AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionDASH-HFNCT05001165

Dashboard Activated Services and Tele-Health for Heart Failure

A study testing Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEF in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, run by VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Dashboard Activated Services and tele-Health for Heart Failure (DASH-HF) study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a quality improvement (QI) intervention of a prospective panel management intervention to optimize medical treatment for Veterans with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEF
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Sep 2021to 16 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Facility: Greater Los Angeles, CA
  • Division: West LA VAMC
  • Patient is eighteen years of age or older
  • Patients has a primary diagnosis of HFrEF (last documented LVEF ≤35% per ADHFD algorithms)
  • Patient has an estimated GFR greater than or equal to 30 mL/min
  • Patient has a last documented potassium less than 5
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patient has a last documented systolic blood pressure over 90 mm Hg
  • Patient lacks at least one active prescription of a beta-blocker, ACE/ARB/ARNI, MRA, or SGLT2i
  • There are no upcoming heart failure or primary care appointments in the upcoming 2 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • ● Patient is currently hospitalized at WLA

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA West Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

Other trials in United States

About this study

The Dashboard Activated Services and tele-Health for Heart Failure (DASH-HF) study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a quality improvement (QI) intervention of a prospective panel management intervention to optimize medical treatment for Veterans with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to the receipt of usual VA health care services over a 6-month period of observation. The study will incorporate the existing VA Academic Detailing Heart Failure Dashboard (ADHFD) to target actionable patients with gaps in performance measures for guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT). Patients with HFrEF are optimally managed by cardiovascular specialty clinics. Typically, patients are referred to cardiology or heart failure (HF) clinics from primary care, emergency department, or post-hospitalization clinicians and scheduled into clinic grids. These patients may be lost to follow-up or clinicians may miss opportunities to optimize GDMT for HFrEF. GDMT includes Class I indicated medications from the following classes: beta blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). The intervention is designed around a novel prospective panel management clinic led by clinicians or clinical pharmacists using impromptu patient telephone calls or electronic communications with existing responsible clinicians.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, pragmatic QI study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of proactive panel management to close gaps in evidence-based care for patients with HFrEF. The investigators will use the VA's ADHFD to generate a list of actionable patients with HFrEF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. After identifying a cohort of HFrEF patients from the ADHFD, the investigators will randomize individual patients on the actionable list to usual VA care or a novel proactive panel management clinic. Clinicians will be trained on how to use the dashboard information to identify opportunities for optimization based on detailed chart review. The proactive panel management intervention will use clinicians to perform an electronic chart review and call patients impromptu at their discretion to evaluate HFrEF management and opportunities to optimize GDMT. Each panel management clinic is staffed by a single cardiovascular clinician or trainee with cardiology (PI) supervision. All patients will receive chart review or telehealth notes brought to the attention of primary care and cardiology clinicians. Patients randomized to the intervention will only receive one chart review during a half-day panel management clinic with follow-up of any laboratory results or diagnostic tests as required and referral to HF or general cardiology clinic as deemed appropriate. The control arm consists of the usual delivery of health services with routine scheduled appointments for primary care or cardiology.

Outcomes will be assessed at 6-months from the last patient to receive the intervention. The study is powered to detect superiority of the intervention compared to usual care in optimizing GDMT for HFrEF. Treatment assignment is based on 1:1 randomization using fixed blocks (size=6) to assure an equivalent number of patients randomized to the intervention and usual care. Patients are randomized after a list of 300 actionable patients are generated from the ADHFD. Study participant numbers will be assigned to the list of patients sorted by optimization scores in Excel. The supervising statistician (AA) will generate concealed randomization assignments by participant identification numbers. The randomization assignments will be merged with baseline study dataset and exported as password protected Excel and PDF documents. Study investigators will divide the intervention arm into lists of 10 to 15 per half-day clinic. Patients not receiving chart review or phone call attempts will be reassigned to future panel management clinics until all patients receive the intervention. Patients that did not answer phone calls will receive chart review notes for primary care and cardiology clinicians and not be reassigned to future panel management clinics.

Study participants do not require informed consent as determined by the VA IRB review. Patients will receive all accepted standards of care and medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration for HFrEF indications. The VA Subcommittee for Research and Safety found an absence of any declared research-laboratory-based biohazards and granted exemption from continued review. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of the QI intervention, telephone/telemedicine panel management clinics, to more rapidly implement evidence-based care for patients with HFrEF. Patients in the usual care arm will be unaware they are part of the control group for the RCT. Intervention patients nor study staff are blinded to usual care or intervention assignments. Patients that receive the intervention will be informed this is a pilot quality improvement effort with informal consent before proceeding to the clinical interventions. Intervention patients may refuse to participate after being contacted by phone in the intervention.

Study enrollment is based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria used to filter the ADHFD list. A list of actionable patients with HFrEF will be exported for randomization. The GDMT optimization score will be automated for each patient on the extracted list (Table 1). A sample of 300 patients will be selected with the lowest GDMT composite scores. Once the final sample of the study is determined, patients will be randomized to usual care or the intervention. Intervention patients will be divided into smaller lists of 10 to 15 patients. These smaller lists will be assigned to proactive panel management clinics. Clinicians staffing the intervention clinics will review ADHFD data, review the electronic health record (EHR) and decide whether to proceed to evaluate and recommend treatment over the phone to patients directly. If clinicians did not have sufficient time to review all patients on their clinic list, they will be redistributed to future intervention clinics. Intervention clinics will be held until each patient assigned the intervention has a chart review or attempted telephone contact. A failure to contact a patient will trigger a letter to a patient or electronic communication to their primary care or cardiology clinician.

