Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 3NCT04976322
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Study Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 3 study testing Dapirolizumab pegol in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 123 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of dapirolizumab pegol treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Dapirolizumab pegol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 760 participants
- Where
- 123 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2021to 7 Aug 2030
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The participant could, in the opinion of the Investigator, benefit from long-term dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) treatment
- The participant completed one of the parent studies within 4 weeks prior to entry to this study
Who cannot join
- Study participant has any medical or psychiatric condition (including conditions due to neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the study participant's ability to participate in this study. This includes study participants with a life-threatening condition or ongoing malignancies at the start of the study
Trial locations and contacts
123 sites in 24 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
123 sites in 24 countries
United States34 sites
Sl0046 50368
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Sl0046 50058
Avondale, Arizona, 85392
Sl0046 50050
Beckley, West Virginia, 25801
Sl0046 50738
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Sl0046 50383
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
Sl0046 50140
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Sl0046 50239
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Sl0046 50366
Canton, New York, 13617
Sl0046 50238
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211
Sl0046 50699
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
Sl0046 50418
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
Sl0046 50339
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Sl0046 50219
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Sl0046 50362
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Sl0046 50662
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Sl0046 50015
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Sl0046 50147
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Sl0046 50474
Hopkinsville, Kentucky, 42240-1746
Sl0046 50240
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Sl0046 50001
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Sl0046 50275
La Palma, California, 90623-1730
Sl0046 50285
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
Sl0046 50273
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Sl0046 50264
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Sl0046 50681
Miami, Florida, 33172
Sl0046 50660
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Sl0046 50334
New York, New York, 10032
Sl0046 50059
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Sl0046 50052
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Sl0046 50324
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Sl0046 50316
San Leandro, California, 94578
Sl0046 50329
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Sl0046 50698
Tampa, Florida, 33618
Sl0046 50328
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
China12 sites
Sl0046 20128
Beijing
Sl0046 20291
Changchun
Sl0046 20019
Guangzhou
Sl0046 20290
Guilin
Sl0046 20020
Shanghai
Sl0046 20346
Shantou
Sl0046 20204
Suzhou
Sl0046 20136
Tianjin
Sl0046 20025
Wenzhou
Sl0046 20180
Wuhan
Sl0046 20273
Yangzhou
Sl0046 20132
Zhengzhou
Poland11 sites
Sl0046 40482
Bialystok
Sl0046 40119
Bydgoszcz
Sl0046 40398
Katowice
Sl0046 40502
Krakow
Sl0046 40151
Lublin
Sl0046 40044
Poznan
Sl0046 40090
Poznan
Sl0046 40097
Warsaw
Sl0046 40098
Warsaw
Sl0046 40397
Wroclaw
Sl0046 40481
Wroclaw
Colombia7 sites
Sl0046 60013
Barranquilla
Sl0046 60019
Barranquilla
Sl0046 60006
Bogotá
Sl0046 60027
Bogotá
Sl0046 60016
Bucaramanga
Sl0046 60007
Chía
Sl0046 60031
Montería
Argentina6 sites
Sl0046 60002
Buenos Aires
Sl0046 60029
Mendoza
Sl0046 60003
Quilmes
Sl0046 60022
Quilmes
Sl0046 60011
San Juan
Sl0046 60014
San Miguel de Tucumán
Germany6 sites
Sl0046 40386
Cologne
Sl0046 40072
Freiburg im Breisgau
Sl0046 40027
Herne
Sl0046 40078
Leipzig
Sl0046 40402
Tübingen
Sl0046 40715
Vogelsang-gommern
Mexico6 sites
Sl0046 50317
Chihuahua City
Sl0046 50250
Cuernavaca
Sl0046 50249
Guadalajara
Sl0046 50271
León
Sl0046 50252
Mérida
Sl0046 50251
Monterrey
Canada4 sites
Sl0046 50374
Calgary
Sl0046 50337
Edmonton AB
Sl0046 50259
Rimouski
Sl0046 50045
Toronto
Greece4 sites
Sl0046 40378
Athens
Sl0046 40501
Athens
Sl0046 40377
Crete
Sl0046 40507
Larissa
Hungary4 sites
Sl0046 40412
Budapest
Sl0046 40411
Debrecen
Sl0046 40031
Szeged
Sl0046 40499
Székesfehérvár
Serbia4 sites
Sl0046 40393
Belgrade
Sl0046 40461
Belgrade
Sl0046 40730
Belgrade
Sl0046 40392
Novi Sad
Spain4 sites
Sl0046 40160
Barcelona
Sl0046 40341
Málaga
Sl0046 40101
Sabadell
Sl0046 40099
Vigo
Taiwan4 sites
Sl0046 20113
Taichung
Sl0046 20142
Taichung
Sl0046 20095
Taipei
Sl0046 20082
Taiyuan
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Dapirolizumab Pegol Treatment in Study Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of dapirolizumab pegol treatment.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Dapirolizumab pegol
- Keywords
- Systemic lupus erythematosus, Dapirolizumab pegol, SLE, DZP
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dapirolizumab pegolDrug
Also called DZP, CDP7657
