BreadNCT04994327
Bread Replacement - Facing the Challenge to Improve Its Quality for Better Metabolic Health
A study testing Beta-glucan bread in people with Bread and Hyperglycemia, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia. The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bread, Hyperglycemia, Glycemic Control
- What is being tested?
- Beta-glucan bread
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 155 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 7 May 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HbA1c 35-50 mmol/mol
- BMI ≥ 27 m2/kg
- regular bread eaters
- freezing capacity of at least 2 bread
Who cannot join
- chronic diseases like T2DM, CVD, cancer (within the last three years)
- unknown or untreated hypertension >160/100 mmHg
- celiac diseases, intolerance, or allergies for nuts, milk, eggs, wheat, mustard, seeds
- use of anti-diabetic drugs
- pregnancy and breastfeeding
- patients planned to have or had a bariatric surgery
- alcohol abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia. The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Bread (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås, Norway) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn, and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status and socio-economic status, physical activity, nicotine use, alcohol habits, chronotype, quality of life, and consumer acceptance of the study bread will be filled in.
Read the detailed description
Carbohydrates are the main source of energy in most European countries with intakes ranging from 40-60% of total energy. Consequently, the role of its quality and quantity for the development of metabolic diseases is the focus of substantial debate. Notwithstanding, replacing processed carbohydrates with unprocessed carbohydrates is regarded as a major strategy to improve public health. This is to a substantial degree based on strong observational evidence that higher intakes of dietary fiber (cereal grains containing the same relative proportions of bran, germ, and endosperm as the intact caryopsis) are associated with lower risks of total mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence and cancer mortality. Nonetheless, data from medium- to long-term intervention studies among adults are less conclusive regarding the benefits of whole-grain consumption on glycemic control, bodyweight and serum lipids. In fact, benefits may be largely confined to whole grains stemming from oats or barley, calling for explicit consideration of these whole grains and/or its mechanistically relevant component.
Adding complexity, many commonly consumed whole grains or products rich in dietary fiber are characterized by a high glycemic index (GI>70), in fact, a high dietary fiber content will not predict a low glycemic response. The GI describes the glycemic potency of the available carbohydrates in a food, is measured under defined conditions and is used to calculate the glycemic load (GL: GI x amount of available carbohydrates). Preferred consumption of high GI grain products is of concern since a higher dietary GI and GL may be causally linked to a substantial increase in T2DM risk and may translate into a considerable health burden.
In European societies, T2DM prevalence is increasing as a result of higher overweight and obesity rates and increases in longevity. Efforts are hence needed to develop carbohydrate-based food items that are both rich in fiber and whole grain and have a low GI and tailored to the dietary habits of middle-aged adults with insulin resistance (also called 'pre-diabetes' or intermediate hyperglycemia defined by intermediately increased HbA1c levels). This stage precedes clinical T2DM and affects up to 30% of adults in Western societies.
Enrichment with selected fibers, e.g. beta-glucan from oat and barley, may offer an alternative to whole grain kernel breads, which may not meet consumer preferences and is also endorsed by EFSA health claims. Preliminary small-scale studies indicate acute, short- and longer-term benefits of such bread for glycemic and/or insulinemic responses among persons with T2DM or at risk of T2DM. However, these studies suffer, besides the small sample sizes, from high amounts of test food (8 servings per day = 320 g bread) and use of white bread as a comparator. The present study will test whether habitual consumption of a bread containing oat bran concentrate and meeting the high beta-glucan content of the EFSA claim (4.3 g beta-glucan per 30 g available carbohydrate) compared to normal wheat bread high in whole grain but without kernels will affect glycemic control over a period of 16 weeks.
Main hypothesis The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Objectives Main objective: Establish whether replacement of habitual bread intake with a low GI bread containing beta-glucan improves glycemic control among persons at risk for T2DM.
Secondary objectives: Examine the effects of the intervention on capillary blood glucose, body composition and serum lipid levels, and address consumer acceptance of the intervention bread.
Study procedures This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Breads (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status, chronotype, lifestyle, and acceptance of the breads will be filled in.
Recruitment of participants Each study site is responsible for the recruitment of the planned numbers of participants. Potential participants will be recruited through flyers and information to local General Practitioners, advertising in local newspapers, central and local social media announcements (websites of universities, Facebook). Potentially eligible participants will be invited to a screening visit and checked for eligibility and exclusion of undiagnosed 2TDM.
