AzTrials
AzTrials

Alveolar Bone ResorptionMRSNCT05005858

Modified Ridge Splitting Technique Using Autogenous Bone Blocks (MRS)

A study testing Alveolar ridge splitting and Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric device in people with Alveolar Bone Resorption and Alveolar Ridge Enlargement, run by Semmelweis University at 1 site in Hungary.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this clinical study ridge splitting procedures are preformed using autogenous bone blocks. After a 3-month healing, at the time of dental implant placement bone core biopsy samples are harvested. The samples undergo micro-Ct and histomorphometric analysis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Alveolar ridge splitting and Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
14 May 2019to 1 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mandibular ridge width at least 3 mm;
  • Ridge height at least 11 mm;
  • Spongiosa between the two cortical plates at least 1 mm

Who cannot join

  • History of uncontrolled medical disorders;
  • History of systemic diseases or medication that alter bone metabolism;
  • Poor oral hygiene;
  • Smoking

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hungary1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Semmelweis University

    Budapest

    Dorottya Penzes, penzes.dorottya@dent.semmelweis-univ.hu

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

In this clinical study ridge splitting procedures are preformed using autogenous bone blocks. After a 3-month healing, at the time of dental implant placement bone core biopsy samples are harvested. The samples undergo micro-Ct and histomorphometric analysis.

Read the detailed description

Patients were required to rinse with a 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 1 min before surgery. Under local anesthesia, a full-thickness flap was raised from a crestal incision with a mesial releasing incision to access the alveolar ridge and the retromolar area. A midcrestal osteotomy was preformed, leaving a safety zone of at least 2 mm from the adjacent tooth. Two vertical releasing osteotomies were performed at the mesial and distal ends of the mid-crestal osteotomy. Apically, the vertical osteotomies were connected horizontally with a superficial corticotomy. Osteotomies and corticotomies were carried out using a piezoelectronic device (NSK Variosurg3 Ultrasonic Bone Surgery System, NSK Europe GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.) Chisels were inserted in the midcrestal osteotomy to create a green-stick fracture to allow extensive mobilization of the buccal cortical.

After mobilization of the buccal cortical, an autologous bone block with dimensions corresponding to that of the bone defect created in the recipient site was harvested from the retromolar area and was placed as a spacer between the buccal and lingual cortical plates. The block was stabilized using osteosynthesis screws (Meisinger Screw System, Hager and Meisinger GmbH, Neuss, Germany). Both lingual and buccal flaps were mobilized to allow tension-free primary closure. The flap was closed with horizontal mattress sutures, and then single interrupted sutures closed the edges of the flaps. Suture removal took place after 14 days. All patients received amoxicillin and clavulanate (Aktil Duo 875 mg/125 mg, Sandoz Hungária Kft., Budapest, Hungary) 1 g twice per day, starting at the day of the surgery and continuing for 7 days. In case of amoxicillin allergy, clindamycin (Dalacin 300 mg, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) was prescribed four times a day for 7 days. Furthermore, a non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac (Cataflam 50 mg, Novartis Hungária Kft., Budapest, Hungary), 3 times a day for 3 days, and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse (Corsodyl, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare GmbH \& Co. KG, München, Germany), twice a day for 2 weeks, were prescribed to the patients. During the healing period, patients did not wear temporary prostheses.

Surgical re-entry took place after 3 months of healing. Implant bed preparation was carried out with rotatory instruments powered by a surgical micromotor (MasterSurg Surgical Systems, KaVo Dental Systems Japan, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A trephine drill with an external diameter of 3.0 mm and an internal diameter of 2.0 mm (330 205 486 001 020 Hager and Meisinger GmbH, Neuss, Germany) with external cooling at a drill rotation speed of 800 rpm to the depth of 8 mm was used to remove bone core biopsy samples for histologic analysis. Implant beds were finalized according to the instructions of the implant manufacturer at a rotation speed of 800 rpm. Implants (Nobel Replace Conical Connection, Nobel Biocare AG, Kloten, Switzerland) were placed submerged in the augmented bone. Implant uncovery procedure took place 3 months after implant placement.

