AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerCCHOWWNCT05000697

Chemoradiation and Consolidation Chemotherapy With or Without Oxaliplatin for Distal Rectal Cancer and Watch and Wait

A study testing Oxaliplatin and 5FU in people with Rectal Cancer and Consolidation, run by Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz at 24 sites in 3 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait - WW). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer, Consolidation
What is being tested?
Oxaliplatin and 5FU
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
216 participants
Where
24 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
14 Jul 2021to Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • ECOG 0-2 or KPS≥70;
  • Primary rectal adenocarcinoma (biopsy confirmed) within the reach of digital rectal examination (at least lower tip/border) by the attending colorectal surgeon;
  • Endoscopic documentation;
  • Abdominal and chest CT scans showing no evidence of metastatic disease;
  • High-resolution magnetic resonance images performed at either 1.5T or 3.0T system using a phased array surface coil with: sagittal T2 images including the anal verge and the sacrum; axial oblique T2 weighted images acquired in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the rectal wall guided by the sagittal images; coronal images acquired in parallel to the anal canal plane. Small field of view (16-18cm), 3mm section thickness, increased matrix size and increased number of signal averages are required;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Radiological defining criteria (centralized):
  • Lower edge of tumor at the level (max. 1cm distance) or below the anorectal ring defined at sagittal or coronal views;
  • mrT2, mrT3 (any subclassification)
  • mrN0-1 (≤3 radiologically positive lymph nodes)
  • mrEMVI: any status
  • mrMRF: any status

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • ECOG ≥3 or KPS<70
  • Unwilling to consent
  • Metastatic disease (any kind; internal iliac and obturator nodes are considered local disease and not metastatic disease and therefore will not be considered as exclusion criteria)
  • mrT4 or mrN2
  • Previous pelvic irradiation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Baseline neuropathy
  • Receiving treatment of other anti-cancer drug or methods
  • Presence of uncontrolled life threatening diseases

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Rodrigo O Perez, Dr contact

+551138871757

roperez@haoc.com.br

24 sites in 3 countries

Brazil18 sites, 18 recruiting
  • Hospital Felicio Rocho

    Belo Horizonte, 30110-934

    Fabio Lopez Queiroz, fabiolopesq@hotmail.com

    Fabio Lopez Queiroz

    Recruiting
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu

    Botucatu, 18607-741

    Marcela Maria Silvino Craveiro

    Marcela Maria Silvino Craveiro

    Recruiting
  • Complexo de Saude São João de Deus - Divinopolis

    Divinópolis, 35500-227

    Fabio Henrique de Oliveira, fabioho84@gmail.com

    Fabio Henrique de Oliveira

    Recruiting
  • Hospital das Clinicas de Passo Fundo

    Passo Fundo, 99010-260

    Miguel Dutra Schmitz, mdudaschmitz@gmail.com

    Miguel Dutra Schmitz

    Recruiting
  • Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, 90020-090

    Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja, azambujadb@gmail.com

    Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja

    Recruiting
  • Hospital das Clinicas de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, 90035-903

    Daniel de Carvalho Damin, damin@terra.com.br

    Daniel de Carvalho Damin

    Recruiting
  • União Brasileira de Educação e Assistencia - PUC-RS - Campus POA

    Porto Alegre, 90160-092

    Gabriel Prolla, gabriel.prolla@gmail.com

    Gabriel Prolla

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Militar de Area de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, 90440-191

    Fabricio Marcondes, procto@hmapa.eb.mil.br

    Fabricio Marcondes

    Recruiting
  • Centro Gaucho Integrado de Oncologia, hematologia, ensino e pesquisa

    Porto Alegre

    Rafael Dutra Vila, rafaeldutravila@gmail.com

    Rafael Dutra Vila

    Recruiting
  • Instituto Nacional do Cancer Jose Alencar Gomes da Silva - INCA

    Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130

    Marcus Vinicius Motta Valadão da Silva, drmarcusvaladao@gmail.com

    Marcus Vinicius Motta Valadão da Silva

    Recruiting
  • Ensino e Terapia de Inovação Clínica AMO

    Salvador

    Anelisa Kruschewsky Coutinho Araujo, coutinhoanelisa@gmail.com

    Anelisa Kruchewsky Coutinho Araujo

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria

    Santa Maria, 97150-900

    Maurício Fraga da Silva, mauricio.f.silva@ufsm.br

    Mauricio Fraga da Silva

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01327-001

    Rodrigo O Perez, Dr, +551138871757, roperez@haoc.com.br

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa

    São Paulo, 01323-001

    Fabio Roberto Kater, fabiorobertokater@gmail.com

    Fabio Roberto Kater

    Recruiting
  • Associação Beneficente Síria - Hospital do Coração

    São Paulo, 04005-000

    Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, pedroluiz_uson@hotmail.com

    Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior

    Recruiting
  • Centro Paulista de Oncologia - CPO

    São Paulo, 04538-132

    Renata D'Alpino Peixoto, renatadalpino@gmail.com

    Renata D'Alpino Peixoto

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Primavera

    São Paulo, 05059-060

    Michel Fabiano Silva Alves, michelfsalves@gmail.com

    Michel Fabiano Silva Alves

    Recruiting
  • COT - Centro Oncológico do Triângulo S.A.

