Haemophilus Influenzae Type B InfectionPhase 4NCT04978818
Immunogenicity of H. Influenzae Type b PRP-OMP Vaccines in American Indian and Alaska Native Children (the HibVax Study)
A Phase 4 study testing Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB in people with Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The main goal of this study is to compare the Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody response in American Indian / Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants to two licensed vaccines: Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection
- What is being tested?
- Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 333 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Jan 2022to 26 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Born at gestational age of ≥35 weeks
- AI/AN infant between 6 to 12 weeks of age (42-90 days) at the time of the first vaccination (i.e., Study Day 1)
- Written informed consent provided by parent(s)/Legally Authorized Representative(s) (LARs)
- Investigators believe that the parent(s)/LARs can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (i.e., return for follow-up visits, recall of adverse events)
- Infant is available to complete the follow-up period of 5 months
- Healthy infant, as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering the study
Who cannot join
- History of receipt of blood, blood products, or immunoglobulin products since birth or expected receipt through the duration of the study
- Chronic seizure or evolving or unstable neurologic disorder
- Congenital Heart Disease, except for uncomplicated CHD (e.g., PDA, small septal defect)
- Infant of mother with HIV infection
- History of reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any vaccine component, or to latex
- Infant with confirmed or suspected immunocompromising medical condition, based on medical history, including chronic administration (more than 14 days in the lifetime) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs since birth
Show all 11Show fewer
- Administration of infant vaccines other than birth dose Hepatitis B, prior to the time of enrollment
- Any condition which might interfere with the evaluation of the investigational product, or interpretation of subject safety or study results, in the opinion of the investigator
- Child of an employee of the sponsor, clinical study site, or any other individual involved with the conduct of the study, or an immediate family member of such individuals
- Acute illness and/or fever (temperature ≥100.4 F or ≥38.0 C) at time of enrollment (Note: Participant with fever may be enrolled at later date if symptoms have resolved and all other criteria for inclusion are met at that time)
- Current (or within the past 7 days) or expected receipt of immunosuppressive agents, including steroids, except topical or inhaled steroids (Note: For oral corticosteroids, this will mean prednisone (≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day, or equivalent; participant may be enrolled at a later date if medication use ends and all other criteria for inclusion are met at that time)
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Alaska Native Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
Chinle Center for Indigenous Health
Chinle, Arizona, 86503
Fort Defiance Center for Indigenous Health
Fort Defiance, Arizona, 86504
Gallup Center for Indigenous Health
Gallup, New Mexico, 87301
Shiprock Center for Indigenous Health
Shiprock, New Mexico, 87420
About this study
Official title: Immunogenicity of H. Influenzae Type b PRP-OMP Vaccines in American Indian and Alaska Native Children
The main goal of this study is to compare the Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody response in American Indian / Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants to two licensed vaccines: Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB.
Read the detailed description
Historically, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) children aged <5 years have experienced invasive H. influenzae type b (Hib) disease at a rate that is at least 5 times higher than the general U.S. population. In the pre-vaccine era, the incidence of Hib disease peaked earlier for AI/AN children at 4-5 months than general US children at 6-9 months. Therefore, prevention efforts for AI/AN populations focused on identifying a vaccine that would protect against disease in early infancy. Studies in AI/AN children revealed that the Hib conjugate vaccine with the capsular polysaccharide (polyribosylribitol phosphate polysaccharide [PRP]) coupled to the outer membrane protein complex of Neisseria meningitidis (OMP) induced anti-PRP IgG titers that correlated with protection (GMC ≥0.15 μg/mL) and demonstrated high efficacy after a single dose in infancy. Hib PRP-OMP was licensed in 1991 as PedvaxHIB; following introduction of a two-dose primary series and a booster dose, the rate of Hib disease decreased substantially among AI/AN children. The importance of PRP-OMP vaccine to disease control was highlighted in the 1990s in Alaska when use of a non-PRP OMP Hib vaccine was associated with an increase in disease incidence in AN children. In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee for Native American Child Health released its official preference for Hib PRP-OMP for use in AI/AN populations.
In spite of Hib vaccine coverage similar to or greater than the national average, AI/AN populations periodically experience pediatric cases of invasive Hib disease. In contrast to the pre-Hib vaccine era, a majority of these cases occur in fully vaccinated children beyond the first year of life. This epidemiologic shift in the age at which disease occurs may indicate ongoing transmission in the presence of waning immunity following vaccination.
