AzTrials
AzTrials

Malignant Digestive System NeoplasmNCT04986566

Perioperative Telemonitoring to Optimize Cancer Care and Outcomes

A study testing Best Practice, Health Education and Medical Device Usage and Evaluation in people with Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to see whether an at-home monitoring program that collects health, symptoms, and quality of life data in real-time can be included as part of the care of surgery patients in order to provide better recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm
What is being tested?
Best Practice, Health Education and Medical Device Usage and Evaluation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Oct 2021to 5 Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cancer patients scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. GI procedures include esophagectomy, gastrectomy, colectomy, abdominoperineal resection/low anterior resection, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy (distal or pancreaticoduodenectomy), and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis. We will include patients scheduled for an ostomy (colostomy or diverting ileostomy)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Ability to read and understand English or Spanish
  • We are targeting patients across all stages of disease
  • Age criterion for this study is based on the National Institute of Health (NIH)'s age criteria, which defines an adult as individuals aged 18 years and over. There are no restrictions related to performance status or life expectancy
  • All subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • City of Hope Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study aims to see whether an at-home monitoring program that collects health, symptoms, and quality of life data in real-time can be included as part of the care of surgery patients in order to provide better recovery. Patient-generated health data (weight, temperature, oxygen level, heart rate, blood pressure, daily steps, symptoms, quality of life) using at-home monitoring devices (thermometer, a pulse oximeter, a digital scale and a Vivofit 4 watch) and smart device applications are used more and more to measure value and quality in cancer care. However, measuring patient-generated health data is not currently part of standard care following cancer surgery. An at-home monitoring program may improve the care of patients after hospital discharge from surgery and may help reduce complications by identifying issues early.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To conduct a pilot randomized trial of a remote, perioperative telemonitoring intervention to improve patient-centered outcomes, surgical outcomes, and healthcare resource use in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled to undergo major abdominal gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery.

Ia. Assess the feasibility, retention, and acceptability of the remote perioperative telemonitoring intervention as measured by the percentage of patients who a) agree to participate; b) complete >= 70% of the telemonitoring; and c) report satisfaction with the intervention through structured exit interviews.

Ib. Determine the preliminary efficacy of the remote perioperative telemonitoring intervention on surgical outcomes, healthcare utilization, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and functional recovery.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (TELEMONITORING): Patients wear a Vivofit 4 daily for 30 days after hospital discharge for steps monitoring, and complete questionnaires over 5-7 minutes about symptoms and quality of life using the Aetonixx application (app) up to 7 days before surgery, before being discharged from the hospital after surgery, and on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients also complete pulse oximetry, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight assessment using at-home monitoring devices before surgery, then on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients assessments are monitored by the surgical team in real-time to identify outcome trends, including onset, worsening/improving measures, and sporadic versus consistent measures.

ARM II (ENHANCED USUAL CARE): Patients wear a Vivofit 4 for daily steps monitoring, and complete questionnaires over 5-7 minutes about symptoms and quality of life using the Aetonixx app up to 7 days before surgery, before being discharged from the hospital after surgery, and on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients also complete pulse oximetry, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight assessment using at-home monitoring devices before surgery, then on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients use standard procedures for reporting problems.

Being tested
Best Practice, Health Education, Medical Device Usage and Evaluation, Quality-of-Life Assessment
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Best PracticeOther

    Also called standard of care

    Use standard reporting procedures

  • Health EducationBehavioural

    Use Aetonixx app

  • Medical Device Usage and EvaluationOther

    Wear Vivofit 4

  • Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther

    Complete questionnaires

Study groups in NCT04986566
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (telemonitoring)ExperimentalPatients wear a Vivofit 4 daily for 30 days after hospital discharge for steps monitoring, and complete questionnaires over 5-7 minutes about symptoms and quality of life using the Aetonixx app up to 7 days before surgery, before being discharged from the hospital after surgery, and on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients also complete pulse oximetry, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight assessment using at-home monitoring devices before surgery, then on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients assessments are monitored by the surgical team in real-time to identify outcome trends, including onset, worsening/improving measures, and sporadic versus consistent measures.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Behavioral: Health Education; Other: Medical Device Usage and Evaluation; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Arm II (enhanced usual care)Active comparatorPatients wear a Vivofit 4 for daily steps monitoring, and complete questionnaires over 5-7 minutes about symptoms and quality of life using the Aetonixx app up to 7 days before surgery, before being discharged from the hospital after surgery, and on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients also complete pulse oximetry, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight assessment using at-home monitoring devices before surgery, then on days 2, 7, 14, 30 after discharge. Patients use standard procedures for reporting problems.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Behavioral: Health Education; Other: Medical Device Usage and Evaluation; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Postoperative Complications Using the Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI)

    Postoperative complications occurring within 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery were measured using the Comprehensive Complications index (CCI), a validated tool that aggregates the Clavien grades of postoperative complications on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death).

    Measured: Outcomes are measured up to 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery. Duration of hospitalization: Median, 5 days (Min: 0, Max: 18).

  2. Number of Participants Who Completed >= 70% of the Study

    Study completion was assessed based on the percentage of patients who completed at least 70% of the following during the study period: (a) daily step counts, (b) quality of life measures, and (c) patient-generated health data. These measures were assessed from baseline through 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery.

    Measured: Outcomes are measured up to 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery. Duration of hospitalization: Median, 5 days (Min: 0, Max: 18).

  3. Number of Participants Who Reported Intervention Acceptability

    Acceptability of telemonitoring was assessed using a patient satisfaction tool administered within 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery. The tool evaluated ease of use, time burden of participation, and access to technology.

    Measured: Outcomes are measured up to 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery. Duration of hospitalization: Median, 5 days (Min: 0, Max: 18).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Participant Reported Symptom Severity Score as Measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)

    The MDASI assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine." Scores from baseline to 30 days post-discharge were calculated. A linear mixed effects model (adjusted for baseline scores) was used to assess differences in symptom severity between both arms over time.

    Measured: Outcomes are measured at baseline, 2 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days post-discharge.

  2. Participant Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the EQ-5D-5L.

    The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system of 5 health dimensions includes 5 response categories of no problem, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5 responses give a health state or profile represented by a 5-digit number (for example, 12231) corresponding to response categories reported by patients. Health states are scored to give the EQ-5D-5L index using a scoring algorithm from a value set derived from valuation tasks typically undertaken with general population samples. Index scores range from -0.59 to 1 where 1 is the best possible health state. Scores from baseline to 30 days post-discharge were calculated. A linear mixed effects model (adjusted for baseline scores) was used to assess differences in QoL scores between both arms over time.

    Measured: Outcomes are measured at baseline, 2 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days post-discharge.

  3. Number of Participants Utilizing Healthcare Resource Use (Hospital Readmission)

    Differences in the number of patients readmitted to the hospital for an overnight stay within 30 days post-discharge were compared between the two study arms using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

    Measured: Up to day 30 post-discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2021
  2. Study start19 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2023
  4. Study completion5 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04986566
Sponsor's protocol ID
20717
Other IDs
NCI-2021-03335, 20717, P30CA033572, R21NR019866
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
11 Jun 2021
Last updated
27 Mar 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Best Practice, Health Education and Medical Device Usage and Evaluation in people with Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Postoperative Complications Using the Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI) (time frame: Outcomes are measured up to 30 days post-discharge after cancer surgery. Duration of hospitalization: Median, 5 days (Min: 0, Max: 18).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in