Hemodialysis Catheter InfectionPhase 1NCT04967859
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Prophylactic Topical Gentamicin in Tunnelled Catheters for Hemodialysis
A Phase 1 study testing 0.1% gentamicin in people with Hemodialysis Catheter Infection, run by Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide, with a significant increase in the number of patients treated with dialysis and renal transplantation. Hemodialysis (HD) is the most widely used dialysis therapy in the world, and adequate vascular access is required. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodialysis Catheter Infection
- What is being tested?
- 0.1% gentamicin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2018to 1 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- incident and prevalent patients on hemodialysis
- Tunnelled catheter implant within 90 days of study initiation
Who cannot join
- patients under 18 years of age
- pregnant women
- other types of access for dialysis other than tunnelled catheters
- course of infection at the time of initiation of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Botucatu, São Paulo, 18.618-970
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Prophylactic Topical Gentamicin in Tunnelled Catheters for Hemodialysis: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide, with a significant increase in the number of patients treated with dialysis and renal transplantation. Hemodialysis (HD) is the most widely used dialysis therapy in the world, and adequate vascular access is required. The central venous catheter (CVC), although not considered the ideal vascular access, is still widely used. Its use has a strong relation with access-related infection, whether it is an exit orifice (IES), a tunnel and the most severe, the bloodstream (BSI). Consequently CVC contributes to patients' morbidity and mortality in HD, as well as to the high cost of hemodialysis treatment.
To compare the use of 0.1% topical gentamicin with the use of placebo in the exit site (ES) of tunneled catheters in patients in chronic HD regarding the reduction in IES and BSI rates and to identify the induction of bacterial resistance to gentamicin.
Read the detailed description
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the use of 0.1% gentamicin versus placebo in the ES of tunnelled catheters for hemodialysis in the prevalence and density of incidence of IES and BSI. Patients will be allocated into two groups randomly: Group 1 (control): Patients using placebo ointment in ES; Group 2 (intervention): Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment in ES.
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis Catheter Infection
- Being tested
- 0.1% gentamicin, Placebo
- Keywords
- hemodialysis;, tunneled catheter, central venous catheters, infections, prevention.
- Medical subject headings
- Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
0.1% gentamicinDrug
Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter
PlaceboDrug
Patients using placebo ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (control): | Placebo comparator | Patients using placebo ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2 (intervention) | Experimental | Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter Receives: Drug: 0.1% gentamicin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rates of exit-site infection
Rates of exit-site infection (measured in events per 1,000 catheter-days)
Measured: 1 years
Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections
Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections (measured in events per 1,000 catheter-days)
Measured: 1 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Jul 2018
- Primary completion1 Nov 2019
- Study completion1 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hemodialysis Catheter InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Group 1 (control): Patients using placebo ointment in ES Group 2 (intervention): Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment in ES
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Camille Pereira Caetano, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
- Investigators
- Daniela Ponce, Study director, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04967859
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 98328718.0.0000.5411
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):884-930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015.
PubMed 26498416Camins BC. Prevention and treatment of hemodialysis-related bloodstream infections. Semin Dial. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):476-81. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12117.
PubMed 23859190James MT, Conley J, Tonelli M, Manns BJ, MacRae J, Hemmelgarn BR; Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Meta-analysis: antibiotics for prophylaxis against hemodialysis catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Apr 15;148(8):596-605. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-8-200804150-00004.
PubMed 18413621Zacharioudakis IM, Zervou FN, Arvanitis M, Ziakas PD, Mermel LA, Mylonakis E. Antimicrobial lock solutions as a method to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59(12):1741-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu671. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
PubMed 25156111Wang Y, Ivany JN, Perkovic V, Gallagher MP, Woodward M, Jardine MJ. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for preventing central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD009631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009631.pub2.
PubMed 27039404Liu Y, Zhang AQ, Cao L, Xia HT, Ma JJ. Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e79417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079417. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24278133Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PubMed 24125729Snaterse M, Ruger W, Scholte Op Reimer WJ, Lucas C. Antibiotic-based catheter lock solutions for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Hosp Infect. 2010 May;75(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
PubMed 20227787Yahav D, Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Gafter U, Paul M. Antimicrobial lock solutions for the prevention of infections associated with intravascular catheters in patients undergoing hemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):83-93. doi: 10.1086/588667.
PubMed 18498236Landry D, Braden G. Reducing catheter-related infections in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jul;9(7):1156-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04700514. Epub 2014 Jun 26. No abstract available.
