Spinal Cord InjuriesSTIMO HEMONCT04994886
Restoring Hemodynamic Stability Using Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation Following Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Device implantation in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Jocelyne Bloch at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to stimulate the circuits in the spinal cord that are directly responsible for hemodynamic control to restore hemodynamic stability in patients with chronic cervical or high-thoracic spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Device implantation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 8 Jun 2021to 18 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 70 years old
- Able to undergo the informed consent/assent process
- Radiologically confirmed spinal cord injury
- Spinal cord injury between C3 and T6
- Classified with AIS A or B Spinal cord injury
- Stable medical, physical and psychological condition as considered by Investigators
Show all 9Show fewer
- Greater than 1 year since initial injury and at least 6 months from any required spinal instrumentation
- Confirmed orthostatic hypotension and autonomic dysreflexia
- Willing to attend all scheduled appointments
Who cannot join
- Patients in an emergency situation
- Diseases and conditions that would increase the morbidity and mortality of spinal cord injury surgery
- The inability to withhold antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents perioperatively
- History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular event
- Other conditions that would make the subject unable to participate in testing in the judgment of the investigators
- Current and anticipated need for opioid pain medications or pain that would prevent full participation in the rehabilitation program in the judgement of the investigators
Show all 15Show fewer
- Clinically significant mental illness in the judgment of the investigators
- Botulinum toxin injections in the previous 6 months
- Presence of significant pressure ulcers
- Recurrent urinary tract infection refractory to antibiotics
- Current pregnancy
- Current breastfeeding
- Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse
- Unhealed spinal fractures
- Presence of indwelling baclofen or insulin pump
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to stimulate the circuits in the spinal cord that are directly responsible for hemodynamic control to restore hemodynamic stability in patients with chronic cervical or high-thoracic spinal cord injury. The ultimate objective of this feasibility study is to provide preliminary safety and efficacy measures on the ability of the hemodynamic Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) to ensure the long-term management of hemodynamic instability and reduce the incidence and severity of orthostatic hypotension and autonomic dysreflexia episodes in humans with chronic cervical or high-thoracic spinal cord injury. In addition, the long-term safety and efficacy of TESS on cardiovascular health, respiratory function, spasticity, trunk stability and quality of life in patients with chronic spinal cord injury will be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) foreshadows a new era in the hemodynamic management of both acute and chronic SCI. It is envisioned that TESS will become the first-line treatment for hemodynamic instability in people with chronic SCI, where vasopressor agents and compression garments will become second-line treatments behind the precise control of blood pressure achieved with TESS.
In this study, the investigators propose to investigate the preliminary safety of hemodynamic TESS to modulate pressor responses and manage blood pressure instability in 4 patients with chronic SCI located between C3 and T6 and who suffer from severe orthostatic hypotension.
The study intervention consists of 8 phases preceded by pre-screening:
- Screening and enrolment
- Baseline and pre-implantation assessments
- Surgery
- Intensive TESS Configuration phase
- Daily supervised at-home TESS phase
- Long-term at-home phase
- Configuration of additional TESS programs phase
- End of study
Measures will be performed before surgical intervention and at regular intervals during the study.
The study will take place at the CHUV (Lausanne, Switzerland). A total of 4 participants will be enrolled in the study and implanted with two lead electrodes (Specify Surescan 5-6-5 Leads, Model 977C190 Medtronic) and two implantable pulse generators (Intellis™ with AdaptiveStim™, Model 97715 Medtronic). All participants will undergo the same treatment and procedures. The total duration of the study will be approximately 2 months (up to 10 months/participant).
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Device implantation
- Keywords
- SCI, Spinal Cord Injury, Epidural Spinal Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Device implantationProcedure or surgery
The intervention involves the insertion of 2 lead electrodes (Specify Surescan 5-6-5 Leads, Model 977C190 Medtronic) epidurally over the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord through 2 laminectomies and two implantable pulse generators (Intellis™ with AdaptiveStim™, Model 97715 Medtronic) in the abdomen of the participant.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation | Experimental | Participants will undergo a surgery for Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS). The neurostimulation system will be used to manage blood pressure instability.
Patients will then proceed to one month of an intensive device configuration protocol to configure the TESS settings of their investigational device to regain hemodynamic stability. After the intensive device configuration phase, daily supervised at-home hemodynamic TESS will be tested for 5 sessions per week for two weeks. Thereafter, and up to 10 months post-implant, patients will have a minimum of 5 TESS supported at-home sessions per week and one laboratory visit per month during a long-term at-home hemodynamic TESS phase. Finally, patients will have to undergo additional testing during a configuration of additional TESS programs phase. During this phase TESS configurations for hemodynamic stability, respiratory function, trunk stability and spasticity will be tested. Receives: Procedure: Device implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurrence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that are deemed related or possibly related to the study procedure or to the study investigational system, from implant surgery until the end of study.