Vaxelis is a licensed hexavalent combination vaccine that contains Hib PRP-OMP and antigens (Hepatitis B surface antigen, Diphtheria Toxoid, Tetanus Toxoid, Acellular Pertussis [DTaP], and Inactivated Polio Virus [IPV]) to protect against diseases caused by 5 other organisms. Vaxelis contains 3.0 µg/mL of PRP-OMP antigen, compared to 7.5 µg/mL in PedvaxHIB. This lower concentration of PRP-OMP has been shown to be less reactogenic and similarly immunogenic to higher doses. Vaxelis is approved for administration as a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. A booster dose with a different licensed Hib vaccine (e.g., PedvaxHIB, ActHib) is required at 12-15 months. Vaxelis Hib PRP-OMP was found to be highly immunogenic post-dose 2 at 4 months and post-dose 3 at 6 months. However, immunogenicity post-dose 1 was not measured in the phase 3 clinical trials of this vaccine.
In June 2019, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) passed a resolution supporting inclusion of Vaxelis in the Vaccines For Children Program for the general U.S. population. This vaccine was made available for routine use in the U.S. in 2021. A preferential recommendation for use of this vaccine in AI/AN children was not given because post-dose 1 immunogenicity data were not available. To support policy recommendations to protect the health of the AI/AN community, a study is needed to assess non-inferiority of the post-dose 1 immune response to Vaxelis compared to the current recommended product (PedvaxHIB). It is important to demonstrate that infants vaccinated with Vaxelis will be protected early in life, given the historic early peak of Hib disease and the evidence that Hib still circulates in village-based and reservation-based AI/AN communities.
If this study finds that Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB provide comparable protection after one dose, this would support the ACIP making a preferential recommendation for Vaxelis for AI/AN infants. This would expand the options of preferred vaccines for AI/AN infants and potentially provide more long-lasting protection given that 3 doses would be given as part of the primary series.
This study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded, phase IV study of the immunogenicity of two licensed Hib vaccines among AI/AN infants. The study will enroll approximately 330 AI/AN infants on Navajo Nation, on White Mountain Apache (WMA) Tribal lands, and in Anchorage, Alaska who are 6-12 weeks of age and due to receive their first set of routine infant immunizations. Eligible infants whose parents provide written informed consent will be block randomized to one of two study arms - either Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB. Participants will make 5 study visits over the course of approximately 5 months. Participants randomized to the Vaxelis group will receive the vaccination at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and randomized to the PedvaxHIB group will receive the vaccination at 2 and 4 months of age.
Four blood samples will be collected: at ages 2, 3, 6, and 7 months. These specimens will be tested by ELISA to assess anti-PRP antibody levels. Among infants vaccinated at 2 months of age, the anti-PRP IgG GMC 30 days post dose 1 of Vaxelis will be considered non-inferior if the ratio of the GMC in the Vaxelis group relative to the PedvaxHIB group is >0.67. The statistical criterion we are using to define non-inferiority corresponds to the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the anti-PRP IgG GMC ratio [Vaxelis / PedvaxHIB] being >0.67. A sample size of 150 evaluable children per group will provide at least 80% power to detect non-inferiority using constrained longitudinal analysis.
Each participant will also be given other routine pediatric immunizations that are not part of the study regimen, per ACIP schedule and recommendations, (e.g., DTaP and IPV at 2, 4 and 6 months, and hepatitis B vaccine at 2 and 6 months, for participants randomized to PedvaxHIB; Prevnar13 at 2, 4 and 6 months, and the rotavirus vaccine series at either 2, 4 and 6 months (if given RotaTeq) or 2 and 4 months (if given Rotarix). Inactivated influenza vaccine will be offered at 6 months of age, as appropriate based on season.
- Conditions
- Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection
- Being tested
- Vaxelis, PedvaxHIB
- Keywords
- Native American, Vaccine
- Medical subject headings
- Haemophilus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VaxelisDrug
Also called Intervention
Eligible infants will be block randomized to one of two study arms.
PedvaxHIBDrug
Also called Comparator
Eligible infants will be block randomized to one of two study arms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vaxelis | Active comparator | 165 infants will be randomized to the Vaxelis group, which is licensed for primary vaccination at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Receives: Drug: Vaxelis |
| PedvaxHIB arm | Active comparator | 165 infants will be randomized to the PedvaxHIB group, which is licensed for primary vaccination at 2 and 4 months of age. Receives: Drug: PedvaxHIB |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anti-PRP IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC)
The non-inferiority of the anti-PRP IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis administered at 2 months of age, compared to PedvaxHIB. GMC was modeled using constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) of anti-PRP IgG concentration at all study visits.