    Uberlândia

    Marcia Rachel da Fonseca, marcia.fonseca@medicos.oncoclinicas.com

    Marcia Rachel da Fonseca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

Argentina5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

    Buenos Aires, C1199CABA

    Gustavo Rossi, gustavo.rossi@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

    Gustavo Rossi

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Ramos Mejia: Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Jose Maria Ramos Mejia

    Buenos Aires, C1221ADC

    Adrian Mattacheo, amattacheo@gmail.com

    Adrian Mattacheo

    Recruiting
  • Hospital de Gastroenterologia Udaondo Ciudad de Buenos Aires

    Buenos Aires, C1264AAACABA

    Soledad Iseas, soledad.iseas@gmail.com

    Soledad Iseas

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires - Asociacion Civil

    Buenos Aires, C1280AEB

    Maria Dolores Daneri, danerimd@gmail.com

    Maria Dolores Daneri

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Curruca: Superintendencia de Bienestar Policia Federal Argentina

    Buenos Aires, C1437JCP

    Julio Lococo, Jllococo@yahoo.com

    Julio Lococo

    Recruiting

Other trials in Argentina

Uruguay1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Médica Uruguaya Coorporación de Asistencia Médica

    Montevideo, 11600

    Marcelo Viola, mviolam@gmail.com

    Marcelo Viola

    Recruiting

Other trials in Uruguay

About this study

Official title: Chemoradiation and Consolidation Chemotherapy With or Without Oxaliplatin for Distal Rectal Cancer and Watch and Wait. A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. (CCHOWW)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait - WW). Consolidation chemotherapy (cCT) regimens using fluoropyrimidine-based with or without oxaliplatin following nCRT have demonstrated to increase complete response and organ preservation rates among these patients. However, the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to cCt compared to fluoropyrimidine alone regimens in terms of primary tumor response remains unclear. Since oxaliplatin-treatment may be associated with considerable toxicity, it becomes imperative to understand the benefit of its incorporation into standard cCT regimens in terms of primary tumor response. The aim of the present trial is to compare the outcomes of 2 different cCT regimens following nCRT (fluoropyrimidine-alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin) for patients with distal rectal cancer.

Methods: In this multi-centre study, patients with magnetic resonance-defined distal rectal tumors will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive long-course chemoradiation (54Gy) followed by cCT with fluoropyrimidine alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin. Magnetic resonance (MR) will be analyzed centrally prior to patient inclusion and randomization. mrT2-3N0-1 tumor located no more than 1cm above the anorectal ring determined by sagittal views on MR will be eligible for the study. Tumor response will be assessed after 12 weeks from radiotherapy (RT) completion. Patients with clinical complete response (clinical, endoscopic and radiological) will be enrolled in an organ-preservation program (WW). The primary endpoint of this trial is decision to organ-preservation surveillance (WW) at 18 weeks from RT completion.

Discussion: Long-course nCRT with cCT is associated with improved complete response rates and may be a very attractive alternative to increase the chances for organ-preservation strategies. Fluoropyrimidine-based cCT with or without oxaliplatin has never been investigated in the setting of a randomized trial to compare clinical response rates and the possibility of organ-preservation. The outcomes of this study may significantly impact clinical practice of patients with distal rectal cancer interested in organ-preservation.

Read the detailed description

Patients and Methods

Patients with distal rectal cancer will be eligible for the study after initial clinical, endoscopic and radiological assessment. At this point, patients will be offered to participate in the study and after informed consent, randomized to control or experimental arms as follows.

Endpoints

Primary endpoint: Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)

Definition of clinical complete response (cCR) available below and at the discretion of the attending surgeon.

Definition of radiological complete response as described below (centralized).