Investigate the preliminary safety of hemodynamic targeted epidural spinal stimulation (TESS) to modulate pressor responses and manage blood pressure instability in patients with chronic SCI located between C3 and T6 and who suffer from severe orthostatic hypotension (n=4).
Measured: From implantation through study completion, an average of 7 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
ISNCSCI (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury)
Clinical examination used to assess the motor and sensory impairment and severity of a spinal cord injury.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity clinical exam using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Patient's limb spasticity levels (5-point nominal scale) are assessed by rating the resistance of a muscle to a passive range of motion about a single joint. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher spasticity.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity isokinetic quantification
A dynamometer (Cybex) is used to evaluate the effect of stimulation on spasticity of the hip, knee and ankle. An extension and flexion movement is performed around each joint (dynamometer in isokinetic mode).
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity isokinetic quantification
An extension and flexion movement is performed around each joint. EMG data is recorded through each movement.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Trunk stability
The patient is asked to perform a systematic set of reaching movements while seated freely (without a back-rest). Additionally, the patient is asked to perform a set of movements deemed functionally relevant, for example reaching for an object behind them or picking up an object from the ground. Each movement is repeated and EMG data can be acquired.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Respiratory function evaluation
The respiratory function is evaluated using a spirometer. Volume is recorded.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Respiratory function evaluation
The respiratory function is evaluated using a spirometer. Flow is recorded.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Orthostatic head-up tilt test
Patients begin by resting in the supine position during which a baseline recording is performed. Thereafter, patients will be passively moved to upright position using the tilt-table. Between each experimental condition, the patient will be moved back in supine position to return to baseline. Beat-to-beat blood pressure will be monitored.
Measured: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Autonomic Dysfunction Following Spinal cord injury (ADFSCI)
The ADFSCI questionnaire is a 24-item self-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of demographics, medications, frequency/severity of symptoms during AD and hypotensive events. Higher scores indicate more severe and more frequent symptoms during AD and hypotensive events.
Measured: At baseline and monthly during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Quality of Life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF
The WHOQOL-BREF is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life. Scores are converted to range between 4-20 or 0-100 and are scaled in a positive direction: higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Measured: At baseline and monthly during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Completion of a Daily Stimulation Log (DSL) by the patient
The patient will be asked to self-report the use of TESS during the at-home phases. This information will be used to evaluate hemodynamic TESS-supported at-home stimulation sessions and characterize the use of the investigational system at home.
Measured: From daily at-home supervised used until the end of the study, an average of 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2021
- Study start8 Jun 2021
- Primary completion18 Dec 2024
- Study completion18 Dec 2024
Why it stopped: New study in place HemON (SNCTP 000004706)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-site, single-arm, non-blinded, non-randomized, interventional
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jocelyne Bloch
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jocelyne Bloch, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Investigators
- Jocelyne Bloch, MD, Principal investigator, CHUV
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04994886
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STIMO-HEMO2021
- Acronym
- STIMO HEMO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
PubMed 15672628Cragg JJ, Noonan VK, Krassioukov A, Borisoff J. Cardiovascular disease and spinal cord injury: results from a national population health survey. Neurology. 2013 Aug 20;81(8):723-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a1aa68. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
PubMed 23884034Illman A, Stiller K, Williams M. The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension during physiotherapy treatment in patients with an acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000 Dec;38(12):741-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101089.
PubMed 11175374Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Contemporary Cardiovascular Concerns after Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms, Maladaptations, and Management. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1927-42. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3903. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
PubMed 25962761Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN, Warburton DE. Perturbed and spontaneous regional cerebral blood flow responses to changes in blood pressure after high-level spinal cord injury: the effect of midodrine. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Mar 15;116(6):645-53. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2013. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
PubMed 24436297Phillips AA, Warburton DE, Ainslie PN, Krassioukov AV. Regional neurovascular coupling and cognitive performance in those with low blood pressure secondary to high-level spinal cord injury: improved by alpha-1 agonist midodrine hydrochloride. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014 May;34(5):794-801. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.3. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
PubMed 24473484Phillips AA, Elliott SL, Zheng MM, Krassioukov AV. Selective alpha adrenergic antagonist reduces severity of transient hypertension during sexual stimulation after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Mar 15;32(6):392-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3590. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
PubMed 25093677Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Warburton DE, Teasell R; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. A systematic review of the management of orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May;90(5):876-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.009.
