AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 4REBELNCT04991350

Effect of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab on the Macular Perfusion in Diabetic Macular Edema

A Phase 4 study testing Intravitreal ranibizumab and Intravitreal bevacizumab in people with Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Ischemia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group founded guidelines for treating patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema (DME) with focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Intravitreal ranibizumab and Intravitreal bevacizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
26 Nov 2021to 1 Nov 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥18 years old with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus with decreased BCVA due to center involving diabetic macular edema on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
  • Patients with central macular thickness "CMT" of ≥ 300 micrometers

Who cannot join

  • Ocular conditions that may affect macular perfusion (e.g. retinal vascular diseases, uveitis, vasculitis etc.)
  • History of vitreo-retinal surgeries.
  • Previous macular laser treatment
  • Presence of epi-retinal membrane involving the macula or vitreo-macular traction.
  • Media opacity preventing good image quality.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma.
  • Thrombo-embolic events within 6 months
  • Previous intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo University

    Cairo, 11956

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Effect of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab on the Macular Perfusion in Diabetic Macular Edema Using OCTA

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group founded guidelines for treating patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema (DME) with focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation. Since then, macular laser, and steroids, were the main therapies for the treatment of DME until anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) drugs were developed after a growing body of scientific evidence implicated VEGF in the pathophysiologic process of DME.

Anti-VEGF drugs have been implicated in the treatment of DME. VEGF has been shown to play an important role in the occurrence of increased vascular permeability in DME. VEGF levels are significantly higher in patients with DME and extensive leakage than in patients with minimal leakage.

Read more

Many studies such as Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research [DRCR] Network studies, RESTORE Study, RISE and RIDE Research Group, and The BOLT Study have supported the use of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME with better visual outcomes using anti-VEGF injections alone or in combination with other treatments.

Several ocular complications of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have been reported including endophthalmitis, cataract, and retinal detachment. The different effects on macular perfusion between different anti-VEGFs have yet to be fully concluded with mixed conclusions that it increases or decreases or has no effect on perfusion of the macula in response to Anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is a vital factor determining the diabetic retinopathy progression and prognosis.

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) detects blood flow by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans at the same location. As it detects the movements of red blood corpuscles within the vessels, compared to the stationary retinal surroundings, which will result in signal disparity and imaging The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio. OCTA is considered a reliable tool in the detection and quantification of macular ischemia in diabetics.

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and bevacizumab on the perfusion of different capillary layers in the macula of diabetic patients using OCTA.

Read the detailed description

Diabetic retinopathy is the major cause of blindness in developed but also in developing countries. The disruption of the blood-retinal barrier and the subsequent accumulation of fluid in the intraretinal layers result in diabetic macular edema (DME), the leading cause of central vision loss in these patients.

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group founded guidelines for treating patients with clinically significant DME (CSME) with focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation. Since then, macular laser, and steroids, were the main therapies for treatment of DME until anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) drugs were developed after a growing body of scientific evidence implicated VEGF in the pathophysiologic process of DME.

Anti-VEGF drugs have been implicated in the treatment of DME. VEGF has been shown to play an important role in the occurrence of increased vascular permeability in DME. VEGF levels are significantly higher in patients with DME and extensive leakage than in patients with minimal leakage.

Many studies such as Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research [DRCR] Network studies, RESTORE Study, RISE and RIDE Research Group, and The BOLT Study have supported the use of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME with better visual outcomes using anti-VEGF injections alone or in combination with other treatments.

DRCR network protocol T found statistically insignificant difference between ranibizumab and bevacizumab on visual acuity and central macular thickness in diabetic macular edema.

Several ocular complications of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have been reported including endophthalmitis, cataract, and retinal detachment. The different effects on macular perfusion between different anti-VEGFs have yet to be fully concluded with mixed conclusions that it increases or decreases or has no effect on perfusion of macula in response to Anti-VEGF treatment.in many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is a vital factor determining the diabetic retinopathy progression and prognosis.

Using ocular ultrasound some studies showed retinal arteriolar vasoconstriction in eyes treated with anti-VEGF, while others showed decreased blood flow velocities in all retro-bulbar arteries after intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF. This may indicate that anti-VEGF may have an effect on ocular perfusion.

Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the studies. Despite its clinical value, however, FA is known to have documented risks. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is an excellent non-invasive modality to acquire high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature that can be utilized in the treatment of retinal disease without the need for dye injection. It allows the visualization of both the superficial and deep retinal capillary layers separately and the construction of microvascular flow maps.