- Conditions
- Bread, Hyperglycemia, Glycemic Control, PreDiabetes
- Being tested
- Beta-glucan bread
- Keywords
- beta-glucan, hyperglycemia, pre-diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperglycemia, Prediabetic State, Glucose Intolerance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Beta-glucan breadOther
Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-glucan bread | Experimental | Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks Receives: Other: Beta-glucan bread |
| Control bread | Placebo comparator | Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks Receives: Other: Beta-glucan bread |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glycemic control
Measurement of HbA1c
Measured: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
fasting capillary blood glucose
Measurement of fasting capillary glucose
Measured: 16 weeks
Body weight
Measurement of body weight
Measured: 16 weeks
Lipids
Measurement of total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides
Measured: 16 weeks
Consumer acceptance
Questionnaire on consumer acceptance (scale 1-9, 9 indicates "tastes really good" or "very hungry")
Measured: 8 weeks
Liver enzymes
Measurement of serum concentrations of ALAT (U/L) and ASAT (U/L)
Measured: 16 weeks
Fecal Microbiota
Analyse the change in the composition of the fecal microbiota using 16S sequencing
Measured: 16 weeks
Continuous blood glucose measurements
Measurement of Continuous blood glucose in a sub-population
Measured: 1 week at baseline and after 16 weeks
Compliance
Compliance of the intervention/control will be evaluated using compliance journals and 24-hour recalls as the basis for sensitivity analysis.
Measured: 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2021
- Study start7 May 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BreadStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicenter
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bergen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Paderborn University, University of Leipzig, Chalmers University of Technology, Nofima
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jutta Dierkes, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Bergen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04994327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 727565
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, Spielau U, Meyer K, Rieder A, Varela P, Ballance S, Koerner A, Landberg R, Buyken AE, Dierkes J, Rosendahl-Riise H. Effectiveness of regular oat beta-glucan-enriched bread compared with whole-grain wheat bread on long-term glycemic control in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Sep;122(3):724-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.018. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
PubMed 40571100Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, Spielau U, Thomassen LM, Meyer K, Piotrowski K, Rosendahl-Riise H, Rieder A, Varela P, Lysne V, Ballance S, Koerner A, Landberg R, Buyken A, Dierkes J. Sixteen-week multicentre randomised controlled trial to study the effect of the consumption of an oat beta-glucan-enriched bread versus a whole-grain wheat bread on glycaemic control among persons with pre-diabetes: a study protocol of the CarbHealth study. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e062066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062066.
PubMed 35998955
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bread Replacement - Facing the Challenge to Improve Its Quality for Better Metabolic Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04994327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 727565
- Conditions
- Bread, Hyperglycemia, Glycemic Control, PreDiabetes
- Keywords
- beta-glucan, hyperglycemia, pre-diabetes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BergenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Paderborn University, University of Leipzig, Chalmers University of Technology, Nofima
- Study start
- 7 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia. The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Bread (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås, Norway) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn, and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status and socio-economic status, physical activity, nicotine use, alcohol habits, chronotype, quality of life, and consumer acceptance of the study bread will be filled in.
Detailed description
Carbohydrates are the main source of energy in most European countries with intakes ranging from 40-60% of total energy. Consequently, the role of its quality and quantity for the development of metabolic diseases is the focus of substantial debate. Notwithstanding, replacing processed carbohydrates with unprocessed carbohydrates is regarded as a major strategy to improve public health. This is to a substantial degree based on strong observational evidence that higher intakes of dietary fiber (cereal grains containing the same relative proportions of bran, germ, and endosperm as the intact caryopsis) are associated with lower risks of total mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence and cancer mortality. Nonetheless, data from medium- to long-term intervention studies among adults are less conclusive regarding the benefits of whole-grain consumption on glycemic control, bodyweight and serum lipids. In fact, benefits may be largely confined to whole grains stemming from oats or barley, calling for explicit consideration of these whole grains and/or its mechanistically relevant component.
Adding complexity, many commonly consumed whole grains or products rich in dietary fiber are characterized by a high glycemic index (GI>70), in fact, a high dietary fiber content will not predict a low glycemic response. The GI describes the glycemic potency of the available carbohydrates in a food, is measured under defined conditions and is used to calculate the glycemic load (GL: GI x amount of available carbohydrates). Preferred consumption of high GI grain products is of concern since a higher dietary GI and GL may be causally linked to a substantial increase in T2DM risk and may translate into a considerable health burden.
