Computer Simulator and Mannequin SimulatorNCT05001659
The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Training
A study testing computer simulator and mannequin simulator in people with Computer Simulator and Mannequin Simulator, run by Tianjin Medical University General Hospital at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Compared two different training simulators(the computer screen-based simulator versus the full-scale mannequin-based simulator) with respect to training effectiveness in ACLS training.At the same time,evaluate the effectiveness of combination of these two simulators(screen-based simulation followed by mannequin-based… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Computer Simulator and Mannequin Simulator
- What is being tested?
- computer simulator and mannequin simulator
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- training doctors,intern Exclusion Criteria:Standardized training of doctors，Medical students
- -
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Enrolling by invitation
the Computer Simulator,the Mannequin Simulator
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality
- Recruiting
the Computer Simulator,the Mannequin Simulator
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality
Qing Li, 13323343757, anelivea@126.com
About this study
Official title: The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Straining:Does the Computer Simulator Have the Same Effectiveness as the Mannequin Simulato
Compared two different training simulators(the computer screen-based simulator versus the full-scale mannequin-based simulator) with respect to training effectiveness in ACLS training.At the same time,evaluate the effectiveness of combination of these two simulators(screen-based simulation followed by mannequin-based simulation),so that to find out a new simulation format for ACLS training.
Read the detailed description
A prospective,single-blinded,randomized controlled study was used.30 first-year residents were randomized to Computer screen-based simulator group(C group),full scale Mannequin-based group(M group) and screen+Mannequin combing group(SM group).After a 30min ACLS lecture and 30min integrated CPR hands-on training,all groups received a pretest.The C group was exposed to two ACLS computer scenarions,M group was exposed to two ACLS mannequin scenario.Each scenario took 10min and followed by 20min debriefing with simulation educator.After the training session,each participant completed by modified'megacode'checklist.
- Being tested
- computer simulator and mannequin simulator
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
computer simulator and mannequin simulatorOther
compared two different training simulators with respect to training effectiveness in ACLS training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| computer simulator | Other | training students ACLS by one computer simulator Receives: Other: computer simulator and mannequin simulator |
| mannequin simulator | Other | training students ACLS by one mannequin simulator Receives: Other: computer simulator and mannequin simulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the effection of the two different simulators for ACLS training.
If all the groups have improvement in konwledge,ACLS and non-technical skills.Compared with C group,M group，the scores of each group were compared
Measured: six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2021
- Study start4 Jan 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Computer Simulator and Mannequin SimulatorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guolin Wang, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05001659
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GWang
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Yu J, Wang Q, Yin L, Yuan F, Kan Y, Wang Z, Yu Y, Li Q, Yu Y. Prospective randomized controlled trial of computer simulation versus high-fidelity mannequin simulation in advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) training for anesthesiology novice clinicians. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026 Jul 4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-04080-8. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42399747
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Straining:Does the Computer Simulator Have the Same Effectiveness as the Mannequin Simulato
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05001659
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GWang
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Medical University General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compared two different training simulators(the computer screen-based simulator versus the full-scale mannequin-based simulator) with respect to training effectiveness in ACLS training.At the same time,evaluate the effectiveness of combination of these two simulators(screen-based simulation followed by mannequin-based simulation),so that to find out a new simulation format for ACLS training.
Detailed description
A prospective,single-blinded,randomized controlled study was used.30 first-year residents were randomized to Computer screen-based simulator group(C group),full scale Mannequin-based group(M group) and screen+Mannequin combing group(SM group).After a 30min ACLS lecture and 30min integrated CPR hands-on training,all groups received a pretest.The C group was exposed to two ACLS computer scenarions,M group was exposed to two ACLS mannequin scenario.Each scenario took 10min and followed by 20min debriefing with simulation educator.After the training session,each participant completed by modified'megacode'checklist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| computer simulator | Other | Other: computer simulator and mannequin simulatortraining students ACLS by one computer simulator |
| mannequin simulator | Other | Other: computer simulator and mannequin simulatortraining students ACLS by one mannequin simulator |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- training doctors,intern Exclusion Criteria:Standardized training of doctors，Medical students
- -
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| computer simulator and mannequin simulatorcompared two different training simulators with respect to training effectiveness in ACLS training. | Other | computer simulator, mannequin simulator |
Primary outcome
the effection of the two different simulators for ACLS training.
Time frame: six months
If all the groups have improvement in konwledge,ACLS and non-technical skills.Compared with C group,M group，the scores of each group were compared
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42399747Yu J, Wang Q, Yin L, Yuan F, Kan Y, Wang Z, Yu Y, Li Q, Yu Y. Prospective randomized controlled trial of computer simulation versus high-fidelity mannequin simulation in advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) training for anesthesiology novice clinicians. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026 Jul 4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-04080-8. Online ahead of print.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing computer simulator and mannequin simulator in people with Computer Simulator and Mannequin Simulator, run by Tianjin Medical University General Hospital at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Qing Li (13323343757, anelivea@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the effection of the two different simulators for ACLS training. (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05001659, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2021.