Chronic UrticariaPhase 3NCT04976192
Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of TEV-45779 With XOLAIR (Omalizumab) in Adults With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
A Phase 3 study testing TEV-45779 and XOLAIR® Injection in people with Chronic Urticaria, run by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of TEV-45779 compared to XOLAIR in patients with Urticaria (CIU)/Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamine treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Urticaria
- What is being tested?
- TEV-45779 and XOLAIR® Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 608 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2021to 5 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of CIU refractory to H1 antihistamines for ≥3 months
Who cannot join
- Chronic urticaria with clearly defined underlying etiology
- Other skin disease associated with itch
- Evidence of parasitic infection on stool evaluation for ova and parasites
- History of anaphylactic shock
- Hypersensitivity to omalizumab or any component of the formulation
- Required background therapy with other than protocol-defined antihistamines
- Any medical condition that could jeopardize or would compromise the patient's safety or ability to participate in this study
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
10008
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Site 10001
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
10012
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
10006
Kissimmee, Florida, 34744
10014
Maitland, Florida, 32751
10005
Miami, Florida, 33014
10004
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84117
10009
Tampa, Florida, 33613
10007
Troy, Michigan, 48084
About this study
Official title: Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of TEV-45779 Compared to XOLAIR (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic/Spontaneous Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite Antihistamine (H1) Treatment.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of TEV-45779 compared to XOLAIR in patients with Urticaria (CIU)/Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamine treatment.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of TEV-45779 compared to XOLAIR administered sc at doses of 300 mg or 150 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 treatments) in patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU)/Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic despite antihistamine (H1) treatment. This study will consist of a screening period (up to 2 weeks), a 24-week treatment period consisting of a 12-week double-blind main treatment period and a 12-week double-blind transition period, which is followed by a 16-week follow-up period. The total duration of the study is up to 42 weeks.
At baseline, patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive the first 3 treatments of TEV-45779 300 mg, XOLAIR 300 mg, TEV-45779 150 mg or XOLAIR 150 mg (main treatment period). At Week 12, prior to receiving their fourth dose of study medication, patients in the XOLAIR 300 mg and the XOLAIR 150 mg treatment groups will be randomized 1:1 to receive 3 additional doses of XOLAIR (at the same dose level as prior to randomization, or switch to 3 doses of TEV-45779 (transition period) at the same dose level as prior to randomization. All patients in the TEV-45779 groups will continue to receive TEV-45779 at the same dose levels.
- Conditions
- Chronic Urticaria
- Being tested
- TEV-45779, XOLAIR® Injection
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Urticaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TEV-45779Combination product
TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) solution for injection 150 mg/mL prefilled syringe
XOLAIR® InjectionCombination product
XOLAIR (omalizumab) injection is supplied as a single dose PFS. Each PFS of XOLAIR contains 150 mg of omalizumab in 1 mL of solution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TEV-45779-300 mg Main Treatment period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 0, 4, 8 Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779 |
| Xolair-300 mg Main Treatment Period | Active comparator | XOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 0, 4, 8 Receives: Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
| TEV-45779-150 mg Main Treatment period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 0, 4, 8 Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779 |
| Xolair-150 mg Main Treatment Period | Active comparator | XOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 0, 4, 8 Receives: Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
| TEV-45779-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to TEV-45779-300 mg in the Main Treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779 |
| Xolair-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to Xolair-300 mg in the main treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779; Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
| Xolair-300 mg Main / Xolair-300 mg Transition Period | Active comparator | XOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to Xolair-300 mg in the main treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
| TEV-45779-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to TEV-45779-150 mg in the main treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779 |
| Xolair-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period | Experimental | TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to XOLAIR-150 mg in the main treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: TEV-45779; Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
| Xolair-150 mg Main / Xolair-150 mg Transition Period | Active comparator | XOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to XOLAIR -150 mg in the main treatment period. Receives: Combination Product: XOLAIR® Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Week 12, TEV-45779 High Dose Compared to XOLAIR High Dose (For European Medicines Agency [EMA] Submission)
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching. Least square (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. Multiple imputation performed both for the participants having missing ISS7 at week 12 and for participants using any disallowed concomitant medication.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Week 12, TEV-45779 High Dose Compared to XOLAIR High Dose (For Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Submission)
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching. LS mean and 90% CI were calculated using ANCOVA model. Multiple imputation performed for the participants having missing ISS7 at week 12.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (22)
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Weeks 4 and 12
