AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Kidney InjuryARDC-SLEDNCT04968587

Comparison of RCA and RACD in Extra-renal Purification by SLED

A study testing Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One of the main RRT issues is anticoagulation of the ECC, because blood contact with biomaterials causes bio-incompatibility reactions, including activation of the coagulation cascade. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
138 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 1 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patient requiring Renal replacement Therapy

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Hypercalcemia ≥ 3 mmol/L.
  • Major under guardianship
  • Major deprived of freedom
  • Impossible to obtain free and informed consent
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Presence of hemostasis or coagulation disorders:
  • Thrombocytopenia < 30 G/L.
  • Curative anticoagulation.
  • Severe liver disease with Prothrombin rate <30%.
  • Coagulation factor deficit.
  • Not registered to a social security system.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France

    Melun, 77000

    Takoua FAYALI, 0033181742474, takoua.fayali@ghsif.fr

    Arezki AGHER, 0033181742228, arezki.agher@ghsif.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA) and Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification in Renal (RACD) Replacement Therapy Using Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis

One of the main RRT issues is anticoagulation of the ECC, because blood contact with biomaterials causes bio-incompatibility reactions, including activation of the coagulation cascade. Based on Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA) protocols, an ionized calcium (Ca-ion) concentration around 0.25 to 0.35mmol / L prevents fibrino formation and allows anticoagulation for the ECC. During RCA, metabolic side effects may occur due to systemic flow of citrate. Our postulate is that reduction of ionized calcemia related to the use of a calcium-free dialysate and haemofilter performance makes it possible to avoid citrate infusion. Our study aim to compare intermittent RRT using 4% Citrate infusion and without Citrate.

Read the detailed description

Background: Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), requires anticoagulation of the extracorporal circuit (ECC) using heparin, citrate or repeated rinsing. Difficulties of implementation or exposition to complications (thrombosis, hemorrhage or electrolyte disorder) are frequent.

Purpose: Regional anticoagulation of the ECC based on ionized calcemia reduction, as using citrate, but induced by the use of a calcium-free dialysate associated with the performance of the hemofilter could reduce these risks and the cost of intermittent RRT. This study aims to compare the efficiency of a regional anticoagulation technique based on the reduction of Ionized Calcium in the extracorporal circuit, without the use of Citrate and with Citrate during intermittent RRT.

Abstract: One of the main RRT issue is anticoagulation of the ECC, because blood contact with biomaterials causes bio-incompatibility reactions, including activation of the coagulation cascade. Based on Regional Citrate anticoagulation (RCA) protocols, an ionized calcium (Ca-ion) concentration around 0.25 to 0.35mmol/L prevents fibrino formation and allows anticoagulation for the ECC. During RCA, metabolic side effects may occur due to systemic passage of citrate. Our postulate is that reduction of ionized calcemia related to the use of a calcium-free dialysate and haemofilter performance makes it possible to avoid citrate infusion. Our study aims at comparing intermittent RRT using 4% Citrate infusion and without Citrate.

Being tested
Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis
Medical subject headings
Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sustained Low-Efficiency DialysisProcedure or surgery

    Also called intermittent haemodialysis equipment with lower blood flow and dialysate flow combined with prolonged sessions

    All patient requiring Renal replacement Therapy in the intensive care unit will be randomized in open order (cross-over) with either Regional anticoagulation with Citrate or Regional anticoagulation by Decalcification without Citrate

Study groups in NCT04968587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: RACD - RCAOtherFirst period of treatment with Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification SLED and second period of treatment with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation SLED
Receives: Procedure: Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis
Group 2 : RCA - RACDOtherFirst period of treatment with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation SLED and second period of treatment with Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification SLED
Receives: Procedure: Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of the plasma urea

    We will compare plasma urea clearance after reaching the prescribed session time without irreversible coagulation of the extracorporeal circuit, with both methods tested in the study.

    Measured: up to 8 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Measurement of the concentration of Ca²+i in post-filter

    Measurement at different timepoints after the beginning of the concentration of Ca²+i in post-filter during each RRT session.

    Measured: 30 minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours

  2. Measurement of the concentration of Ca²+i (patient)

    Measurement at different timepoints after the beginning of the concentration of Ca²+i (patient) during each RRT session.

    Measured: 30minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours

  3. Measurement of the concentration of Mg2+

    Measurement of the concentration of Mg2+ at the end of each RRT session.

    Measured: 8 hours

  4. Measurement of heart rate during each RRT session.

    Measurement heart rate during each RRT session.

    Measured: Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes

  5. Measurement of blood pressure

    Measurement of blood pressure during each RRT session.

    Measured: Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes

  6. Number of circuit losses during each RRT session,

    Number of circuit losses during each RRT sessions,

    Measured: Hour 0; 480 minutes

  7. Number of catheter thrombosis during each RRT session

    Number of catheter thrombosis during each RRT session

    Measured: Hour 0; 480 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
138 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04968587
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-A0122-37
Acronym
ARDC-SLED
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
8 Jun 2021
Last updated
10 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of the plasma urea (time frame: up to 8 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in