AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeNCT04995900

Heart Matters: The Effectiveness of Heart Health Education in Regions at Highest-risk.

A study testing Community education in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, Acute, run by Monash University at 1 site in Australia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether providing a targeted heart health education campaign to regions at high risk of heart attacks will improve ACS patient's symptom recognition and response. The intervention will be will be evaluated according to a cluster randomized, stepped wedged design. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Community education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,240 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 31 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: Adult residents of the eight local government areas -

Exclusion Criteria: Adults not residing in the eight local government areas.

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • Victorian LGAs

    Melbourne, Please Select, 3004

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Heart Matters: A Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Heart Health Education Targeting Communities at High Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether providing a targeted heart health education campaign to regions at high risk of heart attacks will improve ACS patient's symptom recognition and response.

The intervention will be will be evaluated according to a cluster randomized, stepped wedged design. The clusters are eight local government areas (LGAs) in Victoria, Australia. The main primary outcome will be assessed in consecutive patients presenting to emergency departments from the six LGAs throughout the study period with an ED diagnoses of acute coronary syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Primary objectives:

To determine if targeted heart health education will:

  1. Increase ambulance use in ACS patients (main primary outcome);
  2. Decrease patient and prehospital delay times in ACS patients;
  3. Increase awareness of personal cardiovascular risk and associated factors in adult community members; and
  4. Increase cardiovascular knowledge and confidence to act to heart attack warning signs in adult community members.

Secondary objectives

  1. To determine if targeted heart health education:
  2. Reduces the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest;
  3. Improves survival in OHCA patients;
  4. Improves survival in ACS patients;
  5. Improves survival and ACS patients;
  6. Increases presentations to ED for ACS and unspecified chest pain; and
  7. Increases the rates of calls to ambulance for chest pain and non-chest pain.
  8. Increases the rate of Heart Health Checks.

Intervention: To meet the objectives of the study, we will employ HM coordinators for each of the eight high-risk LGAs to organise and deliver our HM education program using HM materials and Partner resources.

Design: The stepped-wedge design is a uni-directional cross-over design - where the randomisation element is when the cluster crosses-over to the intervention following a control period.

Over the 16-month study period, the eight LGAs will move into the intervention phase at two month intervals. As four LGAs are in close proximity, these LGAs will switch from control to intervention periods at the same time to avoid possible contamination.

Being tested
Community education
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Community educationOther

    Also called Local campaign

    Heart Matters coordinators will deliver heart health education to the community using HM materials and Partner resources.

Study groups in NCT04995900
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalIntervention period with active Heart Matters education delivered
Receives: Other: Community education
ControlNo interventionControl period with no Heart Matters education delivered.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ambulance use for ACS

    The proportion of ACS patients that present to ED by ambulance.

    Measured: 16 months

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Median ACS patient delay time

    The median ACS patients delay time (time from symptom onset to decision to seek medical attention).

    Measured: 16 months

  2. ACS patient delay time <60 minutes

    The proportion of ACS patients with patient delay times <60 minutes

    Measured: 16 months

  3. Median ACS patient prehospital delay time

    The median ACS patient prehospital delay time (time from symptom onset to arrival at hospital).

    Measured: 16 months

  4. ACS patients prehospital delay times <120 minutes

    The proportion of ACS patients with prehospital delay times <120 minutes

    Measured: 16 months

  5. Awareness of own risk of heart attack

    The proportion of adult members of the community who are aware of their own risk of heart attack.

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  6. Awareness of heart attack as a leading cause of death

    The proportion of adult members of the community who identify heart disease a leading cause of death

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  7. Awareness of heart attack risk factors

    The proportion of adult members of the community who identify cardiovascular risk factors

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  8. Number of correctly named heart attack risk factors

    The number of correctly named cardiovascular risk factors by adult members of the community

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  9. Awareness of heart attack signs and symptoms

    The proportion of adult members of the community aware of heart attack symptoms

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  10. Number of correctly named heart attack signs and symptoms

    The number of correctly named ACS symptoms by adult members of the community

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  11. Confidence in knowing how to act

    The proportion adult members of the community who are confident about what they would do if experiencing a heart attack

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  12. Ambulance use in scenarios

    The proportion adult members of the community who correctly state they would call an ambulance for two heart attack scenarios.

    Measured: 0-2 months and 6-8 months

  13. Rates of Heart Health Checks

    Rates of Medicare claims for General Practitioner (GP) Heart Health Checks

    Measured: 16 months

  14. Rates of ACS ED presentations

    The rates of ED presentations that are ACS

    Measured: 16 months

  15. Rates of unspecified chest pain ED presentations

    Rates of ED presentations that are unspecified chest pain

    Measured: 16 months

  16. ACS ED presentations via GPs

    Proportion of ACS ED presentations via General Practitioners

    Measured: 16 months

  17. Rates of ACS survival

    The proportion of ACS patients surviving to hospital discharge

    Measured: 16 months

  18. Incidence of OHCA

    incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Measured: 16 months

  19. Rates of OHCA

    Rates out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival

    Measured: 16 months

  20. Calls to ambulance for chest pain

    Proportion of chest pain (event type 10) calls to ambulance

    Measured: 16 months

  21. Calls to ambulance for non- chest pain

    Proportion of non-chest pain emergency calls to ambulance

    Measured: 16 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
The stepped-wedge design is a uni-directional cross-over design - where the randomisation element is when the cluster crosses-over to the intervention following a control period.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
2,240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04995900
Sponsor's protocol ID
291276657
Other IDs
1180282
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
30 Jul 2021
Last updated
15 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Access to data is restricted and is not available for sharing at the individual patient level.

Publications

  • Bray JE, Nehme Z, Finn JC, Kasza J, Woods J, Clark RA, Stub D, Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Smith BJ, Cartledge S, Beauchamp A, Bowden R, Dodge N, Flemming-Judge E, Chow C, Cox N, van Gaal W, Nadurata V, Cameron P; Heart Matters Investigators. Heart Attack Education and EMS Response in High-Risk, Low EMS Usage Areas: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Apr 1;9(4):e268823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.8823.

    PubMed 42043820
  • Bray JE, Nehme Z, Finn JC, Kasza J, Clark RA, Stub D, Cadilhac DA, Buttery AK, Woods J, Kim J, Smith BJ, Smith K, Cartledge S, Beauchamp A, Dodge N, Walker T, Flemming-Judge E, Chow C, Stewart M, Cox N, van Gaal W, Nadurata V, Cameron P. A protocol for the Heart Matters stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: The effectiveness of heart attack education in regions at highest-risk. Resusc Plus. 2023 Jul 25;15:100431. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100431. eCollection 2023 Sep.

    PubMed 37555197

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Community education in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, Acute, run by Monash University at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ambulance use for ACS (time frame: 16 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04995900, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in