AzTrials
AzTrials

Central Nervous System NeoplasmNCT04988009

Patient Perceptions Around Quality of Care Through Telemedicine in Neuro-Oncology

An observational study of Central Nervous System Neoplasm and Leptomeningeal Neoplasm, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates patient perceptions around quality of care through telemedicine in neuro-oncology. Studying questionnaires related to perceptions quality of care through telemedicine in patients with brain cancer may help doctors to improve the delivery of care through this modality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Electronic Health Record Review and Survey Administration
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Aug 2020to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with encounters at the Brain and Spine Center between 4/20/2020 and either (1) 8/30/2020 or (2) date that the state of emergency secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic is declared terminated in the United States of America- whichever date is earlier

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a CNS tumors: this includes patients with primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and leptomeningeal disease
  • Established patients with a follow up encounter with Neuro-Oncology at the Brain and Spine Center at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; this encounter can be
  • An in-person visit
  • A telemedicine appointment

Who cannot join

  • Encounter occurred with the assistance of official language translation support
  • Patients with telephone encounters (without interactive video)
  • New patient or consult visits
  • Neither patient nor caregiver present during the visit are available or able to answer survey questions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Barbara J O'Brien, MD contact

713-794-4380

bjobrien@mdanderson.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

    Barbara J O'Brien, MD, 713-794-4380, bjobrien@mdanderson.org

    Barbara J O'Brien, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study evaluates patient perceptions around quality of care through telemedicine in neuro-oncology. Studying questionnaires related to perceptions quality of care through telemedicine in patients with brain cancer may help doctors to improve the delivery of care through this modality.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To evaluate the patient-perceived quality of care by group (telemedicine versus in-person visits) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To characterize the visits provided by telemedicine compared to those in-person.

II. To contrast the average time spent on telemedicine visits compared to in-person visits, and the delay between visit order placement and visit occurring.

III. To evaluate the domains of patient care addressed on a telemedicine visit versus in-person visit per documentation, including (1) treatment planning, (2) symptom burden, (3) goals of care.

IV. To evaluate frequency of acute care sought (through emergency room or urgent care clinic) within 30 days of encounter in telemedicine visit versus (vs) in-person visit.

  1. The impact of patient and clinical characteristics on perceived quality of care in the context of covariate-adjusted modeling.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete a survey related to their perceived quality of care via telephone and have their medical chart reviewed prospectively.

Being tested
Electronic Health Record Review, Survey Administration
Medical subject headings
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Meningeal Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic Health Record ReviewOther

    Review of medical chart

  • Survey AdministrationOther

    Complete survey

Study groups in NCT04988009
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Observational (survey, medical chart review)Patients complete a survey related to their perceived quality of care via telephone and have their medical chart reviewed prospectively.
Receives: Other: Electronic Health Record Review; Other: Survey Administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survey response to question 6 of the quality of care survey ("I felt I received good medical care during this encounter")

    Survey responses will be summarized by ordinal category as counts with percentages, separately by group. Will separately estimate the proportion of each ordinal level of each group with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Quality of Care Survey

    Will separately estimate the proportion of each ordinal level of each group with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Patients and clinical characteristics

    Differences between groups will be assessed by 2-sample 2-sided t-test and Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, or chi-square test.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Interactive time spent during visit

    Will be summarized by group per mean, median, standard deviation, and range. Differences between groups will be assessed by t-test and Mann-Whitney test.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Time from visit order placement to visit occurring

    Will be summarized by group per mean, median, standard deviation, and range. Differences between groups will be assessed by t-test and Mann-Whitney test.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Domains of patient care addressed during a visit, including treatment planning, symptom burden, and goals of care

    Will be summarized as counts with percentages by group. Differences between groups will be assessed by chi-square test.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Incidence of acute care sought (through emergency room or urgent care clinic)

    Will be summarized as counts with percentages by group. Differences between groups will be provisionally assessed by Fisher's exact test.

    Measured: Within 30 days of encounter

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2021
  2. Study start20 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04988009
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-0493
Other IDs
NCI-2020-07493, 2020-0493
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2020
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in