Clinical measurements:

Measurements were carried out using Williams probe (Karl Hammacher GmbH, Solingen, Germany) prior to ridge splitting surgery after the full thickness flap elevation, to evaluate the width of the alveolar ridge (preoperative measurement) and after a 3-month healing period, before implant placement (postoperative measurement). The width of the alveolar ridges was measured at 3, 10, and 15 mm from the reference point.

Histomorphometry:

Bone core biopsy material was fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde solution. Following decalcination and dehydration, the biopsy material was embedded in paraffin and 20 µm sections were prepared. The sections were stained with routine haematoxylin eosin stain. Sections were evaluated under a light microscope in magnification 40×-400× .

Micro-CT analysis:

The bone core biopsy samples were scanned using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) scanner (Skyscan 1172 X-ray microtomograph, Bruker µCT, Kontich, Belgium).

Being tested
Alveolar ridge splitting, Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric device

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Alveolar ridge splittingProcedure or surgery

    Patients with Kennedy Class I. and II. mandibles with insufficient bone width were included in this study. Ridge splitting was carried out with the use of a piezoelectric surgery device by preparing osteotomies and after mobilization of the buccal cortical by placing an autologous bone block harvested from the retromolar region as a spacer between the buccal and lingual cortical plates. Block-grafts were stabilized by osteosynthesis screws. Implant placement was carried out after a 3-month healing period.

  • Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric deviceDevice

    Osteotomies were carried out with piezoelectric surgery device (NSK Variosurg3 Ultrasonic Bone Surgery System, NSK Europe GmbH, Eschborn, Germany)

Study groups in NCT05005858
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AutograftExperimentalThe filler used in ridge splitting is autologous bone block harvested from mandible * Interventions: * Procedure: ridge splitting * Procedure: bone core biopsy * Device: dental implant placement * Measurement: clinical measurement with Williams probe * Micro-CT analysis * Histomorphometric measurements
Receives: Procedure: Alveolar ridge splitting; Device: Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical measurements

    Clinical measurements were carried out using Williams probe (Karl Hammacher GmbH, Solingen, Germany) prior to ridge splitting surgery after the full thickness flap elevation, to evaluate the width of the alveolar ridge (preoperative measurement) and after a 3-month healing period, before implant placement (postoperative measurement). The width of the alveolar ridges was measured at 3, 10, and 15 mm from the reference point, which was the distal marginal bone of the last tooth of the quadrant. To ensure that preoperative and postoperative measurement sites corresponded, we placed the tip of the Williams probe on the reference point described and the markings of the probe to the highest ridge of the lingual cortical.

    Measured: After the 3-month healing period, at the implant placement.

  2. BV/TV bone volume fraction

    Bone volume compared to total volume in micro-CT reconstruction

    Measured: After the 3-month healing period

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Newly formed bone percentage

    Newly formed bone area compared to total area in histomorphometry

    Measured: After the 3-month healing period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2021
  2. Study start14 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
* Procedure: alveolar ridge splitting * Procedure: bone core biopsy After 3 month healing time reentry took place and bone core biopsy samples were collected from the augmented bone of the maxillary sinuses with a trephine drill. Biopsy samples were collected from the sites where the dental implants were to be placed. * Device: dental implant placement During reentry after bone biopsy dental implants were placed. * Clinical measurements: Measurements were carried out using Williams probe * Histomorphometric measurements * Micro-CT analysis
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05005858
Sponsor's protocol ID
52158-2/2015/EKU
Acronym
MRS
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
4 Jun 2021
Last updated
16 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Penzes D, Simon F, Mijiritsky E, Nemeth O, Kivovics M. A Modified Ridge Splitting Technique Using Autogenous Bone Blocks-A Case Series. Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 11;13(18):4036. doi: 10.3390/ma13184036.

    PubMed 32932942

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Alveolar ridge splitting and Creating osteotomies with piezoelectric device in people with Alveolar Bone Resorption and Alveolar Ridge Enlargement, run by Semmelweis University at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dorottya Penzes (003613176600, penzes.dorottya@dent.semmelweis-univ.hu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical measurements (time frame: After the 3-month healing period, at the implant placement.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05005858, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in