Dermatitis, AtopicPhase 1NCT04975438
Clinical Effect, Safety and Tolerability of GSK1070806 in Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 1 study testing GSK1070806 in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of GSK1070806 in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AtD) participants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- What is being tested?
- GSK1070806
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2021to 13 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate to severe AtD (confirmed by a dermatologist) according to the Hannifin and Rajka criteria or Eichenfield revised criteria.
- Onset of AtD symptoms occurring at least 6 months prior to Screening, with stable disease for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
- Eczema Activity Severity Index greater than or equal to (>=)16; Investigator Global Assessment score >=3.
- Group 1- Biologic Naïve: Topical First Line Treatment: Documented recent history (within 6 months before Screening) of: a) either an inadequate response (IR) to out-patient treatment with at least one topical treatment (intermittent topical corticosteroid, topical calcineurin inhibitor), topical inhibitors or Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (Crisaborole); b) or that topical treatments were otherwise not recommended.
- Group 2- Dupilumab-Inadequate Responder: Documented history of an IR to dupilumab: a) either following at least 16 weeks of treatment according to the Investigator's judgement; b) or intolerant to dupilumab owing to adverse events.
Who cannot join
- Other than AtD, the presence of a significant skin morbidity that will influence the Investigator's ability to assess the severity of the disease (e.g. psoriasis, confirmed or suspected cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, autoimmune bullous disease, fixed drug reaction and Stevens Johnson Syndrome).
- Participants with any uncontrolled medical conditions, other than AtD, that in the opinion of the investigator puts the participant at unacceptable risk or will likely interfere with study assessments or data integrity. Other medical conditions should be stable at the time of screening and be expected to remain stable for the duration of the study.
- Treatment with biologic agents (investigational and marketed monoclonal antibodies) within 12 weeks or 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives (whichever is longer) prior dosing on Day 1.
- Treatment with Janus Activated Kinase inhibitors (e.g. baricitinib, upadacitinib) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to dosing on Day 1.
- Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, or calcineurin inhibitors within 4 weeks of Screening.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 2 countries.
11 sites in 2 countries
United States8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33155
GSK Investigational Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73118
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
GSK Investigational Site
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33613
GSK Investigational Site
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Canada3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N6A 5R9
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
About this study
Official title: A Phase Ib, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Clinical Effect, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Infusion of GSK1070806 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients
This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of GSK1070806 in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AtD) participants.
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- Being tested
- GSK1070806, Placebo
- Keywords
- Eczema activity severity index, GSK1070806
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GSK1070806Drug
GSK1070806 will be administered
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: GSK1070806 | Experimental | Participants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1. Receives: Drug: GSK1070806 |
| Group 1: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2: Dupilumab-IR with GSK1070806 | Experimental | Participants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1. Receives: Drug: GSK1070806 |
| Group 2: Dupilumab IR with Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Group 1
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. Posterior Median presented from Bayesian analysis under the hypothetical strategy. The percent change from baseline in the EASI score at week 12 in group 1 is reported here. Data reported as 'Median' refers to 'Posterior Median' and '95% Confidence Interval' refers to '95% Credible Interval'.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. Posterior Median presented from Bayesian analysis under the hypothetical strategy. The change from baseline in the EASI score at week 12 in group 1 is reported here. Data reported as 'Median' refers to 'Posterior Median' and '95% Confidence Interval' refers to '95% Credible Interval'.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-50, ≥ 50% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-50 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: At Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-75, ≥ 75% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: At Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-90, ≥ 90% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: At Week 12
Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 in Group 1
The Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's atopic dermatitis. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity determined by the investigator, sub-investigator, or trained healthcare professional with required qualifications on a scale of 0 to 4 where, 0-clear, 1-almost clear, 2-mild, 3-moderate, and 4- severe. Higher score indicates severity of disease. A Responder is defined as a participant who had an IGA score of 0 or 1 at each visit.