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching. The observed mean and standard deviation values are reported here with no imputation performed.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at Week 12
The UAS was a composite eDiary-recorded score with numeric severity intensity ratings on a scale of 0 - 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives); and (2) the intensity of the itch separately, measured twice daily (morning and evening). The daily UAS was the average of the morning and evening scores, which ranged from 0 (none) to 6 (severe). The UAS7 was the sum of the daily UAS scores over 7 days, which ranged from 0 (minimum) to 42 (highest urticaria severity). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a UAS7 Score ≤6 at Week 12
The UAS was a composite eDiary-recorded score with numeric severity intensity ratings on a scale of 0 - 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives); and (2) the intensity of the itch separately, measured twice daily (morning and evening). The daily UAS was the average of the morning and evening scores, which ranged from 0 (none) to 6 (severe). The UAS7 is the number of participants achieving the endpoint of less than or equal to 6. UAS7 was calculated as the sum of the daily UAS scores over 7 days, which ranged from 0 (minimum) to 42 (highest urticaria severity). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 Score = 0) at Week 12
The UAS was a composite eDiary-recorded score with numeric severity intensity ratings on a scale of 0 - 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives); and (2) the intensity of the itch separately, measured twice daily (morning and evening). The daily UAS was the average of the morning and evening scores, which ranged from 0 (none) to 6 (severe). The UAS7 was the sum of the daily UAS scores over 7 days, which ranged from 0 (minimum) to 42 (highest urticaria severity). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms. Complete responders were participants with a UAS7 score = 0.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Physician's (In-clinic) Assessment of UAS at Week 12
Physician's (in-clinic) assessment of UAS score was performed using the in-clinic UAS. The physician, or the person designated, provided the sum of the score of the participant's urticaria lesions (number of wheals [hives]) and pruritus (itch) reflective of the participant's condition over the 12 hours prior to the visit using the rating scale of 0 - 6 (0 = none to 6 = intense/severe). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Wheals Score at Week 12
The wheals (hives) severity score, defined by number of wheals (hives), was recorded by the participant twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (> 12 hives/12 hours). A weekly number of wheals score was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the 7 days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (no wheals) - 21 (highest hives activity).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Size of the Largest Wheals Score at Week 12
The weekly size of the largest wheals score was calculated from the eDiary data. A wheal score of 0 was assigned when <10 small wheals (diameter <3 centimeters [cm]) were present, presence of 10-50 small wheals or less than 10 large wheals (diameter >3 cm) was denoted by score of 1. A score of 2 was assigned when more than 50 small wheals or 10 to 50 large wheals were present. A score of 3 denoted wheals covering almost the entire body surface area. A weekly score was defined as the sum of the available daily size of the largest wheals scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily score was available, multiplied by 7. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Time to Minimally Important Difference (MID) Response in ISS7 Score
Time to MID response was defined as time to a reduction from baseline in ISS7 of ≥5 points in ISS7 score by Week 12.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of ISS7 MID Responders at Week 12
A responder was defined as a participant with a reduction from baseline in ISS7 of ≥5 points in ISS7 score.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Angioedema-Free Days From Week 4 to Week 12
Percentage of angioedema-free days from Week 4 to Week 12 were calculated based on the diary data as the number of days in the diary between the dates of Week 4 and Week 12 visits with no angioedema episodes, divided by the total number of days with diary entries in this time span * 100%.
Measured: Week 4 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12
The DLQI consisted of 10 questions concerning participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the last week. The DLQI total score was calculated by adding the score of each question (scored as follows: Very much = 3; Yes [in question 7.a] = 3; A lot = 2; A little = 1; Not at all = 0; Not relevant = 0; No [in question 7.a] = 0; Question unanswered = 0), resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more the quality of life was impaired. A score higher than 10 indicated that the participant's life was being severely affected by their skin disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Week 12 in ISS7 at Weeks 24 and 40
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching.
Measured: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Change From Week 12 in the UAS7 at Week 24
The UAS was a composite eDiary-recorded score with numeric severity intensity ratings on a scale of 0 - 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives); and (2) the intensity of the itch separately, measured twice daily (morning and evening). The daily UAS was the average of the morning and evening scores, which can range from 0 (none) to 6 (severe). The UAS7 was the sum of the daily UAS scores over 7 days, which can range from 0 (minimum) to 42 (highest urticaria severity). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Physician's (In-clinic) Assessment of UAS7 at Week 24
Physician's (in-clinic) assessment of UAS score was performed using the in-clinic UAS. The physician, or the person designated, provided the sum of the score of the participant's urticaria lesions (number of wheals [hives]) and pruritus (itch) reflective of the participant's condition over the 12 hours prior to the visit using the rating scale of 0 - 6 (0 = none to 6 = intense/severe). Higher scores indicated greater severity of urticaria symptoms.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Weekly Number of Wheals Score at Weeks 24 and 40
The wheals (hives) severity score, defined by number of wheals (hives), was recorded by the participant twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (> 12 hives/12 hours). A weekly number of wheals score was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the 7 days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (no wheals) - 21 (highest hives activity).