In European societies, T2DM prevalence is increasing as a result of higher overweight and obesity rates and increases in longevity. Efforts are hence needed to develop carbohydrate-based food items that are both rich in fiber and whole grain and have a low GI and tailored to the dietary habits of middle-aged adults with insulin resistance (also called 'pre-diabetes' or intermediate hyperglycemia defined by intermediately increased HbA1c levels). This stage precedes clinical T2DM and affects up to 30% of adults in Western societies.
Enrichment with selected fibers, e.g. beta-glucan from oat and barley, may offer an alternative to whole grain kernel breads, which may not meet consumer preferences and is also endorsed by EFSA health claims. Preliminary small-scale studies indicate acute, short- and longer-term benefits of such bread for glycemic and/or insulinemic responses among persons with T2DM or at risk of T2DM. However, these studies suffer, besides the small sample sizes, from high amounts of test food (8 servings per day = 320 g bread) and use of white bread as a comparator. The present study will test whether habitual consumption of a bread containing oat bran concentrate and meeting the high beta-glucan content of the EFSA claim (4.3 g beta-glucan per 30 g available carbohydrate) compared to normal wheat bread high in whole grain but without kernels will affect glycemic control over a period of 16 weeks.
Main hypothesis The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Objectives Main objective: Establish whether replacement of habitual bread intake with a low GI bread containing beta-glucan improves glycemic control among persons at risk for T2DM.
Secondary objectives: Examine the effects of the intervention on capillary blood glucose, body composition and serum lipid levels, and address consumer acceptance of the intervention bread.
Study procedures This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia.
Breads (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status, chronotype, lifestyle, and acceptance of the breads will be filled in.
Recruitment of participants Each study site is responsible for the recruitment of the planned numbers of participants. Potential participants will be recruited through flyers and information to local General Practitioners, advertising in local newspapers, central and local social media announcements (websites of universities, Facebook). Potentially eligible participants will be invited to a screening visit and checked for eligibility and exclusion of undiagnosed 2TDM.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicenter
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-glucan bread | Experimental | Other: Beta-glucan breadFrozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks |
| Control bread | Placebo comparator | Other: Beta-glucan breadFrozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- HbA1c 35-50 mmol/mol
- BMI ≥ 27 m2/kg
- regular bread eaters
- freezing capacity of at least 2 bread
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- chronic diseases like T2DM, CVD, cancer (within the last three years)
- unknown or untreated hypertension >160/100 mmHg
- celiac diseases, intolerance, or allergies for nuts, milk, eggs, wheat, mustard, seeds
- use of anti-diabetic drugs
- pregnancy and breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-glucan breadFrozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks | Other | Beta-glucan bread, Control bread |
Primary outcome
Glycemic control
Time frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of HbA1c
8 secondary outcomes
fasting capillary blood glucose
Time frame: 16 weeks
Body weight
Time frame: 16 weeks
Lipids
Time frame: 16 weeks
Consumer acceptance
Time frame: 8 weeks
Liver enzymes
Time frame: 16 weeks
Fecal Microbiota
Time frame: 16 weeks
Continuous blood glucose measurements
Time frame: 1 week at baseline and after 16 weeks
Compliance
Time frame: 16 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40571100Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, Spielau U, Meyer K, Rieder A, Varela P, Ballance S, Koerner A, Landberg R, Buyken AE, Dierkes J, Rosendahl-Riise H. Effectiveness of regular oat beta-glucan-enriched bread compared with whole-grain wheat bread on long-term glycemic control in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Sep;122(3):724-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.018. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35998955Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, Spielau U, Thomassen LM, Meyer K, Piotrowski K, Rosendahl-Riise H, Rieder A, Varela P, Lysne V, Ballance S, Koerner A, Landberg R, Buyken A, Dierkes J. Sixteen-week multicentre randomised controlled trial to study the effect of the consumption of an oat beta-glucan-enriched bread versus a whole-grain wheat bread on glycaemic control among persons with pre-diabetes: a study protocol of the CarbHealth study. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e062066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062066.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bread
Recruiting
Tolerance to an Artisanal Bread in a Population Intolerant of the Conventional Bread and Study of Associated Markers
Intolerance to "Conventional" Bread
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jutta Dierkes, PhD principal investigator
University of Bergen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Beta-glucan bread in people with Bread and Hyperglycemia, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Glycemic control (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04994327, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.