Measured: 30 days after dose 1
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL 30 Days After Dose 1
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL 30 Days After Dose 1
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 121
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 121 after initiation of the primary series, i.e., 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 121
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 121 after initiation of the primary series, i.e., 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 151
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 151 after initiation of the primary series, i.e., 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 151
Describe the percent of infants with anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 151 after initiation of the primary series, i.e., 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB.
Measured: 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2021
- Study start27 Jan 2022
- Primary completion26 Oct 2023
- Study completion26 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Haemophilus Influenzae Type B InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomization of participants will be done at the site level. Participants will be assigned randomly 1:1, to the Vaxelis arm or the PedvaxHIB arm. This is an unblinded study. Study staff will log into a secure system to randomize the participant. The study vaccine associated with that randomization will be selected. A verifier will confirm that the correct vaccine was selected. After verification, study staff will administer the dose.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 333 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laura Hammitt, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04978818
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00011170
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vesikari T, Becker T, Vertruyen AF, Poschet K, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at Two, Three, Four and Twelve Months. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Feb;36(2):209-215. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001406.
PubMed 27846055Bulkow LR, Wainwright RB, Letson GW, Chang SJ, Ward JI. Comparative immunogenicity of four Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines in Alaska Native infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Jun;12(6):484-92. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199306000-00006.
PubMed 8345981Santosham M, Wolff M, Reid R, Hohenboken M, Bateman M, Goepp J, Cortese M, Sack D, Hill J, Newcomer W, et al. The efficacy in Navajo infants of a conjugate vaccine consisting of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide and Neisseria meningitidis outer-membrane protein complex. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 20;324(25):1767-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106203242503.
PubMed 1903846Singleton R, Bulkow LR, Levine OS, Butler JC, Hennessy TW, Parkinson A. Experience with the prevention of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease by vaccination in Alaska: the impact of persistent oropharyngeal carriage. J Pediatr. 2000 Sep;137(3):313-20. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.107843.
PubMed 10969253Diaz-Mitoma F, Halperin SA, Tapiero B, Hoffenbach A, Zappacosta PS, Radley D, Bradshaw S, Martin JC, Boslego JW, Hesley TM, Bhuyan PK, Silber JL. Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of a liquid hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age. Vaccine. 2011 Feb 1;29(6):1324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.053. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
PubMed 21134456Silfverdal SA, Icardi G, Vesikari T, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of an investigational hexavalent vaccine given at 2, 4, and 11-12 months. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 19;34(33):3810-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.054. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
PubMed 27288217State of Alaska Epidemiology Bulletin; Aug 11, 2009
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunogenicity of H. Influenzae Type b PRP-OMP Vaccines in American Indian and Alaska Native Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04978818
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00011170
- Conditions
- Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection
- Keywords
- Native American, Vaccine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 333 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 27 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of this study is to compare the Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody response in American Indian / Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants to two licensed vaccines: Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB.
Detailed description
Historically, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) children aged <5 years have experienced invasive H. influenzae type b (Hib) disease at a rate that is at least 5 times higher than the general U.S. population. In the pre-vaccine era, the incidence of Hib disease peaked earlier for AI/AN children at 4-5 months than general US children at 6-9 months. Therefore, prevention efforts for AI/AN populations focused on identifying a vaccine that would protect against disease in early infancy. Studies in AI/AN children revealed that the Hib conjugate vaccine with the capsular polysaccharide (polyribosylribitol phosphate polysaccharide [PRP]) coupled to the outer membrane protein complex of Neisseria meningitidis (OMP) induced anti-PRP IgG titers that correlated with protection (GMC ≥0.15 μg/mL) and demonstrated high efficacy after a single dose in infancy. Hib PRP-OMP was licensed in 1991 as PedvaxHIB; following introduction of a two-dose primary series and a booster dose, the rate of Hib disease decreased substantially among AI/AN children. The importance of PRP-OMP vaccine to disease control was highlighted in the 1990s in Alaska when use of a non-PRP OMP Hib vaccine was associated with an increase in disease incidence in AN children. In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee for Native American Child Health released its official preference for Hib PRP-OMP for use in AI/AN populations.