Patients will be counted as event if at 18 weeks the decision is to interrupt Watch and Wait and proceed to surgery (any kind) because of overt incomplete clinical response. In order to standardize assessment of response and reduce inter-observer variability, the decision to continue on Watch and Wait (or not) will be at the discretion of the central committee during central revision of studies.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Surgery-free survival at 3 years
  • TME-free survival at 3 years
  • Distant metastases free survival at 3 years
  • Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years
  • Colostomy-free survival at 3 years

Definitions

Definition of cCR:

  • Endoscopic: white scar, teleangiectasia, absence of ulceration and/or mass 6
  • Clinical: no irregularity, firm area with minor induration6
  • Radiological: mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor; no restricted diffusion on diffusion weighted images; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion23-26

Definition of near-complete response:

  • Endoscopic: residual tumor size ≤2cm (or reduction of ≥70% original tumor volume/size) 4,27,28
  • Clinical: only superficial ulceration or minor (questionable) irregularities of the mucosal/rectal wall
  • Radiological: mrTRG2 predominant fibrosis with low signal with foci of intermediate tumor signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images with or without restricted diffusion; mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor with restricted diffusion; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion 27

Central Committee

The central committee is multidisciplinary group of surgeons, medical oncologists and radiologists previously appointed at the beginning of the recruitment of patients and with previous experience with organ preservation.2, 21 This group of specialist will be responsible to assess the baseline staging and define if the patients fulfill all the inclusion/exclusion criteria prior to randomization. The committee will also be responsible to evaluate the endoscopic and radiological tumor re-assessment studies at 12 and 18 weeks from radiation completion. The definition to continue on the Watch and Wait pathway or not will be at the discretion of this committee.

Technical aspects of assessment tests:

Suggested MR protocol:

1.5T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 3300/120 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 256 x 256; NSA 8) 3.0T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 8000/150 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 288 x 288; NSA 5) DWI - inclusion of a high b-value of at least 800

Suggested Endoscopic assessment:

Endoscopic assessment using a flexible scope (gastroscope preferred for retroflexion); direct endoscopic and retroflexion view of the primary tumor/scar; endoscopic biopsies at discretion of participating center.

Radiotherapy

Preoperative radiotherapy will be delivered on a linear accelerator in prone or supine position, preferably with full bladder. The use of a belly board is allowed. Isocentric 3 or 4 fields, as well as an IMRT technique is allowed, as long as all beams are treated on a daily basis. The dose distribution and calculation should be performed on CT or MRI and specified according to the ICRU 50 guidelines.

Dose specification: All patients will receive 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy up to a total dose of 45 Gy to the pelvic field including the tumor bed with a margin and the regional lymph nodes. A field reduction after 45 Gy is recommended up to 54 Gy. The last 5 fractions will then be given to the tumor bed with a margin.

Target volume:

Pelvic CTV

  • The primary tumor
  • Mesorectum: Distally, only lymph nodes or tumor deposits up to 4 cm are included. For tumors in lower rectum this means that the entire mesorectum down to the pelvic floor is included.
  • Presacral nodes and nodes along the rectal superior artery: Since local recurrences are very unusual above S1 - S2, lymph nodes above this level should not be included unless there are signs of radiologically positive lymph nodes presacrally. If this is the case, the cranial limit of CTV should be at least 1 cm above the most cranial radiologically positive lymph node.
  • Lateral lymph node stations: Until they reach the level of the obturator canal Internal iliac artery up to the bifurcation from the external iliac artery. The cranial border for the CTV is in most cases just below the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac arteries. In most patients this is at the level of S1 - S2.
  • Ischio-rectal fossa and the anal canal: Included in pelvic CTV only if the tumor grows into the levators or down into the anal canal.
  • Lymph nodes along the external iliac artery: Included if the tumor grows into anterior organs like the prostate, urinary bladder, cervix, vagina or uterus to such an extent that the external nodes are at risk for metastases.

Boost GTV:

GTV is the visible primary tumor and radiologically positive lymph nodes.

CTV boost:

GTV boost plus a margin of 2 cm within the same anatomical compartment as the tumour is in, for the dose of 45 Gy, also around radiologically engaged lymph nodes.

PTV:

The above description relates to the CTV. A PTV should normally be defined and includes CTV and internal target volume (ITV) and a margin necessary for the setup. These margins are depending upon several factors that are related to the equipment at each radiotherapy center.

Chemotherapy Protocols

Concomitant chemotherapy:

Concomitant capecitabine: 825mg/m2 bid on the radiotherapy days only

Consolidation chemotherapy:

  1. Consolidation capecitabine (alone): 1000mg/m2 bid, for 14 days, in a 3 week cycle, for 4 cycles
  2. Consolidation options with oxaliplatin:

2.1. mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 plus Leucovorin 400mg/m2 on a concomitant 2 hours infusion. 5FU 400mg/m2 on a bolus infusion, followed by 5FU 2400mg/m2 in 46 hours infusion, every 2 weeks, for 6 cycles 2.2. CAPOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 on a 2 hours infusion. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid daily, for 14 days, starting on the evening of the oxaliplatin infusion. Repeat every 3 weeks, for 4 cycles

Assessment of Response

Assessment of response will be performed at 12 weeks (and 18 weeks from last date of radiation therapy if cCR or near-complete response is detected at 12 weeks). All patients will undergo endoscopic reassessment, DRE and high-resolution MR. Endoscopic biopsies will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon/endoscopist.