Subjects will receive dapirolizumab pegol at prespecified time-points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dapirolizumab pegol | Experimental | Subjects will receive dapriolizumab pegol throughout the Treatment Period. Receives: Drug: Dapirolizumab pegol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the study
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are any untoward medical incidence in a subject during administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to study treatment.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 110)
Incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events during the study
A serious treatment-emergent adverse event (serious TEAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:
- Results in death
- Is life-threatening
- Requires in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation
- Results in persistent disability/incapacity
- Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect
- Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardise the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 110)
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to permanent dapirolizumab pegol discontinuation
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are any untoward medical incidence in a subject during administered study treatment, and leading to permanent drug discontinuation whether or not these events are related to study treatment.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 110)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Achievement of prevention of severe BILAG flares (severe BILAG flare-free) through Week 24
BILAG severe flare is defined as a new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade A since previous visit in any system due to individual items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A (Isenberg et al, 2011). Determination of items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A will be according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index (Yee et al, 2010).
Measured: Week 24
Achievement of prevention of severe BILAG flares (severe BILAG flare-free) through Week 52
BILAG severe flare is defined as a new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade A since previous visit in any system due to individual items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A (Isenberg et al, 2011). Determination of items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A will be according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index (Yee et al, 2010).
Measured: Week 52
Achievement of prevention of severe BILAG flares (severe BILAG flare-free) through Week 104
BILAG severe flare is defined as a new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade A since previous visit in any system due to individual items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A (Isenberg et al, 2011). Determination of items that are new or worse qualifying for the Grade A will be according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index (Yee et al, 2010).
Measured: Week 104
Achievement of LLDAS at ≥50% of all visits
Low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) is defined as:
- No significant disease activity as per SLEDAI-2K and BILAG 2004 (SLEDAI-2K score ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever)
- No new and/or worsening disease activity defined as no SLEDAI-2K component documented as present that was not documented present at previous visit
- PGA ≤33 mm
- Prednisone equivalent systemic dose for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) indication ≤7.5 mg per day
- Stable standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs as allowed by protocol
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until End of Treatment (Week 104)
Achievement of BICLA response at Week 24
A study participant is considered to be a BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder if all of the following is fulfilled:
- British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤1 new B.); and
- No worsening in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (PGA) compared to Baseline Visit defined as ≤10 mm increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale
The parent studies Baseline will be used as reference point.
Measured: Week 24
Achievement of BICLA response at Week 52
A study participant is considered to be a BICLA responder if all of the following is fulfilled:
- BILAG 2004 improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤1 new B.); and
- No worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the PGA compared to Baseline Visit defined as ≤10 mm increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale
The parent studies Baseline will be used as reference point.
Measured: Week 52
Achievement of BICLA response at Week 104
A study participant is considered to be a BICLA responder if all of the following is fulfilled:
- BILAG 2004 improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤1 new B.); and
- No worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the PGA compared to Baseline Visit defined as ≤10 mm increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale
The parent studies Baseline will be used as reference point.
Measured: Week 104
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2021
- Study start27 Jul 2021
- Primary completion7 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion7 Aug 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04976322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SL0046
- Other IDs
- 2019-003409-83, U1111-1293-7098, 2023-506368-14, 2023, 2019
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.