Lung NeoplasmNCT04995172
Feasibility of Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Lung Lesion
An observational study of Lung Neoplasm, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study investigates whether using a mobile-CT-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) during a bronchoscopy procedure will better enable the study staff to reach the lung tumor, perform a biopsy, and obtain a diagnosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Computed Tomography, Electronic Health Record Review and Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Apr 2021to 27 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients diagnosed with a peripheral lung lesion who are scheduled to undergo a bronchoscopy
Who may be able to join
- Patients of 18 years of age or older undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnosis of a peripheral lung lesion from 1 to 3.5 cm in diameter located in the outer 2/3 of the lung fields
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients who cannot tolerate raising both arms above their head (position for obtaining mobile-CT images)
- Patients with any contraindication for general anesthesia (e.g., severe and active coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 1 liter, uncontrolled hypertension, increased intracranial pressure, history of intolerance to general anesthesia)
- Dementia or other severe cognitive impairment causing inability to understand or consent to the procedure and study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy
This study investigates whether using a mobile-CT-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) during a bronchoscopy procedure will better enable the study staff to reach the lung tumor, perform a biopsy, and obtain a diagnosis. One method that doctors use for diagnosing lung tumors is bronchoscopy guided by an X-ray machine (called fluoroscope). Though much better guidance could be provided with a CT scanner when compared to the fluoroscope, the standard CT equipment is very large, fixed in a radiology room, and difficult to use with bronchoscopy. Mobile CT imaging systems may more easily and effectively perform the same tasks of the standard CT imaging in the bronchoscopy room, offering better guidance than the standard fluoroscope.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
- To determine the added value of mobile-CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) for the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-D Fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Describe the navigational yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.
II. Describe the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.
III. Describe the mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield. IV. Describe the sensitivity for malignancy of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance.
- Describe anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield (tumor location, tumor characteristics -solid, semisolid-, air-bronchus sign, biopsy tool, relationship between biopsy tool/tumor).
VI. Describe procedure duration. VII. Describe time required to obtain mobile CT scans VIII. Describe fluoroscopy time and estimate radiation dose to the patient. IX. Describe procedural complications.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months.
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Computed Tomography, Electronic Health Record Review, Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Computed TomographyProcedure or surgery
Also called CAT, CAT Scan, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized Tomography
Undergo mobile CT-assisted bronchoscopy
Electronic Health Record ReviewOther
Patients' medical records are reviewed
Endobronchial Ultrasound BronchoscopyProcedure or surgery
Also called EBUS, Endobronchial Ultrasound
Undergo radial probe EBUS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review) | Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months. Receives: Procedure: Computed Tomography; Other: Electronic Health Record Review; Procedure: Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The added value of mobile-computed tomography (CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB)
Defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with thin or ultrathin scope, radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance. Descriptive statistics (mean standard deviation [SD] or median interquartile range [IQR], frequency [%]) will be used to summarize patient characteristics.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Navigational yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules
Navigational yield for standard of care (SOC) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Measured: Up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules
Diagnostic yield of SOC and diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT along with their 95% CIs will be estimated.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield
M-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. M-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. Two-sided exact binomial test will be used to test if diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT is significantly different from 0.2 in the subgroup.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Sensitivity for malignancy of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance
Sensitivity for malignancy of SOC and sensitivity for malignancy of SOC + M-CT will be estimated, considering final pathology as the gold standard test.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield
Anatomic and procedural characteristics that are associated with navigational and diagnostic yield will be evaluated by multivariate logistic regression models. A p-value of less than 0.05 will indicate a statistical significance.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Procedure duration
Will be summarized by mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile range [IQR]).
Measured: Up to 6 months
Time required to obtain mobile CT scans
Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Measured: Up to 6 months
Fluoroscopy time
Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Measured: Up to 6 months
Radiation dose to the patient
Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).
Measured: Up to 6 months
Procedural complications
Complications will be tabulated.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2021
- Study start19 Apr 2021
- Primary completion27 Nov 2024
- Study completion27 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roberto F Casal, Principal investigator, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04995172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-0760
- Other IDs
- NCI-2021-01331, 2020-0760
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04995172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-0760
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasm
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates whether using a mobile-CT-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) during a bronchoscopy procedure will better enable the study staff to reach the lung tumor, perform a biopsy, and obtain a diagnosis. One method that doctors use for diagnosing lung tumors is bronchoscopy guided by an X-ray machine (called fluoroscope). Though much better guidance could be provided with a CT scanner when compared to the fluoroscope, the standard CT equipment is very large, fixed in a radiology room, and difficult to use with bronchoscopy. Mobile CT imaging systems may more easily and effectively perform the same tasks of the standard CT imaging in the bronchoscopy room, offering better guidance than the standard fluoroscope.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
- To determine the added value of mobile-CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) for the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-D Fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Describe the navigational yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.
II. Describe the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.
III. Describe the mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield. IV. Describe the sensitivity for malignancy of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance.
- Describe anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield (tumor location, tumor characteristics -solid, semisolid-, air-bronchus sign, biopsy tool, relationship between biopsy tool/tumor).
VI. Describe procedure duration. VII. Describe time required to obtain mobile CT scans VIII. Describe fluoroscopy time and estimate radiation dose to the patient. IX. Describe procedural complications.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review) | – | Procedure: Computed Tomography, Other: Electronic Health Record Review, Procedure: Endobronchial Ultrasound BronchoscopyPatients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients diagnosed with a peripheral lung lesion who are scheduled to undergo a bronchoscopy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients of 18 years of age or older undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnosis of a peripheral lung lesion from 1 to 3.5 cm in diameter located in the outer 2/3 of the lung fields
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients who cannot tolerate raising both arms above their head (position for obtaining mobile-CT images)
- Patients with any contraindication for general anesthesia (e.g., severe and active coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 1 liter, uncontrolled hypertension, increased intracranial pressure, history of intolerance to general anesthesia)
- Dementia or other severe cognitive impairment causing inability to understand or consent to the procedure and study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Computed TomographyAlso: CAT, CAT Scan, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized TomographyUndergo mobile CT-assisted bronchoscopy | Procedure or surgery | Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review) |
| Electronic Health Record ReviewPatients' medical records are reviewed | Other | Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review) |
| Endobronchial Ultrasound BronchoscopyAlso: EBUS, Endobronchial UltrasoundUndergo radial probe EBUS | Procedure or surgery | Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review) |
Primary outcome
The added value of mobile-computed tomography (CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB)
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with thin or ultrathin scope, radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance. Descriptive statistics (mean standard deviation [SD] or median interquartile range [IQR], frequency [%]) will be used to summarize patient characteristics.
10 secondary outcomes
Navigational yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Diagnostic yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Sensitivity for malignancy of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Procedure duration
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Time required to obtain mobile CT scans
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Fluoroscopy time
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Radiation dose to the patient
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Procedural complications
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2024.
- MD Anderson Cancer Center WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lung Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roberto F Casal principal investigator
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Neoplasm, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The added value of mobile-computed tomography (CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) (time frame: Up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2024.