OCTA detects blood flow by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans at the same location. As it detects the movements of red blood corpuscles within the vessels, compared to the stationary retinal surroundings, which will result in signal disparity and imaging The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio. OCTA is considered a reliable tool in the detection and quantification of macular ischemia in diabetics.

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and bevacizumab on the perfusion of different capillary layers in the macula of diabetic patients using OCTA.

Being tested
Intravitreal ranibizumab, Intravitreal bevacizumab
Keywords
Diabetic macular edema, Macular perfusion, Optical coherence tomography angiography, Anti-VEGF
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intravitreal ranibizumabDrug

    Also called Lucentis

    Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg/0.05 ml ranibizumab will be performed monthly for 3 months.

  • Intravitreal bevacizumabDrug

    Also called Avastin

    Intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml bevacizumab will be performed monthly for 3 months.

Study groups in NCT04991350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ranibizumab GroupActive comparatorPatients will receive monthly ranibizumab injections for 3 months.
Receives: Drug: Intravitreal ranibizumab
Bevacizumab GroupActive comparatorPatients will receive monthly bevacizumab injections for 3 months.
Receives: Drug: Intravitreal bevacizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in foveal avascular zone area

    The change in the foveal avascular zone area will be compared between the two treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months.

  2. Change in vascular density of the superficial retinal capillary plexus

    The change in the superficial retinal capillary plexus vascular density will be compared between the two treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months.

  3. Change in vascular density of the deep retinal capillary plexus

    The change in the deep retinal capillary plexus vascular density will be compared between the two treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    The change in best corrected visual acuity will be assessed following treatment with both drugs using standard Snellen charts.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months

  2. Change in central macular thickness

    The change in central macular thickness will be assessed following treatment with both drugs using optical coherence tomography.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months

  3. Change in intraocular pressure

    he change in intraocular pressure will be assessed following treatment with both drugs using Goldman applanation tonometry.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months

  4. Change of severity of diabetic retinopathy

    The change in the severity of diabetic retinopathy will be assessed following treatment with both drugs using color fundus photographs and clinical examination.

    Measured: 0 and 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2021
  2. Study start26 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2022

Why it stopped: Insufficient recruitment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04991350
Sponsor's protocol ID
CU372021
Acronym
REBEL
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
24 Jul 2021
Last updated
16 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Michaelides M, Kaines A, Hamilton RD, Fraser-Bell S, Rajendram R, Quhill F, Boos CJ, Xing W, Egan C, Peto T, Bunce C, Leslie RD, Hykin PG. A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1078-1086.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.045. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

    PubMed 20416952
  • Manousaridis K, Talks J. Macular ischaemia: a contraindication for anti-VEGF treatment in retinal vascular disease? Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;96(2):179-84. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301087.

    PubMed 22250209
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Evaluation of the Effect of Repeated Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections on the Macular Microvasculature of a Diabetic Patient Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2019 Apr 18;2019:3936168. doi: 10.1155/2019/3936168. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31139483
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Evaluation of Changes in Macular Perfusion Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography following 3 Intravitreal Monthly Bevacizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in the IMPACT Study. J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 27;2020:5814165. doi: 10.1155/2020/5814165. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32411431
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Habib AE, Elnahry GA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Review on Recent Trials Evaluating the Effect of Intravitreal Injections of Anti-VEGF Agents on the Macular Perfusion of Diabetic Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15(3):188-198. doi: 10.2174/1574887115666200519073704.

    PubMed 32427087
  • Elnahry AG, Elnahry GA. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Macular Perfusion Changes after Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Res. 2021 May 22;2021:6634637. doi: 10.1155/2021/6634637. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34124270
  • Elnahry AG, Ramsey DJ. Automated Image Alignment for Comparing Microvascular Changes Detected by Fluorescein Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 17;36(8):757-764. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1901122. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

    PubMed 33784213
  • Sorour OA, Elsheikh M, Chen S, Elnahry AG, Baumal CR, Pramil V, Abdelhalim TI, Nassar E, Moult EM, Witkin AJ, Duker JS, Waheed NK. Mean macular intercapillary area in eyes with diabetic macular oedema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and its association with treatment response. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;49(7):714-723. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13966. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

    PubMed 34189816

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Intravitreal ranibizumab and Intravitreal bevacizumab in people with Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Ischemia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in foveal avascular zone area (time frame: 0 and 3 months.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04991350, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in