Measured: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Change From Week 12 in the Weekly Size of the Largest Wheals Score at Weeks 24 and 40
The weekly size of the largest wheals score was calculated from eDiary data. A wheal score of 0 was assigned when <10 small wheals (diameter <3 cm) were present, presence of 10-50 small wheals or less than 10 large wheals (diameter >3 cm) was denoted by score 1. A score of 2 was assigned when more than 50 small wheals or 10 to 50 large wheals were present. A score of 3 denoted wheals covering almost the entire body surface area. A weekly score was defined as sum of available daily size of the largest wheals scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily score was available, multiplied by 7. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severity.
Measured: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Percentage of Angioedema-Free Days From Week 12 to Week 24
Percentage of angioedema-free days from Week 12 to Week 24 was calculated based on the diary data as the number of days in the diary between the dates of Week 12 and Week 24 visits with no angioedema episodes, divided by the total number of days with diary entries in this time span * 100%.
Measured: Week 12 to Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Overall DLQI Score at Weeks 24 and 40
The DLQI consisted of 10 questions concerning participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the last week. The DLQI total score was calculated by adding the score of each question (scored as follows: Very much = 3; Yes [in question 7.a] = 3; A lot = 2; A little = 1; Not at all = 0; Not relevant = 0; No [in question 7.a] = 0; Question unanswered = 0), resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more the quality of life was impaired. A score higher than 10 indicated that the participant's life was being severely affected by their skin disease.
Measured: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) in the Main Treatment Period
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. AEs were considered TEAEs if onset occurred or worsened on or after the first dose date. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Week 12 up to Week 24
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. AEs were considered TEAEs if onset occurred or worsened on or after the first dose date. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Measured: Week 12 up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) in the Main Treatment Period
Number of participants with positive ADA, positive ADA not treatment-related, and negative ADA are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With ADAs From Week 12 to Week 24
Number of participants with positive ADA, positive ADA not treatment-related, and negative ADA are reported.
Measured: Week 12 up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2021
- Study start30 Aug 2021
- Primary completion5 Apr 2024
- Study completion5 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic UrticariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 608 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceuticals Development, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Teva Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Pharmaceuticals Development, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04976192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TV45779-IMB-30086
- Other IDs
- 2021-001796-17
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of TEV-45779 Compared to XOLAIR (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic/Spontaneous Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite Antihistamine (H1) Treatment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04976192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TV45779-IMB-30086
- Conditions
- Chronic Urticaria
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 608 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceuticals Development, Inc.
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 7 Oct 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of TEV-45779 compared to XOLAIR in patients with Urticaria (CIU)/Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamine treatment.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of TEV-45779 compared to XOLAIR administered sc at doses of 300 mg or 150 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 treatments) in patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU)/Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic despite antihistamine (H1) treatment. This study will consist of a screening period (up to 2 weeks), a 24-week treatment period consisting of a 12-week double-blind main treatment period and a 12-week double-blind transition period, which is followed by a 16-week follow-up period. The total duration of the study is up to 42 weeks.
