior to every trial visit.
Who cannot join
- Subjects of less than 18 or more than 50 years of age;
- Monocular CDVA of dominant eye < 1.0 decimal (> 0.0 logMAR) without cycloplegia;
- Subject unable to comply with the study protocol or likely to be non-cooperative during the study;
- Subject whose freedom is impaired by administrative or legal issues, or adult persons under legal protection or unable to give an informed consent;
- Pseudophakic subjects;
- Subjects, who are unable to fixate for a longer time, e.g. strabismus, nystagmus;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Pathologic miosis;
- Intake of drugs affecting vision;
- Participation in another biomedical study in parallel, if it affects vision or if interactions with cycloplegia exist;
- Intolerance to or contraindication to cycloplegia, e.g. due to narrow angle of the anterior ocular chamber;
- Hyperopes with more than +6 D refraction.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Visual Perception Through Diffractive Optical Lens Designs by Virtual Implantation.
Evaluation of visual perception through diffractive optical lens designs by virtual implantation.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Virtual implantation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual implantationOther
Temporary placement of virtual optical lens in the crystalline lens plane.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Virtual implantation |
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design B | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Virtual implantation |
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design C | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Virtual implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Corrected distance visual acuity
Evaluate visual acuity at distance following virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens designs
Measured: during the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2021
- Study start10 May 2021
- Primary completion19 Aug 2021
- Study completion19 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- W Sickenberger, Prof, Principal investigator, JenVis Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04967612
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PJV2002
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Visual Perception Through Diffractive Optical Lens Designs by Virtual Implantation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04967612
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PJV2002
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carl Zeiss Meditec AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluation of visual perception through diffractive optical lens designs by virtual implantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design A | Experimental | Other: Virtual implantation |
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design B | Experimental | Other: Virtual implantation |
| Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design C | Experimental | Other: Virtual implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female subjects between and including 18 and 50 years of age;
- Healthy eyes;
- Dominant eye with a monocular CDVA ≥1.0 decimal (≤ 0.0 logMAR) without cycloplegia;
- Subject who has been informed of the consequences and constraints of the protocol and who has given his/her written informed consent;
- Negative COVID19 screening test prior to every trial visit.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subjects of less than 18 or more than 50 years of age;
- Monocular CDVA of dominant eye < 1.0 decimal (> 0.0 logMAR) without cycloplegia;
- Subject unable to comply with the study protocol or likely to be non-cooperative during the study;
- Subject whose freedom is impaired by administrative or legal issues, or adult persons under legal protection or unable to give an informed consent;
- Pseudophakic subjects;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual implantationTemporary placement of virtual optical lens in the crystalline lens plane. | Other | Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design A, Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design B, Virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens design C |
Primary outcome
Corrected distance visual acuity
Time frame: during the intervention
Evaluate visual acuity at distance following virtual implantation of diffractive optical lens designs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2021.
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Phenytoin Mucoadhesive Film for Oral Ulcers in Healthy Volunteers
Oral Ulcer, Oral Mucositis
Not yet recruiting
SUVY VerSus SAccharose (SUVISA)
Healthy Volunteers, Erythritol
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 in Healthy Children
Seasonal Influenza
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Microneurographic Assessment of Peripheral Nerves in Healthy Volunteers and Individuals With Sensory Dysfunction Caused by Inherited Mutations in the PIEZO2 Gene
PIEZO2-Deficiency Syndrome
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Connors Protocol for the Management and Use of Stored Human Specimens (Stored Human Specimens)
Healthy Volunteer Samples
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
W Sickenberger, Prof principal investigator
JenVis Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual implantation in people with Healthy, run by Carl Zeiss Meditec AG at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Corrected distance visual acuity (time frame: during the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2021.