PubMed 24970878
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Prophylactic Topical Gentamicin in Tunnelled Catheters for Hemodialysis: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04967859
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 98328718.0.0000.5411
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis Catheter Infection
- Keywords
- hemodialysis;, tunneled catheter, central venous catheters, infections, prevention.
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide, with a significant increase in the number of patients treated with dialysis and renal transplantation. Hemodialysis (HD) is the most widely used dialysis therapy in the world, and adequate vascular access is required. The central venous catheter (CVC), although not considered the ideal vascular access, is still widely used. Its use has a strong relation with access-related infection, whether it is an exit orifice (IES), a tunnel and the most severe, the bloodstream (BSI). Consequently CVC contributes to patients' morbidity and mortality in HD, as well as to the high cost of hemodialysis treatment.
To compare the use of 0.1% topical gentamicin with the use of placebo in the exit site (ES) of tunneled catheters in patients in chronic HD regarding the reduction in IES and BSI rates and to identify the induction of bacterial resistance to gentamicin.
Detailed description
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the use of 0.1% gentamicin versus placebo in the ES of tunnelled catheters for hemodialysis in the prevalence and density of incidence of IES and BSI. Patients will be allocated into two groups randomly: Group 1 (control): Patients using placebo ointment in ES; Group 2 (intervention): Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment in ES.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Group 1 (control): Patients using placebo ointment in ES Group 2 (intervention): Patient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment in ES
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (control): | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPatients using placebo ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter |
| Group 2 (intervention) | Experimental | Drug: 0.1% gentamicinPatient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- incident and prevalent patients on hemodialysis
- Tunnelled catheter implant within 90 days of study initiation
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients under 18 years of age
- pregnant women
- other types of access for dialysis other than tunnelled catheters
- course of infection at the time of initiation of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1% gentamicinPatient using 0.1% gentamicin ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter | Drug | Group 2 (intervention) |
| PlaceboPatients using placebo ointment at the exit site of the hemodialysis catheter | Drug | Group 1 (control): |
Primary outcome
Rates of exit-site infection
Time frame: 1 years
Rates of exit-site infection (measured in events per 1,000 catheter-days)
Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections
Time frame: 1 years
Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections (measured in events per 1,000 catheter-days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 26498416National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):884-930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015.
- Background: PubMed 23859190Camins BC. Prevention and treatment of hemodialysis-related bloodstream infections. Semin Dial. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):476-81. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12117.
- Background: PubMed 18413621James MT, Conley J, Tonelli M, Manns BJ, MacRae J, Hemmelgarn BR; Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Meta-analysis: antibiotics for prophylaxis against hemodialysis catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Apr 15;148(8):596-605. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-8-200804150-00004.
- Background: PubMed 25156111Zacharioudakis IM, Zervou FN, Arvanitis M, Ziakas PD, Mermel LA, Mylonakis E. Antimicrobial lock solutions as a method to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59(12):1741-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu671. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 27039404Wang Y, Ivany JN, Perkovic V, Gallagher MP, Woodward M, Jardine MJ. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for preventing central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD009631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009631.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24278133Liu Y, Zhang AQ, Cao L, Xia HT, Ma JJ. Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e79417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079417. eCollection 2013.
- Background: PubMed 24125729Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 20227787Snaterse M, Ruger W, Scholte Op Reimer WJ, Lucas C. Antibiotic-based catheter lock solutions for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Hosp Infect. 2010 May;75(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 18498236Yahav D, Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Gafter U, Paul M. Antimicrobial lock solutions for the prevention of infections associated with intravascular catheters in patients undergoing hemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):83-93. doi: 10.1086/588667.
- Background: PubMed 24970878Landry D, Braden G. Reducing catheter-related infections in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jul;9(7):1156-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04700514. Epub 2014 Jun 26. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemodialysis Catheter Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate AZD7760 Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults (Phase I) and Adults With End-stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis With a Central Venous Catheter (Phase IIa)
Staphylococcus Aureus
RecruitingPhase 4
Open-Label Study to Assess Safety and Time to Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) in Subjects From Birth to < 18 Years of Age
Catheter-Related Infections
Recruiting
Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment in Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis
Not yet recruiting
Impact of a Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter With Endexo® Technology on Catheter Dysfunction Compared With Historical Catheter Dysfunction Data in Standard Catheters
Haemodialysis, Haemodialysis Complication
Not yet recruiting
Chlorhexidine Caps for CLABSI Prevention in Hemodialysis: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Vascular Access Complication, Device Related Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniela Ponce study director
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing 0.1% gentamicin in people with Hemodialysis Catheter Infection, run by Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rates of exit-site infection (time frame: 1 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04967859, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2021.