Patients with complete or near-complete clinical response at 12 weeks will be recommended reassessment at 18 weeks from RT. Patients with clinically overt incomplete clinical response at 12 or 18 weeks will be referred to immediate radical surgery.

Randomization

Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups (control and experimental) using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.

Protocol Blinding

Patients and attending physicians will not be blinded to the treatment arm randomized for each patient. However, as a strategy to reduce investigator's expectations and reduce inherent bias, the central committee will be blinded to the treatment arm. It is expected that blinding the central committee, who will be responsible for assessing the primary endpoint, any bias related to the investigator's expectation about the treatment arm and the chances of Watch and Wait will be nulled.

Sample size calculation

The primary endpoint (decision to WW due to cCR/near CR) was observed in 55% and 85% at 12 weeks (in contrast to the 18 weeks used in the present trial) among patients with early cT3 and cT2 rectal cancer respectively.29 In this study, there was a distribution of 66% of cT3 and 33% cT2. Therefore, response rates appear to be highly dependent on exact T-stage distribution. Considering the expected inclusion of more advanced disease (late mrT3 or even mrT4 rectal cancers) the investigators expect 40% cCR/near-CR in the control arm. A similar difference 60% versus 40% was achieved in the preliminary report of the outcomes of the OPRA trial. This difference in TME-free survival at 3 years was statistically significant favoring patients undergoing nCRT with cCT in comparison to nCRT preceded by induction chemotherapy (both regimens incorporating oxaliplatin). In this setting, if experimental results in ≥60% cCR/near-CR, the study will be considered POSITIVE. The incorporation of oxaliplatin to a consolidation CRT regimen that results in ≥20% increase in cCR/near-CR exceeds the potential disadvantages of treatment-related toxicity.

The investigators will assume that the primary outcome will occur in 40% of individuals in control group and 60% in the experimental group, which corresponds to an absolute difference in proportions of 20%. It is estimated that a sample of 194 (97 per group) provides 80% statistical power to detect this difference at a significance level of 5% using the Chi-square test and assuming a two-sided significance hypothesis and considering a 1:1 allocation. The estimated dropout rate is 10% in each group, so it is expected to include 216 individuals (108 per group). The sample size calculation was performed using SAS 9.4 (PROC POWER procedure).

Time-table

Patient accrual: 2 years and 6 months Patient/institution/year: 5-6 (20 institutions: 100-120/year - 2 years n=200-240)

Interim analysis:

If the arm of two drugs during consolidation shows ≥25% response rate after 72 patients, study will be interrupted (efficacy). If the arm of two drugs shows less than 5% response rate after 72 patients, the study will be interrupted.

Being tested
Oxaliplatin, 5FU
Keywords
Rectal cancer, Consolidation Chemotherapy, Complete Response, Watch and Wait
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms, Pathologic Complete Response

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OxaliplatinDrug

    Also called 5FU + Oxaliplatin

    Patients will receive 5FU + Oxaliplatin during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation

  • 5FUDrug

    Patients will receive 5FU during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation

Study groups in NCT05000697
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1 - 5FU + OxaliplatinExperimental1) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by mFOLFOX6 or XELOX for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended;
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: 5FU
Arm 2 - 5FU OnlyActive comparator2) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by capecitabine 2000mg/m2/day for 14 days in a 21 days cycle for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended;
Receives: Drug: 5FU

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response

    Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)

    Measured: 18 weeks from last date of radiation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Surgery-free survival at 3 years

    Investigate the risk of being surgery-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm

    Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation

  2. Total Mesorectal Excision-free survival at 3 years

    Investigate the risk of being total mesorectal excision-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm

    Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation

  3. Distant metastases free survival at 3 years

    Investigate the risk of being distant metastases-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm

    Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation

  4. Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years

    Investigate the risk of being local regrowth-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm

    Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation

  5. Colostomy-free survival at 3 years

    Investigate the risk of being colostomy-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm

    Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2021
  2. Study start14 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
216 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05000697
Sponsor's protocol ID
46102621.3.1001.0070
Acronym
CCHOWW
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
19 Jul 2021
Last updated
27 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Habr-Gama A, Sao Juliao GP, Ortega CD, Vailati BB, Araujo S, Jorge T, Sabbaga J, Rossi GL, D'Alpino R, Kater FR, Aguilar PB, Mattacheo A, Perez RO; Latin American Rectal Cancer Consortium (LARCC). A multi-centre randomized controlled trial investigating Consolidation Chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in distal rectal cancer and Watch & Wait. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10984-2.

    PubMed 37316784

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oxaliplatin and 5FU in people with Rectal Cancer and Consolidation, run by Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz at 24 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rodrigo O Perez, Dr (+551138871757, roperez@haoc.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response (time frame: 18 weeks from last date of radiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05000697, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in