At baseline, patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive the first 3 treatments of TEV-45779 300 mg, XOLAIR 300 mg, TEV-45779 150 mg or XOLAIR 150 mg (main treatment period). At Week 12, prior to receiving their fourth dose of study medication, patients in the XOLAIR 300 mg and the XOLAIR 150 mg treatment groups will be randomized 1:1 to receive 3 additional doses of XOLAIR (at the same dose level as prior to randomization, or switch to 3 doses of TEV-45779 (transition period) at the same dose level as prior to randomization. All patients in the TEV-45779 groups will continue to receive TEV-45779 at the same dose levels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 10
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TEV-45779-300 mg Main Treatment period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 0, 4, 8 |
| Xolair-300 mg Main Treatment Period | Active comparator | Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionXOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 0, 4, 8 |
| TEV-45779-150 mg Main Treatment period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 0, 4, 8 |
| Xolair-150 mg Main Treatment Period | Active comparator | Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionXOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 0, 4, 8 |
| TEV-45779-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to TEV-45779-300 mg in the Main Treatment period. |
| Xolair-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779, Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionTEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to Xolair-300 mg in the main treatment period. |
| Xolair-300 mg Main / Xolair-300 mg Transition Period | Active comparator | Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionXOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered twice (total dosage 300 mg) at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to Xolair-300 mg in the main treatment period. |
| TEV-45779-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to TEV-45779-150 mg in the main treatment period. |
| Xolair-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period | Experimental | Combination Product: TEV-45779, Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionTEV-45779 (Omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to XOLAIR-150 mg in the main treatment period. |
| Xolair-150 mg Main / Xolair-150 mg Transition Period | Active comparator | Combination Product: XOLAIR® InjectionXOLAIR (omalizumab) injection 150 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered with one placebo injection at week 12,16,20 in patients that were randomized to XOLAIR -150 mg in the main treatment period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of CIU refractory to H1 antihistamines for ≥3 months
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Chronic urticaria with clearly defined underlying etiology
- Other skin disease associated with itch
- Evidence of parasitic infection on stool evaluation for ova and parasites
- History of anaphylactic shock
- Hypersensitivity to omalizumab or any component of the formulation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TEV-45779TEV-45779 (Omalizumab) solution for injection 150 mg/mL prefilled syringe | Combination product | TEV-45779-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period, TEV-45779-150 mg Main Treatment period, TEV-45779-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period, TEV-45779-300 mg Main Treatment period, Xolair-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period, Xolair-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period |
| XOLAIR® InjectionXOLAIR (omalizumab) injection is supplied as a single dose PFS. Each PFS of XOLAIR contains 150 mg of omalizumab in 1 mL of solution. | Combination product | Xolair-150 mg Main / TEV-45779-150 mg Transition Period, Xolair-150 mg Main / Xolair-150 mg Transition Period, Xolair-150 mg Main Treatment Period, Xolair-300 mg Main / TEV45779-300 mg Transition Period, Xolair-300 mg Main / Xolair-300 mg Transition Period, Xolair-300 mg Main Treatment Period |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Week 12, TEV-45779 High Dose Compared to XOLAIR High Dose (For European Medicines Agency [EMA] Submission)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching. Least square (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. Multiple imputation performed both for the participants having missing ISS7 at week 12 and for participants using any disallowed concomitant medication.
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Week 12, TEV-45779 High Dose Compared to XOLAIR High Dose (For Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Submission)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The severity of the itch was recorded by the participants twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly itch score (ISS7) was defined as the sum of the available daily itch severity scores in that week, divided by the number of days for which a daily itch severity score was available, multiplied by 7. The daily ISS was calculated as the average of the morning and evening scores. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 (best score) to 21 (worst score) with higher scores indicating more severe itching. LS mean and 90% CI were calculated using ANCOVA model. Multiple imputation performed for the participants having missing ISS7 at week 12.
22 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Weeks 4 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a UAS7 Score ≤6 at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 Score = 0) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Physician's (In-clinic) Assessment of UAS at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Wheals Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Size of the Largest Wheals Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Time to Minimally Important Difference (MID) Response in ISS7 Score
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of ISS7 MID Responders at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Angioedema-Free Days From Week 4 to Week 12
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Week 12 in ISS7 at Weeks 24 and 40
Time frame: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Change From Week 12 in the UAS7 at Week 24
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Physician's (In-clinic) Assessment of UAS7 at Week 24
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Weekly Number of Wheals Score at Weeks 24 and 40
Time frame: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Change From Week 12 in the Weekly Size of the Largest Wheals Score at Weeks 24 and 40
Time frame: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Percentage of Angioedema-Free Days From Week 12 to Week 24
Time frame: Week 12 to Week 24
Change From Week 12 in the Overall DLQI Score at Weeks 24 and 40
Time frame: Week 12, Weeks 24 and 40
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) in the Main Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Week 12 up to Week 24
Time frame: Week 12 up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) in the Main Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With ADAs From Week 12 to Week 24
Time frame: Week 12 up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Urticaria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Remibrutinib in Real-world Clinical Practice - a South Korea Sub-Study
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Barzolvolimab Versus Placebo in Adults With Cold Induced Urticaria and Symptomatic Dermographism Inadequately Controlled by H1-antihistamines (EMBARQ - ColdU and SD)
Chronic Inducible Urticaria, Cold Urticaria
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Long-term Efficacy and Safety Extension (LTE) Study of Barzolvolimab in Participants With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of THB335 in Adults With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU)
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU), Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of GTX-B001 in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Chronic Inducible Urticaria
Healthy Subjects, Cold Urticaria
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teva Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Pharmaceuticals Development, Inc.
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing TEV-45779 and XOLAIR® Injection in people with Chronic Urticaria, run by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the ISS7 at Week 12, TEV-45779 High Dose Compared to XOLAIR High Dose (For European Medicines Agency [EMA] Submission) (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2025.