In spite of Hib vaccine coverage similar to or greater than the national average, AI/AN populations periodically experience pediatric cases of invasive Hib disease. In contrast to the pre-Hib vaccine era, a majority of these cases occur in fully vaccinated children beyond the first year of life. This epidemiologic shift in the age at which disease occurs may indicate ongoing transmission in the presence of waning immunity following vaccination.
Vaxelis is a licensed hexavalent combination vaccine that contains Hib PRP-OMP and antigens (Hepatitis B surface antigen, Diphtheria Toxoid, Tetanus Toxoid, Acellular Pertussis [DTaP], and Inactivated Polio Virus [IPV]) to protect against diseases caused by 5 other organisms. Vaxelis contains 3.0 µg/mL of PRP-OMP antigen, compared to 7.5 µg/mL in PedvaxHIB. This lower concentration of PRP-OMP has been shown to be less reactogenic and similarly immunogenic to higher doses. Vaxelis is approved for administration as a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. A booster dose with a different licensed Hib vaccine (e.g., PedvaxHIB, ActHib) is required at 12-15 months. Vaxelis Hib PRP-OMP was found to be highly immunogenic post-dose 2 at 4 months and post-dose 3 at 6 months. However, immunogenicity post-dose 1 was not measured in the phase 3 clinical trials of this vaccine.
In June 2019, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) passed a resolution supporting inclusion of Vaxelis in the Vaccines For Children Program for the general U.S. population. This vaccine was made available for routine use in the U.S. in 2021. A preferential recommendation for use of this vaccine in AI/AN children was not given because post-dose 1 immunogenicity data were not available. To support policy recommendations to protect the health of the AI/AN community, a study is needed to assess non-inferiority of the post-dose 1 immune response to Vaxelis compared to the current recommended product (PedvaxHIB). It is important to demonstrate that infants vaccinated with Vaxelis will be protected early in life, given the historic early peak of Hib disease and the evidence that Hib still circulates in village-based and reservation-based AI/AN communities.
If this study finds that Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB provide comparable protection after one dose, this would support the ACIP making a preferential recommendation for Vaxelis for AI/AN infants. This would expand the options of preferred vaccines for AI/AN infants and potentially provide more long-lasting protection given that 3 doses would be given as part of the primary series.
This study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded, phase IV study of the immunogenicity of two licensed Hib vaccines among AI/AN infants. The study will enroll approximately 330 AI/AN infants on Navajo Nation, on White Mountain Apache (WMA) Tribal lands, and in Anchorage, Alaska who are 6-12 weeks of age and due to receive their first set of routine infant immunizations. Eligible infants whose parents provide written informed consent will be block randomized to one of two study arms - either Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB. Participants will make 5 study visits over the course of approximately 5 months. Participants randomized to the Vaxelis group will receive the vaccination at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and randomized to the PedvaxHIB group will receive the vaccination at 2 and 4 months of age.
Four blood samples will be collected: at ages 2, 3, 6, and 7 months. These specimens will be tested by ELISA to assess anti-PRP antibody levels. Among infants vaccinated at 2 months of age, the anti-PRP IgG GMC 30 days post dose 1 of Vaxelis will be considered non-inferior if the ratio of the GMC in the Vaxelis group relative to the PedvaxHIB group is >0.67. The statistical criterion we are using to define non-inferiority corresponds to the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the anti-PRP IgG GMC ratio [Vaxelis / PedvaxHIB] being >0.67. A sample size of 150 evaluable children per group will provide at least 80% power to detect non-inferiority using constrained longitudinal analysis.