PubMed 19406310Squair JW, Phillips AA, Harmon M, Krassioukov AV. Emergency management of autonomic dysreflexia with neurologic complications. CMAJ. 2016 Oct 18;188(15):1100-1103. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151311. Epub 2016 May 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 27221275Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN, Warburton DE. Baroreflex function after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Oct 10;29(15):2431-45. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2507. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
PubMed 22897489Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, van den Brand R, Yew A, Musienko P, Zhong H, Song B, Ao Y, Ichiyama RM, Lavrov I, Roy RR, Sofroniew MV, Edgerton VR. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1333-42. doi: 10.1038/nn.2401. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
PubMed 19767747Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PubMed 30382197Squair JW, Gautier M, Mahe L, Soriano JE, Rowald A, Bichat A, Cho N, Anderson MA, James ND, Gandar J, Incognito AV, Schiavone G, Sarafis ZK, Laskaratos A, Bartholdi K, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Moerman C, Vaseghi B, Scott B, Rosentreter R, Kathe C, Ravier J, McCracken L, Kang X, Vachicouras N, Fallegger F, Jelescu I, Cheng Y, Li Q, Buschman R, Buse N, Denison T, Dukelow S, Charbonneau R, Rigby I, Boyd SK, Millar PJ, Moraud EM, Capogrosso M, Wagner FB, Barraud Q, Bezard E, Lacour SP, Bloch J, Courtine G, Phillips AA. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):308-314. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03180-w. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PubMed 33505019Legg Ditterline BE, Aslan SC, Wang S, Ugiliweneza B, Hirsch GA, Wecht JM, Harkema S. Restoration of autonomic cardiovascular regulation in spinal cord injury with epidural stimulation: a case series. Clin Auton Res. 2021 Apr;31(2):317-320. doi: 10.1007/s10286-020-00693-2. Epub 2020 May 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 32405661Harkema SJ, Legg Ditterline B, Wang S, Aslan S, Angeli CA, Ovechkin A, Hirsch GA. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Training and Sustained Recovery of Cardiovascular Function in Individuals With Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1569-1571. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2617.
PubMed 30242310
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Restoring Hemodynamic Stability Using Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation Following Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04994886
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STIMO HEMO / STIMO-HEMO2021
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- SCI, Spinal Cord Injury, Epidural Spinal Stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: New study in place HemON (SNCTP 000004706)
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jocelyne BlochUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to stimulate the circuits in the spinal cord that are directly responsible for hemodynamic control to restore hemodynamic stability in patients with chronic cervical or high-thoracic spinal cord injury. The ultimate objective of this feasibility study is to provide preliminary safety and efficacy measures on the ability of the hemodynamic Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) to ensure the long-term management of hemodynamic instability and reduce the incidence and severity of orthostatic hypotension and autonomic dysreflexia episodes in humans with chronic cervical or high-thoracic spinal cord injury. In addition, the long-term safety and efficacy of TESS on cardiovascular health, respiratory function, spasticity, trunk stability and quality of life in patients with chronic spinal cord injury will be evaluated.
Detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) foreshadows a new era in the hemodynamic management of both acute and chronic SCI. It is envisioned that TESS will become the first-line treatment for hemodynamic instability in people with chronic SCI, where vasopressor agents and compression garments will become second-line treatments behind the precise control of blood pressure achieved with TESS.
In this study, the investigators propose to investigate the preliminary safety of hemodynamic TESS to modulate pressor responses and manage blood pressure instability in 4 patients with chronic SCI located between C3 and T6 and who suffer from severe orthostatic hypotension.
The study intervention consists of 8 phases preceded by pre-screening:
- Screening and enrolment
- Baseline and pre-implantation assessments
- Surgery
- Intensive TESS Configuration phase
- Daily supervised at-home TESS phase
- Long-term at-home phase
- Configuration of additional TESS programs phase
- End of study
Measures will be performed before surgical intervention and at regular intervals during the study.
