AzTrials
AzTrials

Mandibular DimensionsNCT04973241

Mandibular Dimensions as a Predictor of Age and Sex in a Sample of Upper Egypt Population by Using Panoramic Images and Cone Beam Computed Tomography

An observational study of Mandibular Dimensions, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Growth changes occur from the intrauterine life to senility, hard tissues like bones and teeth undergo changes with growth, a change in shape and/or fusion of ossification centers, the stability of these changes facilitate ease in estimation of age from hard tissue samples ( Bhalaji ,2006;Reddy,2006; Mohite et… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mandibular Dimensions
What is being tested?
OPG & CBCT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2021to Oct 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: persons aged between 15 and 40 years.

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography of patients aged15-40 years.
  • 2. Only patients with a documented date of birth.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Asymmetry in OPG and CBCT images, unreadable ,unclear ,poor quality, gross pathology and magnification.
  • 2. Panoramic radiographs with positioning errors which could cause distortions in the dimensions.
  • 3. Hereditary facial asymmetries. 4. Images of completely edentulous patients. 5. Surgical intervention, patients with orthognathic surgeries. 6. Presence of pathologies such as fractures, impacted teeth, missing teeth, cleft lip or palate, cysts, tumors, osteomyelitis,severe osteoporosis in the mandible, periodontal lesion, and congenital craniofacial abnormalities, in the lower jaw, resorption in the mandibular arch that could affect the interpretation of radiographic image, 7. History of head trauma

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Eman Mahmoud Metwally, Demonstrator contact

01033343919 ext. 01017812151

emanmetwally53@yahoo.com

About this study

Official title: Mandibular Dimensions as a Predictor of Age and Sex in a Sample of Upper Egypt Population

Growth changes occur from the intrauterine life to senility, hard tissues like bones and teeth undergo changes with growth, a change in shape and/or fusion of ossification centers, the stability of these changes facilitate ease in estimation of age from hard tissue samples ( Bhalaji ,2006;Reddy,2006; Mohite et al.,2011).

Mandibles were used for the study for two simple causes: First, there appears to be a lack of standards utilizing this element and second, this bone is often recovered mostly intact (Franklin et al.,2008) The mandible is considered the most durable facial bone ;is due to the presence of a dense layer of compact bone and therefore remains well conserved than many other bones and the only movable bone of the skull available for gender identification; is due to the morphological characteristics of mandible, and radiology plays an important role in it. It is composed of two hemi mandibles united at the midline by a vertical symphysis. Each one of them is composed of a horizontal body with a posterior vertical extension termed the ramus(ndira et al.,2012 ).

Read more

Mandibular canines are found to exhibit the highest sexual dimorphism.The mean age of eruption of mandibular canines is 10.87 years, and they are the last teeth to be extracted with respect to age; so, they can be considered as the key teeth for personal identification (Khangura et al.,2011; Padmavati et al.,2011; Yuwanati et al.,2012).

Measurements of the mandibular ramus tend to show higher sexual dimorphism, and variations between the sexes are mostly more marked in the mandibular ramus than in the mandibular body (Humphrey et al.,1999).

Gonial angle is commonly used to determine the rotation of the mandible and to identify growth pattern, it is a common parameter used to describe orthodontic extractions or surgical treatments(Kitai et al.,2013).

Several studies focused on the comparison between CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) and OPG (Orthopantomograph) for visualization of bone and teeth (Dalessandri et al.,2012 ;Savoldi et al.,2015).

OPG is a very popular technique ,the most available and commonly used extra-oral radiography, its lower cost ,wide area coverage ,ease of preparation have made it an excellent choice for routine examination of many structures thus useful for research purpose does not involve the patient any additional exposure or cost(Ghosh et al.,2009 ;Sairam et al.,2016).

The CBCT imaging device can obtain undistorted three-dimensional (3D) images of good quality with a low radiation dose (Yamamoto et al.,2003).

Being tested
OPG & CBCT

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OPG & CBCTRadiation

    panoramic images , cone beam computed tomography

Study groups in NCT04973241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OPGNot described
Receives: Radiation: OPG & CBCT
CBCTNot described
Receives: Radiation: OPG & CBCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. comparison of OPG & CBCT

    1. Comparison of the accuracy in identification of age and sex between using digital orthopantomographs and cone beam computed tomography

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2021
  2. Study startOct 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04973241
Sponsor's protocol ID
OPG&CBCT for mandible measures
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
13 Jul 2021
Last updated
22 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mandibular Dimensions, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eman Mahmoud Metwally, Demonstrator (01033343919 ext. 01017812151, emanmetwally53@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

comparison of OPG & CBCT (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in