AzTrials
AzTrials

Perioperative HemorrhagePrEdictNCT04993170

Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management

An observational study of Perioperative Hemorrhage and Hemostasis, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With the help of a standardized questionnaire, an increased risk of bleeding due to pre-existing hemostasis disorders in the site-specific patient population will be detected and the corresponding enhanced diagnostic measures will be initiated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Perioperative Hemorrhage, Hemostasis
What is being tested?
Bleeding assessment tool
How many people
5,004 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
23 Jun 2021to 1 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients of both sexes undergoing elective surgery at the Benjamin Franklin Campus in the period of 12 months and presenting at the anesthesiological preoperative assessment will be recorded. A historical cohort that received surgical care at the Benjamin Franklin campus prior to the introduction of the questionnaire (07/01/2018 - 06/30/2019) will serve as the comparison group.

Who may be able to join

  • All adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients of both genders undergoing elective surgery at the Benjamin Franklin campus in the 12-month period

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy, lactation
  • Patients not capable of giving consent
  • Already diagnosed hemostasis disorder
  • Patients under (plasmatic) anticoagulation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 12203

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders Used in Clinical Routine During Anaesthesiological Preoperative Assessment and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management

With the help of a standardized questionnaire, an increased risk of bleeding due to pre-existing hemostasis disorders in the site-specific patient population will be detected and the corresponding enhanced diagnostic measures will be initiated. The planned prospective observational study should i.) systematically investigate the results of this procedure and ii.) allow a comparison with a retrospective perioperative cohort that was cared for at the Benjamin Franklin Campus before the introduction of the questionnaire. Due to the campus structure with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department, a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is to be expected.

In the following, the feasibility of the required measures in clinical routine (measured by the frequency of actual changes or modifications of the initially planned perioperative procedure, the adequate implementation of indicated diagnostic measures, etc.) will be examined.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is the systematic scientific evaluation of a standardized questionnaire for bleeding history already used in clinical routine during the preoperative anesthesiological visit and its impact on perioperative coagulation management.

The routine use of a standardized questionnaire to assess bleeding risk is based on a study on the preoperative identification of patients with (primary) hemostasis disorders from 2007: in a patient collective of 5649 patients from different disciplines at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a positive predictive value of 99% for the presence of a hemostasis disorder could be established if at least four questions of a standardized bleeding history questionnaire were answered positively. This is not possible in the same way with the plasmatic coagulation-global tests established in clinical routine.

The standardized application of the questionnaire serves to identify patients at risk of bleeding at an early stage and to adapt and optimize perioperative coagulation management accordingly by initiating targeted diagnostics and therapy. However, a systematic scientific evaluation of this questionnaire with regard to the conditions at the Benjamin Franklin Campus with a large vascular surgery center as well as a large urological, general and trauma surgery department and a high number of multimorbid patients with pre-existing disorders of primary hemostasis, mainly caused by medication or secondary diseases, is still pending.

Being tested
Bleeding assessment tool

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bleeding assessment toolDiagnostic test

    The standardized application of the questionnaire serves to identify patients at risk of bleeding at an early stage and to adapt and optimize perioperative coagulation management accordingly by initiating targeted diagnostics and therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relative frequency of changes in the initially planned perioperative procedure

    The relative frequency of changes in the initially planned perioperative procedure in patients with abnormalities in the preoperative questionnaire and target-oriented laboratory diagnostics will be measured.

    Changes can be:

    • need for extended coagulation diagnostics
    • hemostaseological consultation preoperatively
    • administration of coagulation-active substances

    Measured: Perioperative period

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Perioperative complications

    Compared to a retrospective control group in which no standardized questionnaire was used, the use of a standardized questionnaire and the targeted diagnostics initiated in case of abnormalities lead to

    • lower blood loss (estimated in ml, qualitatively)
    • a lower transfusion rate during surgery (number of red cell concentrates)
    • less time spent in the recovery room (hours:minutes)
    • a lower rate of revision surgery due to postoperative bleeding (number of patients)
    • fewer organ complications (number of patients, organ failure defined and diagnosed by attending physician)

    Measured: Perioperative period

  2. Diagnostic discrepancy

    There is a discrepancy between the number of patients, for whom additional diagnostics and measures ,based on the evaluation of the questionnaire,are required on the one hand, and the number ob patients, fo whom these additional diagnostics and measures are actually performed at the time of surgery on the other hand. The relative frequency of these discrepancies should be determined.

    Additional diagnostics and measures are:

    • extended coagulation diagnostics
    • hemostaseological consultation preoperatively

    Measured: Perioperative period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2021
  2. Study start23 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
5,004 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04993170
Sponsor's protocol ID
EA4/181/20
Acronym
PrEdict
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
5 Jul 2021
Last updated
14 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Perioperative Hemorrhage and Hemostasis, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relative frequency of changes in the initially planned perioperative procedure (time frame: Perioperative period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in