Prior to each ADHFD telehealth clinic (half-day clinic lasting 4 to 4.5 hours), clinicians will be sent a secure email that will include a password-protected Excel document of 15 patients with exported clinical summary data from the ADHFD. Clinicians will be instructed to chart-review patients and decide if an opportunity exists to further optimize the receipt of GDMT. Clinicians will also be given a document providing guidance on the sequence of GDMT optimization based on latest guidelines and VA policies (Supplement S1 GDMT Guidance Document). If a patient does not qualify for further optimization (i.e. chart documentation of prior intolerance, patient preference), a short note in the electronic health record (EHR) will document the chart review and inform the primary care clinician that based on chart review, no opportunity currently exists but they may consider further GDMT titration in the future. If a patient appears to have an opportunity for further titration, the clinician is encouraged to call the patient to see if they are available to discuss their HF care. If the patient agrees, a telehealth visit will take place over phone or switch to video. A formal telehealth cardiology visit will occur at the time of care. If the patient is interested but does not have time for a visit, a brief telephone note will be placed and a request for a future cardiology clinic visit will be requested. If a formal telehealth visit occurs, clinicians will be asked to inquire about key details around medication titration (Supplement S2 Interview Guide). The data from chart review and interviews will be documented on a password-protected Excel document (Supplement S3 Clinician Documentation Form). Any medication addition or titration will have indicated laboratory labs ordered per usual care. Lastly, clinicians will also be asked to administer a short survey with each participant based on a template at the end of the call proactive phone call (Supplement S2 Interview guide). Primary care and regular cardiology clinicians will be notified of any changes in medication management in the EHR. The study's lead (BZ, AV) will be available by phone to answer questions or problems that arise during the clinic. Supervision of patient encounters by clinical pharmacists, medical trainees, or advanced practice nurse practitioners and study protocols will be BZ as the licensed and boarded general cardiologist.

Being tested
Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEF
Keywords
heart failure, proactive outpatient management, learning health system, panel management, medical optimization
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEFOther

    Novel clinic based on review of panel HFrEF data and impromptu telephone or video patient contacts/visits.

Study groups in NCT05001165
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPatients with perceived gaps in performance measures for guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction will be chart-reviewed and called impromptu to receive point of care medication titration or reintegration into routine heart failure clinic. Patients lost to follow-up may be better identified using the HFrEF panel management tools.
Receives: Other: Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEF
Usual CareNo interventionA control group of patients with HFrEF will receive routine primary and cardiology care as currently indicated in routine scheduled clinic grids. Patients are at the discretion of their primary care and cardiology clinicians regarding whether further HFrEF optimization is warranted. While panel management data is available to all clinicians, clinical workflows and responsibilities do not encourage the use of panel data or response to performance measurement for HFrEF.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Optimization Potential Score

    Change in composite score created for reaching target doses of guideline-directed medical therapies for HFrEF compared between treatment arms at the end of the study. Optimization Potential Scores ranges from 0 (least optimized) to 10 (full-optimized).

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Number of Patient Receiving ACE/ARB/ARNI

    Number of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between treatment arms at the end of the study.

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

  2. Change in the Number of Patients Receiving Beta-blockers

    Number of patients that receive an active prescription for beta-blockers compared between treatment arms at the end of the study.

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

  3. Change in the Number of Patients Receiving MRA

    Number of patients that receive an active prescription for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) compared between treatment arms at the end of the study.

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

  4. Change in Number of Patients Receiving ARNI

    Number of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between treatment arms at the end of the study. .

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

  5. Change in Number of Patients Receiving SGLT2i

    Number of patients that receive an active prescription for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared between treatment arms at the end of the study. .

    Measured: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention

  6. Total Number of Hospitalizations

    Total number of any cause hospitalizations compared between treatment arms at the end of the study.

    Measured: 6-months

  7. Change in Total Deaths

    Total number of all-cause deaths compared between treatment arms at the end of the study.

    Measured: 6-months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2021
  2. Study start17 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion16 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion16 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05001165
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-000311
Acronym
DASH-HF
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
30 Jun 2021
Last updated
14 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Verma A, Fonarow GC, Hsu JJ, Jackevicius CA, Vaghaiwalla Mody F, Nguyen A, Amidi O, Goldberg S, Vetrivel R, Upparapalli D, Theodoropoulos K, Gregorio S, Chang DS, Bostrom K, Althouse AD, Ziaeian B. DASH-HF Study: A Pragmatic Quality Improvement Randomized Implementation Trial for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Sep;16(9):e010278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010278. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

    PubMed 37494051
  • Verma A, Fonarow GC, Hsu JJ, Jackevicius CA, Mody FV, Amidi O, Goldberg S, Upparapalli D, Theodoropoulos K, Gregorio S, Chang DS, Bostrom K, Althouse AD, Ziaeian B. The design of the Dashboard Activated Services and Telehealth for Heart Failure (DASH-HF) study: A pragmatic quality improvement randomized implementation trial for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Sep;120:106895. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106895. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

    PubMed 36028192

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Proactive Panel Management Clinics for HFrEF in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, run by VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Optimization Potential Score (time frame: 6-months after all patients receive the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05001165, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in