Each participant will also be given other routine pediatric immunizations that are not part of the study regimen, per ACIP schedule and recommendations, (e.g., DTaP and IPV at 2, 4 and 6 months, and hepatitis B vaccine at 2 and 6 months, for participants randomized to PedvaxHIB; Prevnar13 at 2, 4 and 6 months, and the rotavirus vaccine series at either 2, 4 and 6 months (if given RotaTeq) or 2 and 4 months (if given Rotarix). Inactivated influenza vaccine will be offered at 6 months of age, as appropriate based on season.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomization of participants will be done at the site level. Participants will be assigned randomly 1:1, to the Vaxelis arm or the PedvaxHIB arm. This is an unblinded study. Study staff will log into a secure system to randomize the participant. The study vaccine associated with that randomization will be selected. A verifier will confirm that the correct vaccine was selected. After verification, study staff will administer the dose.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vaxelis | Active comparator | Drug: Vaxelis165 infants will be randomized to the Vaxelis group, which is licensed for primary vaccination at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. |
| PedvaxHIB arm | Active comparator | Drug: PedvaxHIB165 infants will be randomized to the PedvaxHIB group, which is licensed for primary vaccination at 2 and 4 months of age. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Born at gestational age of ≥35 weeks
- AI/AN infant between 6 to 12 weeks of age (42-90 days) at the time of the first vaccination (i.e., Study Day 1)
- Written informed consent provided by parent(s)/Legally Authorized Representative(s) (LARs)
- Investigators believe that the parent(s)/LARs can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (i.e., return for follow-up visits, recall of adverse events)
- Infant is available to complete the follow-up period of 5 months
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of receipt of blood, blood products, or immunoglobulin products since birth or expected receipt through the duration of the study
- Chronic seizure or evolving or unstable neurologic disorder
- Congenital Heart Disease, except for uncomplicated CHD (e.g., PDA, small septal defect)
- Infant of mother with HIV infection
- History of reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any vaccine component, or to latex
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VaxelisAlso: InterventionEligible infants will be block randomized to one of two study arms. | Drug | Vaxelis |
| PedvaxHIBAlso: ComparatorEligible infants will be block randomized to one of two study arms. | Drug | PedvaxHIB arm |
Primary outcome
Anti-PRP IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC)
Time frame: 30 days after dose 1
The non-inferiority of the anti-PRP IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis administered at 2 months of age, compared to PedvaxHIB. GMC was modeled using constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) of anti-PRP IgG concentration at all study visits.
6 secondary outcomes
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL 30 Days After Dose 1
Time frame: 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL 30 Days After Dose 1
Time frame: 30 days after dose 1 of Vaxelis or PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 121
Time frame: 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 121
Time frame: 60 days after dose 2 of Vaxelis and dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥0.15 µg/mL on Day 151
Time frame: 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Percent of Anti-PRP IgG ≥1.0 µg/mL on Day 151
Time frame: 30 days after dose 3 of Vaxelis and 90 days after dose 2 of PedvaxHIB
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27846055Vesikari T, Becker T, Vertruyen AF, Poschet K, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at Two, Three, Four and Twelve Months. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Feb;36(2):209-215. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001406.
- Background: PubMed 8345981Bulkow LR, Wainwright RB, Letson GW, Chang SJ, Ward JI. Comparative immunogenicity of four Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines in Alaska Native infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Jun;12(6):484-92. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199306000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 1903846Santosham M, Wolff M, Reid R, Hohenboken M, Bateman M, Goepp J, Cortese M, Sack D, Hill J, Newcomer W, et al. The efficacy in Navajo infants of a conjugate vaccine consisting of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide and Neisseria meningitidis outer-membrane protein complex. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 20;324(25):1767-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106203242503.
- Background: PubMed 10969253Singleton R, Bulkow LR, Levine OS, Butler JC, Hennessy TW, Parkinson A. Experience with the prevention of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease by vaccination in Alaska: the impact of persistent oropharyngeal carriage. J Pediatr. 2000 Sep;137(3):313-20. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.107843.
- Background: PubMed 21134456Diaz-Mitoma F, Halperin SA, Tapiero B, Hoffenbach A, Zappacosta PS, Radley D, Bradshaw S, Martin JC, Boslego JW, Hesley TM, Bhuyan PK, Silber JL. Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of a liquid hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age. Vaccine. 2011 Feb 1;29(6):1324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.053. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 27288217Silfverdal SA, Icardi G, Vesikari T, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of an investigational hexavalent vaccine given at 2, 4, and 11-12 months. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 19;34(33):3810-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.054. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
- BackgroundState of Alaska Epidemiology Bulletin; Aug 11, 2009
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Safety and Lot-to-lot Consistency of LBVD, a Fully Liquid Hexavalent Diphtheria-tetanus-whole Cell Pertussis-hepatitis B-poliovirus-Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate (DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib) Vaccine, in Healthy Infants as Primary Series
Diphtheria, Tetanus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Study of BK1803 in Healthy Infants
Pertussis, Diphtheria
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Clinical Trial of Lyophilized Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate Vaccine
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection
RecruitingPhase 1
Clinical Trial of the Adsorbed Acellular Pertussis (Tricomponent) DTaP-Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (Conjugate)-ACYW135 Group Meningococcal (Conjugate) Combined Vaccine
Diphtheria, Tetanus and Acellular Pertussis, Epidemic Meningitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Hammitt, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB in people with Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anti-PRP IgG Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) (time frame: 30 days after dose 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04978818, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2024.