AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Gastric CancerEPSILONNCT04977401

EndoscoPic Submucosal dIssection Using geL Versus glycerOl for Submucosal iNjection

A study testing Endoscopic submucosal dissection, use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection and use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection in people with Early Gastric Cancer and Rectal Polyp, run by Erasme University Hospital at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The EPSILON study aims to comparatively evaluate the submucosal injection using ORISETM gel and glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Early Gastric Cancer, Rectal Polyp
What is being tested?
Endoscopic submucosal dissection, use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection and use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
32 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
21 Sep 2021to 5 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • o Patients must have given written informed consent
  • o Subjects with documented gastric or rectal lesions with indication of endoscopic removal by ESD, namely:
  • Gastric focal lesion with suspicion of early gastric cancer (low or high grade dysplasia with features of early gastric cancer; adenocarcinoma with morphology of superficial lesion and work-up of superficial lesion)
  • Rectal polyps (adenoma or superficial carcinoma) from 0 to 15 cm from the anal margin; with features being recognized indications of ESD: more than 20mm granular LST, more than 20mm non granular LST, more than 20mm villous or bulging polyps, Paris 0-IIa+IIc lesions, lesions with suspicious pattern (Kudo Vi / JNET 2B), lesions with anal canal involvement.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria cannot be enrolled in the study:
  • Gastric and rectal neuroendocrine tumour (NET) with indication of ESD will be excluded
  • Gastric and rectal lesions with indication of ESD but strong fibrosis due to previous partial resection will be excluded
  • Subject is currently enrolled in another confounding research
  • Subjects with any other location of ESD (esophagus, duodenum and colon) will not be included.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

Belgium1 site
  • Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles. (ULB)

    Brussels, 1070

Other trials in Belgium

Germany1 site
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus

    Düsseldorf, 40217

Other trials in Germany

Japan1 site
  • Keio University Hospital

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: EndoscoPic Submucosal dIssection Using geL Versus glycerOl for Submucosal iNjection: a Randomized Controlled Multicentric Trial (EPSILON)

The EPSILON study aims to comparatively evaluate the submucosal injection using ORISETM gel and glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.

Read the detailed description

Traditionally, ESD requires the injection of some colloidal solution (glycerol, geloplasma, hydroxyethylstrach, etc.) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion. Alternatives to colloid-solution assisted ESD have also been developped: pocket creation method and saline-immersion ESD.

Recently, other colloidal solutions have arrived on the market, such as gel (ORISETM gel) in order to improve the lifting during ESD.Our preliminary experience using ORISETM gel as a lifting solution for ESD was unexpectedly favourable with few per-procedural bleeding, quick time and facility.

As the spread of ESD is closely associated to its easiness, procedure duration (itself associated to number of procedural bleedings and instruments change through the operating channel) and safety, we sought to study comparatively two submucosal solutions when conducting ESD in a specific population presenting gastric or rectal superficial lesions.

Being tested
Endoscopic submucosal dissection, use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection, use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection
Keywords
ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), Rectum polyp, early gastric cancer, endoscopic resection, submucosal injection solution
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissectionProcedure or surgery

    Dissecting superficial gastric or rectal lesion/polyp after injection of the submucosa for lifting, using a electrosurgical knife through the endoscope

  • use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissectionDevice

    Injection of some colloidal solution (ORISE gel) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.

  • use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissectionDevice

    Injection of some colloidal solution (glycerol) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.

Study groups in NCT04977401
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group GlycerolSham comparatorSubmucosal injection using glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Device: use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection
Group Gel ORISEActive comparatorSubmucosal injection using ORISETM gel during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Device: use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure

    Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure (defined as the dissected surface (mm2)/ESD duration (min). The dissected surface is defined as maximal diameter of specimen (mm) x perpendicular minimal diameter of specimen (mm) measured on ex-vivo pinned stretched specimen onto a cork. ESD duration is defined as the time from first submucosal injection to final cut time.

    Measured: At day 0 during ESD

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Total procedure duration

    Total procedure duration (from scope insertion to scope retrieval) (min)

    Measured: At day 0 during ESD

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2021
  2. Study start21 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion5 Jan 2023

Why it stopped: Urgent Medical Device Product (ORISE Gel Submucosal Liftiong Agent) Removal by sponsor

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A multicentric, randomized, open label prospective study: * All subjects with indications of gastric and rectal ESD undergo screening and baseline visit * Informed consent is obtained when scheduling the ESD procedure * Randomization is made at the time of the ESD procedure after confirmation of the indication * ESD is performed using a 25 G needle, a dual-knife-J with glycerol (standard solution) or ORISETM gel in order to remove the lesion en-bloc. Additional saline injection through the electrosurgical knife will be left at the discretion of the endoscopist * A follow-up visit is scheduled at 2-4 weeks
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04977401
Sponsor's protocol ID
EPSILON
Acronym
EPSILON
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
8 Jul 2021
Last updated
23 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

    PubMed 19693750
  • Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 21;14(27):4289-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4289.

    PubMed 18666315
  • Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using flexknife. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 May-Jun;40(5):378-84. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200605000-00004.

    PubMed 16721217
  • Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2666-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1627-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

    PubMed 21424201
  • Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):763-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

    PubMed 22884100
  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, Conio M, Haringsma J, Langner C, Meisner S, Messmann H, Morino M, Neuhaus H, Piessevaux H, Rugge M, Saunders BP, Robaszkiewicz M, Seewald S, Kashin S, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Deprez PH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

    PubMed 26317585
  • Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Mizushima Y, Oka M, Enomoto S, Kakushima N, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Iguchi M, Shimizu Y, Ichinose M, Omata M. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2004 Jul;36(7):579-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814517.

    PubMed 15243878
  • Castro R, Libanio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):777-788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777.

    PubMed 30809079
  • Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sagara Y, Okada M, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Miura Y, Sunada K, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

    PubMed 30716306
  • Yamamoto H, Hayashi Y, Despott EJ. The pocket-creation method for endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with saline-immersion: another potential option to overcome challenges in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug;90(2):288-289. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.244. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31327340
  • Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):570-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861352.

    PubMed 15933932
  • Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.

    PubMed 22609383
  • Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakamura H, Hotta K, Horimatsu T, Sakamoto N, Fu KI, Tsuruta O, Kawano H, Kashida H, Takeuchi Y, Machida H, Kusaka T, Yoshida N, Hirata I, Terai T, Yamano HO, Kaneko K, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi Y, Tamai N, Nakano N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Iwatate M, Ishikawa H, Murakami Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):526-33. doi: 10.1111/den.12644. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

    PubMed 26927367

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endoscopic submucosal dissection, use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection and use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection in people with Early Gastric Cancer and Rectal Polyp, run by Erasme University Hospital at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Belgium, Germany, Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Urgent Medical Device Product (ORISE Gel Submucosal Liftiong Agent) Removal by sponsor). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure (time frame: At day 0 during ESD). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04977401, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in