Measured: At Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 2
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. NA indicate that data is not available since only one participant was analyzed, therefore Standard Deviation (SD) was not derived.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Groups 1 and 2
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other situations as per investigator's medical or scientific judgment.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Signs Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Vital signs included diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate (PR) and body temperature were measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in semi-supine position. PCI ranges- SBP (millimeters of mercury[mmHg]): <85 (low) or >160 (high), DBP (mmHg): <45 (low) or >100 (high), PR (beats per minute): <40 (low) or >110 (high) and body temperature (degrees Celsius) <=35.5 (low) or >38.0 (high). Participants with worst case results relative to PCI criteria and who had values "to high" are reported here. Participants with a missing baseline value are assumed to have a within range value.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Twelve lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured QTc, PR, QRS intervals. Participants with clinically significant changes relative to baseline are reported here. Clinically significant findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Urine samples were collected to assess urine glucose, bilirubin, protein, occult blood, Leukocyte Esterase and ketones using dipstick method. Participants with clinically significant changes relative to baseline are reported here. Clinically significant findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Blood samples were collected for analysis of chemistry parameters. PCI ranges were >3*Upper limit of normal (ULN) units per liter (U/L)(Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT]), >3*ULN (U/L) (Aspartate Aminotransferase ([AST]), >2*ULN (Alkaline Phosphatase [ALP]) (U/L), >2*ULN (micromoles per liter) (bilirubin), <3 or >6.5 mmol/L (potassium), <130 or >160 mmol/L (sodium), <1.5 or >3.25 mmol/L (Corrected Calcium) and >40 mmol/L (Urea). Participants with worst case results relative to PCI criteria and who had values "to high" are reported here. Participants with a missing baseline value are assumed to have a within range value.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. The ranges for the hematology parameters are as follows: Hematocrit [High >0.54 Proportion of red blood cells in blood, Low <0.1 Proportion of red blood cells in blood], Haemoglobin [Higher: > 185 grams/Litre (g/L) Low: less than (<) 100 g/L ], Lymphocytes [<0.8 10^9/L], Neutrophils [<1.5 10^9/L], Platelets [High: > 999 10^9/ L and Low: < 100 10^9/ L] and White blood cells [Low:<2 10^9/L]. Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (for example [e.g.], High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in "To within Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if participant has values that changed 'To Low' \& 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100%.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)- Groups 1 and 2
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence of antibodies using a validated assay method. The treatment emergent ADA assay results up to week 24 are reported.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2021
- Study start18 Nov 2021
- Primary completion19 Dec 2022
- Study completion13 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Dermatitis, AtopicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04975438
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 215253
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase Ib, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Clinical Effect, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Infusion of GSK1070806 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04975438
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 215253
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- Keywords
- Eczema activity severity index, GSK1070806
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jul 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of GSK1070806 in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AtD) participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: GSK1070806 | Experimental | Drug: GSK1070806Participants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1. |
| Group 1: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1. |
| Group 2: Dupilumab-IR with GSK1070806 | Experimental | Drug: GSK1070806Participants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1. |
| Group 2: Dupilumab IR with Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Moderate to severe AtD (confirmed by a dermatologist) according to the Hannifin and Rajka criteria or Eichenfield revised criteria.
- Onset of AtD symptoms occurring at least 6 months prior to Screening, with stable disease for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
- Eczema Activity Severity Index greater than or equal to (>=)16; Investigator Global Assessment score >=3.
- Group 1- Biologic Naïve: Topical First Line Treatment: Documented recent history (within 6 months before Screening) of: a) either an inadequate response (IR) to out-patient treatment with at least one topical treatment (intermittent topical corticosteroid, topical calcineurin inhibitor), topical inhibitors or Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (Crisaborole); b) or that topical treatments were otherwise not recommended.
- Group 2- Dupilumab-Inadequate Responder: Documented history of an IR to dupilumab: a) either following at least 16 weeks of treatment according to the Investigator's judgement; b) or intolerant to dupilumab owing to adverse events.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Other than AtD, the presence of a significant skin morbidity that will influence the Investigator's ability to assess the severity of the disease (e.g. psoriasis, confirmed or suspected cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, autoimmune bullous disease, fixed drug reaction and Stevens Johnson Syndrome).
- Participants with any uncontrolled medical conditions, other than AtD, that in the opinion of the investigator puts the participant at unacceptable risk or will likely interfere with study assessments or data integrity. Other medical conditions should be stable at the time of screening and be expected to remain stable for the duration of the study.
- Treatment with biologic agents (investigational and marketed monoclonal antibodies) within 12 weeks or 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives (whichever is longer) prior dosing on Day 1.
- Treatment with Janus Activated Kinase inhibitors (e.g. baricitinib, upadacitinib) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to dosing on Day 1.
- Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, or calcineurin inhibitors within 4 weeks of Screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GSK1070806GSK1070806 will be administered | Drug | Group 1: GSK1070806, Group 2: Dupilumab-IR with GSK1070806 |
| PlaceboPlacebo will be administered | Drug | Group 1: Placebo, Group 2: Dupilumab IR with Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. Posterior Median presented from Bayesian analysis under the hypothetical strategy. The percent change from baseline in the EASI score at week 12 in group 1 is reported here. Data reported as 'Median' refers to 'Posterior Median' and '95% Confidence Interval' refers to '95% Credible Interval'.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-50, ≥ 50% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: At Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-75, ≥ 75% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: At Week 12
Number of Participants Achieving EASI-90, ≥ 90% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: At Week 12
Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 in Group 1
Time frame: At Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 2
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Signs Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)- Groups 1 and 2
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Dermatitis, Atopic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
11 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing GSK1070806 in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Group 1 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2025.