AzTrials
AzTrials

Dermatitis, AtopicPhase 1NCT04975438

Clinical Effect, Safety and Tolerability of GSK1070806 in Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 1 study testing GSK1070806 in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of GSK1070806 in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AtD) participants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Dermatitis, Atopic
What is being tested?
GSK1070806
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
34 participants
Where
11 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
18 Nov 2021to 13 Mar 2023
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Moderate to severe AtD (confirmed by a dermatologist) according to the Hannifin and Rajka criteria or Eichenfield revised criteria.
  • Onset of AtD symptoms occurring at least 6 months prior to Screening, with stable disease for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
  • Eczema Activity Severity Index greater than or equal to (>=)16; Investigator Global Assessment score >=3.
  • Group 1- Biologic Naïve: Topical First Line Treatment: Documented recent history (within 6 months before Screening) of: a) either an inadequate response (IR) to out-patient treatment with at least one topical treatment (intermittent topical corticosteroid, topical calcineurin inhibitor), topical inhibitors or Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (Crisaborole); b) or that topical treatments were otherwise not recommended.
  • Group 2- Dupilumab-Inadequate Responder: Documented history of an IR to dupilumab: a) either following at least 16 weeks of treatment according to the Investigator's judgement; b) or intolerant to dupilumab owing to adverse events.

Who cannot join

  • Other than AtD, the presence of a significant skin morbidity that will influence the Investigator's ability to assess the severity of the disease (e.g. psoriasis, confirmed or suspected cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, autoimmune bullous disease, fixed drug reaction and Stevens Johnson Syndrome).
  • Participants with any uncontrolled medical conditions, other than AtD, that in the opinion of the investigator puts the participant at unacceptable risk or will likely interfere with study assessments or data integrity. Other medical conditions should be stable at the time of screening and be expected to remain stable for the duration of the study.
  • Treatment with biologic agents (investigational and marketed monoclonal antibodies) within 12 weeks or 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives (whichever is longer) prior dosing on Day 1.
  • Treatment with Janus Activated Kinase inhibitors (e.g. baricitinib, upadacitinib) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to dosing on Day 1.
  • Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, or calcineurin inhibitors within 4 weeks of Screening.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 2 countries.

11 sites in 2 countries

United States8 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • GSK Investigational Site

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73118

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78218

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77479

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

Other trials in United States

Canada3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 5R9

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6H 5L5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase Ib, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Clinical Effect, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Infusion of GSK1070806 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients

This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of GSK1070806 in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AtD) participants.

Being tested
GSK1070806, Placebo
Keywords
Eczema activity severity index, GSK1070806
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK1070806Drug

    GSK1070806 will be administered

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo will be administered

Study groups in NCT04975438
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: GSK1070806ExperimentalParticipants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: GSK1070806
Group 1: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Group 2: Dupilumab-IR with GSK1070806ExperimentalParticipants received a single dose of 2 mg/kg GSK1070806 as intravenous infusion on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: GSK1070806
Group 2: Dupilumab IR with PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received Placebo as intravenous infusion on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Group 1

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. Posterior Median presented from Bayesian analysis under the hypothetical strategy. The percent change from baseline in the EASI score at week 12 in group 1 is reported here. Data reported as 'Median' refers to 'Posterior Median' and '95% Confidence Interval' refers to '95% Credible Interval'.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. Posterior Median presented from Bayesian analysis under the hypothetical strategy. The change from baseline in the EASI score at week 12 in group 1 is reported here. Data reported as 'Median' refers to 'Posterior Median' and '95% Confidence Interval' refers to '95% Credible Interval'.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12

  2. Number of Participants Achieving EASI-50, ≥ 50% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-50 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: At Week 12

  3. Number of Participants Achieving EASI-75, ≥ 75% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: At Week 12

  4. Number of Participants Achieving EASI-90, ≥ 90% Reduction in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 1

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: At Week 12

  5. Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 in Group 1

    The Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a participant's atopic dermatitis. It is a static 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity determined by the investigator, sub-investigator, or trained healthcare professional with required qualifications on a scale of 0 to 4 where, 0-clear, 1-almost clear, 2-mild, 3-moderate, and 4- severe. Higher score indicates severity of disease. A Responder is defined as a participant who had an IGA score of 0 or 1 at each visit.

    Measured: At Week 12

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12 in Group 2

    EASI scoring system is standardized clinical tool for assessment of extent (area) and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % body surface area with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100% The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and scores ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores= more severe or extensive condition. NA indicate that data is not available since only one participant was analyzed, therefore Standard Deviation (SD) was not derived.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12

  7. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Groups 1 and 2

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other situations as per investigator's medical or scientific judgment.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  8. Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Signs Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2

    Vital signs included diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate (PR) and body temperature were measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in semi-supine position. PCI ranges- SBP (millimeters of mercury[mmHg]): <85 (low) or >160 (high), DBP (mmHg): <45 (low) or >100 (high), PR (beats per minute): <40 (low) or >110 (high) and body temperature (degrees Celsius) <=35.5 (low) or >38.0 (high). Participants with worst case results relative to PCI criteria and who had values "to high" are reported here. Participants with a missing baseline value are assumed to have a within range value.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  9. Number of Participants With Worst Case 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2

    Twelve lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured QTc, PR, QRS intervals. Participants with clinically significant changes relative to baseline are reported here. Clinically significant findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  10. Number of Participants With Worst Case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2

    Urine samples were collected to assess urine glucose, bilirubin, protein, occult blood, Leukocyte Esterase and ketones using dipstick method. Participants with clinically significant changes relative to baseline are reported here. Clinically significant findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  11. Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of chemistry parameters. PCI ranges were >3*Upper limit of normal (ULN) units per liter (U/L)(Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT]), >3*ULN (U/L) (Aspartate Aminotransferase ([AST]), >2*ULN (Alkaline Phosphatase [ALP]) (U/L), >2*ULN (micromoles per liter) (bilirubin), <3 or >6.5 mmol/L (potassium), <130 or >160 mmol/L (sodium), <1.5 or >3.25 mmol/L (Corrected Calcium) and >40 mmol/L (Urea). Participants with worst case results relative to PCI criteria and who had values "to high" are reported here. Participants with a missing baseline value are assumed to have a within range value.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  12. Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline - Groups 1 and 2

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. The ranges for the hematology parameters are as follows: Hematocrit [High >0.54 Proportion of red blood cells in blood, Low <0.1 Proportion of red blood cells in blood], Haemoglobin [Higher: > 185 grams/Litre (g/L) Low: less than (<) 100 g/L ], Lymphocytes [<0.8 10^9/L], Neutrophils [<1.5 10^9/L], Platelets [High: > 999 10^9/ L and Low: < 100 10^9/ L] and White blood cells [Low:<2 10^9/L]. Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (for example [e.g.], High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in "To within Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if participant has values that changed 'To Low' \& 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100%.

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  13. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)- Groups 1 and 2

    Serum samples were analyzed for the presence of antibodies using a validated assay method. The treatment emergent ADA assay results up to week 24 are reported.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2021
  2. Study start18 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion19 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion13 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04975438
Sponsor's protocol ID
215253
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
14 Jul 2021
Last updated
28 Aug 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing GSK1070806 in people with Dermatitis, Atopic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Group 1 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in