The study will take place at the CHUV (Lausanne, Switzerland). A total of 4 participants will be enrolled in the study and implanted with two lead electrodes (Specify Surescan 5-6-5 Leads, Model 977C190 Medtronic) and two implantable pulse generators (Intellis™ with AdaptiveStim™, Model 97715 Medtronic). All participants will undergo the same treatment and procedures. The total duration of the study will be approximately 2 months (up to 10 months/participant).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-site, single-arm, non-blinded, non-randomized, interventional
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation | Experimental | Procedure: Device implantationParticipants will undergo a surgery for Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS). The neurostimulation system will be used to manage blood pressure instability. Patients will then proceed to one month of an intensive device configuration protocol to configure the TESS settings of their investigational device to regain hemodynamic stability. After the intensive device configuration phase, daily supervised at-home hemodynamic TESS will be tested for 5 sessions per week for two weeks. Thereafter, and up to 10 months post-implant, patients will have a minimum of 5 TESS supported at-home sessions per week and one laboratory visit per month during a long-term at-home hemodynamic TESS phase. Finally, patients will have to undergo additional testing during a configuration of additional TESS programs phase. During this phase TESS configurations for hemodynamic stability, respiratory function, trunk stability and spasticity will be tested. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age 18 to 70 years old
- Able to undergo the informed consent/assent process
- Radiologically confirmed spinal cord injury
- Spinal cord injury between C3 and T6
- Classified with AIS A or B Spinal cord injury
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients in an emergency situation
- Diseases and conditions that would increase the morbidity and mortality of spinal cord injury surgery
- The inability to withhold antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents perioperatively
- History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular event
- Other conditions that would make the subject unable to participate in testing in the judgment of the investigators
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Device implantationThe intervention involves the insertion of 2 lead electrodes (Specify Surescan 5-6-5 Leads, Model 977C190 Medtronic) epidurally over the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord through 2 laminectomies and two implantable pulse generators (Intellis™ with AdaptiveStim™, Model 97715 Medtronic) in the abdomen of the participant. | Procedure or surgery | Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Occurrence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that are deemed related or possibly related to the study procedure or to the study investigational system, from implant surgery until the end of study.
Time frame: From implantation through study completion, an average of 7 months
Investigate the preliminary safety of hemodynamic targeted epidural spinal stimulation (TESS) to modulate pressor responses and manage blood pressure instability in patients with chronic SCI located between C3 and T6 and who suffer from severe orthostatic hypotension (n=4).
11 secondary outcomes
ISNCSCI (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury)
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity clinical exam using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity isokinetic quantification
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Spasticity isokinetic quantification
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Trunk stability
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Respiratory function evaluation
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Respiratory function evaluation
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Orthostatic head-up tilt test
Time frame: At baseline and during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Autonomic Dysfunction Following Spinal cord injury (ADFSCI)
Time frame: At baseline and monthly during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Quality of Life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF
Time frame: At baseline and monthly during the rehabilitation phase, an average of 7 months
Completion of a Daily Stimulation Log (DSL) by the patient
Time frame: From daily at-home supervised used until the end of the study, an average of 5 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: New study in place HemON (SNCTP 000004706)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 15672628Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
- Background: PubMed 23884034Cragg JJ, Noonan VK, Krassioukov A, Borisoff J. Cardiovascular disease and spinal cord injury: results from a national population health survey. Neurology. 2013 Aug 20;81(8):723-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a1aa68. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 11175374Illman A, Stiller K, Williams M. The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension during physiotherapy treatment in patients with an acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000 Dec;38(12):741-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101089.
- Background: PubMed 25962761Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Contemporary Cardiovascular Concerns after Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms, Maladaptations, and Management. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1927-42. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3903. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 24436297Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN, Warburton DE. Perturbed and spontaneous regional cerebral blood flow responses to changes in blood pressure after high-level spinal cord injury: the effect of midodrine. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Mar 15;116(6):645-53. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2013. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 24473484Phillips AA, Warburton DE, Ainslie PN, Krassioukov AV. Regional neurovascular coupling and cognitive performance in those with low blood pressure secondary to high-level spinal cord injury: improved by alpha-1 agonist midodrine hydrochloride. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014 May;34(5):794-801. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.3. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
- Background: PubMed 25093677Phillips AA, Elliott SL, Zheng MM, Krassioukov AV. Selective alpha adrenergic antagonist reduces severity of transient hypertension during sexual stimulation after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Mar 15;32(6):392-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3590. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 19406310Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Warburton DE, Teasell R; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. A systematic review of the management of orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May;90(5):876-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.009.
- Background: PubMed 27221275Squair JW, Phillips AA, Harmon M, Krassioukov AV. Emergency management of autonomic dysreflexia with neurologic complications. CMAJ. 2016 Oct 18;188(15):1100-1103. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151311. Epub 2016 May 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22897489Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN, Warburton DE. Baroreflex function after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Oct 10;29(15):2431-45. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2507. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 19767747Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, van den Brand R, Yew A, Musienko P, Zhong H, Song B, Ao Y, Ichiyama RM, Lavrov I, Roy RR, Sofroniew MV, Edgerton VR. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1333-42. doi: 10.1038/nn.2401. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 30382197Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Gait
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Recruiting
tSCS Combined With Rehabilitation Training in Treating Paraplegic Patients After SCI
Spinal Cord Injury, Paraplegia, Spinal
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Neuromodulation for Metabolic Dysfunction
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Prediabetes / Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jocelyne Bloch, MD principal investigator
CHUV
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Device implantation in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Jocelyne Bloch at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: New study in place HemON (SNCTP 000004706)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurrence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that are deemed related or possibly related to the study procedure or to the study investigational system, from implant surgery until the end of study. (time frame: From implantation through study completion, an average of 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04994886, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.